Also i never type the keys always copypaste them, so would a keylogger really get these passwords?
Damn.... I guess i have to format my PC and setup a new OS. Atleast my BTC are in cold storage and still safe.
keylogger can log clipboard too would you mind posting all 3 passwords just to prove you were the owner. posted them. Also i did setup a new OS. Fucking hacker scam....  check the browser history - which sites did you use for alias registrations? |
|
|
|
I'm launching a cryptocoin based on Nxt AM technology. It will be a PoW coin, but it will be protected against 51% attacks by Nxt PoS algo. If this coin becomes popular then we will see a lot of forks. Any ideas if this will make Nxt more or less popular? Such coins require to have an Nxt wallet, coz transactions a made by paying 1 NXT fee.
Beyoncé  Today/yesterday I had a nice talk about this with my friend. He would like to host a gaming currency on the Nxt blockchain. That currency would be balanced by the gaming cards. It is used only for buying cards now, but there will be more games/projects in the future. There was a little problem with the 1 Nxt fee, it is probably too much. He would like to implement it, but without using any programmator skills. Also he wouldn't like to manage the currency, it should all be secured by the Nxt network... |
|
|
|
|
do they have 3 decimals in bter for the NXT or am I wrong again?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't understand. I don't care about BCNext. Nxt was and is being released by 70 guys.. and this number is every day bigger and bigger (now 15.000). They have 5 months for the initial IPO before Nxt launches. Now we are still in alfa. Nxt was released by a community of 70 people.. I cannot even send a Nxt message with the stupid client that was created by the dinosaur inventor BCNext. Now months after the release I will finally get a client that was created by a non original stakeholder and funded by original stakeholders... The code won't look like it was written by my grandpa - again - thanks to the community effort, Jean-Luc, Ricot and other users, often non original stakeholders, who even don't know who BCNext is. This is Nxt.
|
|
|
|
it is Sunday afternoon in China, right? Price should still go up up  |
|
|
|
very few? There are 15.000 users now. Do you know, why Nxt hasn't got all functions? Because we want to gain more users before these functions will be implemented. If we had all functions month ago, Nxt would cost 10$ today. 15.000 is quite a lot
A lot... OK and now what? I suppose grow? But in order to grow (and to make moneys, lets not forget about that) you are competing with each other and crapping all over your freshly acquired user base. Didn't you guys get some internal memo, like Phase 1, 2,... please explain more |
|
|
|
Great story and insight.
Personally, Proof of Stake (POS) concept is interesting and different from Proof of Work (POW) like Bitcoin.
Personally, I think they should invent a coin with initial POW and POS after maybe after a threshold of 50% of more.
This would be fair to everyone as those who work hard initially like miners, get rewarded by POW, and eventually when there is very hard to mine, then the stakeholders will be rewarded for keeping them (POS).
Unfortunately, NXT choose to reward the early stakeholders and leave very little to the rest.
This is not a Fair and does not support the idea of decentralized crypto currency in the first place.
They setup their own exchange and inflate some value with no liquidity in the system, which does not reflect the true value of free market.
In the first place, this coin is doomed to fail as greed is the ultimate target.
