Bitcoin Forum
June 29, 2024, 03:37:56 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 [807] 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 ... 934 »
16121  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Unconfirmed transaction for 3+ hours on: February 15, 2018, 07:54:39 AM
Your tranasction fee is to low 5 sat/B. I am not sure even now when there are not many transactions in the memory pool that you can get by this low fee tho.

Why don't you try free accelelator? I have used viabtc as free service in the past when I needed to boost up my transaction, the only drawback is that you could end up trying multiple times until it lets you accelerate your transaction since as a free service many people are trying to push their transaction. Altgouh sadly you can not speed up your transaction as your fee is less than 0.0001BTC/KB and viabtc require you to put higher than 0.0001btc/kb fee.

Anyway here is the link if you ever need it in the future: https://pool.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/

The other thing is simply to try to do a duble spend by putting higher fee 2nd time sadly not many wallets will allow you to do this or paid service should get your transaction confirmed.

Good luck.

We tried it but unfortunately they don't accelerate them anymore, you will get an error message "Transaction fee is too low" and since the no. of unconfirmed transactions has risen we were worried and preferred to try the accelerator which has worked - it might have remained unconfirmed if it was without it!


They still work, they just have a minimum threshold of 10 sats/byte fee for acceleration, which yours didn't meet. Hopefully by now, you've learnt from the many replies on the forum how to ensure your tx gets the fee it deserves! Especially if you intend to use Bitcoin for your site's business. Though again, I still think that 5sats/byte fee would have confirmed in a few more hours if you'd just waited...
16122  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Europa League/Champions League Lounge on: February 14, 2018, 10:19:19 PM
I watched Real vs. PSG and must say that it was really well spent 2 hours. Real proved that in spite some bad results in Primera they are still one of the best teams in Europe when stakes are high enough. PSG has a lot of great individuals but they are not a team.

What happened in other match? Did Liverpool played that well or Porto didn't show this evening?

Well, it does seem like my luck's sitting pretty at the Last 16 so far, 3 bets and 3 wins, although I almost bet a draw for PSG/RM, good thing I didn't. Liverpool handicap would have taken more winnings but I'm very happy with a ML @2.24. Seems like Liverpool's average of 4 goals per away game at CL is going to stay for a while more, can't see them conceding 5 goals at Anfield, so they might even have a chance to give some of the other boys a European night next leg.

My thoughts, can't have a better result: for once, a decent return of goals, 6 shots on target, 5 goals; a clean sheet; no injuries; no yellow cards. Sadio Mane returns to scoring form with a bleeding hattrick, and of course all frontmen got on the scoresheet. Finally outscored PSG in Europe. What else can I think of? Marvelous game, a joy to watch.

What happened? Liverpool did get a bit lucky for the first goal, but credit to Lovren for the intercept that started it all. Porto tried to attack, and rested Casillas... bad choice they'll be regretting all year.
16123  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Other Decent Bitcoin Forums? on: February 14, 2018, 08:05:38 PM
In my opinion, it doesn't get any better than this forum if you want the widest possible access to a huge range of topics and discussions on Bitcoin. The local boards are also helpful, if they happen to support your country/language.

I've been to the other forums mentioned above, nothing's made me stay like this one has (although I actually only returned here after two years and losing my original account). Here's another link from the Bitcoin wiki: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Forums
If you actually still like IRC, on freenode there are a few channels... not only are they generally spam free, they're very quiet when I visit =p

I might add that the Bitcoin and crypto sections on Quora are really picking up... spam seems more controlled there, and you get a really different crop of people.
16124  Economy / Speculation / Re: McAfee Speculation Thread on: February 14, 2018, 07:00:12 PM
Let's the focus on the other thing McAfee said for a change.  Eating his d*ck on national TV.  Lol.  It would be great to have him here in BCT, among the low lifes, and interact with us.  Grin
Do you guys think he'll come by if someone reaches out to him on Twitter or something?  I heard he's game.


