This is strange because I read in some article that exchange has been established since 2013 but the funny thing is that they are not registered in CMC because it should be if you have been able to enter CMC for a long time, just send it to support them repeatedly, maybe they will return your coin
but, the support team don't give any reply to me... I'm not familiar with them even it said that they are operating years ago already and I just heard about them just now. To get replied about your issue you can contact them via their social media accounts such their facebook page, twitter even on their telegram group. Saw their ANN thread, but I'm not sure if they will reply on the thread since the OP was so inactive. i trying in all social media... fb, telegram, twiter, discord.... I saw some threads and feedbacks that the service usually has critical customer service and over 2 months passed before some issue got resolved. So you should expect the same that they will act the same... You should not hurry on transferring funds. Should have done a little research, you'd not have been facing any problem. Accept it as a lesson hard learned and hope bluetrade would respond as they are the only one that could help. |
|
|
|
|
Lewis Hamilton wins the Formula 1 British Grand Prix again. He had a tough call with Valtteri Bottas from the Mercedes team.
This is going to be a great day for English people. Both Grand Prix and cricket world cup coming home.
|
|
|
|
England needs another 236 runs to win, with 48 overs and 10 wickets remaining. From this point, there is close to 100% probability of England winning the match, and the trophy. Only something stupid from their part can alter the result. My only concern is that both Jason Roy and Johnny Bairstow have started very cautiously... that's not needed. They should play in their natural style.
England are now in control of the match. They still have six wickets in had while they require slightly more than 6.5 runs per over. A quick successive wicket may change the momentum but Buttler and Stokes seems to be holding and rotating the strike well. Which is enough to make them win. |
|
|
|
Well, numbers are very clear.
From 20 grand slams, Federer won 12 until 2007, until Djokovic and Nadal have become serious competitors.
From 2007 until now Federer won 8 grand slams and Djokovic 15.
I think a real turn has occurred in the US Open semifinals 2011.
Federer had a great 2-0 lead in the sets but Djokovic returned and balanced on 2-2.
In the last set Federer again had great lead 5:3 and 40:15 on his service but lost this game.
I think Federer never recovered from that defeat and began to be afraid of Djokovic.
In the next five and a half years Federer won only 1 grand slam.
So, because of this history I think that Djokovic has a much greater chance of winning today.
Federer is a great player and he is not some who is afraid of Djokovic. No one can remain champion forever and I think Federer had a great career and now his age factor wont let him win all the tournaments. Yet, you cannot compare the class of Federer with Djokovic. Federer is vastly more experienced of the two. Well the competition is going tough at the moment. The game is in the fifth set and Djokovic just seems a bit more balanced than the Federer is. My bet for more than 4 sets yielded so does my expectation of an exciting match. |
|
|
|
By participating in a set of free poker tournaments, I learned how to play well so I could win most of the free courses
This is of course if you would like to play and play several times and take advantage of previous mistakes this gives you some kind of experience. This has made me look for the best gambling sites, Despite all the knowledge I have now I want more if you have an advantage I would like to know, Do not worry write down what you know.
As you get more amateur, you'd start meeting professional players so unlike any other gambling, learning never stops in poker. Anyone can learn the basics in a couple of weeks. But for advance gameplay, you should be able to study your opponents, their playing strategy, know when they are bluffing and know how they behave when they have good hands. |
|
|
|
Nadal doesen't look so good at the moment. He is loosing 2:1 in sets and break down in forth. Now he needs some exceptional tennis to turn this around but I don't think Federer will alow him an openning.
We should have a great final on sunday. Personally I am glad Federer will probably be in it. It is something special to see him play on grass.
