ooo i know he shouldn't but im bored at work  LMAO  |
|
|
|
now we just need a miner :p
do we even need to ask how much your earning on it? or would we all smash our rigs in envy?
No good GPU miner means higher prices. So.. I prefer Christian just keeps his earnings and well done to him. If I would be as good as he is, I'd do exactly what he did. Would *you* share? I doubt that. |
|
|
|
XMR is currently challenging DRK. I think if the GUI wallet issue gets sorted out it might be able to challenge LTC even. Cryptonote coins are here to stay (well, except MountCoin, HorizonCoin, OrionCoin, duh. you can't fix an incompetent dev...)
Thank you. I don't know about the GUI wallet issue, I use the official command line one, but there is indeed a need of VERY good CN wallets soon, the exchanges need that. |
|
|
|
Aside from the profitability of you mining the coin, do you like BBR? I bought a bit earlier.
Same question for XMR too  Do you think it has some future? |
|
|
|
What's coming on version 1.3?
Fixes or new stuff?
VERY good question! Mumbly, is it secret? Maybe you can enlighten us? |
|
|
|
In the meantime, everyone should try to move their hashing power around to non-major pools in an effort to cut down on dust. Note that mining dust hurts your profitability as well, as you need to generate more tx (and spend more fees) in order to transfer it anywhere.
Exactly. Try to find a pool that is no bigger than 100-200x your own hashrate. If you are only using one computer with 200 H/s, try to find a smaller pool that is 20 KH/s or smaller. If you a larger miner, you can use the larger pools, but try to keep to the above guideline to avoid the dust issue. Shortly: it's so easy to ask others to do this! I am a tiny miner. But I will not go to a pool with less that 100kH/s. Why? Because I am not patient enough to wait maybe one day for a block. And I am sure that many others think the same. So, if you want the many small miners to move their hashing power, you big miners should do that first. From one pool of 1.5 GH/s there's plenty of you that can move around. The others (us) will have then real choices. |
|
|
|
dead coin
the start was fair Promised as a cpu-only coin, no cpu miner released, gpus mining from the first days, no windows wallet, pools weren't working.... things may have gotten straightened out since then, but you cannot say the start was fair. Read from page 1... CPU miner was there. Pools came about 1 day late, yes. 1GH did a great job there. GPU miner came about one week later, maybe two. Windows wallet was there. Mac wallet had problems for half a day. What's all this FUD? I understand that you want to buy cheap? |
|
|
|
I am also curious about the correct answer  |
|
|
|
For these small payments we really need the wallet to calculate the best way to send a large payment and calculate the correct fee. If it's going to be a multi block payment then the client needs to handle that itself.
I agree. But first things first: let's have a proper wallet first. Then it can be improved. |
|
|
|
How to send in smaller chucks?
Try to send 1 MRO. If it's not working, try 0.75 .... |
|
|
|
It depends on how many chunks got in to get to that amount. As far as I've read, each time you got some MRO from the pool, a new address is generated for that. This is for our protection and it's OK. So I actually had to send from maybe 100 (internal) addresses to get to that 0.15 MRO (only one CPU mining). That's why the size was too big. If your 3000 MRO went to your wallet in one chunk or two, I'm almost sure you can send it away in one piece. I don't know more exactly, never had that many |
|
|
|
|
I had this problem too, I was forced to send even 0.15 MRO chunks !!!
Now I mine on a pool that makes the payouts less often. Life got better.
|
|
|
|
Heh, I wish I'd see an announcement like this here... |
|
|
|
If anyone is still reading this - can I ask you an honest question? Are you a speculator or are you interested in seeing this coin succeed? If you're a speculator that's cool, I'm speculating on other coins I don't put any effort in to. But if you would like to help with this project, here are some things you could decide to do:
1. Tell me you're interested, but not sure how you could be helpful, either here or via PM
2. Take a look at the logo I posted further up the page - do you think this is an improvement, is it good enough for now? Would you like to take a swing at a new logo design or improving on the one I've posted - post or PM me, I'm happy to share all of the source files for the design work I paid for
3. Like to help out with the Facebook promo - let me know, I work full time, so I can only work on it outside of office hours, any help would be appreciated.
4. Like to suggest a new project to advance the coin? post it here or PM me, I'm all ears, and might be able to introduce you to other people who you could collaborate with.
I understand your frustration, really! There are a very small number of coins I keep my eyes on and hope that they'll succeed. Dogecoin has a great community, Heavycoin has interesting algorithms, Bitmonero is quite new and as promising as Heavycoin was. For reasons I don't understand the first two are still not successful on the market. (3rd is too new, it's out of discussion.) I keep a small amount of Dogecoins and an even smaller amount of Heavycoin. My hardware doesn't allow me to mine too much, I mine what is the best paid CPU coin of the moment and convert to these coins. I mined Heavycoin at early start, even after GPU mining was possible. But after a while the difficulty was too big for me. I thought that the problem of Dogecoin is "no innovation" and the problem of Heavycoin is "no community". But as you see neither of them are doing great. And I just don't understand why. [1]: Unfortunately I have 2 jobs, meaning free time is a luxury I don't have. [2]: Done. [3]: Done. [4]: I wish I'd know. But I am completely out of ideas. Good luck! |
|
|
|
|
Is it faster for all CPU or only for the ones with AES-NI?
|
|
|
|
 What do you guys think - do you like this? It looks clean and pretty good, though I would have liked a little 3D in it. |
|
|
|
I do kind of like this though - world/trivia knowledge and good google search ability are two separate and legitimate skills.
I think whoever can solve it first with whatever skills they bring to the table are the legitimate winner.
What do you guys think?
I agree. |
|
|
|
And the winner of the First Annual GAWlympics Competition (maybe we'll do it monthly?) is:User sticknutzhash, with entry: I came. I GAW. I conquered.Thank you and congratulations! You're being contacted now! Thank you everyone for participating and making this a fun event in the name of GAW We really enjoyed going through each one of your entries and look forward to running promotions like these for you in the future! The GAW Team Now I wish I could GAWk his account... |
|
|
|
I'm just telling you what your realistic options are:
1. Make smaller payments.
2. Combine your inputs in 2+ steps.
3. Get whoever is sending you the tiny inputs to send you bigger ones.
That's pretty much it.
Yeah, not many real options... Thank you though.. |
|
|
|
I have more and more often issues with the transaction size. Last time the biggest amount I was able to send was 0.15 MRO at a time.
I am using monero.win.x64.experimental.0526.
Is it a known issue? Is there anything I can do about it?
Thank you.
Its due to how many inputs you have, Im guessing your mining to that address? Theres not really a lot you can do as far as Im aware. You have to create a second wallet, then send the coins from the first wallet to the second wallet in bigger chunks than you received them. Keep doing that and you can build up outputs of whatever size you want. Yes, I am mining to that address and my hashrate is not very big, so the inputs are very small. Still, it's extremely frustrating to transfer so small amounts and all the pools I know mine directly to wallet. Am I the only one with this problem?? Probably not. The pools should be making a smaller number of larger payouts. Transferring from one of my wallets to another in small chunks would be tax free or less frustrating? I doubt it. And then it would be no benefit at all in this.
The benefit is that you can make larger payments. Otherwise it would be impossible to do so. There will be transaction fees. Again, get your pool to give you bigger payments to begin with, or switch to one that will. Or gamble on solo mining. You probably get nothing but if you do get something it will at least be big enough to use. I don't know any MRO pool that does that. Do you? Solo mining at my hashrate is waste of time and you know that. I hoped for real/helpful advises, really... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