You know what, I actually think that's a good idea, or a fun one at any rate. I mean, he'd love an audience, and he might learn a thing or two from people here, I know I have! It's nice to see you think we're all low lifes =p

Come to think of it, would be curious to see other corporate types and "rebels" come here.

if you're willing to pay him then i'm pretty sure he'll turn up anywhere and any time and do anything.

i wonder if he's gonna snap out of his current insanity and return to being a yogi or whether he's on a downward slide into hell. things would certainly be very different if he cleaned up his act and stopped being insane.

i'm fascinated by him because he's a public figure who it's possible to compare against a time when he was not a violent paranoic.

Think if he realises he could gain even more fame from a signature campaign, he might dip his toes. And I like having crazies around. Makes the benchmark for sane that much higher.
16125  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Europa League/Champions League Lounge on: February 14, 2018, 04:20:32 PM
In my mind yesterday matches were just appetizers for a main meal today. Had some obligations so couldn't watch yesterday but I must say that I am very surprised to see Juve - Tott end in 2:2 draw. I thought this will be a match were teams will primarily watch not to concede, but early goals from Juve probably changed dynamic of the match.

Can't wait for Real-PSG to start. I will be playing both teams to score & over 2.5. There is not much to say about this tip. Everybody knows what kind of attack PSG has and the will score for sure today. For Real to have any chances of progression to next stage they have to score at least 2 goals today.

Same tip for Porto - Dortmund game. Both teams have strong attacking options and Liverpool away games have more 4 goals in them on average. Only concern for this tip is that Porto's best striker Aboubakar (sorry if I spelled it wrong) will probably miss this game.

You said it buddy! I did win both bets yesterday (simple over goals) but I didn't even get to watch them either... domestic activities required my undivided attention. But I'm going to retire from work early today and gobble some junk food while watching Liverpool. I really miss us being in Champions League past group stages, so it's really something extra special for me.

I did bank on Juve getting the early goal, and as predicted, the floodgates opened. Credit to Basel for trying but City isn't United;)

Definitely PSG-RM Over 2.5 is a great bet but odds are too low for me. Even over 3 it's at a mere @1.6 so I'm staying away from this match.

You accidentally said Dortmund btw, but Liverpool are not going to want to disappoint their away fans so I'm going for a Liverpool ML bet @2.24.
16126  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Unconfirmed transaction for 3+ hours on: February 14, 2018, 03:18:51 PM
Yeah, I wouldn't have paid! I was just about to say 5 sats/byte got me confirmed in 2 blocks but I see mempool steadily rising again (this means price is going up, in my experience haha). Fact, majority of txs right now are in the 1-10 sat/byte range, guess people all got in line for cheap fees.

Here's another free accelerator by antpool, you do need a mobile number to sign up for an account though: https://www.antpool.com/user/prioritiseTransaction.htm?m=savePrioritiseTx

Both Via and antpool's work when mempool's not bloated, though I haven't tested them in many months.
16127  Economy / Economics / Re: Bitcoin bull run begins now? on: February 14, 2018, 12:52:24 PM
I think it's still too early to talk about a bull run... The bitcoin is stabilizing today and it will make some more dump before really providing a solid base to get back on the rise.

Agree. A bull run may well be a bull trap, though I don't see anything that would count as a bull run at all in the first place. Right now we are in what should be called a minor reversal, and if we don't jump over $10,000, we may head southward. There are no good fundamentals for Bitcoin to rise now, but when it doesn't rise it falls, as simple as that. On the other hand, Litecoin seems to be getting a lot of attention these days with LitePay just around the corner.

I was kind of hoping Bitcoin would just stick around at the $8k mark for the rest of the month, after flailing around 6 and 7 for a while, but I suppose that's wishful thinking. I think now a lot of people would be wary of possible bull traps, although right now moving above 9k, I guess the smart's money on a retesting of 10k over this coming week. Like you said though, if the waves break over that barrier, then we'll likely be in for another reversal before Bitcoin can gather strength.

