Why do the moderators let you spam your defamation posts all over this forum? Obvious shill is obvious. Take it to the proper thread if you wish to wine about something that has absolutely no bearing to you.
No bearing to me? You and I are in agreement that as long as you don't keep your word, I am here to remind everyone else you are a liar and a thief. ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) (Apologies to everyone else, but dank is ignoring squall's PMs) It's flattering that your life revolves around me, but really, you should really consider focusing on yourself. Squall has not been pming me, like you would even know if he was.
|
|
|
(Breaking the annoying chain quote) @Dank: For you, there may not be any addictions, but some guy might be taking shrooms day in, day out. It really differs on an individual level. Some with a stronger willpower can resist even physical addictions and some go nuts after tasting a teaspoon of sugar. Such differences in effects are the main scare for governments to take any action in legalizing psychedelic mushrooms.
That really doesn't happen. You have to really push yourself to trip everyday, the chemical does not push you.
|
|
|
(Trying to break the chain quote) @backtrackit: Any specific examples of such drugs?
Nicotine highly addictive and is usually inhaled by smoking tobacco. Think we all know that it slowly kills you Synthetic Marijuana legal in most parts of the world - kills people and is stupidly addictive Salvia divinorum - more intense than mushrooms but the effects don't last as long Datura - easy to OD and dangerous to use without a sitter Hope that's enough ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) ...I know nicotine won't cause immediate harm to the user or anyone else but worth mentioning since it does kill a lot of people. Nicotine does change behavior. Synthetic cannabis are illegal in many big countries or are in a so called legal grey area. Same for Salvia divinorum: some states in the US passed lawas against it, some haven't mostly due to the fact it isn't widely used unlike shrooms. Datura is a herb growing naturally without interaction of people and due to it's mass toxicity again isn't widely used. So if it's not widely used it's ok then lol. Jesus the ignorance must be bliss...do you think magic mushrooms don't exist in a natural habitat? Do you also think they would be widely used ? They grow all over the world you know ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Legalization or prohibition of drugs are only possible if the majority agrees. Since the majority doesn't use such drug nor they heard of it, they don't give a crap. If a couple of idiots OD nobody in the government cares, but if those idiots are only a few overdoses out of hundreds than the government gets pressure to ban it. We're not talking about if drugs are bad or good, we're talking why aren't they being legalized by the government and sorry to break it to you, but that how current governments work. Regarding mushrooms, the Datura (unlike mushrooms which grow only in certain areas) grows like a parasite both in woodland and urban areas: it's everywhere, doesn't require human interaction to spread and can even grow in garbage dumps thus banning would be like banning trees. The other factor is that there is an extremely high OD rate with the Datura that usually outweighs the psychological effects. "unlike mushrooms which grow only in certain areas" you mean like fields and woodlands ya know like datura and btw mushrooms don't need human interaction to spread, the wind does a pretty good job of that them spores travel miles on the smallest of winds animals help too. Your just ignorant to the facts and now your argument is "Legalization or prohibition of drugs are only possible if the majority agrees" That is true but only because of ignorant people like who clearly never tried them and spout shit about it killing you. I'm not spouting shit, I'm expressing my opinion unlike you who has to angrily comment on every post of mine to make an argument. The thing is, that the majority of people don't live in fields and woodland areas, they live in cities, urban areas and daturas grow there as well. Regarding the legalization, I have my own opinion and many people do have the same one. And if the majority doesn't want to see people tripping balls everywhere they go, deal with it. And if you can't live without such substances, move somewhere you do. I think the main reason people don't want to legalize it is the fact of the trip. Any drugs causing hallucinations (good or bad), that is altering how one sees reality, aren't taken upon lightly since any drug altering behavior causes psychological addictions. Another thing might be pushing the boundaries: allow weed, they demand shrooms; allow shrooms, they demand LSD and so on. OMG when shrooms was legal where I am not once did I see anyone tripping balls everywhere they go ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) . Some of the propaganda stuff you come out is laughable. psychological