Just to keep it short : if latest news are real seems like Edward Snowden revealation unveiled a "conspiracy" againt at that time Italian Prime Minister Berlusconi (which Italians had voted and put there where he was) that brought him to be dismissed (because he didn't want to submit to strict constraints and commitments that Sarkozy and Merkle wanted Italy to keep) and to be substituted by the more welcome from EU = ( Merkel and Sarko). The conspiracy was to remove the pro-Russian leaders in the European Union, and it was hatched in the Pentagon. If you remember, Berlusconi was not the only leader to be removed. Around the same time, pro-Russian Gerhard Schröder was replaced with anti-Russian and American puppet Angela Merkel, and the pro-Russian Nicolas Sarkozy was replaced with the pro-NATO François Hollande. And here are some small things Hollande did with Russia: http://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/26/putin-meets-hollande-france-and-russia-getting-closer.htmlhttp://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34931378Yeah he's really against Russian that's for sure  |
|
|
|
Just to keep it short : if latest news are real seems like Edward Snowden revealation unveiled a "conspiracy" againt at that time Italian Prime Minister Berlusconi (which Italians had voted and put there where he was) that brought him to be dismissed (because he didn't want to submit to strict constraints and commitments that Sarkozy and Merkle wanted Italy to keep) and to be substituted by the more welcome from EU = ( Merkel and Sarko). The conspiracy was to remove the pro-Russian leaders in the European Union, and it was hatched in the Pentagon. If you remember, Berlusconi was not the only leader to be removed. Around the same time, pro-Russian Gerhard Schröder was replaced with anti-Russian and American puppet Angela Merkel, and the pro-Russian Nicolas Sarkozy was replaced with the pro-NATO François Hollande.AHAHAHAHAH xD OMG! You keep adding BS after BS... You're "pro-Russian" Sarkozy is the first president of France who accepted to integer back NATO xD So where is your argument now? You really don't care about truth and reality do you? |
|
|
|
More joys of immigration coming to the European Union!!! Europe's New normal? Muslim migrants film rape of male teenhttp://www.wnd.com/2016/02/new-normal-muslim-migrants-film-rape-of-male-teen/Seems like no one is safe in the European Union. Girls, boys, men, women, horses, cattle, swine, everyone is getting attacked by these immigrants. The authorities should make it mandatory for minors to be accompanied by adults, if they venture outside their homes, especially in areas with a high migrant population. Also, all domesticated animals should be kept under lock and key. Blah blah blah blah *nonsense* blah blah blah blah *useless remarks* blah blah blah... God we understood, you don't think migrants can integrate society, we understood thank you. And what now? |
|
|
|
Or as we're in a civilized country and Age, maybe they can marry who the fuck they want?
I don't have a problem with Muslims marrying non-Muslims. But you should not be a hypocrite. If Muslim males are allowed to marry non-Muslim females (i.e after converting them to Islam), then why Muslim women are not allowed to marry non-Muslim men? Even if the non-Muslim male agrees to convert to Islam, the permission is very rarely granted. Permission by who? You're talking about permission and having the right and shit like that. But law allows all those things! So you're talking about families I suppose! Well it's the same thing that a black wanting to marry a white, daughter of a racist family. It's a cultural problem and there is nothing you can do about it! If the two are serious about marriage they'll do it anyway without the family agreement! What would you like to do about that? A daughter or a son should listen to her father until she/he become an adult, so when she/he marries. Even then they should. Unfortuantly, children now don't listen enought ot their parents, or maybe is it the parent who are less and less strict ? Maybe the parents should start listening their children... Last generation destroyed everything and had nothing to do! They had work, growth, political reforms. They took it all and didn't give a fuck about the future. And now we should start listening to them? They can all burn for all what I care. You can see in alot of families children who aren't respectful with their parents. The parents let them do because they were brainwashed by the Left. Do you know even what ? A "law" passed to prohibit the fact for a parent to put a fessée, a beat on the butt (strange explanantion, yeah  ) ! The world is going crazy  ... And you can see in even more families parents who are not respectful of their chidren! Respect goes both way. Listen to your children, discuss with them without talking to them like they're stupid and don't know anything in the world whereas YOU you know how things work. |
|
|
|
It's pretty difficult to define what "hate speech" really is, it also depends on the circumstances. So in these days it's just a rubber category, used to keep certain taboos untouched, and suppress any uncomfortable truths.
If hate speech was legally defined as "incitement to murder" would you have a problem with that? It's clearly defined, no chance of rubberyness, slippery slope or being changed to suit governmental whim. Of course there is always a problem! Again, what can be said under humourous speeches? I mena even myself sometimes I say things like "yeah we should kill all the blacks it would make more work". It's a joke nothing else. I don't mean it, it's just that in the conversation it was rather funny to say it. Should I go to jail? |
|
|
|
How many people will lose jobs now? This is first i thought about when i saw this video.
Second, this one can carry gun i think? We are fucked anyway.
Of course. Jobs are meant to disappear. Don't let big companies fool you, you should be paid more working less, because technologies evolved in a way to make humans work less and less! |
|
|
|
That dude at the end is a dick.
