Ah someone agreed with me. The movie was an insta-classic.[/list]

Ryan isn't saying that you faked the jackpot's winnable amount. We know that the jackpot was winnable and has been proved by the NotTardy win. What your site represented was the true and winnable jackpot that was funded from the MoneyPot bankroll.

Ryan is saying that the progression was an illusion in the sense that there were no coins specifically set apart for it in the bankroll. Any win would come directly from the bankroll and not a separate divide. Slot machines work in a similar format.

So for arguments sake, Ryan is right that neither ownership group stole any bitcoins as they were just a represented amount and not a factual partition, and you (JPR) are right that the jackpot was winnable. Nobody scammed anyone as the jackpot was winnable and has been paid out on numerous occasions for different amounts.

Ew. Some regard it as a 'classic' but I truthfully hate that series.

The Big Lebowski is one of my favorites. It’s a classic but it cracks me up every time I watch it.

Just visited your app again. Nice improvements!

 I will try to test it out later this evening.

In this particular case we had a large amount withdrawn from the hot wallet. We had to wait until certain team members were available to sign the transaction from our multisig wallet.

I can assure you that everything is okay. Our hot wallet has been drained from a whale withdrawing large amounts.

We are working to top off the wallet but waiting for others in our multisig cold wallet to sign off on the refill transaction.

4) Regarding the alts, I agreed with you at a certain level, but truthfully I can not speak on behalf of the others.

Myself and DodgeDigital are the only with any access to our servers. Additionally ever single query is logged in our cloud environment. I can provide proof of this. If any of us were to cheat, we would know.

5) The team is under a lot of stress and sometimes we have reached our wits end. We are only human, and again, please take my efforts to resolve our conflicts serious. Its the best for both of us.

6) Im not sure who declined any help. There has been specific times that I have directly interacted with some notable members in this community.

In the case of NotTardy, we didn't find any of their play to be irregular. Everything that we looked into checked out. We spent countless hours researching, communicating as a team, and attempting to identify and adverse actions.

Regardless of how much he/she deposited the idea of your site was to win a jackpot and they did so.  It would be no different from me buying a $5 lottery ticket and winning 20m. The user did go on to play at Yahoo's site and only after did I discover that the client seed length was not having a proper impact on the roll generation. This did not mean that their rolls were invalid, if anything it would be working against them as it would not be provably fair in his favor.

We actually would provide information if a cheat was found. While we would not disclose the exact details for legal reasons, we would have a duty to let our investors know.

I am alive and well. I haven't been as active on the forefront as contrary to your beliefs, I have been highly active on the back-end of our applications.
Ill try to address your points to the best of my ability since my role focuses on development and not the business side of things:

1) MoneyPot strives to be as transparent as possible with investors. But like any business, some information is confidential.

2) I cannot comment on this as it is something that you would need to discuss with DogeDigital. There are many factors involved with this but I will say that I know that a plan is in the works.

3) MoneyPot has been extremely respectful to players and investors alike. On an extreme basis, such as yours, there have been times where the frustrations have gotten the best of people. We are only human. Please take into consideration that I am doing my best to resolve our differences at this time. I am being "respectful."

4) I can agree with you to a certain extent with this. However owners have always been transparent with their alts and there are cases when multiple alts are needed. I for one have two. I use one mainly for testing apps and another for testing against the upcoming production environments. Other owners may use an alt for "lurking" in chats. I cannot speak directly for them, but I have always been transparent.

My alts are Pumpkinspice and CCTestAccount. There was a time that I did gamble on MoneyPot. At the time, our majority investors were okay with it (still are) and the cost per coin was considerably less than it is today. I haven't gamble on MoneyPot or in reality, any casino, in over ~8 months.

5) We openly accept constructive criticism. There has been several occasions that I personally have admitted that I have could have done things better or admitted my wrong doings.

6) Since bitcoin and our services are largely "anonymous" and we have the responsibility to safe guard our users data, we are limited to what we can and cannot disclose. We have always been transparent on our investigations and always note of the outcome, however, transparency does not involve disclosing pivotal information about an investigation or player. This is to protect ourselves and the player in the event of any legal action.

