Also note that most, if not all the accounts sold on this forum are hacked or created using falsified documents.
Do you have to verify your identity in order to get an SES account? If so, there is a rule that assumes the account is hacked unless the seller provides an explanation as to why they are not hacked. If this is the case, you should report the threads, and the accounts will get banned.
What about people who sell online banking accounts with other people docs?
What about people who sell gamling accounts with other people docs?
Neither of these are allowed, unless you can explain why the accounts are not hacked. |
|
|
|
Basically, my odds of dying from covid are 400 times higher than my odds of developing a blood cloth (and there's about a 50/50 chance of dying from a blood cloth). So my actual odds of dying of covid are about 800 times higher than my odds of dying of the vaccin. I like those odds.
The odds of dying from this particular type of blood clot is closer to 1/6 than 50/50. Your point remains true. |
|
|
|
A lot is saying the Vaccine is fake and an experiment.
A lot of saying that it will make you sick or you will just die few numbers of people I know personally said this and not on the internet.
I can tell you that the Covid vaccines are not fake. The vaccines may cause some minor side effects, but they vastly outweigh the alternative of potentially contracting covid. The vaccine will almost certainly not kill you.
I have received the first of two shots of the Pfizer vaccine and had some cold-like symptoms several hours after receiving the shot for about 12 hours or so. I would strongly argue that unless you have an unusual situation, you should get the vaccine when it is your turn. |
|
|
|
Floyd having 3x the lethal amount of drugs in his system is relevant....how would one expect someone to survive after having that level of fentanyl in his system? And we all know that the '3x the lethal amount' line does not take into account Flloyds size or tolerance and meanwhile you have multiple experts testifying that he did not die from an overdose. The medical examiner said that if it had not been for the video, he would have believed Floyd died from an overdose. I am not even sure why medical examiners are looking at anything other than the body when making these kinds of determinations. The medical examiner said "George Floyd did not die from drug overdose". I believe the comment you're referring to was the hypothetical "If we found Flloyds body at home, alone and in the same state, it would be ruled an overdose." But what happened was a cop sat on top of him for 10 minutes until he was dead and it was all caught on video from many angles. The physical evidence available to the medical examiner suggests that Floyd died from an overdose. The conclusion that Floyd died from having a knee on the back of his neck did not involve any information gained from examining Floyd's body -- it was entirely based on the video evidence. This is a concern because, well it is the medical examiner's job to examine the body. The question is not solely was Chauvin justified in putting his knee on Floyd's neck or shoulder for 9 minutes? The question is, did Chauvin putting his knee on Floyd's neck cause Floyd to die, or significantly contribute to Floyd's death? I think Chauvin was probably not justified in restraining Floyd to the extent that he was restrained for the amount of time he was restrained. However, I do believe that based on the toxicity report, and the fact that Floyd was having difficulty breathing prior to being put on the ground, Floyd likely died from something related to having excessive amounts of fentanyl in his system. I think the argument for a manslaughter charge might be more reasonable, but I don't think it is clear-cut that Chauvin is guilty of manslaughter. There is an argument that Chauvin should have administered aid to Floyd, and said argument would again be reasonable. |
|
|
|
else:
print("trying private private_Key = ", private_Key, file=f)
print("address = ",address, file=f)
continue I don't think this code snippet should be used. I don't see any point in logging private keys that are not a match if you are trying to brute force a private key. However, I do not recommend making this change. The computational speed of programs is limited by the time it takes to write I/O to a console or disk, and it has very high latency because you are making the same write() kernel call millions of times, and that's going to dominate and throttle the program speed.
Basically instead of iterating through billions of keys per second you will be printing and iterating through just thousands per second.
