Does your cto still owe Homero a handjob?
|
|
|
Mullick, are you/Cryptsy aware that Garza has been dumping hundreds of thousands of xpy on your exchange? And more importantly do you care?
We have filed all the paperwork we are legally required to about such transactions. It would be illegal for us to stop them And yes we care. Which is why we wanted to stop at least one prime node from dumping its coins Im not the person to talk to about those type of legal matters though. Thats another department It wouldn't be illegal to just take the fucking coin off the market. You guys are like a Rite Aid rationalizing selling meth over the counter because it's suddenly legal. You know it's bad for everyone involved, but hey, it's legal. Who cares if the people buying it are cashing in their children's college funds and believing that it's going to give them the ability to breathe underwater/fly? Exactly how far on the wrong side of this do you guys want to be? Delist the coin. There's no excuse for further trading it. You shouldn't list any coin where anyone involved with it is under investigation, first and foremost. You're acting as a direct conduit from scam to payout. Stop. Doing. That. Help me out here who is under investigation that is involved with XPY? LOL It's a serious question. Bitcoin startup GAW Miners reportedly under SEC investigationJan 20, 2015 The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has opened an investigation of GAW Miners and its CEO Josh Garza, according to CoinFire, a Bitcoin news site, which on Tuesday cited “1,000 pages of a [leaked] investigation file." GAW was first introduced to the Bitcoin public around a year ago, and first came about re-selling Bitcoin mining rigs. Later, the company shifted to cloud-based mining, and more recently, it introduced its own altcoin, dubbed “Paycoin.” GAW also runs its own cloud-based wallet service (Paybase), its own cloud-based mining service (ZenMiner) and its own online discussion board (HashTalk). For months, there has been active speculation amongst the Bitcoin community that GAW may be a scam, or at least could be engaged in illegal behavior.... http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/01/20/bitcoin-startup-gaw-miners-reportedly-under-sec-investigationOld news is old, how soon will they arrest him? Old news is old. 2-3 more years based on general timelines. Now show me where GAW Miners or Josh Garza own any prime controllers or PayCoin. Unless you define involved as some guy on the internet who can't let go? EDIT: You cited a source that cited coinfire. Why not just cite the two subpoenas? We got a truther up in here
|
|
|
How many jonahs worked for Homero?
|
|
|
So what are the bankruptcy laws like from where you're from?
|
|
|
Maybe it's just me being slow, but I find this bit of information important: Marshall Long is the CTO of Cryptsy
Mr. Long was featured in those leaked e-mails in extensive communications with Mr. Garza about Paycoin development. I believe his nickname was "pumpkin". He supplied a developer (named Brad - Cryptsy employee by any chance?) to Mr. Garza. If that's all true it kind of puts Cryptsy's position in a very different light. Good luck convincing the "community" that it's for their own good. I would think that this kind of prior involvement should be preemptively made public and addressed appropriately. Or if it's not true it still needs to be addressed. Haven't seen any of that so far, just a lot of posturing. Wasn't he on Reddit trying to explain things away? And acting like an idiot?
|
|
|
Everybody's hands are in Homeros cookie jar and the muggles keep filling it up. Gawtards are now competing on who gets to steal their money. Best bid wins, boys!
|
|
|
The first I heard of Cryptsy's ownership of a prime controller was on the google meetup.... and, at the time, I kind of wondered if that was a slip of the tongue...
Did Cryptsy actually publicly announce this acquisition before the google meetup? Can someone post a link to that?
This is a great question. Where exactly is (Cryptsys Cryptsy's Cryptsys') release about getting a Prime Controller? Did the party releasing this information have explicit permission to release the information first? Did Cryptsy ever intend for this information to go public? If not why were they trying to hide it? Elon was surely at the meeting, he meets up with Homero to get advice and patents.
|
|
|
Using mycelium entropy would be really cool
|
|
|
Do we know if Homero is on okcupid?
|
|
|
It would also explain why Stu would take this dumbtard muggle under his wing and engage in all of these crazy schemes with him.
Exactly what I was thinking, bravo. Seriously, how in the fuck would Stu and Josh even meet, much less end up doing business together? Supposedly Jessica is stus daughter but I doubt it, she looks like a muggle It makes more sense that Homero is stus bastard child
|
|
|
Primenode key is correct for activating a prime controller Primenode rate for staking is 100
|
|
|
Sure where do you want it?
|
|
|
Just had a meeting with Satoshi and he thanked me for fixing Bitcoin. He just traded all his Bitcoin for paycoin. - Homero
|
|
|
MrCEO aka HashKing
|
|
|
people in HT like an idiot and a fool they make ridiculous thread like trash stupid ..... stupid .... once they The world already knows paycoin is SCAME
Scame? He's from Indonesia asswipe. And still knows more English than Homero
|
|
|
It's sad when you have to convince a company not to be complicit in fraud
|
|
|
Isn't the key way too long to be for an address?
This is a good point and I would need to look into the code now to confirm or deny this. Good possible that you will only see a fraction of the wallet balance after importing the priv keys.
According to research someone (Daffy?) did a while ago the PC keys are not XPY addresses. They are private keys supplied to the wallet daemon via command line or config file and allow any address in that wallet to stake at the higher rate. That's all. No minimum balance requirement or anything like that. So the key is a secret identifier like an ID string not a wallet address? It should be used to sign a staked block to enable larger rates
|
|
|
|