I thought Nadal has the momentum, he made it 1:1 and it was a beautiful second set comeback. But Roger is the king of this court and eventually won, but it is an amazing display from two of the best players. I think Roger will win against Djoker in the finals. It was a big match against Nadal, so I think Federer will be too much exhausted for the final of tomorrow. Federer is old now. Of course Djokovic has some youthfulness compared to Federer. The two were the favorite to reach the finals. And Djokovic have a better record against Federer while competing in final. Both of these stars are fit and we could expect a competing and wonderful finals. I don't think that Federer was favorite against Nadal. Nadal was very close to bring match in the fifth set and in that case I think that Nadal would turn the match to his advantage. Federer already said after match that he is tired and I'm not sure how much he can recover until Sunday. Djokovic is obvious favorite on Sunday but we shouldn't underestimated Federer. Nadal only comes close in stats with Federer considering the clay court of which Nadal undoubtedly is an expert. But when it comes to wimbeldon, Federer is no doubt the favorite over Nadal. As of Sunday, I'd call it to be a long match rather than a winner over 40.5 |
|
|
|
|
Australia was always a bad luck for New Zealand and not getting to play with Australia made them reach the final. India was just a hyped team, they were no competition to New Zealand or England. They got lucky with Australia. England and New Zealand are undoubtedly the top 2 teams at the moment.
|
|
|
|
Hellooo
The challenge has started for 4 days and my balance still growing!!
i'm still positive on the next day.
My starting balance is 16600 doge, and after 30 days i expect it will be 30000 doge!!
Profitable for a month right??
Goodluck to dicer!!
Sooner or later you'll be out of your funds however you bet. So, you should bet only what you can afford to lose and consider gambling as an entertainment for your spare time. Keep on withdrawing when you double or make a 50% of your initial amount. That way you'll be gradually withdrawing your profit and be safe from any long losing streak. |
|
|
|
since bitcoin was introduced to me few years ago i've got this thing in mind
is gambling really about luck or can you beat the house using maths and probability?
well as for my i always YOLO bet a lot and sometimes it's working fine but most of the time it's not
i tried also using lowbets with strategy , mostly on dice autobetting, it seems fine but kinda boring, seems okay but it will bust in a time
so do you think gambling is about luck or you can beat the house with strat?
Gambling is always about luck. When you go high on a low odds. You could have 90% chances of wining 10% of bet and 10% chances of losing it all. Moving forward, the risk and reward would always be the same. However you may play or whatever you may do, your chances would always be 49% as 1% would be the house edge. |
|
|
|
|
India in a trouble now. Already lost half of their wickets and need 148 runs in next 20 overs. i.e. a run rate of 7.4. This certainly is a bowling pitch and New Zealand's score is a good one.
This game could easily be won by New Zealand if they kept bowling the same way and keep their field tight.
|
|
|
|
|
The projects start their fundraising even before they start developing and the time in between fundraising and being able to provide the product is going to be difficult for the price of token. Another reason is the project don't want to buy time to get to safe place before making it's investors realize that they have been scammed.
Both of the discussion are correct. In a conclusion, it's better for the project token to enter the market later than early.
|
|
|
|
India started really well and the disappointing tournament of Martil Guptil continues as he lost his wicket after facing more than 2 tentative minutes in the crease, it all depends upon how Williamson plays today and he is the trump card to know how much New Zealand is going to post today and can trouble the Indian top order. If they could not post a good total India will chase them easily as they have youth and experience in their key players.
Considering the pitch it's not a bad performance from New Zealand. Ross Taylor did a good job sticking to the wicket. Now everything lies on how Kiwis could bowl and field. India has been consistent on both batting and bowling. IMO This is going to be a competitive match till the last overs. As rain has stopped the play, it's highly likely that DL method be introduced which would significantly reduce the target for India and give a clear advantage to them. They'll be able to win scoring less than what New Zealand did. So, they don't really have to worry about the pitch. |
|
|
|
I'd also highly recommend sporstbet.io for small bets. They allow 0.01 mbtc that is equal to 0.0001 BTC (1000 satoshsi) as the minimum bet. They also have lower withdrawal fees and the withdraw are nearly instant. They have daily bet boost option for almost every sports, which makes their odds much better than all of sites. |
|
|
|
Looks like the New Zealand vs India semi-final is going to be an one sided affair. The former have been playing horribly for the past 3-4 matches and I don't think that they have much of a chance against a strong Indian lineup. On the other hand, the other semi-final will be a closely fought one. Both Australia and England have almost equal chances of winning.