If I am not mistaken, the sdout on the terminal would quickly eat up available memory since the sdout is never flushed, so printing to the terminal IMO is not a good idea. Your concern would also be addressed if my above suggestion is implemented. |
|
|
|
Of all the defenses I've heard for Chauvin, I think these two are among the most insincere: If Floyd was saying he couldn't breathe prior to being put on the ground, a reasonable person might not give similar statements much weight when he is put on the ground We all know that "I can't breath" is what someone says when they're having trouble breathing or short of breath. Trying to discredit the victim as a liar because he said he couldn't breath but didn't turn blue and pass out and somehow justifying sitting on top of him while he's screaming it and until he's dead is just dumb. You are misrepresenting my argument. I am saying that Floyd was saying he couldn't breathe before Chauvin was doing anything that would possibly interfere with Floyd's breathing. This means one of two things, 1) some factor other than Chauvin was causing Floyd to be unable to breathe, or 2) Chauvin had a reasonable reason to believe Floyd was not actually unable to breathe when making these cries. Floyd having 3x the lethal amount of drugs in his system is relevant....how would one expect someone to survive after having that level of fentanyl in his system? And we all know that the '3x the lethal amount' line does not take into account Flloyds size or tolerance and meanwhile you have multiple experts testifying that he did not die from an overdose. The medical examiner said that if it had not been for the video, he would have believed Floyd died from an overdose. I am not even sure why medical examiners are looking at anything other than the body when making these kinds of determinations. |
|
|
|
Watching the video in May made me believe that Chauvin killedmurdered Floyd. However after additional information was made public, such as Floyd's drug levels in his system when he died, and his history of health problems, along with the fact that Floyd was saying that he cannot breathe while he was in the police car, and more recently, that Chauvin did not have his knee on Floyd's neck the entire ~9 minutes.
Except, as any rational person was trying to explain to you since the beginning, none of this "additional information" was relevant in reaching a verdict. I disagree. If Floyd was saying he couldn't breathe prior to being put on the ground, a reasonable person might not give similar statements much weight when he is put on the ground. Floyd having 3x the lethal amount of drugs in his system is relevant....how would one expect someone to survive after having that level of fentanyl in his system? Guilty on all counts? On to appeals.
I think the comments Waters made will have the verdict overturned. The prosecution will try the case again. Will he be convicted a second time? I don't know. And 10 hours of deliberations for a case like this? Really?
This probably means the jurors did not need much convincing to reach their verdict. This could have meant the evidence was strong enough that they were willing to convict. Or it could have meant they were afraid of the outcome if they did not return a guilty verdict. It also could have meant one or more of the jurors was implying they would out anyone who did not vote to convict. |
|
|
|
Chips.gg is legit casino , i won 60000$ yet i got after KYC they TRUSTED
Do you have a txid for the withdrawal? |
|
|
|
All in all after listening to everything? Should be an acquittal. There is reasonable doubt that is painted all over this case and almost an infinite number of holes the prosecution left on the table. But I'm not sure if the jury will agree.
It appears that even nutildah agrees with you. The fact that the video taken by the bystander was allowed to circulate and go viral last summer, while the police department did not release additional footage showing Chauvin's knee on Floyd's shoulder is probably grounds for an appeal if Chauvin is found guilty. Whoever made the decision to not release the additional footage is also probably guilty of the manslaughter of the dozens of people who died in the resulting riots. Who do you think should've stopped the video from circulating. And how? Think about the implications of citizens not being able to share footage of police. This wasn't some magical camera or edited footage. People saw what actually happened. The big tech companies routinely restrict the circulation of videos and posts. They can also attack a warning that it is misleading, or is lacking context. All in all after listening to everything? Should be an acquittal. There is reasonable doubt that is painted all over this case and almost an infinite number of holes the prosecution left on the table. But I'm not sure if the jury will agree.
It appears that even nutildah agrees with you. Not in the slightest. I wasn't at the trial, I'm not a juror; I accordingly and appropriately hold no convictions on the outcome of this case. If anything I think it has been blatantly apparent to millions since Day One that, at the very least, Chauvin was directly responsible for Floyd's death through his actions. I'm sure it was unintentional, but there's no sane reason to keep your knee on somebody's neck or even upper extremities for three and a half minutes after they took their last breath. Watching the video in May made me believe that Chauvin killedmurdered Floyd. However after additional information was made public, such as Floyd's drug levels in his system when he died, and his history of health problems, along with the fact that Floyd was saying that he cannot breathe while he was in the police car, and more recently, that Chauvin did not have his knee on Floyd's neck the entire ~9 minutes.