So far the January dump replayed itself, time to see if the coming Spring will be another season of renewal.
16128  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Countries with No Bitcoin Taxes on: February 14, 2018, 06:33:46 AM
Just thought I'd add this as I only found out recently, that for the Netherlands, Bitcoin is not considered a currency, just a medium of exchange. It (along with other cryptocurrency) itself is not taxed, much as you wouldn't tax anyone just for owning something that can be bartered. You can't even be charged VAT on them if you sell or trade them. Here's the official statement clarifying: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=170305&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=604646

But if you earn Bitcoin, whether for providing a service or product, then you owe tax as calculated on income. So this would definitely include mining, trading for specific purpose of gains and this also means that getting a salary in Bitcoin doesn't exempt you from income tax.

I cannot find all these details online (not the second bit), but this comes from a former judiciary official turned tax consultant.

16129  Economy / Economics / Re: Map of the internet in 1973, or why Bitcoin will be worth $millions on: February 13, 2018, 09:16:54 PM


That is it, the internet in all it's glory, dated as old as 1973. In this historic document, you can see the entire network in a piece of paper.

Back then most people would have said it would never scale, the idea of everyone on the planet connected to the internet was absurd. Similarly, assorted scammers and short sighted morons claim Bitcoin will never scale (as they sell you some shitcoin claiming that is the one that will scale in order to steal your hard earned BTC from you).

Just put things into perspective. This is a long term race. Bitcoin protocol is TCP/IP, secondary layers like LN are HTTPS. We will scale and and we will be all over the world. Beware of scammers claiming otherwise, specially when they sell you some altcoin.

A lot of other similarities actually! The media used to demonise the Internet too, saying it was a place where scammers, hackers, paedophiles and gamblers would hang out. Of course, it was probably quite true, judging from my own early experiences there, but hey, early adopters who weren't bad people weren't newsworthy.

It also reminds me of the very early people on Internet. You'd literally get people reaching out for helpful advice, technical docs, just to help a guy finding his way online - much like some of the very able users on this forum.

On scaling, Antonopoulos said in one of his lectures many years this was also a good comparison. The Internet has always been in lagging behind in scaling. And it still struggles behind the scenes... it's a perfect problem to have, if you think about it. Success breeds problems, and none come faster and stay longer than scaling!
16130  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Europa League/Champions League Lounge on: February 13, 2018, 06:59:25 PM
Juventus will be facing Tottenham tomorrow. The Bianconeri are in amazing run now they are going on 11 wins in row. I think the hosts will be trying to play it safe in the first leg they know that Tottenham have the potential to punish if you do not play careful so that's why Juventus will try not to concede first especially when their first leg will be played at home but they wouldn't settle for a goaless draw while Tottenham knows what they are in for Juventus reached the CL final twice in last three years so I think they will be also trying to get out with least of casualties so I expect an under 2.5 goals.
I agree with you with the bet of under 2.5 goals in this game , I think juventus is one of the best teams on defence even if they lost a master peace like Leonardo bonucci , but they still one of the most powerful teams in Europe , I think the old lady Will still manage to get the maximum points from this game for sure because they have a Strong desire of going far in this competition like last year , I predict a juventus win by 1 goal or 2 so the score will be 1-0 or 2-0 , you can also bet on clean sheet for Juve

Looks like I'm the one going against the grain. Got a bet riding on over 2 goals @1.95, Juvie's definitely got one goal in them, and I'm counting on Dele to show his usual European form to get at least one goal, if not an assist. If the goal comes within 30 mins, then I'll breathe easy. Spurs have been upsetting the big teams at Europe, much like Liverpool used to do. I have a feeling Champs League seems to be a sort of looked forward to by the Spurs and Liverpools who want to forget the pain of Premier League.

The City game doesn't have nice pickings... barely @1.6 for over 2.5 but Basel bookings -0.5 look pretty good @1.95. Am sure they'll want to attack while they're at home, but at the same time are sure to pick up a card or two more than the City slickers.

16131  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: The Blockchain Confirmations on: February 13, 2018, 02:52:06 PM
Isn’t it right that bitcoins transactions are only confirmed when a block is mined?