addictions don't happen with shrooms it's not possible to get addicted to them. You may have your opinion but it's not based on facts just fantasy propaganda...I don't take them anymore so don't need to move anywhere that and if I wanted too I could just grow them ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Any substance which brings pleasure or enhances/modifies/stimulates the brain or the nervous system to the person using it will develop a psychological addiction (even with no physical addction possible). That includes a lot of stuff: sugar, coffee, drugs, especially psychedelics since they stimulate the brain the most thus yielding such effects. In summary, your body might not demand it, but your mind will. As I read up, the most common form of addiction is complete tolerance: Complete tolerance (where no amount of psilocybin can produce the desired effects) can develop within several days of continued use. Such could lead to consumption of bigger amounts of the drug to reach the desired effects. Which, well... will make you broke unless you grow big farms of them. Aside from that, due to the fact they weren't properly researched, any negative, long lasting effects aren't known. However: Although the effects associated with the long-term use of psilocybin have not been studied, the use of psilocybin has been associated with:
Psychosis. Some people have developed prolonged psychosis resembling paranoid schizophrenia. Psychosis is a mental disorder that affects the personality and is characterized by a loss of touch with reality. Heroin also used to be legal and used in medicine for migraine. However when people researched it they banned it. The governments now don't want to make the same mistake and wait until multiple creditable studies show that there are no long lasting harmful effects. Quotes from: http://www.healthycanadians.gc.ca/health-sante/addiction/mushrooms-champignons-eng.phpP.S. Your angry ramble really makes you sound childish. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Try to talk in a neutral mood even when your countering my "propaganda stuff" ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Sorry but that's just not how psychedelics work. The day after you trip you think, well I'm not doing that again for a while. Because the experience increases your sensory input so extensively and is not desirable to repeat constantly. Very few people can use them daily and if they are using it daily it's not because they are addicted or seeking a high, it's because they are seeking self evolvement. I'm sure Jimi Hendrix pulled this off. I've gone for over three weeks within one month once, but I can tell you that there was no chemical dependency drawing me towards it, I was simply seeking to evolve myself into my best shape spiritual/physical/musical being. Which it helped significantly with. Again, very few people can do this or even want to. In general, psychedelics are such an experience that people don't want to try them again for a while. Sugar and caffeine are far more addictive than psychedelics. Psychedelics truly have negative addiction properties though some are experienced enough to repeat as they have already found the answers and have grown to handle the increased sensory input you incur.
|
|
|
You're just lying now. Like normal. I just sent squall .042 BTC. I sent him .1 last month.
Do you even have the ability to determine reality anymore? I don't lie. You, on the other hand, are a pathological liar. ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) Your last 0.1btc payment to Squall was in Jan. It's all public record, since as a proven scammer you cannot edit your posts. You asked me to get involved. You also gave your word to respect me. Calling me a liar is not showing respect. If your word is worth nothing, then you are worth nothing dank. ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) If he has a problem he would contact me, I don't see why you feel the need to get in other people's business.
Did he not contact you? Did he not ask you via PM to send him 0.1btc? Did you not offer him via PM worthless potcoins instead? HE HAS A PROBLEM - HE HAS CONTACTED YOU - PAY YOUR DEBTI just paid him .042 BTC and .1 for the last month, meaning the month before. So yes, January was .1, Feb was .042, looks like I still have several weeks to make this month's payment. Take a chill pill vod. Or better yet, put down the alcohol. Why do the moderators let you spam your defamation posts all over this forum? Obvious shill is obvious. Take it to the proper thread if you wish to wine about something that has absolutely no bearing to you. You're like the US government in Ukraine.
|
|
|
I'm paying once a month like I agreed with squall. I don't see where the discrepancy is.
You don't?? You said the debt was on Squall's terms. Squall asked for 0.1btc a month. You were making payments of 0.1btc a month. Your last payment was in Jan. We are in March. Do you understand the discrepancy now? Can you catch up on your payments? Debt is on your terms, squall.
