Bitcoin Forum
July 01, 2024, 12:17:09 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 [815] 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 ... 903 »
16281  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is BFL using BitPay for money laundering purposes good for advancing Bitcoin? on: October 31, 2014, 03:32:44 AM
Why is nobody paying any attention to this? This could be VERY bad for the bitcoin economy if Bitpay was aware that BFL was using them as an exchange. Am I the only one who realizes what the OP has discovered?

You give BitPay BTC and you get cash. 

You can't judge stolen BTC or it fucks shit up.  Not accepting stolen cash is a felony in the USA I believe.

Be mad at BFL not BP.

Basically, I can reply to both your welcome posts at the same time.

Even though I don't like the alternative, I'm working under the assumption that BitPay may have been unaware of BFL's practice, albeit it'd been hard to miss.

I'm claiming that the BTC that BFL quasi-stolen from its customers were converted to fiat and deposited in some bank using BitPay as its own personal exchange, and not as a payment provider that BitPay only is.

I hate to say it, but Sonny Vleisides, Jeff Ownby and Josh Zerlan, et al., have opened up a can of worms that shouldn't have been sealed in the first place.

Suffice to say, I'm been privy to a myriad of information, and I'm hear to tell you it's a lot worse than you can imagine and what I'm all allowed to say at this time.  Cry Cry Cry

#ASKFTC
16282  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is BFL using BitPay for money laundering purposes good for advancing Bitcoin? on: October 31, 2014, 03:19:37 AM
this is possible hard to tell

Really? Even after it's shown that the https://blockchain.info/address/1QAHVyRzkmD4j1pU5W89htZ3c6D6E7iWDs BWA was virtually totally funded via blocks found on the block chain and paid out accordingly from BFL's (formally Josh Zerlan's) EclipseMC (EMC) pool? On top on that, Josh has yet to call me a liar even after the dozens of times I've espouse such fact, something he's always done in the past when he believed in his mind such was warranted.




Lemme see if I can put this post in words.  You've identified that the infamous 1QAH paid to a wallet known to belong to Eligius (i.e., Luke Jr.) an even 100 BTC, which, given the latter's known programming work for BFL, can be inferred to be compensation for work.  That re-establishes that 1QAH was controlled by BFL.  

Around two hours later, that 100 BTC, plus an additional 11, were transferred out of some wallets of unknown ownership, with 100, matching the payment to Eligius, going to ("repaying") 1QAH, and the rest going to another wallet of unknown ownership.  One could then infer that those three wallets were also controlled by BFL.

You also note that these transfers occurred after business hours, which may or may not be significant, if this were a transaction involving a programmer.

That about sums it up. But, if I'm incorrect, Josh will be here to call me out a liar and offer up proof depicting how I'm mistaken.

Also, it looks like most all the BTC that the 1QAH BWA garnered stemmed directly from the EMC pool as shown in the following:

http://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0dd32fc1a663150a
http://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0dd32fc1a663150a?page=2
http://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0dd32fc1a663150a?page=3
http://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0dd32fc1a663150a?page=4
http://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0dd32fc1a663150a?page=5

Then, BFL was using BitPay to liquidate the BTC to fiat, treating them as an exchange oppose to ONLY as a payment processor.

#ASKFTC



I'll tell you what! Thanks to Josh showing us how the game is played, as well as sharing with us the rules, this sure the hell is a fun sport... And glad I'm on the winning team.
16283  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is BFL using BitPay for money laundering purposes good for advancing Bitcoin? on: October 31, 2014, 03:10:49 AM
IRS has been informed about these transaction? This seems to be worse for Bitpay if they were operating as an exchange without a license to do so. Bitpay seems they were doing  BFL a special service doesn't it? Legally what US laws were broken by Bitpay and BFL?