Normal bitcoin website explain it like this: "Roughly every ten minutes, a new block is created and added to the blockchain through the mining process. This block verifies and records any new transactions. The transactions are then said to have been confirmed by the Bitcoin network." So really how could the network confirm it, without new blocks?

So when we hit 21.000.000 and there are no blocks to mine, how will you transfer your bitcoin if it can’t be confirmed?

Quote from: buybitcoinworldwide.com/confirmations

Please share reliable sources when trying to help find a solution. Thank you!

The limit of 21 million refers to the units of Bitcoin that will ever be generated. Each new block found currently will generate new bitcoins, given as a reward to the miner that solved the block. Once these rewards dwindle... As the reward halves every 210k blocks, miners will still be incentivised through fees included with transactions. So there is always an incentive to mine.

Also, blocks don't necessarily mean your txs are confirmed. They only are when/if the miner solving the block includes yr tx in the block. They're free to choose from the pool of txs... And can even choose to mine an empty block (including no txs except for the coin base tx generating new coins) if they want.
16132  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: There is no FUD. There is only denial. on: February 13, 2018, 01:24:18 PM
"FUD" screams many in here - they are so afraid that negative news will further increase their losses on their Bitcoin "investment".

They desperately hope that by screaming "FUD" the price will magically be pumped again.

But what they call "FUD" is often just plain old truth and facts. And no amount of screaming will change reality.

Reality is that Bitcoin has proven beyond any doubt that it does not work as a currency.

You don't see the irony in talking about facts, reality and truth (they're not all the same things, by the way, possibly related but hardly necessarily correlating to each other!)... in a post completely devoid of facts. You can hate the guys who shout FUD as much as the guys who shout any of the terminology peppered across this forum, but if you're a player yourself, don't hate the game...

IMO, FUD specifically refers to spreading false information deliberately with malicious intent (or at the very least being willfully ignorant of readily available correct information).

Malicious intent is difficult to gauge so it's hard to say that FUD is definitely prominent, but the blanket statement that it doesn't exist at all seems very disingenuous.

While I don't tend to use the term myself, if I was ever going to refer to anything as "FUD" it would most likely be your posts, due to your willful ignorance of various obnective aspects of BTC.  If you look through your history of created threads, you'll find that some of your threads have been corrected by a variety of people, and you have repeatedly attempted to ignore or offhand their points.

Yeah, I think actual FUD is a lot more complex than the shouts of "scam" or "crash" or "bloodbath". You can spread panic easily with clickbait, but not the deep-lying fear and uncertainty that takes a lot of documenting to build. I also don't necessarily see that information is false or true... any data can be analysed into a number of various takes, positive, negative and neutral.

Take any data you want. Daily charts? The recent Congress hearing on crypto. A hundred analysts could come up with a hundred different possible interpretations. Not necessarily false (or true), just adjusted to the statement they want to make.

Few people take raw data and then form a statement from objective analysis. They already know what they want to believe, and seek validation in the data.
16133  Economy / Speculation / Re: what effect have the exchange registration closures had? on: February 13, 2018, 08:52:29 AM
as far as i can tell there are still quite a few exchanges where new users can't register, which considering it's been months for a few is a surprise, and then there are others such as bitfinex that did reopen but increased the minimum amount to $10,000 before new people could start to trade. this has been going on since slightly before the peak.

what effect do you think this had on the markets since december, if any? has a huge amount new blood been denied and subsequently stopped a pump or softened the dump or would their effects have been negligible?

as far as i know there's never been a period where so many newbies couldn't get in on the action.

I'm sure I'm not overestimating newcomers when I say that they can surely find a way around registering accounts at these exchanges. There's still quite a few options available for those who can't open new accounts at the "big players", and even a 5 second Google search will show these up. Even if the established P2P marketplaces like Localbitcoins aren't available in those countries (it's virtually everywhere though), there are plenty of others to try - yes, they may not seem as straightforward as Coinbase and the like (then again, you gotta jump through a lot more hoops there with verification anyway!) but if people can open and manage online bank accounts, it doesn't take much more to get their first crypto.

