Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 02:19:34 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 [83] 84 85 86 87 88 »
1641  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: The Sound of a Bitcoin on: November 30, 2011, 11:08:33 PM
Cool but I don't see any usefulness.

This did inspire me to make a vanity address that is my HAM callsign, though
1642  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Elliptic curve math question on: November 30, 2011, 10:25:04 PM
This is interesting.  Anything that reduces the amount of trust required is good IMO.
1643  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: [OpenSource] BitSafe, a safety deposit box for your bitcoins on: November 30, 2011, 12:52:27 AM
Have you seen rsnapshot?  It is a super simple way to do backups.  The only problem is that it doesn't have any sort of encryption.  maybe if you connected it with truecrypt, that could work.

In my searches, I also came across http://duplicity.nongnu.org/. I haven't used it yet, but it sounds like it would be easy to do encrypted and compressed backups.


EDIT: You really do have strict firewall rules!  I added some code to "tor-route-disable" to get bitcoind and namecoind to accept rpc commands.

Code:
#Allow loopback connections to bitcoind and namecoind
iptables -A INPUT -i lo -p tcp --dport 8332 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -i lo -p tcp --dport 9332 -j ACCEPT
1644  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: Request for an RPC capable fork of cgminer (120/145 BTC pledged so far) on: November 29, 2011, 09:46:12 PM
Glad to see this is coming along.  I guess plain sockets are okay instead of JSON since it isn't too difficult to parse.
1645  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: [OpenSource] BitSafe, a safety deposit box for your bitcoins on: November 29, 2011, 06:51:24 PM
Is there any chance you can include Truecrypt as part of the default install?    That'd be awesome Smiley
The persistent storage is already encrypted. How many times do you want to encrypt your wallet?
1646  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: New, simple online wallet: www.instawallet.org - no signup required on: November 29, 2011, 06:45:35 AM
I've setup a bookmark on my iPhone to use your site as a quick-and-easy wallet until a native app comes out.

Any chance of implementing a mobile-friendly theme?  jQuery Mobile is stable now and makes it really easy to make a pretty site for lots of smartphones.
1647  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: iOS Bitcoin Client on: November 29, 2011, 06:41:53 AM
Where are bitcoins illegal? That doesn't sound right..

They are just afraid that bitcoins will become illegal and just want to stay away.

https://instawallet.org/ is an easy web based wallet. It doesn't currently have a mobile version, but that's why you have a smartphone.
1648  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: [OpenSource] BitSafe, a safety deposit box for your bitcoins on: November 29, 2011, 01:45:02 AM
I ended up using the IMG instead of an ISO.

It took me a few steps to get it working on Mac with VirtualBox like I want it to.  (I don't have a machine that I want to boot from USB)

1. Convert the IMG to a VDI: VBoxManage convertfromraw -format VDI binary.img binary.vdi
2. Go into VirtualBox and create a VM with a harddrive w/e size you want (I chose 20GB, although it doesn't seem to be using all of it)
3. Clone the data on your new hd using:
VBoxManage clonehd –existing binary.vdi newhd.vdi
4. Launch VirtualBox and boot into the VM
5. sudo apt-get install gparted (not sure if this part matters)
6. make an EXT2 partition with label "live-rw" that fills the rest of the HD (not sure if this part matters)
7. Run the "Format Storage" tool.  This overrote my large image with a 1.86GB crypt-luks.

Is there anyway to make this encrypted storage larger? I am running both bitcoin and namecoin and need the storage to be larger.

How did you get bitcoin to use /storage/bitcoin instead of $HOME/.bitcoin?  I can't seem to find anything that sets that path, but I want to do the same for my namecoind. EDIT: aha! I found the wrapper scripts in src/chroot_local-includes/usr/bin/storage_wrappers/

I'll have some more pull requests up soon (mostly just fixing typos in docs and comments). I really like the notification scripts when anything happens.  Great work so far!

1649  Economy / Goods / Re: (pics) Physical Bitcoin Bills - For Real World Transactions - Printcoins.com on: November 29, 2011, 12:26:56 AM
I liked the idea of bitbills, but their site hasn't changed in a while.  I like this approach a little more since these could fit in a wallet just like paper cash.

I still don't like the idea of the manufacturer having the ability to know the private key, but there isn't a way around that.
1650  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: [OpenSource] BitSafe, a safety deposit box for your bitcoins on: November 28, 2011, 07:15:23 PM
I'm building an IMG now.  Wish me luck.

