Thanks => mic
Good luck => everyone
Except igor72 lol Except the 25 lowest bets, then. Agreed
|
|
|
Thanks => mic
Good luck => everyone
Except igor72 lol
|
|
|
Attention returning returned
|
|
|
the genius of the invention of bitcoin is just in the huge bandwidth due to the huge computing power and huge block size. The mistake of Satoshi's followers is that they limited the block size for the sake of increasing difficulty. EOS can not more than 3000 TPS, its capacity is limited by the performance of the server. But bitcoin can, if you let the block size float freely like a Komodo. however, this has its plus, the high complexity of bitcoin is ideal for notarization transactions altcoins like the same Komodo
. The word "gibberish" springs to mind
|
|
|
What's the point of "fully scaling" if nobody uses your coin?
BCH blockchain size: 167.20 GB BSV blockchain size: 169.49 GB BTC blockchain size: 244.81 GB
BCH active addresses: 23,353 BSV active addresses: 8,198 BTC active addresses: 580,395
You sound salty. I thought the smallblocker mantra was 'Bubut mah RaspPi can't store that much data!' Why would I be salty? You're the one down 30% (or more) on your bitcoin imitation investment. I don't know why you'd be salty. I'm just observing that you seem to be. After all, you're the one hanging around the Bitcoin Cash thread for the sole purpose of badmouthing it. Isn't that what's this thread is for?
|
|
|
So apparently the EU is passing article 13, without any revision. And thus exposes itself as a dictatorship.
And people wonder why the UK voted out of the united states of Europe And yet internally they are even more insane than anyone else (save perhaps for canada and sweden). It's a weird contrast. Are the english even human? We're reptilian
|
|
|
So apparently the EU is passing article 13, without any revision. And thus exposes itself as a dictatorship.
And people wonder why the UK voted out of the united states of Europe
|
|
|
Why am I not surprised by this? 12345 bitcoinPsycho
Thankyou nutildah I will take that as a complement
|
|
|
I don't think so . It's not an original goose
|
|
|
Bitcoin volatile? Welcome back volatility
|
|
|
12345
Thanks Mic your a legend
|
|
|
Kill joy
|
|
|
We are so overdue for a $1000 fomo pump
|
|
|
Short term oscillations (1m-3m) tightening. Breakout soon? Up or down?
It has to go up based on my own requirements $4200 in the next 24 hours please
|
|
|
we are a bunch of psychos! for real. everone is posting the shit he is interested in almost without responding to the shit the other psychos had posted. But look at the quality of this shit! The WO is like a big anthill in which each of the gang members drags that food (interesting information) that they found. +1 WO sMerit good other point of view! I'm truly open for other opinions because I decline to be called as a psycho. (I called myself, I know) I'm with you on that one
|
|
|
After all this time this thread is still quite remarkably mediocre. There is literally nothing other than name calling. How can some of the world's biggest alts inspire nothing beyond worthless dribbles?
Well, it likely has a lot to do with the fact that about half of this thread's participants are ignorant pikers who come here merely to fling clueless shit around the room. busted
|
|
|
Why #bitcoin will not drop under $2k: 1) Miners already capitulated (difficulty -25% Nov/Dec) 2) Too close to the Halving (14 months) 3) BTC never dropped below geometric mean ($2750) 4) BTC never dropped below 50% of stock-to-flow model ($5500) 5) RSI bottomed at (42) now rising https://twitter.com/100trillionusd/status/1102958785772044289?s=21Where do you mention trading volume? You realize there’s no one new coming into this market? It’s all you guys trading a bleeding market. You’ve names 5 reasons why BTC shouldn’t go below $2000, now explain 5 unique reasons why BTC should go above $5000. Your bitterness is plain to see. swap some Of your failing Alts (all of them)for BTC before you loose everything and become another roach
|
|
|
No, I likely wouldn't. To the extent that it may mean what you are implying*, it would mean I have failed as a father. For not instilling a foundation upon which she might lead a happy, fulfilling, and helpful life.
Relevance to my observation that dishonest and dishonorable opponents are once again using falsehoods to try to taint a coin by association? None.
Your relentless defensiveness and apologism for creepy people and aspects of things you have no influence over is really bleedin' weird.
|
|
|
|