I'm sure the robot will remember him.
Damn I thought exactly the same thing xD I was like "WTF? Why are you doing this??? Where is da police?"  |
|
|
|
I really like how the site design and its operation.
Make a deposit, the payment came in and soon more will spread. I advise you !!!!!!!!
Why are you investing in this when you have your own ponzi I mean safe doubler investment? xD |
|
|
|
Not so vast. We had some problem with a humorist who was clearly on the grey area here...
If I say "gays should be killed" it's easy to classify.
But if I'm a humorist, and I take a character who says "but gays should be killed, after all it's like a disease, and the horrible thing is that the more they are, the more they spread the disease" then what do you do?
It can be considered as humour yeah... But if the said humorist has some relationships with far right religious movements... And you know he's against gays... What do you do?
I'm not sure how that's humorous. It still sounds like it's someone trying to get someone else to kill members of another group. Change "gays" to "americans". You still ok with that? Should ISIS be allowed to peddle their propaganda in your streets? Edit: TBH I don't care about the legality of the thing, more the morality. Well maybe I'm not so funny :p Ok if you talk about morality it's easy, because you can consider each case as specific. But it's really hard to make a law about that! Because it's impossible to define a clear border between what's ok and what is not  |
|
|
|
Or as we're in a civilized country and Age, maybe they can marry who the fuck they want?
I don't have a problem with Muslims marrying non-Muslims. But you should not be a hypocrite. If Muslim males are allowed to marry non-Muslim females (i.e after converting them to Islam), then why Muslim women are not allowed to marry non-Muslim men? Even if the non-Muslim male agrees to convert to Islam, the permission is very rarely granted. Permission by who? You're talking about permission and having the right and shit like that. But law allows all those things! So you're talking about families I suppose! Well it's the same thing that a black wanting to marry a white, daughter of a racist family. It's a cultural problem and there is nothing you can do about it! If the two are serious about marriage they'll do it anyway without the family agreement! What would you like to do about that? A daughter or a son should listen to her father until she/he become an adult, so when she/he marries. Even then they should. Unfortuantly, children now don't listen enought ot their parents, or maybe is it the parent who are less and less strict ? Maybe the parents should start listening their children... Last generation destroyed everything and had nothing to do! They had work, growth, political reforms. They took it all and didn't give a fuck about the future. And now we should start listening to them? They can all burn for all what I care. |
|
|
|
what is this 92 investor? is it the people who invested at your site? where is this investor coming from? and how much are them from bitcointalk. here? this is bitcointalk community.. so i hope some investor that are from here  and give a vouch about ur site.
Join us on the crest of a wave.You have an investment plateform in btc but you just found out bitcointalk.org? |
|
|
|
Yeah, because those militaristic Muslims just love Christians and Jews and only hate atheists, right?
And who is messing with whom? I don't care what you believe, but I do care what theists attempt to make other people believe about me. That's not "messing with you", that's self - defense.
You see, nowadays we so called theists used to accept or at least ignore the beliefs of others, only militant atheist and muslim extremists used to think that they must not tolerate others with different views, because of freeing people from their superstitions is their ultimate moral obligation . If that was right their wouldn't be any need for the US president to be Christian |
|
|
|
Hahahaha xD I like your reaction! OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH if you think it gonna work then it's all good. They gotta have some kind of Plan B nah? |
|
|
|
What do you think? That in socialists countries like France you can't do that? In France he wouldn't have been allowed to work more than 35 hours per week, because the government decided to limit his income. Of course you can, don't say dumb things like that... Difference is that in France YOU have to ASK for it. The company can't impose more hours on you. You think it's a bad thing to give people the choice?
Well the only difference is that if your government were socialist you wouldn't have to pay for your school that's all!
You would have to pay for your school, even if you didn't go to school, and you would also have to pay for everyone else's school, for the rest of your life. Yeah that's called solidarity, it's in our official moto. You'll have to pay for high educational institutions all your life and you know why? Because having a highly educated population means you'll have more innovative techs, more companies, more quality products, in a word: a better average quality of life. You pay for the school of others cause that's an investment we decided to do in our future generations. You don't want to do that? Well just leave and go to the USA, here nobody pays for the school so if your child wants to go, he'll have to take a 200k$ study loan. What's better? Taking money from those who earn it or asking a 18 years old student to start his life with a debt big enough to buy 3 small houses? Me I've chosen. And so did the whole Europe. |
|
|
|
Yeh I don't really care EU is bad for us anyway, at least the British people are smart.
I think they where the only ones who could actually vote to accept the euro or not.
And they chose to not even use the Euro and look at the gbp now still higher then euro's or dollars!
So them leaving europa seems like a logical choice for them since they aren't even using the Euro.
EU is probably the best thing that was made in last centuries, problem is that people don't care about it and are too dumb to see the real problems. They keep talking about immigration and their little petty problems... EU is a criminal mafia, as bad as the bulgarian guberment, and it will be disbanded just as soon as we vote to leave the dictatorship Lol, what did EU do to your country? I mean apart from bringing peace in the whole Europe for the longest period of time ever? |
|
|
|
I don't like it when someone calls me something mean but I believe in their right to do so. I believe it is their free speech. I am not going to boycott his business or anything of that sort.
