Here is some more info about how the name exchange would look.
The exchange will have 2 lists one that contains all the names that are for sale and one that contains only your names that are for sale.
Everything is working at this point I still need to add a search box so you can easily search for specific names.



These conspiracy theories are funny :p.

To be realistic I do expect that there will be bugs in the release that didn't popup during the beta and while testing.
Even after all this time the bitcoin code still has bugs.


You will be able to specify the amount of accounts you want to recover.


Thank you for all your work.
Yeah I can use google fonts no problem. Did you use any specific font?


When you look at the debug tab do you see any peers?
Currently I am hosting 2 servers one in New York and one in Amsterdam.
You should be able to see atleast 2 peers.


Sent you some.


If you want to create a new wallet just delete the wallet and/or data folder.

1. I am aware that in some cases the client does not want to close. Was the client trying to synchronize at the time you were trying to close the client?

2. Currently you can only recover more then 10 addresses when you use the API. Maybe I should let the user choose on the amount of accounts you want to recover in the GUI.

3. You will be able to copy addresses and balances with the release client.


Thank you for noticing that I will change it.


Could you please show me a screenshot of this problem?


Something like this for example.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Original_Bitcoin_client/API_Calls_list
https://developers.facebook.com/docs/graph-api/reference/v2.0
https://dev.twitter.com/docs/api/1.1

I will create the documentation in PDF first and then we can look on how to move it to the website.

It would be great if the API documentation could be on the website.
I can do that myself or I can provide you with the information that you need.


You need oracle java 7 to run it properly.


I do not understand chinese and google translate doesn't help either.


The plan is to make a custom style for the client eventually after all the technical features are done.
It would be great if the client and website would be in the same style in the way that later on the design of the client will change to represent the style of the website.
Currently the client just uses the OS style.
The design won't change between the current beta and the release.


Zerocoin at this point still requires a lot of computerpower to make and validate those transactions.
I think coinjoin will be a better and simpler solution.
This will require some centralization but as long as it is optional and the centralization is zero trust I don't see a problem using coinjoin.

Yeah I don't follow bitcointalk actively. I check it a few times a day to answer questions if there are any.

At the end of this weekend I should be able to show screenshots about the name exchange.
The current plan is to launch on a friday so that it will be easier to handle all the questions and possible problems that may happen.
If everything goes fine the launch should be on 16 may.

The beta servers have been running quite well for long periods of time despite of the bugs the beta client has.
I was actually hoping people would try to crash them but that hasn't happened yet.

The client that is currently available is a BETA.
If you want some beta funds just ask me or post your address here.
Beta funds have 0 value do not buy them from anyone.

The reason why the expected release is that late is because I want to make sure that the database and core functionality works very well.
It is better to make sure everything is working well before release and be able to implement features fast then wasting a lot of time after release creating patches.


I definetly prefer modern. Atleast for the first page.
Other pages might a bit more classic like API documentation etc.

The only way you can still get a stake before launch is if someone is willing to sell theirs to you.

I must admit I find it quite crazy that people are already trading their stakes.


You can start the program command line only using the -disablegui flag.


Ofcourse I can create a website and logo but I am far from a master in it.
If someone who is more capable wants to contribute who can stop him from doing it?
If it is good and they allow me to use it I could use it as the base of the official website.
I will maintain a website myself because of the trust needed when it comes to hosting the client.
I will not transfer any of the BTC invested before the release because people need to be able to ask for refunds.


People can provide bounties if that is what they want to do with their stake.
The only way I would be able to provide bounties is when people do not collect their stake.

I agree that if we want to keep things simply and organised one centralized party should be in control of all the wallets. When we look at bitcoin there is one official wallet that almost nobody is using anymore and a lot of 'light' wallets and mobile wallets that use servers but are still secure.

The plan is after the pc client is perfect to also develop light clients and mobile wallets.
There is still a lot of work to be done until we get to that point and the chance is big that mobile wallets will already be available by that time but they will not be officially supported.

In the end it will all come down to user-friendliness and documentation.

I meant that I like the first version of #4 with just 2 colors .

I will create a simple website before launch.
I do not mind if someone else wants to create the website.
The only problem I see with that is that I can not support it 100% as the main website because of the trust aspect when you host the client on it.
I can definetly use the design to create the website.

Personally I prefer the first version of the logo.


If you would like I could give you more info about the API or you could tell me which functions you would need.
The new API will be more REST like using HTTP methods and urls to make it easier to use.

Everything except the last 3 will be available at launch.
8 and 9 should take about a month to complete after launch depending on how things work out.

Yeah it always gets 500 blocks before processing them. I do not know if it is a big problem but that is just how the synchronization is working now.
There are definetly some things I can do to speed up synchronization like asking for multiple blocks at the same time instead of one by one.


sent you some.


I actually have some sort of list like this of my own but it is more complete ofcourse.
I will not make it public because a lot of people invested through pm's and might want to stay anonymous.

Did you try to delete the wallet and data files? Can you create a wallet without problems?

I hope to release it within a month but I cannot guarantee that.

I have no problem doing it that way but Anon136 suggested I did it the other way.


Sent you some.
This is perfectly normal while synchronizing.
Message 6 means that you ask for a block with a certain id and message 7 is the response that contains the block.


I really like them. Maybe we should start a poll to let the community decide which one.


Are there any errors in the command line. Do you have the latest java 7 and do you run it by using the run.bat/run.sh files?


Isn't it Koran? Or is it called different in other languages?


Hmm it seems the server has gone crazy. Strange it had been running quite well for the past 2 weeks. Let me try and fix it.

Oke the server has been restarted and seems to be working fine again. The beta has problems with handling large messages and forks. I have fixed those issues but they still exist in the beta client.
You might have to delete your wallet and data files to make it work again.

I know that when you want to release the transaction you need to proof ownership.
It is just easier to manage everything if we know which transactions belongs to which bitcointalk account before the release.

That shouldn't happen I will look into it.

I believe that the features of cryptocurrencies will not decide which one will survive and which one not.
Some features will become useless and some will become standard in all cryptocurrencies.
I believe that at the end the most documented/user-friendly cryptocurrency will dominate.
Getting to this point might still take a few years.

The release is planned to be within a month.
Do not rely on this though something unexpected might happen and we will only release when everything is working properly.

Sent you some.

IMPORTANT!

Anon136 has not kept track of which transaction belongs to which bitcointalk account. Everyone that invested through Anon136 needs to contact me and provide me with proof that they are the owner of the transaction!

I am very sorry for this misunderstanding the other user that claimed the transaction was "ccienet" not Djinou94.
Agestorzrxx provided proof that he is the owner of the transaction and everything is solved now.

I can not allow people to move from the IPO address to the escrow address now that the IPO is over.
If your really don't trust me you can ask for a refund but I can not allow you to reinvest after.