do you use Google? Facebook? Bitcoin? Why do you use them, when people who invested in it early became rich? There's a fundamental difference. I can use Gmail perfectly fine without Google shareholders having to return their investment many thousands times over. Its not about NXT rewarding early stakeholders. It's about rewarding very FEW and having a low userbase. Its about major NXT cats constantly having to dump and undercut each other in order to grow that base. very few? There are 15.000 users now. Do you know, why Nxt hasn't got all functions? Because we want to gain more users before these functions will be implemented. If we had all functions month ago, Nxt would cost 10$ today. 15.000 is quite a lot |
|
|
|
I'll take a million as well  Well, if only 500 people respond by the deadline, then you'll get 2 million NEX! It is unfair, what about other 199.500 users of Bitcointalk? |
|
|
|
I just saw I had published Myths n. 2 without some text, so here it is all: Q: „Do you think the unequal distribution of bitcoin / big gains of early adopters / will be a deterrent in a more widespread adoption of bitcoins?“
A: „No. Early adopters get bigger gains (as they should) because they take on bigger risk. A bitcoin can be divided into 100 million pieces, so I don't see divisibility or distribution as a problem.“
Cameron Winklevoss The distribution of Nxt has many phases: Original IPO (1 NXT = 2 Satoshi) First week (1 NXT = 100 Satoshi) Second week (1 NXT = 400-2000 Satoshi) - first exchange Next month (1 NXT = 3000-6000 Satoshi) - aliases February (?) – distributed exchanges, stock exchanges (?) March (?) – transparent forging (?) April (?) – colored coins (?) The distribution of NXT is very fair because it still continues. Now it isn’t in hand of one man, but it is a community effort. BCNext gave us a long time to get on the train. If all coins are in existence already, doesn't this make the original holders of Nxt very wealthy? Potentially. The original stakeholders of Nxt all made an investment of Bitcoin to seed their holdings, however, with no promise of any kind of success or return on investment.[1] In order to get more users they started to sell their stakes in undervalued prices and also they spent tenths of millions on bounties or giveaways. And BTW – who are original stakeholders? These who paid 2 Satoshi? Or 100? Or 400? Q: How would you solve problem with scam accusations according to "unfair" distribution Nxt to 73 big stakeholders? BCNext: “This problem can not be solved. Even if we had a million stakeholders the rest seven billion people would call this unfair. A world with the money can not be perfect.”Why was the launch of Nxt speeded?Come-from-Beyond: „BCNext explained why he speeded up the launch. He wants the stake holders to make all important decisions“. BCNext: “I wanted Nxt to be launched by the community, not by a single person. Success of Nxt is supposed to be achieved by work of a LOT of PEOPLE.” When did Nxt really launch? Was it really in the day when the Billion NXT was transferred from the Genesis account to the original stakeholders? The IPO had been running for weeks in November 2013. In first days NXT cost 100 Satoshi. In first weeks of the December the price of Nxt was still about 400 Satoshi. Then 1500, 2000, 4000 before Christmas and if we don’t count the first bubble, we came back to the original 4000 in the middle of the January. But still – we have really bad client. Nxt is not yet traded in any of the big exchanges. There are many features – already programmed and tested – but they still weren’t implemented why? Because we are still in a Beta. The launch wasn’t in November 24, it wasn’t in January 3, it will be in February/April. We all - 15.000 Nxt users - are beta original stakeholders. The distribution of NXT is extremely fair. The IPO still continues. We haven't launched yet. We can forget about some 73 stakeholders... Now everyone has an opportunity to jump on the train... and also to drive him! Why Nxt doesn’t use all features now? Because CBNext’s plan is to bring as many as possible users before the real Nxt will be released. Then we will have – more users, more features, all source code, but most important – this launch will be leaded by all Nxt community. This will be made by decisions of stakeholders. The success of Nxt is now supposed to be achieved by Nxt community, not BCNext. What happened with the 21 Bitcoins?Bitcoins were required to determine how to split the stake among founders. That's why BCNext asked for tiny amounts. These bitcoins were used to fund development but they covered only part of expenses. When people talk about Nxt IPO they forget about this important detail. 21 Bitcoins were used as a token amount. They didn’t represent any real world development costs. |
|
|
|
please confirm it.
I confirm it and also I bought an alias, it will be in the blockchain explorer soon. Much thanks |
|
|
|
If this would be NXT without the very questionable initial distribution (and potentially more improvements over time compared to NXT because of opensource and more developers), then count me in. May be very interesting.
