OP, I noticed that you posted a similar topic last year about some big gambling losses you were facing. Have you taken any steps to manage your gambling habits and minimize the risk of losses? It's important to remember that gambling, even with the best intentions and strategies, can be unpredictable and can result in significant financial losses if not managed properly. If you're feeling overwhelmed, there are resources available to help you, such as seeking help from a support group or talking to a professional. Hope everything is going well and take care!

Yeah, totally agree with you there! AI is only as good as the data it's fed. So if there's any bias or inaccuracies in the training data, it's gonna show up in the AI's predictions. And let's not forget that AI can only think about the factors it's been programmed to consider, so there could be other important variables affecting the prediction that the AI doesn't even know about. But despite these limitations, I still think AI and machine learning are super cool for analyzing huge amounts of data and coming up with conclusions. As for using AI to predict sports results, I'm not so sure. We'll just have to wait and see!

How do you know that the user changed their IP address?
Just changing an IP address isn't exactly proof positive, since lots of people do it for various reasons. I'm curious to know how you figured out that the user who supposedly hacked your account changed their IP.

I'm not an expert in Canadian tax laws, however, based on my brief online research (referencing the guide in my previous post), it appears they treat cryptocurrencies very similarly to, for example, the EU.

In your case, the focus is not merely on your change of residency from one country to another, but rather on your intended utilization of cryptocurrency and the method of acquisition. For instance, if you purchased BTC at $10,000 per coin, then sold it for $20,000 per coin after moving to Canada, you would be obligated to report the capital gains tax on the difference between the purchase and sale prices, according to Canadian tax regulations. In other words, the change of residence is irrelevant.

But, as I mentioned another thread, if you're unsure about whether you need to file a tax return, it's best to seek advice from a knowledgeable tax expert.

I was aware of the Opera Crypto browser, but I had no idea that they had integrated a crypto wallet into the default version of their browser. I haven't used Opera for a long time, this might be reason enough to give it another try.

Depending on the tax laws of the country you move to and the country you are leaving, you may or may not have to pay taxes in both countries. Some countries have tax agreements with each other to avoid double taxation, while others tax residents on their worldwide income. For example, if the country you are moving to has a tax agreement with the U.S., you may be exempt from paying taxes on your worldwide income. However, if you are moving to a country that does not have such an agreement with your home country, you may be required to pay taxes in both places. In some cases, this can lead to double taxation and result in higher taxes than what would have been due if you were only taxed once.

When in doubt about whether or not you have to file, consult an accountant or tax professional who is familiar with international taxes.

No, there is no tax to buy or hold cryptocurrencies in Canada. However, if you decide to sell your cryptocurrency holdings, a tax basis may arise.

source: https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/programs/about-canada-revenue-agency-cra/compliance/digital-currency/cryptocurrency-guide.html


Yes. The government can request information about the source of your BTC, but only if it has been informed of your cryptocurrency holdings or after the sale.

To my knowledge, Bitcoincore.org was established in 2013 and serves as the official website for the Bitcoin Core software. Prior to this, the software was hosted on Bitcoin.org, which was registered by the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, the founder of Bitcoin. Currently, the domain bitcoin.org is owned by Cøbra, and the website operates as an independent, open-source project with contributions from a diverse group of individuals globally.^[1]

[1] - https://bitcoin.org/en/about-us#owners


There are no stupid questions. 

The relationship between the number of altcoins and the price of Bitcoin is not clear-cut. The rise in altcoins can divert market focus, potentially hurting Bitcoin's price.
On the other hand, the existence of a wide range of altcoins may have also sparked public awareness and interest in the cryptocurrency industry as a whole, potentially leading to increased demand for Bitcoin. The presence of a diverse range of coins can also bring new innovations and technologies, which can benefit the entire industry and lead to a positive impact on the price of Bitcoin. So, all in all, I'd say it's like a double-edged sword.

---

Learning from your own mistakes is cool and all, but relying on it too much has its downsides. It can be time-consuming, inefficient, and costly. So, relying solely on learning from your own slip-ups isn't the smartest move.

Not sure what you're trying to say, might be a rough translation issue. But the way it's worded, it's definitely not right. Sadly, the reality is that Bitcoin, as a form of payment, can be used for scams by both parties - the scammers and their victims. In this context, the only difference from other online payment methods is that Bitcoin transactions are irreversible, making it a better option for sellers compared to buyers.

