After all, I pay you in bitcoins for creating an account You only have to pay if your IP has collected Units of Evil already, and that doesn't mean you can't get banned again. So my guess is ban evasion: if one of your accounts is banned: YOU are banned as a person. Creating a new account isn't allowed (except for posting here in Meta to complain about your ban). I just report on my tweets and retweets to participate in the bounty! ~, which is the point of the forum Lol, no, spamming millions of links to social media is not the point of this forum. Because of the bans, I have already lost a lot of strength and nerves and my health is now not very satisfactory due to the fact that you neglect me The internet has an amazing power, apparently. Not long ago, you blocked my account again This confirms ban evasion. |
|
|
|
Assuming you probably weren’t even aware of these freebies yourself Theymos' address with 750 BTC (19XTo6BHpPHSkW5cm183VrgEYpGjVJmQEt) was not in the airdrop, so unless theymos didn't care about (the tax and administrative complications of) ~10 BTC, he didn't know about it. |
|
|
|
A tl;dr would be nice  Indeed! Or even better, and this goes for anybody: before making any deal, and before shaking hands on how the deal is going to be: make a summary, and then agree only to everything that's in the summary. Having a chat-log as "reference" complete with "chat language" makes it very difficult to find all the details, and also makes it very likely both parties have different expectations. DarkStar_ involved was in another case, it was about lending related. I will be coming up with it later in another topic. This isn't helpful either: when making an accusation, make a complete overview of all the details, keep it as short and complete as possible, and don't add irrelevant information. If DarkStar_ isn't related, don't mention him. What I got from the chatlogs is indeed slightly weird, but I still think all of this could have been prevented. i informed him that he should wait while my developer fix the issues of emails not delivering to some users especially Yahoomail users, OP replied to me, what does that have to do with an ANN I'm with Royse777 on this one. OP contacted and said he can make an ANN for me, that is true and yes i was ok with that, he explained to me everything and more, i agreed that i will hire him to make me an ANN, 2 days later he told me to check a link with some codes in them and view the ANN, seriously until now i have not even opened it to see what it looks like, we agreed on a price for 50$ that is true enough, but now what OP missed to inform you all was that i informed him that he should wait while my developer fix the issues of emails not delivering to some users especially Yahoomail users, OP replied to me, what does that have to do with an ANN, LOL, well this part i never noticed because i have been busy and my developer is yet to work as well but not known to me he made the post accusing me over 50$, which is ridiculous, he said i never kept my word but i have explained to him already that he should wait let me get the website email system working properly, and he said he has done the work, that i do not understand how a job is done if it is not LIVE, i cannot steal the code, in what way is it beneficial to me? And why it is more outrageous is the fact it's over 50$. I'm quoting this as an example of what I meant earlier: you post 1161 characters (917 excluding spaces), 245 words, and it's just one sentence. That makes it all TL;DR and very hard to read. For me i see miscommunication and that's that. I see that too, but like I said: this could have been prevented. |
|
|
|
Small update: I changed the file name for future updates: clubofabove1000.2019-12-01_Sun_12.35h.txt. You can still find weekly updates at http://loyce.club/Merit/tranthidung/?MDAnd: quoting myself: Updates should be uploaded automatically every Saturday morning (Amsterdam time). If anything fails (for instance if my Merit update wasn't ready yet, or if uploading fails), sent me a PM so I can check it. |
|
|
|
This is something that's long overdue: I will no longer post my updates in this thread. You can find weekly updates at http://loyce.club/Merit/tranthidung/?MDUpdates should be uploaded automatically every Saturday morning (Amsterdam time). If anything fails (for instance if my Merit update wasn't ready yet, or if uploading fails), sent me a PM so I can check it. ExampleThe last update would have been meritperdayandweek.2019-12-01_Sun_12.33h.txt. This file uses the same BBCode I used to post my updates. |
|
|
|
First: I've been wondering about this for a while now, and although I don't want to point fingers, I do like transparency so here it goes: What happened to the "dividend" from airdrops based on Bitcoin holdings? http://transition.obyte.org/ shows that treasurer address 1Eog8UqRFLufC71rBLt2nYgfUDskgxAyVF joined the Byteball airdrop with 500.00051 BTC (0.0771% share): -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
OOUIJTHWY5PANA7P2YUJX67VVN2QZYIX
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1Eog8UqRFLufC71rBLt2nYgfUDskgxAyVF
HMdUJW2FnsyZVJAoXhuLuYvt2Zqgdpt5o9xGCqIQqnMVOIyrzkY2ICiwGbAfeCXOiS6SDj/UvRRr+CvIo+zTQJQ=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- shows the GBYTE (now called OBYTE) received on address OOUIJTHWY5PANA7P2YUJX67VVN2QZYIX: on 09.07.2017 13:58:44, approximately 36.174 GBYTE was received. Out of this, 0.0625*500 = 31.25 GBYTE was thanks to forum funds. At the time, this was worth approximately 7 BTC. There were later airdrops too, and Stellar Lumens could have produced a similar amount based on Bitcoin holdings, but I don't think that data is publicly available. |
|
|
|
But you guys continue on with your witch hunt that after a year and a half has not done any favour to investors. If this is a witch hunt, that makes you the witch. The massive warnings on this forum made several of your latest scam-attempts fail, and stopped you from stealing much more than you did already. |
|
|
|
Should've created a separate blockchain for Merit distribution. Damn why didn't we think about that earlier... See: Merit ain't no immutable cryptocurrency! |
|
|
|
So I've just had a look at their payment page, and the smallest I can choose is 1 month. If I send less BTC than they are asking for, they will credit me with the time I've paid for, even if it's just a few hours like you say? Correct. I used it with BTC in the past when BTC was worth a lot less. Now, with BTC, the fees get you for very small transactions (and make the dust completely useless to the receiver). That's why I keep a few bucks worth of BCH in Electron in the VM I use for the VPN. I can't wait for them to start accepting LN I will potentially use this as a completely disposable VPN since their accounts require absolutely no personal details. That's what I do |
|
|
|
I posted my solution for LN > on-chain last week. The minimum is 1 m BTC, if you buy Dogecoin you can go as low as 1000 Doge. I don't mind keeping a small amount in a LN-wallet without owning the keys, and all this can be solved when exchanges start acceping LN deposits (people keep billions of dollars in exchanges anyway). Update: zigzag.io (which I haven't tried yet) has a lower minimum amount, but charges higher fees. |
|
|
|
I have decided that users need to be held accountable for their actions, so when they sign up for this campaign that clearly states sr member and higher only may join, they will be tagged with the below statement
Taking advantage of auto sign up for cryptotalk campaign, not reading rules and applying when they know they don't qualify.