Q: „Do you think the unequal distribution of bitcoin / big gains of early adopters / will be a deterrent in a more widespread adoption of bitcoins?“
A: „No. Early adopters get bigger gains (as they should) because they take on bigger risk. A bitcoin can be divided into 100 million pieces, so I don't see divisibility or distribution as a problem.“
Cameron Winklevoss The distribution of Nxt has many phases: Original IPO (1 NXT = 2 Satoshi) First week (1 NXT = 100 Satoshi) Second week (1 NXT = 400-2000 Satoshi) - first exchange Next month (1 NXT = 3000-6000 Satoshi) - aliases February (?) – distributed exchanges, stock exchanges (?) March (?) – transparent forging (?) April (?) – colored coins (?) The distribution of NXT is very fair because it still continues. Now it isn’t in hand of one man, but it is a community effort. BCNext gave us a long time to get on the train. If all coins are in existence already, doesn't this make the original holders of Nxt very wealthy? Potentially. The original stakeholders of Nxt all made an investment of Bitcoin to seed their holdings, however, with no promise of any kind of success or return on investment.[1] In order to get more users they started to sell their stakes in undervalued prices and also they spent tenths of millions on bounties or giveaways. And BTW – who are original stakeholders? These who paid 2 Satoshi? Or 100? Or 400? Q: How would you solve problem with scam accusations according to "unfair" distribution Nxt to 73 big stakeholders? BCNext: “This problem can not be solved. Even if we had a million stakeholders the rest seven billion people would call this unfair. A world with the money can not be perfect.”Why was the launch of Nxt speeded?Come-from-Beyond: „BCNext explained why he speeded up the launch. He wants the stake holders to make all important decisions“. BCNext: “I wanted Nxt to be launched by the community, not by a single person. Success of Nxt is supposed to be achieved by work of a LOT of PEOPLE.” When did Nxt really launch? Was it really in the day when the Billion NXT was transferred from the Genesis account to the original stakeholders? The IPO had been running for weeks in November 2013. In first days NXT cost 100 Satoshi. In first weeks of the December the price of Nxt was still about 400 Satoshi. Then 1500, 2000, 4000 before Christmas and if we don’t count the first bubble, we came back to the original 4000 in the middle of the January. But still – we have really bad client. Nxt is not yet traded in any of the big exchanges. There are many features – already programmed and tested – but they still weren’t implemented why? Because we are still in a Beta. The launch wasn’t in November 24, it wasn’t in January 3, it will be in February/April. We all - 15.000 Nxt users - are beta original stakeholders. The distribution of NXT is extremely fair. The IPO still continues. We haven't launched yet. We can forget about some 73 stakeholders... Now everyone has an opportunity to jump on the train... and also to drive him! Why Nxt doesn’t use all features now? Because CBNext’s plan is to bring as many as possible users before the real Nxt will be released. Then we will have – more users, more features, all source code, but most important – this launch will be leaded by all Nxt community. This will be made by decisions of stakeholders. The success of Nxt is now supposed to be achieved by Nxt community, not BCNext. What happened with the 21 Bitcoins?Bitcoins were required to determine how to split the stake among founders. That's why BCNext asked for tiny amounts. These bitcoins were used to fund development but they covered only part of expenses. When people talk about Nxt IPO they forget about this important detail. 21 Bitcoins were used as a token amount. They didn’t represent any real world development costs. |
|
|
|
This IPO scam has the same BTC address of FrictionlessCoins NEX-Coin development fund: .... One of the main revolutionary aspect of FLC is the 100% fair distribution, possible through a short and fair IPO of 14 days. Every interested investor could send any amount of BTC to the following BTC address: 129YoGArgyp7eFi9wbXPtUq7BccS8EABhz https://blockchain.info/address/129YoGArgyp7eFi9wbXPtUq7BccS8EABhz Do not forget to send me a pm!!!End of the IPO 02/02/2014 00:00 (UTC).... ...
Here's the Development Fund: 129YoGArgyp7eFi9wbXPtUq7BccS8EABhz
Note: Dev. Fund contributions have no effect on how much coins you will receive. The Dev. Fund exists to ensure that this does not remain vaporware and becomes a real implementation.
...
FC, can you explain this?
FC accepted 122 Namecoin (NMC) to develop a lightweight Namecoin wallet based upon Multibit and has thus far produced nothing, and reports nothing. I encourage you to read the whole thread, it really is quite humorous.
http://dot-bit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=1450
In summary: FC has an idea, wants donations, accepts donations, complains that donations aren't big enough, pisses off some major NMC developers, threatens to close source his work, then disappears without delivering. And ALL of of it with the serious attitude problem that FC has shown here and across the BTT forums.