Imagine, Derek Chauvin convicted and Maxine Waters is Chauvin's get out of jail free card.
This is probably what Waters wants. Chauvin getting off would help Waters and her fellow Democrats push their talking points. There was a segment on Tucker Carlson Tonight last night that talked about Waters' decades-long history of promoting the use of mob violence.
The jury has reached a verdict, and it should be read in the next 10 minutes. Some are saying that such a quick verdict is not beneficial to the defense. I would expect riots regardless of the outcome. Edit: he was found guilty on all charges |
|
|
|
If I cannot find/recover the old programm file, I'm not able to recover with only a password?
You don't need the program file, but you do need the wallet file. I believe the naming convention is *.wallet With Multibit wallets, the password is only what amounts to the encryption key. |
|
|
|
|
A master thread that has a list of all scam accusations of casinos and the status of the threads would be a good idea. In order for google to give it a high ranking, many people would need to link to the thread, which should happen naturally over time if it is well maintained.
|
|
|
|
I think it would be okay for the thread to be in the bitcoin services sub as per the below: <>
14. All altcoin related discussion belong in the Alternate cryptocurrencies and its child boards. [3][4][e]
<>
14. This includes services, trades, discussion, speculation, mining and any other content related to altcoins. Trades that include an altcoin and Bitcoin is OK (except for an exchange between the two). For example, a thread named "Buying Bitcoins and Litecoins for bank transfer" can stay in the general boards.
<>
As a philosophical question, I am curious why you are only paying a portion of the payment in bitcoin. Was your intent to create/exploit a loophole in the rules to allow your thread to be in a more prominent section? Or is there some other reason? If it is the former, the admins may be reluctant to allow your thread to be moved back to the bitcoin sub. If we start to see more of these split payment type threads, it may be a good idea to implement a rule requiring a minimum percentage of payment be in bitcoin when the OP explicitly says payment will be in bitcoin + an altcoin.
Off Topic - I also want to point out that your "escrow" implementation is not actually protecting the campaign participants. If whoever is behind the campaign decides to not pay the participants, they would have the ability to do so. They would still lose out on the coin being held in the multisig address, but the participants would still be without payment. |
|
|
|
~
Don't do this. The person you attack can sue you for assault, and you will possibly be criminally liable for the same. Instead, you should contact the police or FBI who can investigate and pursue criminal charges against the person, if there is sufficient evidence. But can I just say that I was on fight or flight mode and that I was doing a self defence because that piece of shit made a hoax bomb threat, basically I am just trying to beat the shit out of this kind of people who wants to get clout even if it means getting to jail or terrorizing people. You can say what you want, but that will not stop you from getting convicted of assault criminally, nor will it stop you from loosing a civil case, IMO. You shouldn’t resort to violence in these situations. What you describe is not self defense. |
|
|
|
So if anyone of you click on that link: It's an obvious phishing link, I do hope that no one from this community has fallen for this trick. It is a phishing link, but it is not obvious to everyone. The domain is similar to the domain for the "real" celsius website, and a casual user who does not frequently visit their website may not notice the difference. |
|
|
|
If someone is making public bomb threat and I know that it is a hoax bomb threat, will I be pursued with legal actions if I beat the shit out of the person who made the fake bomb threat?
Don't do this. The person you attack can sue you for assault, and you will possibly be criminally liable for the same. Instead, you should contact the police or FBI who can investigate and pursue criminal charges against the person, if there is sufficient evidence. |
|
|
|
You can get more details at https://www.binance.com/en/support/articles/360034998492. You should know by now that such interest is too good to be true, and there is no way they can keep the service if they continuously pay such a ridiculous amount (even a ponzi is not that crazy). I would not say that the interest rates being offered by Binance are "too good to be true", however, I would say that "investing" with Binance is not without risk, and is high risk. Binance is taking their customers' deposits, and lending them out to other customers at a higher interest rate. Unlike with US banks, there is no FDIC insurance, so if Binance incurs too many losses from bad loans, they will be unable to repay all their deposit holders. |
|
|
|
The only part that isn't clear to me is the captcha, you don't need to solve a captcha for this task.
