so someone bought the 1080, for testing how the hashrate is in all the algo?
For 1080 Decred 3200 Lyrarev2 16000 Quark 32000 Neosrypt and etherium needs clarifying - maybe will be bound to linux on release - cant tell the numbers yet All is at 180w 1070(maybe it will change a bit) Decred 2300 Quark 23000 At 120w |
|
|
|
i've read that because of the memory bus of these gpu, they will not be good for etheruem, is this true? would be a major let down for me
Not because of the bus - there is still hope for much improvement if what i've heard is true - it might be 20mhs on 120w on 1070 but as for now it seems very dull As for amd - I think we will see same 20mhs at 150w with polaris |
|
|
|
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining? In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right? You mean 650KH/s  how so, the guy said 12. mega which is still bad, but 650 is worse than a bad joke... I don't know who 'this guy' is but I saw it with my own eyes. vaulter the guy who posted the hashrate with 1080 before everyone else, in this thread Sorry guys - its bad news so far - I was wrong about 12.5mhs - I just couldnt belive it would be... 1.25mhs - its because tlb - i'll try to find out if they can fix this or not... It might be the same reason why neoscrypt is 0.450mhs but im not sure... what % it report in the bus interface, using gpu-z? 50 on current DAG |
|
|
|
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining? In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right? You mean 650KH/s how so, the guy said 12. mega which is still bad, but 650 is worse than a bad joke... I don't know who 'this guy' is but I saw it with my own eyes. vaulter the guy who posted the hashrate with 1080 before everyone else, in this thread Sorry guys - its bad news so far - I was wrong about 12.5mhs - I just couldnt belive it would be... 1.25mhs - its because tlb - i'll try to find out if they can fix this or not... It might be the same reason why neoscrypt is 0.450mhs but im not sure... |
|
|
|
I think its around 15mhs
This is sp-mod opensource release 62 mining lyra2v2 (980ti 1275MHZ core)  The sp-mod private #5 does 16.2MHASH at the same clocks. I'll check 62 later and report, will try to overclock it as well Ive got 16.3 at 180W without OC and 80 build |
|
|
|
I think its around 15mhs
This is sp-mod opensource release 62 mining lyra2v2 (980ti 1275MHZ core) The sp-mod private #5 does 16.2MHASH at the same clocks. I'll check 62 later and report, will try to overclock it as well |
|
|
|
[quote ]
I think 1.7.1 smth - can you point me to the proper one to test?
31.9 Intensity didnt change anything..
The fastest kernals are not opensource. What do you get in the lyra2v2 algo? [/quote] I think its around 15mhs |
|
|
|
As for decred - 3300 at 180W tdp
Nice. The maxwell can do this (Decred sp-mod #9): 750ti tdp 38Watt 980tdp: 240watt (79% used) =189Watt Wich kernal did you test? Try -i 31.9  I think 1.7.1 smth - can you point me to the proper one to test? 31.9 Intensity didnt change anything.. |
|
|
|
The 1080 will cost $700, have 2500 shaders and clocked @ 1600mhz. A used 980ti can be picked up for $400, 2760 shaders and can be oveclocked to 1500mhz stable. (Gigabyte G1 windforce) Quark will draw around 240Watt The shadercount of the gtx 1070 is unknown. To benchmark the pascal is easy compile this sourcecode https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminerrun it with ccminer -a quark --benchmark And then compare it to my modded Maxwell kernal. Here are the results on the 980ti: (31,8MHASH) (132.5KHASH /Watt)  As I mentioned in other topic 1080 at Quark - 32Mhs at around ~170W Ethereum - crashes on Genoil 1.0.7 with "device bit not recognizes" message (smth like that) With Ocl ethereum miner - 12.5mhs at.. 30w Neoscrypt is not optimized - 0.450 What do you suggest to test next? 1070 Quark was at 24mhs at 110W the same for ethereum - 12.5 mhs at 30W Must be nice to be an insider, loaner or keeper? The 1070 