Worse come to worse, at least two of any of the markets listed on coinmarketcap are open for registration. So I don't really think there's a nett effect. New money isn't restricted, I don't think.
16134  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Premier League Prediction Thread (EPL) on: February 13, 2018, 08:19:58 AM
^ Aguero tho...  Wink

That guy could still end up with the golden boot if he keeps his form until the end of the season. 

Top three scorers in the EPL are:

Kane - 23 Goals
Salah - 22 Goals
Aguero - 21 Goals

I'm confident Aguero can make it on top by April. 

Aguero's actually improved every season in terms of goals per playing time, and that's ever since the season he scored that championship winning goal to help City beat United on goal difference (wow, was it really that long ago?), although that was the stats I recall seeing before Christmas, not sure how it looks like now. So yes, in terms of striker efficiency, he's right up there with Kane in being consistent (or improving) with every season that goes by.

In my opinion Kane is still above Salah in the pecking order just because of premier league history. He has been performing on high level multiple seasons while this is the first one for Salah.

Don't get me wrong, I love watching Salah play and terrorize opponent defenses but he has to keep that form for few seasons before he can be measured to Kane (remember Mahrez). Salah has tremendous speed and dribbling/trickery but still has to work a bit on his finishing. Furthermore, Liverpool is my favorite team so I am hoping for Mane to raise his form so we can watch Tremendous Three once again Smiley

Oh, no, no. I only pick Salah for my very obvious bias... I personally think it's incredible how Benitez (Torres), Rodgers (Suarez) and now Klopp (Firminho and Salah) have really brought out the very best in these players. I know it's not like we plucked all these guys out from obscurity, but Liverpool really did well to take on unfinished products and make them shine, so I'm very sure guys like Salah aren't a flash in the pan.

All due respect to Kane and even Aguero - they're massive players and it's still early days (even if Salah has the lowest mins per goal average, perhaps when defenders get used to him, he'll find it less easy to score... but then that's what they said about Suarez).
16135  Economy / Exchanges / Re: List of exchanges that accept Waves tokens? on: February 12, 2018, 10:30:28 PM
The easiest quick way for me to find the markets for any token is just to check coinmarketcap's token page> Markets tab. So for Waves: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/waves/#markets. If it's not on there, then the numbers aren't significant enough anyway.

As you can see, it looks pretty extensive, but of course as others point out, there's not much action going on outside of Tidex, which has got more than half of the Waves volume. The Waves DEX itself together runs up quite a bit of volume, and is slowly picking up. Yobit also as mentioned has a few pairs trading (released some months back along with Doge and LTC, if you can believe).

I'd recommend its own DEX if you want to get Waves, simplest and probably best priced.
16136  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Price stability-The end of trading between platforms on: February 12, 2018, 09:45:14 PM
Bitcoin was in my opinion never the best cryptocurrency for arbitrage trading. There are other cryptos with faster transactions and low fees. But as soon segwit transfers are the new standard, also little differences could be worth for beeing traded between exchangers.

It was the best because it had the highest volume and largest orderbooks. Sure, you see wild variances in other alts but a few BTC worth of orders would clean the slates at most of the small exchanges and dexs. Arbitrage of course works a lot better when markets are adjusting to the volatility of Bitcoin - sure, these recent weeks have seen it stabilise, but try have a peek during the next bear/bull - those variances will become larger.

It will be more difficult to arb trade now with regulations in place - the volumes of South Korean ones will now be closed off to foreigners, but you can always find people looking for a loophole (check out some of the offers for people looking to partner with locals there and on LCB, for example).
16137  Economy / Economics / Re: Thesis: Price determinants of Bitcoin on: February 12, 2018, 07:41:10 PM
No, I actually mean any sector that is related to information technologies, computer hardware and finance. Maybe take a look at startups in those sectors as well, although I'm not sure how much of this information is public.

As far as I know none of the American companies in this space are publicly traded yet. (Ignoring companies that simply put "Blockchain" in their name such as the Long Blockchain Corp FKA Long Island Iced Tea Corp and companies that so far only dabbled with permissioned blockchains such as JP Morgan. Come to think of it, maybe it does make sense to look at companies that only dabbled with blockchains after all.)