Besides money laundering on BFL's part, I haven't a clue, but I don't think it's legal for one entity - BF Labs Inc. - to pretend that another entity - HashTrade - sent the first entity a million dollars for its upcoming line of bitcoin miners, then even go out of its way to declare the following: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/10/prweb11283333.htm

Quote
This is a major endorsement of Butterfly Labs' technology and ability to deliver, from one of the industry's most significant players."Butterfly's technology is robust and reliable and our relationship is very strong,” said Greg Bachrach, Co-Founder and CEO of HashTrade. “Having worked with their equipment now for some time, we are confident of Butterfly Labs' ability to deliver based on their multi-generational experience designing, producing and delivering high performance mining equipment. Because of this we feel that Butterfly Labs is one of the only institutional hardware vendors uniquely positioned to deliver exactly what they advertise."

I don't know the legalese term for such practice, but I sure the hell know that it's illegal. And so does/will the FTC and whatever other three-letter agency who reads this post/thread.

Many millions were sent to BFL due to that one endorsement (the PR picked up by dozens of other periodicals) by working folks who are now entangled in the FTC lawsuit. Yet, HashTrade, NimbusMining, Netsolus and LiquidBits have yet to file their lawsuits to get their supposedly tens of millions back for non-delivery of Monarchs, but recall that LiquidBits filed as quick as possible to try to get their $6M USD back from HashFast (not HashTrade, to clarify).

#ASKFTC

PS: Now, I ask one more time: Where's the fuckin' media that has reported on much lesser Bitcoin-related issues? Fuck, I can't even get the Reddit actors to comment: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2kqqyu/is_bfl_using_bitpay_for_money_laundering_purposes/ It's like it's some taboo subject like 'who is Satoshi' or something akin.
16284  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: How much does one earn with a mining pool`? on: October 31, 2014, 02:12:28 AM
Maybe i wanna start a mining pool,
and do you know any good services,hosting provider?
and how much to earn daily?

Here's an address that does pretty good: https://blockchain.info/address/1QAHVyRzkmD4j1pU5W89htZ3c6D6E7iWDs Also, when you reach a certain amount you can have BitPay convert your BTC to fiat deposited directly into your bank account like BFL did all the way up to the day before they were raided by the #ASKFTC. And, if you're on probation, request Courtney N. Piece to be your probation officer, for you'll be able to get away with a myriad of shit like Sonny Vleisides has.
16285  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is BFL using BitPay for money laundering purposes good for advancing Bitcoin? on: October 31, 2014, 01:21:26 AM
This is weird! According to this transaction, BitPay is using BitStamp to ??: https://blockchain.info/tx/baaa36348f7228ec46570ead17f764af133dd5a7cd07c67dd14e31124017ec2f

http://www.walletexplorer.com/address/1L7T67j4um5BTFpzvyqd3ShqEBDruZnEW4 ---> http://www.walletexplorer.com/address/15QTGigFgnMpqcg5tQwBszQ94me98ZTVkr
16286  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is BFL using BitPay for money laundering purposes good for advancing Bitcoin? on: October 31, 2014, 12:43:12 AM
http://www.walletexplorer.com/txid/45d41f9297ebfbb0d840b47698698d0b3499b35ce109e55093477ffd97a49763



More proof that the QAHVyRzkmD4j1pU5W89htZ3c6D6E7iWDs BWA doesn't belong to HashTrade but to BFL, for I can now easily site a myriad, as in dozens, such transactions stemming from said and similar BWAs verified to belong to BFL paying Luke Jr. for various services. In fact, if you note the date of the transaction you'll realize that HashTrade had yet to create a web presence as witnessed here: http://web.archive.org/web/20130401000000*/http://hashtrade.com

#ASKFTC
16287  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is BFL using BitPay for money laundering purposes good for advancing Bitcoin? on: October 31, 2014, 12:12:02 AM
How do you link that transfer to BFL?

BFL used BitPay to liquidate a million dollars worth of BTC stemming from who knows where, also opting to get their buds, HashTrade, into the act by having them claim that said bogus transaction came from them for the purchase of Monarch bitcoin miners, now getting BitPay caught up in their con actions. Two days later, BFL had a million dollars in their bank account, and that's if BFL used their business account to do such, otherwise Sonny Vleisides and Jeff Ownby split the booty, after giving Josh and Nasser their cuts of course.

