I am growing to like Blue, but I share LoyceV's concerns about the proprietary aspect of the "Blue" wallet structure.
It's just easy to use
![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
the 0.00432483 shows as confirmed on the block-chain, but did not "appear" in the Eclair wallet.
This is the weirdest one, as it has nothing to do with LN. If 3Hn6UVrbLmiV16ya4stoPtunGBjkzoLNig is part of your wallet, it should show up. If that addy is not part of your Eclair wallet, you somehow got the wrong address.
Have you tried installing Eclair on another device with the same seed phrase?
- the 0.0010528 channel shows as "unconfirmed" on Eclair but confirmed on the block-chain
- the 0.0010801 channel shows as "unconfirmed" on Eclair but confirmed on the block-chain
Is this the same Eclair wallet?
There is a total of 0.00027500042 on the LN according to Eclair. (the three open channels I have managed to empty to my Blue wallet)
Is that the channel reserve? So if you close it, it goes to fees?
On my Blue wallet, I now have 0.0001 on chain and 0.00150845 on LN. (the latter got shifted in increasingly tiny amounts 1500 - 2500 sats, so there were more than a dozen TX's involved. All of these funds came from the mobile phone's Eclair wallet. The remaining balances are after these funds were sent)
One of the things I disliked in Eclair was that my sending capacity varies depending on the momentary on-chain fee. I assume this is because the channel reserve varies *so there's enough to force-close the channel when needed), but I don't like the way "chain problems" are transfered into LN.
Loyce sent me a link to a diagnostic to delve into the back end of the wallet
I did?