India has been playing much better than New Zealand but still we can't predict about the result as New Zealand always is an unpredictable team. The world cup stats are slightly in favor for New Zealand. Indian team also has not been invincible in this tournament. They lose to England before wining over a weak team of Sri Lanka. |
|
|
|
I guess op is interested in the basics, as well as the technical side. I think YouTube is the best way to learn this things but op says he isn't interested in just YouTube.
Does your SwC poker offer tutorials like the type op is asking for? I am considering trying the free one on SwC after learning to play poker well.
I have the feelings also that that’s what the OP wants and learning on YouTube is a very good option for him. I wish I drop the link of the channel I used in learning on You tube, the guy was so good. He broke down everything I needed to know about it and changed my mentality about the difficulty of the game Although there’s room for improvement even after learning online. This is where an expert might come in. In my case I had to invite my elder bro, who had been playing poker games for many years, it was now easier because I already had an idea from YouTube, but either ways there are still players who become experts by mere watching on YouTube and also using other applications from Google store. I too tried to learn from youtube never got to learn most of the omaha and related pokers. Even the tutorial websites don't have a detailed and complete info. I'm well know to holdem from my early ages. I played them as a kid. I also has good knowledge about 2-7. And I started playing omaha and related games without proper knowledge of hi low and slowly learned how it works. Though learning by playing could be extremely difficult for total newbie to cards. You need to learn the cards on deck first. |
|
|
|
|
Advisers are of two types.
One that advises about technical aspects of project, design, marketing, blockchain, smart contracts, economics etc. There types of advisers are useful for project especially when the team lacks expert of respective fields.
Another type of advisers are those who just gives advertisement and buzz on media. They do create some interest but are not worth the cost they come with.
|
|
|
|
Currently IEO's are becoming pupular and providing a more reliable option for new projects than ICO's. Previously a lot of new projects started by raising funds via their ICO sites and because of unregulated nature of this avenue, a lot of scammers used the medium to swindle a lot of victims.
Now the story has changed as it only serious projects that would want to go through IEO's, we no longer would hold only the project body responsible for any IEO scam but the exchange, so any exchange that values its reputation and users should do a proper scrutiny about any project before accepting their IEO sales. For instance if an exchange fails multiple times with their IEO, it will drive attention away from them, that is why Binance still draws a lot of attentions because it has recorded more successful and profitable IEO's.
Users should only look at IEOs hosted by popular exchanges as they won't generally risk their reputation and hence do an extensive research about the project before listing. IEOs even shows the real nature of exchanges. Look at what IDEX did it to themselves. They just destroyed their reputation which will soon destroy their business. |
|
|
|
People are shilling some stupid coin around, they are saying this coin is good, bla bla bla. Don't invest just because people saying it is good or don't get into a coin just because it was hyped recently. Better do your own research with all information and only then decide what to do.
There are many such shilling posts recently. Most of them dead coins or pump and dump ones. Making fake buzz about. Newbie investors should be generally cautious about such activities. Try to confirm things from more than one place and try to research yourself. It's not much difficult to find out scam coins. It's just much more difficult to find profitable one. |
|
|
|
|
It's a bit bitter to read but most of the things stated are correct here.
Though I would not agree with the value near zero. The value is provided by supply and demand. For anything to have a value, it doesn't necessarily needs to be backed by materials. It could also be backed by communities. Consider bitcoin as one of the collectibles, collectibles have low production value but with their low supply and community backing, they get much better value.
|
|
|
|
|
It's not much difficult to buy and sell bitcoin for other cryptos.
But's it's still too much difficult to buy and sell bitcoin for fiat. Most of the fiat exchanges takes insanely large fees. There are issues on every step. The support for most of them are useless and it's much better to find a like minded person and trade it with them rather than going with the hassle of exchanges.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
