any movement/word on the return of registrations?
See the previous page ^^ saw burnside's post, but totally missed the timestamp - assumed it was a few days ago for some reason.  |
|
|
|
|
any movement/word on the return of registrations?
|
|
|
|
"Even with 20TH or 50TH they won't be able to pay dividents as high as IPO." ?
I dont get that.. So the dividend per share should be IPO price? If that happens..
I mean with difficulty change taken into account, the cumulated dividents won't reach a value for IPO investors to break even. you do know that the IPO was to fund the development and production of new chips, right? Not related to the current production, which was prefunded? |
|
|
|
Next thing they need to do is figure out how to get that warning removed on btct.co.
I think burnside wants to see a little more before that happens.. Well, they should find out what, specifically they need to do to get it removed. well, nobody knows what specifically they did to get it added  |
|
|
|
Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.
It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place. A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile. It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess. Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production. So this IS insignificant. You've missed the point of my reply entirely. The discussion is not about the amount of dividends, it's about watching the (apparent) hashrate for signs of deltas. It's already been pointed out that they already sold one of those Avalons, and the apparent hashrate is more than what the two remaining Avalons could output. It's being watched carefully to distinguish from any possible Avalon output, specifically to avoid falling for the trap you're in that says they must be using the Avalons. I'll reiterate: dividends are not the central theme of the topic of hashrate - the viability of the hardware is. And the hashrate conversation is directly tied to the viability of the hardware, because it's the closest thing we have to transparency at this point. |
|
|
|
Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.
It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about. That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place. |
|
|
|
TheSeven just clarifyied something via irc from the last chat, which was already pasted here (timestamp below is US/Central) [09-21 12:27:20] <TheSeven> let me quote sam (or whoever was using the skype account at that time): "they do but they will stop hashing after a few cycles and restart back" and "never showing the full hashing speed we have at any moment, i could show some mining address but that would not stop the FUD because of this"
[09-21 12:27:45] <TheSeven> and I haven't talked to them since a week, they're somewhat hard to reach. so I'm not involved with rev1 yet.
[09-21 12:28:20] <bobbabad> ok..
[09-21 12:28:21] <TheSeven> note that these quotes are also a week old, they might have made a lot of progress since then
...
[09-21 12:50:53] <TheSeven> sam explicitly confirmed that they were only restarting after several billion hashes
[09-21 12:50:59] <yttr> okay
[09-21 12:51:05] <yttr> several as in more then four?
[09-21 12:51:10] <TheSeven> yes
[09-21 12:51:12] <yttr> so more then a whole diff1 share
[09-21 12:51:21] <TheSeven> he basically said "every couple of diff1 shares"
|
|
|
|
It's not unprecedented. I think there's just more attention on this issue than there was on previous issues I have posted warnings on.
that doesn't really justify it |
|
|
|
I tried to keep the warning low key. I thought it was fairly self explanatory. That there was market impact confirmed my suspicion that some users were flying blind with the asset, so to speak, unaware of the seemingly hundreds of posts going through on the forums.
In case you or someone else (mightaswellallowanonymous and creativex especially) got me wrong: I'm absolutely in favor of the warning at the moment - Labcoin is highly speculative right now and the last thing I'd like to see is newbs getting burned by thinking "Lab is as safe as AM" or so. Sure everyone should do his own research etc., but it's not all that "black and white". But my point was another one and of course no accusation or complain, but only suggestion to implement guidelines on when warnings are issued or lifted as well as when and how a security is going to be frozen. And one example might be be (probably not the best): "if moderator vote ratio is negative or below x, post an automated warning" or so. exactly this. The warning itself appeared to be a vote of no confidence from the exchange, and NOBODY was expecting it. The inference was that you had some sort of inside knowledge that you wanted to get across by hinting to everyone without coming right out and telling everyone that there was a problem. A moderator voting mechanism would be good, I think - and 24+ hour notice on the news tab would be preferred as an announcement that a vote is pending. That will give the market time to figure out what's going on without a big "THAR BE PROBLEMS HERE" getting thrown up all of a sudden. I think the market was more spooked that this unprecedented warning came on suddenly, and less that people were unaware that there were issues. |
|
|
|
Looks like neobee is a turd.
I think the term you're looking for is "undersubscribed" - they simply tried to sell too many shares, and there were not enough buyers. |
|
|
|
Could TheSwede's silence be implying that the hashing is legit? If it was fake I'm sure he would be on here immediately.
HA! you made me laugh so hard the dog started barking in the back yard. XD |
|
|
|
I think JohnyBigs is confused about how mining pools work..
Another 3rd world country sock poppet account. As you can tell from the name that makes no sense in English, only in 3rd world country retard language. His name means "well, very thin" I think someone is confused how English works. Or to reduce virulence of infectious particles - as in what I am doing my PhD thesis on. But you know - thin makes tons more sense. You are now my favorite person of the last 50 pages. |
|
|
|
the new Labcoin mining address
12JdkhAmFrZZ1q6NWT3Ug86WLHdwRKmnqz
Since people are sending free BTC maybe I get some you never know
golfclap.gif |
|
|
|
You realize he's a brit right?  ...ask a hockey question at least. lol Right - and if you ask a question about something involving "world" in the name be aware that outside the US it tends to imply that more than one country participate in it. woah, woah, woah, woah there... back that horse up, now - there's a Canadian team in Baseball. |
|
|
|
And there is no way for the user to hide the "last time" information ?
Well, if zumzero is using the "don't show me when I'm online" thing, it's not working for his account, so I assume it wouldn't work for anyone else either. |
|
|
|
Dear Labcoin PR aka The Swede. DID YOU KNOW THAT YOU CAN DISABLE THE ONLINE/OFFLINE STATUS IN OPTIONS? I STRONGLY SUGGEST YOU DO THIS AS IT WILL PROVE BETTER FOR YOU AND WORSE FOR THESE CRAZY STALKERS!  That doesn't work for the method used by the StalkBot in the IRC channel What method do you use ? parse xml for profile, check last login time (which is the same as the last time the account was used to read any page, think of it as logging in with a cookie) |
|
|
|
Could you pass me the IRC data? I missed it.
chat.freenode.net, #labcoin |
|
|
|
Dear Labcoin PR aka The Swede. DID YOU KNOW THAT YOU CAN DISABLE THE ONLINE/OFFLINE STATUS IN OPTIONS? I STRONGLY SUGGEST YOU DO THIS AS IT WILL PROVE BETTER FOR YOU AND WORSE FOR THESE CRAZY STALKERS! That doesn't work for the method used by the StalkBot in the IRC channel |
|
|
|
We are here to stay and everyone who is having doubts will have to change his opinion once we show what we achieved.
Again, we advise anyone to purchase more shares now that they are cheap.
You know what, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt before you said this. This makes me think you want to sell your shares, which are still not verifiably locked, by the way. Your focus should not be on giving advice right now; it should be on following it. |
|
|
|
well, that was the easiest 32% ever. So predictable. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