I noticed that tor was installing from the debian repos.  The Tor Project recommends that you use their repos to be sure you get updates ASAP.

https://www.torproject.org/docs/debian

I changed my build system's sources.list, but I've never worked with live-build before, so I'm not quite sure if I need to make a sources.list for live-build.
1651  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: On a decentralized bitcoin-based stock market... on: November 28, 2011, 07:00:16 AM
There isn't any reason why this project can't work along side GLBSE. In fact, I think that would help make it much more successful.

The genesis block for our chain could contain everything in GLBSE at whatever time we decide to launch.  When the chain gets launched, a new GLBSE back-end would also be launched that would use our chain instead of w/e database it is using right now.
1652  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Skycoin Client at www.skycoins.com on: November 26, 2011, 05:08:39 AM
This sounds completely unnecessary.  There are far too many useful projects being developed to put time into one that is literally only different in name.  At least you aren't making a fork of the chain, but I'm actually not sure if that makes your client any better.
1653  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: [OpenSource] BitSafe, a safety deposit box for your bitcoins on: November 26, 2011, 05:05:44 AM
Did you build the UPNP support?  I'm adding namecoin to my fork and want to keep it consistent.

How do I build an ISO instead of an IMG? I thought "lb config -b iso" would do it, but that doesn't seem to work. Sad
1654  Other / Off-topic / Re: Osiris - Serverless Anonymous forum on: November 25, 2011, 08:48:10 PM
I like this idea of this.  We should get a .bit name registered.
Or just use the Osiris client, since it's distributed and all. It's harder to visit a .bit than to use Osiris.
Well the client is great for desktops, but what about mobile devices?
1655  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [announce] Namecoin - a distributed naming system based on Bitcoin on: November 24, 2011, 08:56:00 PM
I'm discussing the hypothetical situation where the .bit namespace is allocated by ICANN to some registrar.
While I tend to agree it 'probably' won't happen - it's not so easy to evangelize a system based on such a fuzzy 'probably'.

If ICANN ever officially allocates .bit, then the namecoin network can switch to something else like .nmc.  That is why the name records are "d/blah" not "blah.bit."  I'm pretty sure I read a nice explanation of this on dot-bit.org, but now I can't find it.
1656  Other / Off-topic / Re: Osiris - Serverless Anonymous forum on: November 24, 2011, 07:51:36 PM
I like this idea of this.  We should get a .bit name registered.
1657  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: [Bounty] BIP 0011 on: November 22, 2011, 09:54:38 PM
The ability to have three party escrow would be so cool!
1658  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: MtGox: Green address option on: November 22, 2011, 09:53:08 PM
I really like the idea of green addresses.  Getting multiple large sites (MtGox and Installawallet) will definitely help us get code into the main client.

Having some sort of registry would be great.  Maybe we could use a variation of the namecoin personal namespace (dot-bit.org/Personal_Namespace) so that anyone can publish an address.  Then there would be some third party that could collect lists of the addresses that they are willing to trust by checking the namecoin blockchain.  Merchants could then get a list from a trusted third party and not have to worry about managing the list themselves.
1659  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Payment Address on Plastic "Credit Card" on: November 22, 2011, 04:52:46 PM
For all of your who are uploading your own design, I'd love to see them posted here in the forum.
My design that I submitted last week. (couldn't post because of the newbie restriction):
http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/9558/creditcardk.jpg
This is just an example and not the exact same as the one on the website.
The QR code is a different size. The font is different aswell. But the rest is the same.
That's really clean, and my favorite so far.
1660  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: Request for an RPC capable fork of cgminer (110 BTC pledged so far) on: November 22, 2011, 02:57:48 AM
The JSON RPC must have been designed by people who can't write software.
It's slow due to the ridiculous HTTP overhead it has and it's design looks like someone who wants to talk to a program, not provide information over an API.
Considering how simple it it to create a socket interface I wonder about the naivety of those who chose it for bitcoin.
Why does "slow" matter for an app like this? Do you need to send thousands of commands to your miners at once?

JSON RPC is also incredibly easy to implement in just about every language and platform, local or remote.  Socket api's are not as standardized across lots of projects.

What would you propose we use instead of JSON RPC? Now would be the time considering no code has been written yet.
Pages: « 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 [83] 84 85 86 87 88 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!