Is this really the person you want to trust with your NXT, and to lead a new cryptocurrency?FrictionlessCoin, solracx, Carlos Perez and the CodeAudit.com corporation of Delaware, come on down! (I'll refer to you collectively as "the FCs" for much of this post) This posting is my reply to your threat of legal action against myself and others, accusing us of defamation of a corporation, ie CodeAudit.com, and of it's president/CEO/owner/whatever Mr. Carlos Perez. I don´t have a hell of a lot of time to deal with this, so I´m going to skip the usual sarcasm and comedy and simply deal with the legal facts as they apply to both CodeAudit.coms corporate activities and the activities of myself (and other) private individuals in connection with our criticisms of CodeAudit.com. For those of you who have no idea what is going on: Read the following threads: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=424724.0 (replies here, please) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=422052.0 (this one) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=429399.0 the tl:dr version is: Myself and others criticise the FCs activities in connection with NXT and nex, the FCs suddenly claim to be a corporation in order to be able to file a suit of corporate defamation against us in order to make us shut the fuck up. Heres the moment the FCs first publicly claimed to be a corporation:507,000 NXT STOLEN
Quoted for fun. So it is clear, CodeAudit is a for-profit corporation incorporated in the state of Delaware.
FrictionlessCoin will be the brand for products that will create all kinds of crypto-currency software for sale.
One of these products may be a Nxt clone that we may offer for sale to the public.
Carlos Perez is a shareholder in CodeAudit Corp. "FrictionlessCoin" in this forum relates to the actions of the corporation. "solracx" in this forum relates to the actions of the person.
So it is even clearer to you, ZenithCoin is owned and by Carlos Perez. FrictionlessCoin created ZenithCoin.
FrictionlessCoin also is the lead developer for iXcoin and makes its software contributions for free for iXcoin.
FrictionlessCoin has other projects in the pipeline regarding crypto-currencies.
In short, if FrictionlessCoin decides that selling a Nxt clone has financial potential, then it is clearly within the laws of the United States of America and the State of Delaware to provide such software.
ROFLMAO.....that has got to be the sneakiest about-turn the FCs have ever tried to pull off. I cant express how much LOL i'm doing right now. I've watched FrictionlessCoin and solracx have an honest to god conversation with each other on this forum, and now it turns out that Carlos The Human was actually talking to Carlos The Corporation. Quoted to show FrictionlessCoin's insanity
There, fixed that for ya!
You might think your edit to be amusing. However you are falsely accusing a company of a crime. Jack Needles, given that you are making a serious accusation could you please provide us with your identity? We are a legitimate business and your persistent wrongful accusations may require us to file damages against you. 507,000 NXT RESERVED STOLEN
see other thread for more reservations
There, fixed that for ya! LOL'd lots. Poor old FCs.......... EvilDave, if you do not want to provide us with your identity, then please do not post false accusations. We are a legitimate business and your persistent wrongful accusations may require us to file damages against you. , which I think the FCs should have done first.... Point number one: legal action by the FCs against myself and others.The FCs had a good point, unfair criticism of a corporation can lead to justifiable legal action. But: the FCs did not declare themselves to be a corporate entity for quite some time, so any criticism of the FCs from before that moment is inadmissible for the FCs in any defamation case. However, as a defendant and a private individual , I can bring all of this thread (and other relevant threads) into my defence and any further counter-suit that I feel like bringing against the FCs for malicious prosecution. So the FCs havent got a snowballs chance in Hell of winning a defamation suit, given that the only evidence is this thread and others. He does have a real chance of losing a counter-suit for malicious prosecution, though. My last 3 points on the FCs defamation suit: Defamation of a corporation is a civil matter, and therefore non-extraditable, even between different US states. So, unless u are a critic of the FCs and live in Maryland or Delaware, u can simply cross those states off your list of places to visit and stick your fingers up at the FCS. I live in the Netherlands, so I completely can't be extradited for civil charges. <sticks finger up at FCS> And who knew that the US of A was so keen on free speech for the individual ? And all those rights as a private individual that simply don't apply to corporations. For example: disclosure of corporate information vs private information.If someone were to post the FCs private address details, that would be wrong, but as the FCs are now a corporation, all of the details of that corporation can be freely published, because they are a matter of public record. But that doesnt really matter, because the FCs have created a much bigger problem for themselves:
Now we come to the fun bit, at least for me. Not so funny for the FCs, I think, or their investors. Corporations are governed by much stricter legal requirements than private individuals. As a private individual I can start up a crypto-currency and ask freely for investments. No problem at all.....if it goes to shit, there is very little investors can do about it. If a corporation actively recruits investors, but does not disclose to these investors that they are investing in a corporate project, then the corporation and its officers can be prosecuted for obtaining funds under false pretences. This is actually a proper criminal offence and can get you something in the region of 5-15 years state prison time. Just to throw some more on top, because the investors where recruited via the internet, the Federal authorities can treat it as a form of wire fraud, which gets u another 5-15 years in a real "fuck u in the ass" federal penitentiary. In case no-one noticed, the FC's have never stated that nex was a corporate project until last Saturday......ooops!! And do all of their previous projects now qualify as corporate projects.......? All it will take is one person with an issue with the FCs to step up to the Federal authorities with a complaint against them and they are in deep shit. All because they couldn't handle some criticism, and decided to pull a sneaky trick to shut some annoying people up. Genius move , FCs, gotta admire your brilliance.(as a note: I'm not gonna press charges against them, unless they get really stupid. Somebody else might, tho') And here is a sneaky manouver from me: INTERESTED. I hereby pledge one NXT to be exchanged for 50 nex. Hey, I am now a corporate investor in the nex project from Code Audit.com. Yay! As an investor, I hereby request that CodeAudit.com posts: Copies of its incorporation papers. A comprehensive list of it's past, current and future activites. A comprehensive list of it's officers, executives and employees. And copies of its filed yearly tax returns, accounts and yearly reports for the last 5 years. Within 72 hours would be nice, Google Doc links are acceptable. So, FCs, the ball is in your court, have fun!TL:DR version: FCs have no chance in defamation case, open themselves up to Federal fraud charges. EvilDave demands copies of every piece of paper CodeAudit.com has ever filed. If the FCs have threatened you with legal action, don't worry unless u live in Maryland or Delaware. BTW what is NXT? All myths about NXT  NXT vs Litecoin NXT vs Peercoin NXT vs QuarkCoin |
|
|
|
Great story and insight.
Personally, Proof of Stake (POS) concept is interesting and different from Proof of Work (POW) like Bitcoin.
Personally, I think they should invent a coin with initial POW and POS after maybe after a threshold of 50% of more.
This would be fair to everyone as those who work hard initially like miners, get rewarded by POW, and eventually when there is very hard to mine, then the stakeholders will be rewarded for keeping them (POS).
Unfortunately, NXT choose to reward the early stakeholders and leave very little to the rest.
This is not a Fair and does not support the idea of decentralized crypto currency in the first place.
They setup their own exchange and inflate some value with no liquidity in the system, which does not reflect the true value of free market.
In the first place, this coin is doomed to fail as greed is the ultimate target.
do you use Google? Facebook? Bitcoin? Why do you use them, when people who invested in it early became rich? |
|
|
|
It is gaining momentum, the amount of accounts keep going up so lots more people are getting involved in NXT. http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=40&sub=6If that isn't a bullish indicator I don't know what is. We'll probably start seeing more of a rise in price with media coverage, but we really need better clients out first. actually this is a Saturday number... Weekends are richer |
|
|
|
You can find the spanish translation of the original write-up by optical carrier here:
thank you, the link is in the OP now and also I put it to the Nxteam Gdoc next to your name to the 3rd week of January: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgAGADgnQcrtdHRrV3V3Z1lzOXVEMWtqdElUaEtqV1E#gid=8I think we will use it after the release of better client, probably in next weeks. If there will be any voting about unclaimed coines, you can support the PR Committee so you would also get NXT from the PR Committee fund for translations |
|
|
|
|
TwinWinNerD:
check browser history - where did you download NRS?
check download history - where did you download it exactly? really no nxtcripto.org..?
check hash of downloaded client
|
|
|
|
so 70% of bitcoins are held by 2-3% of the userbase? It's no surprise a vocal group of people are pumping it then... if I had 1000 bitcoins I'd be selling 900 of them and converting them to physical bullion personally. Pigs get slaughtered, as they say... no way so many coins in so few hands is a healthy market.
you probably don't know that in the fiat it is much worse.. |
|
|
|
Seeing as there is a lot of myths put forth by competitors and confused individuals regarding NXT, one of our most beloved community members has started a short series disspelling these myths one by one, starting with the most prominent ones: http://nxtcoin.blogspot.comIf you still have any serious questions, then please just ask and we will do our best to clarify Well what about this myth... "NXT is open source". sure https://github.com/slothbag/nxt-decompiled |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