The above is fact and breaking news, but for the life of me I don't understand why Matthew N. Wright's Bitcoin Magazine doesn't pen an article around it.

#ASKFTC
16288  Economy / Securities / Re: [Interest check] publicly traded bitcoin company IPO %100 transparent on: October 30, 2014, 06:24:24 AM
So, there's this guy who wants to IPO/ICO something he doesn't have yet, and I know this guy who has something that may be seeking an ICO: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=763364.0
16289  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: How to create an exchange like crypsy or bittrex? on: October 30, 2014, 05:12:25 AM
I talked to these guys at the Chicago conference: http://www.modulusglobal.com/

They mention a ~$20K package would do the trick. What's everybody else's assessment?
16290  Other / Off-topic / Re: What really happened to Phinnaeus Gage on June 17, 2014 @ 05:34:23 PM.... on: October 30, 2014, 02:31:05 AM
I just received a PM from one of the main devs and they told me that Phinnaeus Gage was actually the one telling Andreas Antonopoulos what to say to the Canadien Senators through that white earbud Andreas had on at the hearing. They also said that Andreas has been Phinnaeus Gage's sock puppet for some time now.

If my brother were still alive, I believe he would link this here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=816296.msg9374172#msg9374172

Looks like the Canadiens have a motive as well. Good catch on those last names. I bet Phinnaeus Gage would have been all over that also. And you know he wouldn't be able to keep quiet on info like that.

Yep! So true. Me and the family went to a séance and he spoke to us there, providing a link to share on the forum that he so loved: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2kqqyu/is_bfl_using_bitpay_for_money_laundering_purposes/

Bruno is dead?Huh WTF?Huh

But his spirit lives on.

We can't believe all of the MyFreeCams girls that came to the funeral and wept. And, about a dozen goats.
16291  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is BFL using BitPay for money laundering purposes good for advancing Bitcoin? on: October 30, 2014, 02:21:23 AM
This should get the media and #ASKFTC attentions: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2kqqyu/is_bfl_using_bitpay_for_money_laundering_purposes/
16292  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is BFL using BitPay for money laundering purposes good for advancing Bitcoin? on: October 30, 2014, 02:05:29 AM
Whats the fraud again? That they have sold stolen BTC via BitPay?

BFL is using BitPay as an exchange to convert their BTC to fiat and deposited into their bank oppose to only using them as a payment service provider of which that is all BitPay is, again, not an exchange.

You can't do! I can't do it! Yet, BFL has converted millions via BitPay. I just found three other BFL BWAs that have used BitPay to convert their BTC to fiat. BFL has been sooooo NAUGHTY!

Where's the fuckin' media on this?

#ASKFTC
16293  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Is BFL using BitPay for money laundering purposes good for advancing Bitcoin? on: October 30, 2014, 01:26:39 AM
http://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0dd32fc1a663150a = http://www.walletexplorer.com/address/1QAHVyRzkmD4j1pU5W89htZ3c6D6E7iWDs





Looks to me like BF Labs Inc. (Butterfly Labs Inc./BFL) has been using BitPay as their own private exchange. Note the 5562.354 BTC that I highlighted. That was supposedly the $1M USD down payment from HashTrade that Josh Zerlan has NEVER called me out on as being a liar about, yet he's also been quick with that lizard tongue of his each time such in his mind was warranted.

BF Labs, Inc. Processes $1 Million Bitcoin Merchant Transaction for Institutional Bitcoin Mining Hardware Purchase

https://bitpay.com/legal

Quote
1. The Services

We are a Bitcoin payment processor—we enable you to accept Bitcoins as payment for goods or services, and process Bitcoin payments that you receive from your customers. We are not a Bitcoin exchange, Bitcoin wallet, or a place to purchase Bitcoin. By using the Services, you authorize us to receive, hold and disburse funds on your behalf and to take any and all actions that we think are necessary or desirable to provide the Services and to comply with applicable law.