I will tell you that every single MoneyPot account is tested against an in-house designed algorithm that attempts to score an accounts trust/threat level. Because this algorithm is proprietary, I will not discuss the details.

-
Suicide is a serious matter and using it in jokes or slander is childish. I served in the military, and have personally lost friends who have committed suicide.

What do you want? What is the point for all of this? It has been going on months and months. Lets put an end to it mutually and work a way to go forward.

Sorry guys, have been extremely tied up with the development of MoneyPot! I do have some exciting news to share regarding Provably.io in the near future! Stay tuned!

There is scheduled maintenance on our SocketPot application servers tonight between 10-11pm EST. Expect intervals of downtime.

As others have stated, the best way is to run your own blockchain node.

The main reason for this is control. You are control of your wallet. You do not have to rely on a third party service that may one day collapse or become hacked. When you control your wallet, you control your private keys and your funds.

When running a node, make sure you secure it.

Here are some recommendations:

Server
1 ) Disable root login
2 ) Disable password login, require SSH keys
3 ) Change default SSH port
4 ) Proxy public traffic.
5 ) Interface on private network
6 ) Routinely check for security patches
7 ) Install security tools such as Fail2Ban, Tripwire, RKHunter,
8 ) Secure all application servers, especially those that interact with the RPC.
9) MONITOR MONITOR MONITOR

RPC
1 ) Secure RPC with distinct password & username
2 ) Change default RPC port
3 ) Encrypt, unlock wallet  through private network RPC calls only.
4 ) MONITOR MONITOR MONITOR

Due to the current blockchain backlog and the increased mining fees for priority transactions, we have increased the bitcoin sending fee to 600 bits. This falls within the range of other services who are currently setting a fee between 500 - 800 bits.

When the blockchain congestion clears, we will evaluate reducing sending fees.

MoneyPot does not discuss financial information relating to our players. That has been expressed before.

Your situation is different however because the information is publicly available and expressed through your own site and your posts.

Another classic example of deflection.

MoneyPot does not:

- Pay Bit-Exo's salaries
- Pay Bit-Exo's promos
- Pay Bit-Exo's expenses
- Develop games for Bit-Exo
- Lead Business direction for Bit-Exo
- Own Bit-Exo

MoneyPot does:

- Pay Bit-Exo & all apps commission per wager
- Provide a gaming wallet and a Provably Fair API for casinos.

There may be a few apps that members of the MoneyPot team may have purchased a stake in, but Bit-Exo is not one of them and your points are on par with a 3 year old child demanding Babka before dinner.

So lets take you points and then apply them towards your former operation. To sum up your points "An owner should not receive rain or tips."

- 10/20 - NotTardy hits Jackpot for 105 BTC only receiving 72 BTC of the actual wager.
- 10/20 - JackPotRacer receives 4 forced tips equal to approximately 30 BTC from NotTardy
- 10/21  - JPR rains 7.x BTC to his users as inline with his contest.

Proof: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1508394.msg16636073#msg16636073

So where did the remaining 23 BTC go? You kept it. Just as you did with every other jackpot win. You walked away with a 23 BTC forced tip.

Do you really want to complain about 46 bits when I just demonstrated that you, an owner of a casino, have in fact received tips from wagers on your site on a much larger scale than that of ranlo from an automated rainbot.

This case is closed. Move on with your life and start focusing on something that matters.

Are the MP owners the owner of Bit Exo?

JPR, the app owners control who they send rain to. If they don't want to send rain to MP owners / developers they are in control of that. It is the app owners funds.

Each casino is its own entity. MoneyPot just controls the api.

Very interesting concept. It is different then some other PVP games I have seen in the past.

The one thing I would do if I were you would be to somehow implement an overview of the game play before you present them with the game. Maybe with a transparent layer of some sort. Initially the game looks confusing and it required me to read your support menu.