results don't seem to scale the same as the 1080. Based on the 1080 rate you posted I was estimating 26 MH/s on the 1070. But the power usage on the 1070 is unexpectedly low compared with the 970/980 ratio. Neoscrypt is a curious beast. The original neoscrypt kernel (DJM34) performs better on kepler (780ti specifically) than the improved Pallas neoscrypt kernel, although pallas' works better on Maxwell, both compiled with cuda 6.5. Then the Pallas neoscrypt took a big hit when compiled with cuda 7.5. DJM34 took a crack at it and restored much of the lost hash. Now it appears it's taking another hit on Pascal. I would suggest trying the original DJM34 neoscrypt (SP_MOD 58) compiled with cuda 6.5, the Pallas kernel compiled with 6.5 & 7.5 and the improved DJM34 (I think that is what you already tested). have you compiled your cpp-ethereum miner (genoil) by your self ? Same Problem in Build 0.9 with GTX 9XX Cards and prebuilded binarys... Compiled by myself and everything works Downloading VS 2013 now - never compiled before - are there any tips beyond github instructions on compiling the current master? |
|
|
|
Lets say... tester
As for neoscrypt - it is 300khs - 450khs depending on the version of ccminer - tested both on DJM34 and latest builds - but thats at 100W tdp - obviously it will improve
As for decred - 3300 at 180W tdp
Quark is 35mhs with +150mhz overclock and around 200W tdp
is this for 1080? what about 1070? I dont have 1070 atm but the one i tested (final one can be better) was 110W at 24mhs at Quark I think it will be the best choice for mining.. or maybe 1060  depends on pricing and final perf |
|
|
|
The 1080 will cost $700, have 2500 shaders and clocked @ 1600mhz. A used 980ti can be picked up for $400, 2760 shaders and can be oveclocked to 1500mhz stable. (Gigabyte G1 windforce) Quark will draw around 240Watt The shadercount of the gtx 1070 is unknown. To benchmark the pascal is easy compile this sourcecode https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminerrun it with ccminer -a quark --benchmark And then compare it to my modded Maxwell kernal. Here are the results on the 980ti: (31,8MHASH) (132.5KHASH /Watt) As I mentioned in other topic 1080 at Quark - 32Mhs at around ~170W Ethereum - crashes on Genoil 1.0.7 with "device bit not recognizes" message (smth like that) With Ocl ethereum miner - 12.5mhs at.. 30w Neoscrypt is not optimized - 0.450 What do you suggest to test next? 1070 Quark was at 24mhs at 110W the same for ethereum - 12.5 mhs at 30W Must be nice to be an insider, loaner or keeper? The 1070 results don't seem to scale the same as the 1080. Based on the 1080 rate you posted I was estimating 26 MH/s on the 1070. But the power usage on the 1070 is unexpectedly low compared with the 970/980 ratio. Neoscrypt is a curious beast. The original neoscrypt kernel (DJM34) performs better on kepler (780ti specifically) than the improved Pallas neoscrypt kernel, although pallas' works better on Maxwell, both compiled with cuda 6.5. Then the Pallas neoscrypt took a big hit when compiled with cuda 7.5. DJM34 took a crack at it and restored much of the lost hash. Now it appears it's taking another hit on Pascal. I would suggest trying the original DJM34 neoscrypt (SP_MOD 58) compiled with cuda 6.5, the Pallas kernel compiled with 6.5 & 7.5 and the improved DJM34 (I think that is what you already tested). Lets say... tester As for neoscrypt - it is 300khs - 450khs depending on the version of ccminer - tested both on DJM34 and latest builds - but thats at 100W tdp - obviously it will improve As for decred - 3300 at 180W tdp Quark is 35mhs with +150mhz overclock and around 200W tdp |
|
|
|
