Technically speaking, FreeBitco.in is not a US based company and operates outside the jurisdiction of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This means that the SEC doesn't have regulatory authority over the platform.

Well, they don't actually need real money because they pay their campaigners with the share of their own made-up tokens. But what blows my mind is that these tokens have any value at all on exchanges. I haven't checked the trading volume though.

No, it doesn't.

If you've been banned, starting a new account isn't allowed, unless it's for the purpose of appealing your ban in the Meta section. And the "evil point fees" you're talking about are just for your IP address - because it was linked to a user that got banned permanently. Basically, you can pay to have your IP address cleared, but the ban on your user account still stands.

Check out rule number 25 in the Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ.

Here is my review of Coinslotty (Live Casino Edition).
(Part 1)

At first look, Coinslotty casino has a good-looking and modern website design and an intuitive user interface that's easy to use. They've got a ton of games, like slots, table games, live games, instant win section… So I spent a good chunk of time just checking out all the different options.


Sign-up Process:



The registration process was quick and easy. No surprises there. I needed only to fill in a few fields, including my email address, a password, my preferred nickname, and the currency I wanted to use. After completing this process, I received a welcome message and was able to proceed with depositing funds into my account.


Deposit:

Even though you choose a preferred cryptocurrency during registration, we can easily add any other supported currency to your casino wallet. I chose Bitcoin, but BCH, ETH, DOGE, LTC, USDT and XRP are also available.



However, the casino doesn't offer any other means of payment. You can only deposit or withdraw your funds using one of the cryptocurrencies listed above. The deposit process is straightforward. After I've chosen my desired currency and made a deposit, my funds were credited instantly to my account balance and I could start playing immediately, which is a great thing. It’s also worth mentioning that the casino offers a 100% welcome bonus up to $100 on your first deposit.


General Experience:

The website is very user-friendly. It's easy to navigate, and it doesn't take long to learn how everything works. I was impressed with the selection of games. There were plenty of slots, table games and video poker and roulette to choose from. The games themselves are clearly labeled so that you can tell what type of game each one is and from which provider. Each game I played were all very well-designed, with crisp graphics and smooth animations that made it easy to enjoy the experience.



Since my review should be based on Live Casino games, I will go into more detail about a few specific games in the second part of the review.

Customer support:

The customer support team is available 24/7 via live chat. You can also find answers to common questions in the site's FAQ section, or send an e-mail directly to customer support from the site.



So far, I haven't needed to reach out to customer support, but I'll update my review if that changes down the line.

Overall, Coinslotty casino has been awesome so far! I've had a great time playing on their platform. In the next part of my review, I want to talk about some specific games and list all the things I liked (or didn't like) about the casino. Stay tuned!

Ok, let's clear this up a bit. You claim that you lost everything from your computer, including the private key of your vanity BTC address on around January 30, 2020. However, you also claim that GabrielKiara account was hacked around June 14, 2018, which is a year and a half prior. I don't understand the connection between these two events. You had ample time to recover your account before the claimed loss of the private key.



That's a lie. You have repeatedly given advice to other members on how to recover their lost accounts using a staked address. ^{[reference: 1, 2, 3]}



So, you are admitting that you had the intention of buying accounts, but lied about actually buying one? And now, you expect us to blindly trust your word?  


And that's another lie. The first merit exchange between those accounts took place on January 27, 2018, with both accounts having the Member or Full Member rank at the time.

Proof:



source: web.archive.org (28 Nov 2017)



Your alt account GabrielKiara has been banned since July 6, 2019 and you are evading the ban by using other accounts. You haven't offered any credible proof of a hack. Additionally, I have easily challenged the explanations you have given so far with verifiable evidence.


If you truly wish to do so, it's best to stop lying to begin with.  

It's interesting that your accounts are frequently hacked. Have you not learned anything from your past mistakes? Also, can you think of any way to prove that your account was actually hacked before it was banned? You never mentioned it before today. Why didn't you try to recover it back then? You had staked BTC addresses for both your accounts.







I seriously doubt your claim, given that you have repeatedly expressed your intention to buy BTT accounts and have even openly admitted to doing so.

[Laku/Udah dapet] WTS Twitter & WTB Akun BTT Jr.Member-Member


google translated:

So, how many more accounts have you bought or farmed?


Yes, I checked the BPIP.org data as well. Not only did you evade the ban, but you also engaged in exchanging merits between your alt accounts.


https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?from=GabrielKiara&to=dhemasm


https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?from=dhemasm&to=GabrielKiara

That's true. However, I still think it's smart to take a closer look before jumping into such campaigns. I mean, the fact that the project highlights "Mining ecosystem built on the metaverse" and uses the name of a previously established project as its selling points are enough red flags for me. Personally, I would never promote or in any way participate in such a project. Unfortunately, many bounty hunters don't really do their research before signing up for these things, and then they complain afterwards.