That was your word, dank. And you say all you have is your word. You're just lying now. Like normal. I just sent squall .042 BTC. I sent him .1 last month. If he has a problem he would contact me, I don't see why you feel the need to get in other people's business. Don't you have your own life to live?
|
|
|
I've been sending him money. What's your deal?
You gave your word you would send coins on a regular basis. You are not doing that. ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) If you have all this power, why not pay your debt as you agreed? I'm paying once a month like I agreed with squall. I don't see where the discrepancy is.
|
|
|
You are speaking in negatives, fallacies. The truth is positivity, the truth is the universe is infinite. And it really is that simple, positive statements are true, negative statements are false. The only laws of the universe are the ones you set yourself.
What about the laws of economics? Why can't you simply create the coins to pay back Squall? You gave your word you would. All you are is your word. Why are you ever nothing but talk? I've been sending him money. What's your deal?
|
|
|
I have the guy on ignore but I can still see the quotes of course. Atheism is a religion. Science is a religion. There are no universal laws. As usual, his drugged up twisted mind gets the facts 100.0% wrong. Atheism is not a religion (that would kinda defeat the purpose, now wouldn't it?). Science is not a religion (has nothing to do with it -at all- no matter what uneducated numbnuts believe, although science can in some parts help explain how some humans can fall victim to religion). There are universal laws (for starters, try defeating gravity please. Thank you, I thought so.). As criticism should always have something constructive to it : dank really is a very useful contraindicator when it comes to common sense- or sanity-checks. Just reverse anything he says by exact 180 degrees - then you've made an excellent step towards the truth (basically takes you within about 10% of being 100% spot-on. Persistently >90% is not bad actually...). If you say so. religion: a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe Atheists believe in ego. Theists believe in god. It's not very complicated, as I just said, negatives and positives, duality. There are universal laws (for starters, try defeating gravity please. Thank you, I thought so.). I disagree. I, and several friends, have witnessed a lamp jump off a table, a violation of physics. And I have a friend who swears that he has levitated on accident momentarily. Girls that had never done any drugs saw this happen. You are speaking in negatives, fallacies. The truth is positivity, the truth is the universe is infinite. And it really is that simple, positive statements are true, negative statements are false. The only laws of the universe are the ones you set yourself.
|
|
|
Physics isn't like religion - it doesn't give a sh*t about belief. People know physics, religious nuts believe their religion (and erroneously mistake that for knowledge, despite the 100.0% perfect contradiction of terms).
Small detail, insanely massive difference. But pointless trying to explain belief vs. knowledge to a believing person (IMHO it's like their brains mashed those two completely different items into one, I have no better explanation for that permanent mistake those people make over and over and over again).
I won't even go into the percentage of (religious or non-religious) eldery who live with severely degraded vision. Neuronal cells can recover, but only to some extend and with drastically reduced success with increased age.
No thanks to religion, scientists were able to assist and amplify the process to a high degree - but even that has limits.
Anyway superresistant (to education), tell your BS story to some paraplegic or nearly blind, elderly person. If ever you get chocked or hit with a cane on your head by a pissed-off eldery or someone stuck to a wheelchair - it's well-deserved.
Seriously, the amount of religious BS and nonsense around threads like this is mind-bending. Never seen so much stupidity and human mad cow disease in an internet forum before, in such a concentrated form. Religious nuts truly are mental zombies. Frightening to know such people freely roam the planet and may even look healthy to the outside.
