According to coindesk 21 is trying to build a light bulb which is mining...
What do u think about that?
snip this is actually possible if the two birds are one behind the other According to coindesk 21 is trying to build a light bulb which is mining...
What do u think about that?
are those light bolb running with low wattage, or are they based on the old 60w model?
|
|
|
And way more easier to get spammed by e-mail advertiser. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Thats the point you give your bitcoin address so that all the spam goes there and not into your actual email address. Then you move to new bitcoin email along with your new bitcoin address. actually you will receive more spam in the form of bitcoin fee, like the recent ponzi spam of 10k satoshi, so you can see it as a way to make money, without doing nothing...
|
|
|
Cash is much less traceable than Bitcoin, not to mention that anonymity is an important trait of a good currency. A good currency should allow individuals to trade without the government tracking every transaction. It's not their business and AML is just a bad excuse for regulations that don't work and significantly encroach on individual rights.
they are coming with a new cash that is traceable, there was a discussion about it https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1070180.0actually it is good that they are aiming at this, will only make bitcoin stronger, because more people will move to it I don't think it will make bitcoin stronger: untraceability is not one of its strong points to say the least ! But it might make anon coins stronger. bitcoin is more anon than many think, but you need to work with something like coin-join, project like this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=919116.0, could potentially turn the table on the anonimity issue about bitcoin
|
|
|
As far I understand one transaction has around 200-250 Bits and it has to send two times (One from sender and one from recipient). That means, we could process with a 20MB block around 60-90 tx per second.
Is that right?
What do you think about that above? yeah it's correct, you should count about 3 transactions for every 1mb of space(there are multisig too to be counted) so more near 60 than 90
|
|
|
it would be cool for many if it was partnered with paypal too... usually i don't like online wallet, but i signed up to see how this is, it looks pretty simple this how it look insie, for those who are lazy ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FxIhd3GF.png&t=663&c=ilCy5s8wQrU74A)
|
|
|
Yes, I think Satoshi is not a person. Satoshi is a group with have superior brains and i want to meet with them. This is a list of my favorite people. 1. Albert Einstein 2. Nikola Tesla 3. Satoshi Nakamoto ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Nice list you got there. And obviously it is people you cannot and will not ever meet with (with the exemption of Satoshi who is still with the living as far as we know, but still probably impossible). at least the others two have a face, satoshi is completely unknown now that i think about it, satoshi was using a proxy when he was writing here? otherwise we could know from where he was typing
|
|
|
well one could simply advise, to buy i filter, they should be cheap enough, but it depend on how big are your optional fans and how many they are or if you are just using a tube(from which the air goes outside with a big ventilator) to keep the room cool, you could apply a filter there
Every filter I tried is stopping the airflow and the ambient temperature gets higher. I am using tubes. Can you recommend a nice filter? how big is that yellow dust thing? the particles should not be that big, you need a right filter with the right measure of the its holes, without knowing the size of those thing i can't suggest you much
|
|
|
it's a new exchange to me, it's better to deal with known exchange in any case, thos random exchange can reveal many bad surprise
if they don't respond after 26 days or start repeating the same crap you can be assured that your are facing some kind of scam
it's still strange because they site don't look that fishy....what bank they use btw?
|
|
|
On the other side, regulated and registered exchanges will be popping up soon, making it easier and safer for people to enter bitcoin through 'normal' channels. If that money comes in, it may become huge.
a lot people can already easily buy and sell bitcoin without problems. regulated exchanges won't make loads of people buy just because of it being regulated. it's a nice bonus. nothing more. not to mention that exchanges are dumping also, i doubt they keep the total bitcoin revenue just for the sake of waiting the next bubble, until the demand is not stronger than the supply the price will remain there
|
|
|
i was thinking that you should add a really cool faucet to attract more investiors, something that work with level, each level is equivalent to 100gh/s of hashpower
they start with free earning from the faucet, let's say the standard 1k every hour, then if they want to invest on the 100gh/s to raise the level of their miner(add a cool graphic that display an initial miner with level 1 then 2 ecc....)
they need to pay something like 0.16 or what is the current rate
Post this in the official thread in service announcements, interesting idea! you mean in the discussion thread?
|
|
|
bitcoin has a large growing standard. in the past few months bitcoin has developed gradually in the state of online marketing and shopping. bitcoin is earned by means of faucets , gambling , advertising etc... it is you who decide which method to choose and earn bitcoins.
