I believe bryce weiner isn't a noob but for the record, ALL his other coins failed ..
To my opinion, there must be room for criticism and questions, even when there have been already asked or answered by someone.
Since bryce copied the code makes you wonder if his knowledge is sufficient enough to take the coin to the next level and not just hype it.
The anon function via tor does it really work? Or is it a work in progress?
As mentioned many times in this thread, the TOR implementation is there right off the bat. That is what gives this coin true value & huge potential. |
|
|
|
Hey guys,
Few quick questions,
Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?
Thanks,
"Is this the first coin to implement tor?" No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin "Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?" Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor. "What are its current issues?" Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be. And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community. Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin? So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school? Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own. It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game? , no need to resort to bets, name-calling or use your so-called Twitter "fame". I'm giving you an opportunity to make a public statement that this is a scam. You seem very sure. Why would you not view this as free money? Are you a coward? Just a troll? How about 5,000$ if 10 is too rich for you Just answer this: Why did Bryce called Neutrino a scam and then copied its code, call it his own and then launched his own coin? Why not work with the Neutrino Devs instead? Why is there no difference between the two codes at this moment? Why isn't Razorcoin showing any anonymity tests to prove it's working? Be mature and just answer the above. You've proven my point. You are a coward who is calling something a scam without facts you are sure of to back it up. Go away troll, you lose. Talking to yourself? Just answer the damm questions! "People are too lazy to do research. The answers are out there." There you go...  |
|
|
|
Hey guys,
Few quick questions,
Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?
Thanks,
"Is this the first coin to implement tor?" No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin "Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?" Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor. "What are its current issues?" Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be. And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community. Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin? So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school? Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own. It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game? , no need to resort to bets, name-calling or use your so-called Twitter "fame". I'm giving you an opportunity to make a public statement that this is a scam. You seem very sure. Why would you not view this as free money? Are you a coward? Just a troll? How about 5,000$ if 10 is too rich for you Just answer this: Why did Bryce called Neutrino a scam and then copied its code, call it his own and then launched his own coin? Why not work with the Neutrino Devs instead? Why is there no difference between the two codes at this moment? Why isn't Razorcoin showing any anonymity tests to prove it's working? Be mature and just answer the above. You've proven my point. You are a coward who is calling something a scam without facts you are sure of to back it up. Go away troll, you lose. Talking to yourself? Just answer the damm questions! |
|
|
|
Hey guys,
Few quick questions,
Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?
Thanks,
"Is this the first coin to implement tor?" No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin "Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?" Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor. "What are its current issues?" Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be. And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community. Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin? So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school? Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own. It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game? , no need to resort to bets, name-calling or use your so-called Twitter "fame". I'm giving you an opportunity to make a public statement that this is a scam. You seem very sure. Why would you not view this as free money? Are you a coward? Just a troll? How about 5,000$ if 10 is too rich for you Just answer this: Why did Bryce called Neutrino a scam and then copied its code, call it his own and then launched his own coin? Why not work with the Neutrino Devs instead? Why is there no difference between the two codes at this moment? Why isn't Razorcoin showing any anonymity tests to prove it's working? Be mature and just answer the above. I bet no one will ever answer this. |
|
|
|
Hey guys,
Few quick questions,
Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?
Thanks,
"Is this the first coin to implement tor?" No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin "Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?" Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor. "What are its current issues?" Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be. And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community. Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin? So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school? Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own. It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game? , no need to resort to bets, name-calling or use your so-called Twitter "fame". |
|
|
|
Hey guys,
Few quick questions,
Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?
Thanks,
"Is this the first coin to implement tor?" No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin "Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?" Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor. "What are its current issues?" Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be. And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community. Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin? So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school? Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own. It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO |
|
|
|
Hey guys,
Few quick questions,
Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?
Thanks,
"Is this the first coin to implement tor?" No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin "Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?" Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor. "What are its current issues?" Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be. And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community. Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin? |
|
|
|
Is the world going nuts? This dev claimed that this coin has anon feature using Tor network which we all know it is bullshit and nothing but a hyped coin and still a bunch of sheep herds come to pump this and Rush to exchanges like heading to a slaughterhouse.
There was no block explorer when this went live to Bittrex and if you people dont know, block explorers can be hacked to show false information. In some weeks from now this coin is going to be delisted from exchanges like many others did. So now any snake oil will do to get people to buy these coins?
People are too lazy to do research. The answers are out there. This is no fud. It's time to end the anon hype. Don't get caught in the anon train wreck! |
|
|
|
I wish the FUDsters would gtfo... seriously, why bother?
It makes them feel better since the train is already long gone aka they have small penises
I'll just sum up my warning..
Razor is a complete clone of Neutrino coin. Neutrino devs have a brilliant idea but chosen to do 99% premine. The Neutrino devs have public faces and are very skilled in what they do - developing new tech.
While Razorcoin is headed by Razortech which I suspect is a twist of Blocktech which is a company by Bryce Weiner. Bryce is mostly a miner and have little knowledge in coin development - though he hires devs. He also have many other coins to develop (Dirac, OpenSource Coins, etc)
If Razor coin begins to have problems, no one in Weiner's camp can fix it.
You've been warned |
|
|
|
|
Neutrino coin was experimental in nature. Who do you think will fix this clone coin when it bogs down? The Neutrino dev? LOL
|
|
|
|
What about this issue? RZR is a newbie investment trap amigo. All the facts are there , go ahead say its fud and prove me wrong  Hint : Scrypt * Hint * Old Algo Hint *Ninja launched after being mined heavily. DRK got forked and is crashing.
RZR is innovative and skyrocketing.
Guess who's going to be replaced on the coinmarketcap board?
yea this seems to be happening a lot lately with these "dark" coins... buyer beware as the old saying goes. it looks like the current marketcap is at 2.4M usd and it has been only out for a week so i doubt there is much room for this to explode upwards. wait until someone does something like x11 or cryptonotes using tor? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