Of course, it is wrong, when someone makes racist statements, but what they are, are just words.
If you ask me, if anything should be banned, it is the thuggery of businesses interfering in domestic issues. There should be a separation of business and state.
Even pornography and video games are protected as free-speech.
Hate is one of the emotions of human beings like love.
Repressing it through legislative actions are just trying to repress one of the basic human emotions.
Words don't physically hurt people.
I tend to believe that hate speech is a part of free speech.
Now, the definition of hate speech is very broad, after a few years, it might be offensive to even say "He' or "She"
Pooping is one of the basic human rights. It doesn't mean I want to see people pooping in the street. Keep your hate speech -- and your pooping -- to yourself. Two entirely different things. There are places were people can poop that they don't have to in the street unless they have diarrhea or something. Then people should only be speak hate in toilets then? If they did, I wouldn't have a problem with it at all. Actually, the thought of someone in a public toilet telling me that all INSERT MINORITY NAME HERE should die is a bit creepy. So let me rephrase: I'm fine with people being bigots and racists as long as they only involve the same audience that they have for their poops. If that is true, then you are just a self-conceited little fascist who is pretending for be for human rights and defending the minorities but your objective is to classify everything you disagree with as hate speech and shut down the conversation, basically a control freak. Maybe there should be more 'safe-spaces' in public. http://dailysignal.com/2015/12/01/college-president-tells-students-to-grow-up-because-campus-not-meant-to-be-safe-space/No, I only classify "hate speech" as the sort of speech that is designed to incite violence against minorities. If you think that's ok -- if that's the sort of conversation you have -- then calling me a fascist is the pot calling the kettle black. Question arises, who is the arbiter of what is hate speech and what is not. If it is the government via legislative actions, they will eventually widen the term and add a lot of things as hate speech. People are entitled to their opinions even if it something which is disagreeable. Throughout history, from Galileo, it was a hate speech to say something that contradicted the views of those times and shook the majority of views. What if it was flipped around and it was your opinions that was hate speech and not the other way around? Hate speech is just orwellian code name to control opposite views. I can never be the pot or the kettle, I believe in your free speech. The difference between "opinion" and "inciting people to murder" is vast. If you like I'll only refer to "hate speech" as "murder speech". Not so vast. We had some problem with a humorist who was clearly on the grey area here... If I say "gays should be killed" it's easy to classify. But if I'm a humorist, and I take a character who says "but gays should be killed, after all it's like a disease, and the horrible thing is that the more they are, the more they spread the disease" then what do you do? It can be considered as humour yeah... But if the said humorist has some relationships with far right religious movements... And you know he's against gays... What do you do? |
|
|
|
maybe he deserve it,insulting if far too much,must be warn about that,every president have big wises to keep it respected by anyone,maybe that child only given some warn and education about "insulting". What? You gonna sue me if I say you're a dumbass? Well you're a dumbass that's for sure! |
|
|
|
I'm for free speech. I want to know what people I interact with think. Who to call friend and who to stay away from.
If a shop owner want to exclude people minority's from his shop I want to know about it so I can avoid doing my shopping there
I understand your way but you can't really consider normal global segregation. If you allow a shop owner to forbid access of his shop to blacks, then it means the white racists people will only go out and talk with white racist pricks... It won't help them to understand things :-/ |
|
|
|
Interesting how the pope had nothing to do with the trump until he decided to run for president. Now all of a sudden he's not christian. Nice.
Cause he hadn't enough public exposure. It's like saying "funny how nobody cared about Obama being black before it became president". Well of course, as nobody knew him... |
|
|
|
A Japanese company produces lifelike child sex dolls - claiming they prevent paedophiles from offending. Shin Takagi has shipped anatomically-correct sex dolls of girls as young as five to clients around the world for more than a decade. In an interview with The Atlantic, he described how he set up the Japense company Trottla because of his own attraction to children and his conviction they should be protected. “We should accept that there is no way to change someone’s fetishes,” Mr Takagi said. “I am helping people express their desires, legally and ethically. It’s not worth living if you have to live with repressed desire.”..... Japanese company manufactures lifelike child sex dolls for paedophileshttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/japanese-company-manufactures-lifelike-child-sex-dolls-for-paedophiles-a6811046.htmlAnd so? Now it's bad to have weird fetishes? Oo Why would you ban this fetish and not BDSM for example? No surprise that this comes from you. I have always suspected that you had serious issues. The urge to have sex with a child sex doll is not a fetish. I would call it pedophilia. Normal people don't get sexually aroused by little children, who are four or five years old. But if you get such sexual arousal, then I am afraid that you are a pedophile. And why should anyone ban BDSM? It is a consensual sexual activity involving adults. What is the problem with sex dolls though? I know it sounds sick but I don't see why it would be bad thing because there is no victim. Nothing bad. It's the same argument as people explaining that video games make you violent! Because you'll have sex with a child doll it means you'll rape children! Meh. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