Čekamo s nestrpljenjem nove vijesti o tome što nam spremate! Sviđa mi se vaš entuzijazam i želja za inovacijama. To nam svakako treba na ovom forumu. Držim fige za uspjeh.

There is a thing called self-plagiarism. I'm not sure how the forum moderators feel about it, though.
In my opinion, proper referencing of original article should be made, even by its author, to avoid confusions like this one.

I'm not down with the whole chip implant thing idea. Don't want us humans turning into cyborgs.

If people start using a "human wallet", it'll probably be because of biometrics or something like that. I think there're already some trials for self-service stores where you can grab what you want and just go. They've got the whole store covered in cameras and use facial recognition for the checkout part, it's pretty wild.

---

Same thing goes down today if your card gets declined, no matter the reason.

I doubt he'll be able to sway the moderators into thinking that he would be good for the forum as a whole. Looks like our friend here has a history of taking the moderators to task over his spam-marked posts getting the axe from the forum. Sadly, it seems those warnings went in one ear and out the other, as he's still churning out drivel just to hit that signature quota.

Not all reports post need attention

And let's not overlook the fact that this account was probably purchased at some point, as you pointed out in that thread:


And it's not just a one-off, we've seen this account connected to other aliases:

Rollbit.com ima slobodno mjesto za jednog Full Member člana.
Minimalno 20 postova tjedno (od toga barem 10 u Gambling-u). Local postovi se broje u tjednu kvotu.

Payouts & Positions:
Full Members - $40/Week.

---

4cryptobet kampanja je ponovno pokrenuta s novim uvjetima, te prihvaća Members+ članove. Svi sudionici se moraju ponovno prijaviti.

Minimalno 5, a maksimalno 15 postova tjedno će biti plaćeno. Postovi u Local sekcijama se broje u tjednu kvotu (do 3 posta tjedno). Predviđeno trajanje kampanje nije definirano.

Campaign rewards

Sr. Members+: $2.00 per post up to 15 posts each week
Full members: $1.50 per post up to 15 posts each week
Members: $0.80 per post up to 15 posts each week

Yeah, it's pretty ironic that a big win for a player can actually cause problems for the casino. 
But I guess they don't want to discourage players by making them go through the KYC process before they even start playing. It makes sense that they would want to attract new players by making it easier for them to deposit and play. Plus, they probably figure they'll catch any potential money launderers when they try to withdraw their winnings. However, I do think that there should be some sort of standard process in place for this.

It doesn't matter where the money came from, it's still his. He could've taken it off the platform at any time, but he chose to keep gambling. It's all part of his strategy. He bets big to constantly win daily jackpots and other prizes, which give him a much higher return-to-player rate compared to other players. Plus, he gets a ton of rewards points for betting such large amounts, which is just an added bonus.

Being a "whale" sure has its perks! You can bet big, win big, and earn even more rewards points, which can give you an edge over other players. It's a pretty sweet deal if you can afford it!

It's definitely true that the COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact and made online gambling more popular. However, it's also worth noting that online gambling was already becoming more popular before the pandemic because of technology and internet access.

Let's look, for example, at the google trends of the last 5 years for terms like "Gambling" and "Online Casino":


There's no denying that there was a big spike in interest during the first year of the pandemic, but it's clear that people were already starting to turn to online gambling more and more. And, it's likely that this trend will continue even after things go back to normal.

Tech experts and developers may have a better understanding about the difference between open source and closed source software, but it is not necessarily limited to only them. Even if you don't know much about it, you can still figure it out by understanding the basics of open source and closed source software. For example, there are ways like checking the documentation or software license (A license file is almost always present with open source software). A company can also use GitHub, or any other public repository, to make the code available for anyone to see and use. However, just because the code is open to the public, it doesn't necessarily mean that the software is trustworthy or safe, or that it's free of any potential issues.

You didn't really explain anything about plagiarism. Perhaps you could start with that.


Wait a sec, you rebranded because of a trademark dispute, but you still thought it was okay to take other people's intellectual property without permission?


What team? The one that's a figment of your imagination, right? And let's be honest, there's no actual company behind this.


Prove it! Show us the address or smart contract that holds that amount of assets, or at least the majority of them.


If you truly believed that, you wouldn't be here. Or better yet, why don't you just get the hell out of here and save us all the headache.