Other metrics that just came to my head:

1) Wallet downloads
2) Amount of visitors to Bitcoin related websites and exchanges (eg. using Alexa ranking)
3) Subscriptions to cryptocurrency related subreddits

Just throwing some ideas out there, not sure how much sense it will make for your work in practice.

I was just going to comment on this, but Heretik's post probably better explains the other variable I feel you need to take into account, which is "number of market users/players". The timelines you use, if you include 2017/18, will have a distinctly difference in terms of market makers/users. Cambridge is the only academic reference I know of (2017) that tried to put a number to unique Bitcoin users, but I daresay this number dwarfs those of previous periods/timelines. It's an important variable because the price swings in 2011 would be much easier to manipulate or be impacted by a handful of players (or even one major exchange) than it would be today where even the largest exchange can only do so little.

You can then apply the same reasoning to your other variables, if you believe they have influence: hashrate, etc.

And yes, please share. A lot of students come here looking for feedback, I always try to participate, but we seldom get anything back.
16138  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: bc1 can only receive from another Electrum? on: February 12, 2018, 07:24:28 PM
See here.

I read this weeks ago but I still don't get this part.

"receive from most other wallets and websites simply because they consider bech32 addresses as invalid."

If the wallet uses segwit-in-p2sh/P2SH-P2WPKH, they can understand bech32 address as valid?

This means that if you want to receive BTC to SegWit bech32 address you may have problem because some sites/wallets simply do not recognize that type of address.We hope that this will change with time,and in the meantime you can use segwit-in-p2sh address format in Electrum if you follow these instruction : Create SegWit BIP49 Wallet

For security reasons use iancoleman tool offline and on 100% clean PC to keep your seed safe.


Yeah, but I want to know if the wallet uses segwit-in-p2sh they can send to bc1 too.

For example, trezor and ledger uses address starting with 3(segwit-in-p2sh), they can send bitcoins to bc1 address?

Understand?

Short answer I'd say yes.

You're going to have to refer to the actual support documentation of your wallet for a definitive answer. From my understanding, even if the wallet integrates SegWit by use of P2SH, then they can still spend to bech32 addresses. So Trezor and Ledger are two such examples, they've integrated segwit but use "3" P2SH addresses for now. I've possibly seen transactions from p2sh to bech32 on blockchain too, but then it could be spends from Electrum or Core.

Safe answer, I'd say try a test spend. As everyone says above, Core and Electrum support native SegWit so have no issues spending to bech32 adds. Let us know if the test spend works? Would love to try myself cept I only use Electrum...
16139  Economy / Speculation / Re: Why the last dip makes me optimistic. on: February 12, 2018, 07:11:48 PM
Just a natural side effect of mainstream awareness - media's always been happy to cover Bitcoin, but I think the "mediasation" was apparent from November at least, thanks to the slew of regulation news beginning with Japan from April and them derivatives up in Chicago. So if we take your observation to have any meaning, it should be that the media hype during the peaking to make us pessimistic about price - as it turns out, we (you) would have been right then.

P.S. I think bubble means a lot of things, and can happen in cycles, just like real estate bubbles. They burst, and blow up again. I personally never took bubble to be a bad thing, yet another metric, yet another indication of maturity.
16140  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Request to all Bitcoin holders on: February 12, 2018, 05:18:10 PM
What can we do to help it get to that level?

Advocacy! If you're a member of site or service that uses Bitcoin, encourage them to quickly upgrade to Segwit wallets. The majority of sites are still on legacy addresses. You don't have to force anyone to do it, but if enough users ask about it or even just talk about it, you bet the service owners will think more about it. As I understand, most are putting it off because of huge backlogs and unmanageable inputs, but with the mempool so low right now, it's the perfect time to consolidate wallets and just make one big move to Segwit. One site starts, second follows... domino effect.
Pages: « 1 ... 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 [807] 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 ... 934 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!