What about GabrielKiara? Is that also one of your "old" accounts?

Our legend, the coach of all coaches, Miroslav Ćiro Blažević, passed away a day before his 88th birthday after a long battle with cancer. He will always be remembered as the man who initiated our journey with our golden generation and winning our first ever medal at the '98 World Cup in France.

Počivaj u miru, Ćiro! #RIP

According to the latest message from the Telegram group, token distribution was set to start on February 5th. It is now February 8th. I don't see what the problem is. Minor delays in token distribution by the team should not be a reason for alarm.


https://t.me/EgoldRewardCampaign/9667

Also, did you read the disclaimer at the end of the bounty campaign post? tranthidung specifically stated that he is not managing that campaign, and that all communication between the company and the participants will be done via email. Have you sent an email to the company?

FYI, such terms were never specified in your original agreement. Allow me to quote you:


So, you see, you ambiguously stated that "there is no such a service for free anywhere", without specifying its required features or that it must be an exact copy of yours. The word 'such' in this context is a pronoun used to describe a thing of a similar type or category as something previously mentioned.

As I see it, dkbit98 successfully proved that there is such a service for free after you accept the deal.  

Just in case you're not aware:
   
Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ

Anyway, I've left a negative trust rating on both of your accounts for attempting this childish little stunt in the first place.

Oh, wow! Another person in need of a million dollars! How original. Just to be clear, would you like Guyanese or Jamaican version? Because you know, it makes a huge difference.

Well, good luck with your millionaire dreams. Maybe try winning the lottery or finding a genie in a bottle.

Well, I can see where the "incoherent" part of the neutral tag on your profile is coming from.  

I understand that not everyone is proficient in English. However, it's fair to say that some members may find it challenging to read your posts and may have trouble deciphering your messages. This can be a common issue when using translation tools like Google Translate (I don't know if that's actually the case here, but that's what it looks like).

Keep in mind, while you may be a top-notch poster in your local community, that same level of recognition may not extend to the English section of the forum. If I were you, I'd definitely brush up on my English skills or check out some resources that can help me with better syntax and grammar in my posts.

Having multiple accounts is not an offense by itself on this forum. If you encounter a negative trust rating with such an explanation, it is a sign of misuse of the trust system. (I honestly didn't notice such trust ratings from DT members based on multiaccounting. Perhaps you have some example to show?)


People use multiple accounts on online forums for different reasons, and there is no one-size-fits-all explanation. Some use it to maintain anonymity, others to express varying opinions, and some just for the enjoyment of having multiple online identities. The motivations behind this usage can vary greatly from person to person.

Here is another example from the same individual.:


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5438315.msg61716675#msg61716675 [ archive ]

Not only is it obvious that he used ChatGPT to generate the text, the idiot even included the "Regenerate response" part, which further confirms this. 

Yes. The concept of 'provably fair' technology in gambling can be traced back to the rise of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology. When Bitcoin came around in 2009, it brought a new level of transparency and trust to financial transactions. And that's what got people thinking, "Hey, why not use this technology to make online gambling fair too?" This, in turn, inspired the idea of using cryptographic algorithms to ensure fairness in online gambling.


Your first sentence is logically flawed. Merely mentioning something does not necessarily make it a reliable fact to base a conclusion on. Also, I have to correct you on your second statement. While 'provably fair' technology may use similar methods to blockchain, like cryptography, it doesn't necessarily mean it requires blockchain to be considered valid. There are numerous examples of online casinos that have adopted 'provably fair' methods that don't involve blockchain or cryptocurrencies in any way.

Personally, I find the notion of having to constantly agree to lengthy terms and conditions and cookie notifications quite frustrating. It seems that every website or app is like, "Hey, check out these 10 pages of fine print before you use us." Who's got the time for that? The truth is, most people don't have the patience to read through all of these agreements, and as a result, they often click "accept" without truly understanding what they are agreeing to. This is a concerning issue as it raises questions about privacy, data protection, and informed consent. In my opinion, there needs to be a better solution that balances the need for legal protection with the rights and interests of the user.

4cryptobet ima slobodno mjesto za jednog Full Member+ člana.
Bit će plaćeno najmanje 5, a najviše 15 postova tjedno (od toga barem 5 mora biti u Gambling-u). Samo 3 lokalna posta se broje u tjednu kvotu.

Payouts & Positions:
Full members: $1.50 per post up to 15 posts each week

Thanks @PowerGlove for the charts, they really bring clarity to the game, especially in categories where second place is light years behind.



That means nothing. Apparently, there are even chicks with cocks these days (or so I've heard.)