Very well put! I especially like this part: "Seriously, the amount of religious BS and nonsense around threads like this is mind-bending. Never seen so much stupidity and human mad cow disease in an internet forum before, in such a concentrated form. Religious nuts truly are mental zombies. Frightening to know such people freely roam the planet and may even look healthy to the outside." My $.02. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) So you're on team vod now? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Atheism is a religion. Science is a religion. There are no universal laws. "Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.: Yeah, I am all enthused about living my life by that shit. My $.02. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Christianity: A man titled Jesus walked the earth and found his soul through alterations of consciousness. He learned the true spiritual nature of the universe and shared it unconditionally. He learned about duality, the opposing forces of negativity and positivity which compose our very being. He learned that anything you believe is possible and practiced so by performing miracles, healing beings and ultimately resurrecting from the dead. He stood up against a corrupt empire knowing full well they would kill him for speaking so loud. He did so anyways for it was what he believed in and he knew that existence is eternal and beyond this life awaits a world of infinite peace and possibilities.
|
|
|
Physics isn't like religion - it doesn't give a sh*t about belief. People know physics, religious nuts believe their religion (and erroneously mistake that for knowledge, despite the 100.0% perfect contradiction of terms).
Small detail, insanely massive difference. But pointless trying to explain belief vs. knowledge to a believing person (IMHO it's like their brains mashed those two completely different items into one, I have no better explanation for that permanent mistake those people make over and over and over again).
I won't even go into the percentage of (religious or non-religious) eldery who live with severely degraded vision. Neuronal cells can recover, but only to some extend and with drastically reduced success with increased age.
No thanks to religion, scientists were able to assist and amplify the process to a high degree - but even that has limits.
Anyway superresistant (to education), tell your BS story to some paraplegic or nearly blind, elderly person. If ever you get chocked or hit with a cane on your head by a pissed-off eldery or someone stuck to a wheelchair - it's well-deserved.
Seriously, the amount of religious BS and nonsense around threads like this is mind-bending. Never seen so much stupidity and human mad cow disease in an internet forum before, in such a concentrated form. Religious nuts truly are mental zombies. Frightening to know such people freely roam the planet and may even look healthy to the outside.
Very well put! I especially like this part: "Seriously, the amount of religious BS and nonsense around threads like this is mind-bending. Never seen so much stupidity and human mad cow disease in an internet forum before, in such a concentrated form. Religious nuts truly are mental zombies. Frightening to know such people freely roam the planet and may even look healthy to the outside." My $.02. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) So you're on team vod now? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Atheism is a religion. Science is a religion. There are no universal laws.
|
|
|
Physics make you blind and stupid if you believe in it like a religion. This is one of the lie along with "brain cannot grow new neurons". It is only because you believe in it that you lose vision acuity and your brain get rotten.
Old people can see very well. Old people can grow new neurons and maintain their mental capacity.
If you use science to justify your point of view, at least get updated. Physics isn't like religion - it doesn't give a sh*t about belief. People know physics, religious nuts believe their religion (and erroneously mistake that for knowledge, despite the 100.0% perfect contradiction of terms). Small detail, insanely massive difference. But pointless trying to explain belief vs. knowledge to a believing person (IMHO it's like their brains mashed those two completely different items into one, I have no better explanation for that permanent mistake those people make over and over and over again). I won't even go into the percentage of (religious or non-religious) eldery who live with severely degraded vision. Neuronal cells can recover, but only to some extend and with drastically reduced success with increased age. No thanks to religion, scientists were able to assist and amplify the process to a high degree - but even that has limits. Anyway superresistant (to education), tell your BS story to some paraplegic or nearly blind, elderly person. If ever you get chocked or hit with a cane on your head by a pissed-off eldery or someone stuck to a wheelchair - it's well-deserved. Seriously, the amount of religious BS and nonsense around threads like this is mind-bending. Never seen so much stupidity and human mad cow disease in an internet forum before, in such a concentrated form. Religious nuts truly are mental zombies. Frightening to know such people freely roam the planet and may even look healthy to the outside. People believe in physics, so it exists. Your reality is formulated by beliefs. If you truly believe in something impossible, it can happen. Hence, nothing is impossible.
|
|
|
The truth as to why mushrooms and LSD are illegal is not because they are harmful. Nor is it because people take them and jump out of windows or run across highways. No. The reason they are illegal is very simple. They connect you to a universal consciousness, they connect you to others. They allow you to see life from a new perspective rather than the one the government has indoctrinated into society for your whole life.
