We are discussing internally whether to out this person publicly. If you don't, your accusation is useless and could look like an excuus to justify your own red trust. If you do, this is a big thing and would probably lead to the user being kicked off DT. That means you have one less red trust on DefaultTrust. All of those members are still on DT? Is Lutpin still on DT1/2? Yes (to both questions). |
|
|
|
And you sent it to him because....? Better to just lay it all out here in this thread so we can have a discussion about it. I've seen reputations attacked for publishing a PM, so I get that. I've seen the screenshot. A very short summary: First, Betcoin.AG offers "some test chips" to try the new site. Then, the other person asks for a significant amount of BTC to "gamble and document every section". The username is cut from the screenshot, but I don't trust screenshots anyway. I suggest to report the PM to an Admin ( hilariousandco?), and ask him to confirm authenticity here. |
|
|
|
There was 1 member who asked for money and we have sent proof of this to Coolcryptovator. I'd like to see this proof. Update: Please make it something better than a screenshot! |
|
|
|
Hello, everyone who left negative feedback in 2016 was based on 1 incident that they had heard about but were not involved with. The one player who was involved with this issue was satisfactorily compensated and continued to play here. Prior to us contacting everyone who left the negative feedback, there were about 15 of these (all from the one incident). Everyone we spoke to reversed their feedback, except those remaining. Of those remaining, they were either unreachable or demanded money to change their feedback. Can you proof this? The first thing I noticed, is that you don't have any Sent feedback. That would have been the appropriate place to address extortion. Can you respond in Betcoin.AG claims DT members demanded money to change feedback? That's where I found this claim.I see you've posted there already. |
|
|
|
It says: "You can submit up to 492 more captions." I don't think I'll get even close to that number. |
|
|
|
Vadi2323 opened a topic about me on the Beginners board where he plagiarizes my thread title, after I removed his offtopic post. He also had some posts deleted from ChipMixer's signature campaign thread recently, and he plagiarizes the signature design. It seems like he loves off-topic fights. Let's see if he dares to post here. |
|
|
|
I got a request to add a donation address for the Club. Therefore I post here this: -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Donation address for the Spambuster's club : 3LUycQqFRCS2v5BzayNzLtziXqR3ZjEHUV
Today is 23.10.2019, iasenko.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1PJBktMEwFFVwxRNM1CcJDGmyuhWFx3tbM
H366lBXxQBKLHgQ6NePL0YnyDj8eMawzSSJCFur1yWdzb4Oo9EjOFesN0+pg6OhyNlWr37jPT+CZNFspL/AmCsc=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- , my staked addressDonation Address linkQuoted  You should probably add a link to the OP. And this is nice too: Balance:  Balance: [img]http://btc-priceimg.herokuapp.com/balance/3LUycQqFRCS2v5BzayNzLtziXqR3ZjEHUV/00f[/img] |
|
|
|
I know it's not directly DT related, but is it possible to have IsBSVStillAScam.tk ?~ Would be a useful link to use Don't know how hard that would be to code though  It would be quite easy by scraping https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2371095, but I don't really want to keep adding more pages to scrape when it's obvious nothing is going to change. Requests on DT-members are easy and only take a few minutes to set up, while it doesn't require additional scraping. |
|
|
|
But if you think I deserved because of that thing, please send it to the next generations of LoyceV. I'm feeling better seeing next Bitcoin forums contributor get the special gift. And they're deserved accepting these reward. On behalf of my little girl: thanks Maybe in the long term, you people can create a fund for this purpose and keep this a long term rewards for all the campaigns that you manage. My initial thought: that would be a good use of forum funds. But on second thought: forum funds are used for this already through Mods. The best reward though, is a cleaner forum. Thanks to the Merit system, spammers will run out of accounts eventually. |
|
|
|
Just two days back; Update: limit from now is only 10 posts / day That explains why so many users make exactly 10 posts per day. |
|
|
|
I'd suggest at most depth 1 to anyone. 2 is way too broad I think but I agree that many are using it just because it's the default. Using Trust depth 1 would effectively remove DT2. I don't think that's desirable. However, for my personal additions to the Trust list, I wouldn't mind going less deep. I made a topic a while back to show the effect: Custom Trust lists have large recursive implications because the users you trust directly (Depth 0) make you trust the ones they trust (Depth 1), and the users they trust (Depth 2) Although I haven't updated it in a while, on my list, I already don't recognize some of the names on Depth 1, while I also have people excluded on Depth 1 who I didn't want to exclude. At larger Depth, I barely recognize any names. |
|
|
|
Going completely off-topic, I'd like to point out that in the week before 4:53 AM (Amsterdam time) last night, a total of 10,000 unique users has posted on Bitcointalk:  |
|
|
|
Right now there are only 3 and LoyceV is one of them, the other two are in the CT campaign. Maybe LoyceV can help you with some archived stats if he has such a thing, I have the data, but don't think it's worth the effort to search through it. If anyone's interested, they can make weekly archives of http://loyce.club/active/7d.html. |
|
|
|
We haven't hired anyone to spam, but to maintain the social area of the project. Can you share what "package" you bought, and how much you were charged for it? |
|
|
|
we hired an agency with some people specialized in communication to maintain dialogue with the public. Quoted for reference. So you admit to hiring bump spammers. For your own financial gain, you pay people to spam this forum. Let me put it nicely: not cool! |
|
|
|
It only bans you for up to 4 hours. Thanks, I can live with that Locking thread. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