You forgot the signature campaign that is a famous method and you can earn a lot and not have any risk, just avoid ponzi and scam . And you now when signature campaign is ponzi and scam just use your common sense. Scams and ponzi are more attractive than honnest sites with low sure profit. I have found more referrals for ponzi and scams last 3 Months than for my honnest site. But it is so already for years and it will not change ...it will never change. Both of them is always attract people to play it but the risk is really really higher that makes it impossible for us to get inside. Altough with some referal one day they will scam your money and run away and at the end you will lose all your money you can scam the scammers, if you know how to play safe and conservative, usually those guy don't run away at the first day the key is to re-invest your profit and nothing else, and it work almost always... this is why there will be always people who will jump on those train for others the simply temptation is greater than the lesson they have learned when they had lost money the last time I dont think we can play save in every ponzi because they will always run away no matter what, they are just waiting the good timing to run away and get all your money. You said that the first day they didnt run away because the investor only invest a little but how about at the first day someone invest 10 bitcoin I dont think the ponzi admin wont be provoked by it well this is your fault(the one that invest tons of coins is usually a little fish), i said that you should play with tem, but play safe, don't go big at start, invest little regain the principal and invest again, no ponzi can scam you in this way
|
|
|
what about a rts like age of empire that utilize bitcoin and altcoin as a resource system in-game, so instead of wood and gold you get bitcoin and altcoin, then your final income can be withdrawal only if you win the game
That's a nice idea, I would play the game if someone want to make it ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) we can use bitcoin as a primary resourse and litecoin or monero maybe as a second, it would promote the rts genre more, seeing how it is dying and i hate this, as i love RTS to death
|
|
|
if it is double the wait, then you need the diff to be the half of the current ones, to start with this, so half the hashpower need to be shut down This would of course be extensively tested on a testnet before going live. Will be a very smooth change if it were to happen!
Indeed. Something I forgot to ask though is: What if Bitcoin switches algo and it's not Sha-512? Will there be a problem then? it's always a problem related to the security of the network, when you change stuff like that and disrupt the current miners's paradise
|
|
|
what about a rts like age of empire that utilize bitcoin and altcoin as a resource system in-game, so instead of wood and gold you get bitcoin and altcoin, then your final income can be withdrawal only if you win the game
|
|
|
there is a weekly limit that increase the more you use their site, and start at 1k total, but this rule was from late 2014, i don't know if they changed it
|
|
|
I have recommended it to a few people and I did it when the price for 1 Bitcoin was 600+ and then it kept sinking and sinking and it gave them an impression that it's too unstable. I have a few colleagues who are using it but they're afraid to invest too much money into it because of volatility.
Also, all the scams, theft and companies running away don't help at all making a good impression.
then say to them that right now and from january, bitcoin is stable as fuck, it is the less volatile phase this, they can start and invest without worrying too much, now it's the time to invest not when the climb is almost done, like many did with the 1200 rally
|
|
|
Aww wth. I put .5 btc in today. Lets see what 4 months brings.. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) isn't this like entering a long investment ponzi? i can't see much of difference same chance of losing your money, it is not really advisable
|
|
|
they want to scare new investors like you from entering the bitcoin market, they probably hate it because they lost tons of money, and they don't want that to happen to somebody else, or their are delusional troll, not many reasons
|
|
|
It would be better if the bitcoin address is the email address. So I can send some bitcoins to 1CjPR7Z5ZSyWk6WtXvSFgkptmpoi4UM9BC or send an email to it.
how this can work without a specific domain? you mean an integrated email fuction in the client directly? it could work only in that case, without using third party
|
|
|
I see more of the same information, and I feel its the right direction.
The $100-160ish range should be on the spot, since the whole 2 years were around the same price.
it was even lower, if you don't take into account the mega pump of late 2013, then the initial price was around $90, before that storm happened, 200-300 was just an other peak of april 2013, it was not a decisive price...
|
|
|
|