LSD is less toxic than vitamin c. More people die from aspirin than all illegal drugs combined. They are not illegal for your health, if you did not know this before, it becomes blatantly obvious when cannabis is illegal and has killed zero people throughout thousands of years of use while at the same time treats and cures dozens of diseases.
The answer is very simple. Psychedelics threaten our greed based society. They threaten corrupt power structures and war.
The government would prefer to feed you cigarettes and alcohol, the former being laced with toxic chemicals and causing 500,000 deaths per year, the later numbing the mind's ability to critically think whilst causing 150,000 deaths per year.
They'd prefer to synthesize their own versions of medicines that only attempt to mimic the perfected plants found in nature.
They'd prefer to feed you radiation that kills more people than it heals in sight of a tumor.
Why?
This answer is also very simple. Money and power. There is no money to be made relative to the trillion dollar pharmaceutical industry if people were growing their own medicine. There is no trillion dollar oil industry if people could grow biofuel with hemp. There is no government to control if people could freely explore their minds and form a more advanced society that operated off love rather than fear and greed.
|
|
|
Starting bid .0001BTC one week time. The highest bidder gets my soul when I die. You can do whatever you want with it.
When facing the devil, I will let them know my soul has already been sold to [insert bid winner's name].
Maybe you and dank should hook up. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I smelled a dank post immediately before I scrolled down to this.
|
|
|
.....anyway, I'm just saying, don't worship the sun- worship the One who created all of the suns...
peace
And just who in the Hell was that? My $.02. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Big bang. Which is you. Your consciousness.
|
|
|
I think something that is underestimated in an anarchic system is fear. The majority of people will have elevated fear levels which will lead to all sorts of problems. Illnesses related to stress, more people going postal, a poorer quality of life in general.
Ruthless and powerful gangs may dominate, the sort who will kill anyone at the first sign of conflict, before their opponents 'police force' is even aware there is a problem.
Compassion and karma in the majority is unfortunately outweighed by greed in the few.
Sorta like how it is now? People living in fear of being blown up by a drone, people living in fear being spied on by their government, people living in fear of a nuclear holocaust. Anarchy is not chaos though. Anarchy is nature, a perfect equilibrium of forces. An anarchist world is controlled by the universe rather than man. Just because there is no man made law does not mean there are no laws of physics. 1. In an possible in the real world anarchistic society, you'd get ransaked if you possesed anything of value. Surviving a day without having lots of goods/currency to hire and maintain armed forces would be an achievement. The stringest would win. 2. Anarchy where every person respects and helps each other is a utopian idea. It's due to the violent and selfish nature of man and the fact that a small group of psychos can ruin the whole situation That's the fallacy about anarchy. The fact of the matter is that, as you said, only a small percent of people are psychopaths and wish to go and take people's stuff. As it is now, these psychopaths are in charge and protected to ransack anyone and anything they desire with the power of armies. If we were in a true anarchist state, with no government or money, the 2-3% of sociopaths would have no way to leverage their powers, thus, if they continued with their ways, they would be killed as the numbers are astronomically against them.
|
|
|
I hereby bequest rights to one Vod, one underage girl flirt for each karma bequest to Dank.
I think there is a country gap here. To me, 20 is legal. 18 is the legal age in CanadaTo dank, 20 is underage. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) 1. The 40 year old man was filming my 17 year old friend dancing with a girl. My friend is a guy. The camera was was clearly focused on him.
So you provide access to drugs/alcohol for minors? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Pretty sure it's 18 in the US too. What part of the story indicated to you that any of them were drunk or had gotten drugs from me?
|
|
|
I FOLLOW HIM BY HEART HUGE FAN OF HIM LONG LIVE THE WAYNE ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi59.tinypic.com%2Fk4igow.jpg&t=663&c=FACZGWE5ALoj8w) Is it possible to follow him by heart?
|
|
|
|