Quote
10.2 Our Right to Close or Suspend Your Account

We may terminate these Terms and close your account, at our discretion, upon notice to you via email or phone communication. We may also suspend your access to the Services if we suspect that you have failed to comply with these Terms, pose an unacceptable fraud risk to us, or if you provide any false, incomplete, inaccurate or misleading information. We will not be liable to you for any losses that you incur in connection with our closure or suspension of your account.

Reads to me like BFL will no longer be using BitPay since I've personally - with no motherfuckin' help from the media - exposed this fraud.

#ASKFTC
16294  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I just paid the $100K USD via BTC to become a Platinum Member of TBF. on: October 29, 2014, 10:24:47 PM
To date, nary a Bitcoin-theme periodical has penned an exposé exposing that KnC did not indeed pay TBF $100K USD via BTC for their Platinum Membership.

Likewise, nary a Bitcoin-theme periodical has penned an exposé exposing HashTrade for not REALLY paying BFL that infamous million dollars via BitPay for a shitload of Monarchs in October, 2013. Is it because HashTrade and its sister companies, LiquidBits, NimbusMining, and Nitsolus, all under the auspices of Coinware, are all controlled by none other than the Jacobson brothers, Jean-Marc and Remy, who in turn control respectively the Canadian and Miami Bitcoin Embassies?

What gives, you news guys?

~Bruno Kucinskas
16295  Other / Off-topic / Re: Answer the question above with a question. on: October 29, 2014, 09:20:07 PM

Did you know she's known as the carrot queen? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUPLc3Tvuuc
16296  Other / Off-topic / Re: What really happened to Phinnaeus Gage on June 17, 2014 @ 05:34:23 PM.... on: October 29, 2014, 09:03:04 PM
I just received a PM from one of the main devs and they told me that Phinnaeus Gage was actually the one telling Andreas Antonopoulos what to say to the Canadien Senators through that white earbud Andreas had on at the hearing. They also said that Andreas has been Phinnaeus Gage's sock puppet for some time now.

If my brother were still alive, I believe he would link this here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=816296.msg9374172#msg9374172
16297  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Bitcoin advocates at Senate of Canada hearings: highlights and insight on: October 29, 2014, 09:02:00 PM
Surely, Senator Diane Bellemare isn't related to a Dominique M. Bellemare who's partners with Jean-Marc Jacobson in their CRÉDIT MUTUEL DE MONTRÉAL CMM INC. endeavor located in the same building as the Canadian Bitcoin Embassy, is she? https://opencorporates.com/officers/686259

At least Dominique isn't... Oh, wait!... He is: http://www.newswire.ca/en/story/1158467/government-of-canada-announces-appointment-of-social-security-tribunal-vice-chairpersons

Quote
OTTAWA, May 3, 2013 /CNW/ - The Honourable Diane Finley, Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development, today announced the appointment of Mr. David Wake, Mr. Dominique Bellemare and Ms. Margot Ballagh as Vice-Chairpersons of the new Social Security Tribunal (SST).

What a tangled web we weave: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=837883.msg9372154#msg9372154
16298  Other / Off-topic / Re: Answer the question above with a question. on: October 29, 2014, 07:19:12 PM
would anyone want to meet the man who cheated on his tomato?

Or, meet the woman obsessed with carrots?

16299  Other / Off-topic / Re: Proof that the Chinese truly do send satellites into orbit. on: October 29, 2014, 06:58:35 PM

You think? Surely, the Chinese wouldn't...
16300  Other / Off-topic / Re: Pope Francis declares evolution and Big Bang theory are real. on: October 29, 2014, 06:56:58 PM

"I say we go forward in time and coax the Pope into declaring that we are real."
Pages: « 1 ... 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 [815] 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 ... 903 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!