Yes you do: <tp-yt-paper-button id="button" class="style-scope ytd-button-renderer style-default size-default" role="button" tabindex="0" animated="" elevation="0" aria-disabled="false" aria-label="View email address"><!--css-build:shady--><yt-formatted-string id="text" class="style-scope ytd-button-renderer style-default size-default">View email address</yt-formatted-string></tp-yt-paper-button>
<yt-formatted-string id="text" class="style-scope ytd-button-renderer style-default size-default">View email address</yt-formatted-string>
You need to click this button to view the email address, and pressing this button requires a captcha to be solved. The page you queried has email addresses listed in the description. I don't think this is what he is looking for.
I can create a python script that meets your requirements and timeline. I would need an API key for your captcha solving service for development/testing. Work would not start until either I receive payment, or payment is being held in escrow. |
|
|
|
|
Do Doge addresses contain a checksum as bitcoin addresses do? If so, it shouldn't be necessary to worry about a single omitted address, as the transaction would be invalid if incorrect.
If you are concerned about an attacker creating a vanity address that matches the entire 1st page displayed on your Ledger device, remember that creating vanity addresses get exponentially more difficult with each additional character you want.
|
|
|
|
If not, you will have to go through each exchange's process for recovering your accounts if you have lost access to your email address. Expect to have to complete a lot of KYC. For each family member who cannot access their email, they will have to go to each exchange account they have and go through the exchange's process of recovering access to an account without access to the associated email address. Many exchanges will require KYC in such a scenario in order to verify ownership of the account. If the person has already completed KYC with the exchange, this is nothing more than an inconvenience. If they have not completed KYC, I see no reason why the exchange would need to verify the person's identity, as doing so would prove nothing to anyone. If I gave an exchange proof that I am "Phil Nolan", they might know who I am but would have no way to connecting that name to the account. IMO, any exchange should have the user sign a message from an address used to deposit coin to the exchange, or a receiving address a withdrawal was sent to, along with information about the user's "fingerprint" the exchange would have, such as ISP (or VPN provider), operating system, and browser type. |
|
|
|
Just to be clear, homicide in the medical sense is not homicide in the legal sense. I think the term "homicide" in a medical sense is a poor choice of words because it is often used by propagandists who conflate the two meanings. It would be more appropriate to describe these types of deaths as "caused by a person who is not the deceased". All in all after listening to everything? Should be an acquittal. There is reasonable doubt that is painted all over this case and almost an infinite number of holes the prosecution left on the table. But I'm not sure if the jury will agree.
It appears that even nutildah agrees with you. The fact that the video taken by the bystander was allowed to circulate and go viral last summer, while the police department did not release additional footage showing Chauvin's knee on Floyd's shoulder is probably grounds for an appeal if Chauvin is found guilty. Whoever made the decision to not release the additional footage is also probably guilty of the manslaughter of the dozens of people who died in the resulting riots. I thought it was usual to ask for an acquittal? People were saying that everybody expected it, that it was just procedural.
I think it is very common for the defense to ask for an acquittal after the prosecution rests their case.
I really don't know how the trial will turn out, but I am for due process. Trying to put myself in the shoes of the jurors, just for the exercise: on one hand, you don't want to sentence a man to prison if it turns out he didn't actually do anything wrong; on the other hand, you don't want to cause riots by letting a guilty man off scott-free. How do you handle the gray area between technically legal and common sense?
Something that is technically legal, is legal. Period. If you don't like it, change the law. Hold the politicians accountable. There are plenty of laws passed by Democrats they should be held accountable for. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