The 1080 will cost $700, have 2500 shaders and clocked @ 1600mhz. A used 980ti can be picked up for $400, 2760 shaders and can be oveclocked to 1500mhz stable. (Gigabyte G1 windforce) Quark will draw around 240Watt The shadercount of the gtx 1070 is unknown. To benchmark the pascal is easy compile this sourcecode https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminerrun it with ccminer -a quark --benchmark And then compare it to my modded Maxwell kernal. Here are the results on the 980ti: (31,8MHASH) (132.5KHASH /Watt) As I mentioned in other topic 1080 at Quark - 32Mhs at around ~170W Ethereum - crashes on Genoil 1.0.7 with "device bit not recognizes" message (smth like that) With Ocl ethereum miner - 12.5mhs at.. 30w Neoscrypt is not optimized - 0.450 What do you suggest to test next? 1070 Quark was at 24mhs at 110W the same for ethereum - 12.5 mhs at 30W |
|
|
|
I wonder if the new gtx 1070/1080 cards will beat the 980ti in the quark algo. Here is sp-mod #6 private compute 5.2 unreleased:  Got my hands on 1080 with ccMiner 1.5.80-git SP-MOD fork on Quark at default clokcs at ~170W it does 32000 unfortunetly it needs optimization for neoscrypt as it did only 0.450 with default settings at ethereum it crashes with Genoil build - says doesnt recognizes the device but at original Ocl version it gives... 12.5mhs with low tdp (need to double check but it is around 30W!) - needs an optimization as well |
|
|
|
Please you run a cudaminer with 1 only 750 palit card and post image your kh/s . No Overclock . Use Litecoin for test . This is my palit NE5X75TS1341-1073F work on coinotron no overclock mine LTC : http://www.palit.biz/palit/vgapro.php?id=2253This is the same card, Palit GTX750Ti STORMX OC I don't know why it works worse with the script. I tried the driver also 335 and -l T10x24 Probably cheap ver. 1200/1600 +20kh only and 1200/1700 get blue screen cudaminer.exe -q -l T5x24 -d gtx750ti -i 0 -m
1 -L 2 -H 2 -o stratum+tcp://gigahash.wemineltc.com:3333 -O u:p
*** CudaMiner for nVidia GPUs by Christian Buchner ***
This is version 2014-02-28 (beta)
based on pooler-cpuminer 2.3.2 (c) 2010 Jeff Garzik, 2012 pooler
Cuda additions Copyright 2013,2014 Christian Buchner
LTC donation address: LKS1WDKGED647msBQfLBHV3Ls8sveGncnm
BTC donation address: 16hJF5mceSojnTD3ZTUDqdRhDyPJzoRakM
YAC donation address: Y87sptDEcpLkLeAuex6qZioDbvy1qXZEj4
[2014-03-20 22:23:13] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://gigahash.wemineltc.com:3
333
[2014-03-20 22:23:13] 1 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2014-03-20 22:23:15] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti with compute capability 5.0
[2014-03-20 22:23:15] GPU #0: interactive: 0, tex-cache: 0 , single-alloc: 1
[2014-03-20 22:23:15] GPU #0: 32 hashes / 2.0 MB per warp.
[2014-03-20 22:23:15] GPU #0: using launch configuration T5x24
[2014-03-20 22:23:49] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 199.59 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-20 22:24:09] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 202.16 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-20 22:26:15] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 201.14 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-20 22:27:10] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 202.01 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-20 22:27:35] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 201.80 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-20 22:27:38] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 199.23 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-20 22:27:48] accepted: 7/7 (100.00%), 197.74 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-20 22:28:47] accepted: 8/8 (100.00%), 171.93 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-20 22:28:50] accepted: 9/9 (100.00%), 199.65 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-20 22:29:17] accepted: 10/10 (100.00%), 201.51 khash/s (yay!! I have both Palit GTX750 StomX and Palit StormX GTX750Ti - rate is 280 kh/s with +90 core +200 memory for gtx750ti (6 cards ~1680 Khs) with Asrock H61 and USB3 risers as for gtx750 it is 250 Khs stock (but I didnt try it with USB riser and I only have 1 board yet) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