How do you other DT members feel about this sort of tag? They are basically stealing from a site and know they are not allowed. Yes they get nuked from the campaign within a day but that hasn't deterred 50 of them from trying. I wouldn't do it myself. Unfortunately, almost nobody ever reads any rules, and people who don't qualify often apply for signature campaigns that exclude their rank. The fact that the auto sign up allows this is on Cryptotalk: they could easily check the rank or even signature before accepting the user. That could be coded in a few minutes. I have to ask: if the rank isn't checked, how do they determine who gets the higher payment per post? Would a Jr. Member be accepted too if he posts just an URL in his signature? That being said, I also don't mind getting rid of those: usually its throwaway accounts who haven't been active in awhile. If it's an account farmer who's just using all his old farmed accounts, it would be great if they can be linked together. |
|
|
|
Their first recommendation is Mullvad. Good to know: you can pay any amount with crypto, it doesn't have a be a full month. I sometimes buy a few hours access for a few cents in BCH. I regret to say that, unlike BTC, it's accepted without confirmation |
|
|
|
Actually this is what I get when I try with my userID ! The information on the 404-page is says is still correct: If you were looking for someone's Merit history, this means the user has not received any Merit yet. So basically I tried this to see if is there sMerits sent from my account for the time it was hacked, (lost for more than two years, just recovered on 28th November), I founded 141 sMerits, from 500 I think. Theymos based the sMerit airdrop on your account rank, and the Activity gained in the year preceding the introduction of the Merit system. For sure, the maximum sMerit was 400 (I received 200), so yours was most likely 141 from the start. So do that mean that the sMerits lost are goes just for not using them ? No, you have them all! You cannot see your merit history, because you hadn't received any merit until the last update. Merits history are updated once a week. As it shown in your merit summary, you have received two merits in the current week. So, you be able to see your received and sent merits in the next update. Correct. I don't do realtime tracking, only weekly updates, and Danydee's first Merit transaction happened after yesterday's Merit data dump. |
|
|
|
Those pages only get manual updates, and the current update is still running. So you were looking at the right place, I just don't have the time to fix it. |
|
|
|
LoyceV, you sure it's updating in every 3 minutes? Yes, see the time stamp on the top-right. Okay it's ascending order. It's working 😉 Correct, just like the forum. |
|
|
|
It's been (maybe) a month since I bumped this, so once again: The WO just keep scrolling edition: At NeuroticFish's request, I made this: All posts in the Wall Observer thread in the past 1h, 24h and 7dAll posts in the past 1 hour: WallObserver.tk/1h.html (updated every 3 minutes). All posts in the past 24 hours: WallObserver.tk (updated every 30 minutes). All posts in the past 7 days: WallObserver.tk/7d.html (updated every 2 hours). Domain WallObserver.tk expires a year from now, I'll see by then if anyone uses it. All times are set to Amsterdam time. Limitations: Images still go through Bitcointalk's image proxy, and they don't load when there are too many on one page. In Firefox a fix is to go to the URL-bar a few times, and press Enter. Just "Reload" doesn't help. I'm just leaving it here in case anyone things this is useful If not, please ignore it. |
|
|
|
Did the service work correctly on November 28-29? I see there are edited posts, but they did not get into the archive.
The question is quite serious since a scammer with Hero rank can avoid punishment.
I have 9995, 9998 and 9995 posts (out of 10000) around these days. That means I missed only 0.04% of all posts, and some of them were probably in topics that aren't publicly accessible. I'm currently running an update on members and topics, that should be enough to find back most posts. Can you share links to the posts that you can't find in my archive? |
|
|
|
Yes, BitPay sucks. But you can bypass their shit payment protocol which is only supported in a few wallets by using a tool like DeBitpay which decodes the payment URL and gets the address and amount, allowing you to make the transaction directly from any wallet. https://alexk111.github.io/DeBitpay/Although I have no reason to believe this site is untrusted: it can easily be abused by a phishing site that gives you the wrong Bitcoin address. BitPay introduces a new angle of attack by using this, and as far as I know it's only because they want to decide what fee the customer uses. BitPay's QR-codes are bad too: they use round dots instead of black squares, with a big Bitcoin logo in the middle, which makes them very hard to scan. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
I've actually no idea how to get coins out of this wallet into a standard bitcoin wallet!!?! I should probably investigate how to do that at some point... 
