Many ICOs appeared using the real identities of the project team and dominance emerged from Africa, Russia and China, I even confirmed this several times via skype (I didn't carelessly follow many ICOs). if their project ends up detrimental, they are not even touched by law because there is no online crypto business regulator that limits the number of investors from outside their country. If this is related to terrorists, the government should have pocketed their data as evidence, but in reality this problem is still not too important to be taken seriously. For KYC, this is a very abstract problem because their business does not get legality, even after circulating in the market, dev is free to spread coins to traders without KYC. Important data investors and hunters who are considered important eventually become a boomerang for themselves.

High demand because the factors revealed will increase the value of the currency, it is true for fiat. But there is nothing related to permanent policy in bitcoin so it's very different. bitcoin always evaluates prices so that they will never be zero.
Currency devaluation does not affect anything, but it is useful to rearrange the influence of the central economy and focus on GDP, the rest depends on economic policy and governance. this explanation is suitable for macroeconomics. and you also have to look at the micro side related to investment because not everything will go parallel and only focus on debt.

Common man don't really care about sharpening assets, so they only attract profits that they think are enough. Investors are the opposite so they can continue to be stable, they manage everything with long-term calculations.
Consumptive nature is also different, investors tend to target something higher / expensive and this gives the effect of higher patience patterns on maximum satisfaction. Choose only to achieve targets and even in urgent conditions.

there is no need to clearly support it, but prepare their own crypto with their focus on digital transitions through the blockchain. this is the economic foundation that I see in China.

bitcoin transactions cannot be traced flexibly, but macro transaction control can be carried out from their official cryptocurrency (not from fiat) so that it will explicitly maintain the fiat value and further distance from the possibility of inflation.

accreditation is very important for this, if not then your efforts will only become ordinary non-regulated training institutions. Online open universities are already widely circulated, you can also start the same thing with the informal phase first and take care of regulations gradually, it can be started by holding regular blockchain seminars to refer to the formation of educational organizations that focus on legal pre-registration according to the conditions and provisions.

TA is part of supporting indicators, fundamentals are often not always 100%, so there is no single congruent factor for volume accumulation. prices will not really move without the manipulation factor. Here TA plays an important role because the candle will always be connected to the line behind it. Discussing about SL, sometimes it is not necessary if it is still close to the resistance and potential for a breakout.

You must use the Long-Term strategy because beginners will not feel panicked because of rapid fluctuations, profits can also be targeted starting at 10%. My point is that after placing an order, there is plenty of time to study the basic trading charts and what conditions will occur when floating.

If you have targeted daily trading and daily profits from the start, your capital will decrease very quickly because you only think of cutloss and small profits.

Massive movements that move suddenly will only occur in a short time because the pump will be saturated and then the market will move massively to altcoin to find a higher percentage. This also applies to the stock market in general. none of the interconnected entities can be quickly separated and weed out the others. what makes sense is a gradual increase in the pattern of adoption of real developments. This will encourage organic movement. So the condition of just moving it will not have serious effects.

Inflation has a model that is connected to the stability of state policies and if they try to reverse the situation with crypto then many areas of position do not run perfectly, this is more a behavior of neutralizing the economic atmosphere in a hurry and ultimately damaging the position of their legal currencies on the world stock exchanges , damage will occur quickly in the medium area.

not all are bad, I see some of them have analytics and movement charts that have accuracy, they even provide Twitter updates of each coin very quickly, they only sell their analysis. But unfortunately there are many channels that really like your comments, and here really need a personal filter.

I joined the VIP on the channel after many questions and answers with the owner, and always debated if our analysis was different, and here we have complementary views.

Almost all traders have moved to BTC now. if you still want to trade xrp then the usdt pair is still moving positively. BTC is testing prices up to $ 10k and has not been confirmed positive today. Daily xrp / btc hasn't touched 2750 and there is still good support to return to resistance, they are still in the average price.

many exchanges serve as competition aimed at reducing monopoly transaction fees. traders can have trading options with a 0.5% maker / taker requirement and move to an exchange that is only 0.075% with the condition of holding their utility token. Then it also functions to see which exchanges have the highest volume with different price ranges, this is very interesting for arbitrage.

a few months ago a lot of pumps and dumps took place on bitcoin with a fantastic nominal. If it is not funding from an institution, this is not possible. Then some cases of catching bitcoin scammers lead to the CIA which is collecting a lot of bitcoin stock. If this is related to a conspiracy, they can easily make it, throw it to the public massively easily because without official rules, and take force in large numbers considering the potential to be used for very large crimes. The rest that is still circulating is allowed to become an ongoing rumor, this conspiracy is effective in preparing backups to overcome many parties who begin to distrust fiat, and if in the end the world only chooses one system, and even then only a game of transition from the government.

If the stable coin you mean is USD, you are better suited to discuss it on the forex forum, bitcoin has its own characteristics. And if you mean usdt (tether), this coin is also very active in btc and alt price pairs. although price refers to the original dollar, tether cannot stand alone especially if it is used for alt trading whose daily charts still depend on btc.

several times I did not get a ticket from ieo binance., especially this kava project. but that doesn't matter, profits can still be obtained when the trade is opened. Sure, profits can be lower, but that's OK. I prefer to join directly in ieo. but for other markets it is better to look at the market's reputation first, no matter how good the coins are, the reputation will greatly affect, of course we don't want to get lost like what happened at bitmart.

there is a saturation limit on every trend that has had the same pattern for too long, this can be seen from the monthly chart, generally occurs on coins that almost touch atl. From several things, they formed the pattern independently without seeing btc. Road maps and new programs can also be a rocket spark, we can see on bnb and similar coins.

The current dominance of bitcoin has greatly influenced the development of altcoin, I think this is a logical problem. If it returns to $ 5k and the sideways are long enough, alt dominance will increase. It is true that many coins will not be strong, but not with coins that have sufficient daily volume in some large exchange markets, but conditions will return more differently if btc returns to $ 3k

Other reasons besides the BTC condition still appear micro, yesterday's example is TRX which has a case in China, the price reduction did not occur significantly and the recovery went smoothly in July. But when BTC went down, TRX could not survive and fell about 150 sat and is still low until now. bitcoin is still the dominant reason for altcoin, even the usdt / alt pair as an alternative doesn't really help.

Quantitative easing with an emphasis on inflation also depends on the debt ratio and economic resilience to interest rates. If it is still below the normal threshold, it will not damage many things explicitly, most countries cannot handle it because it only depends on one guarantee sector. Crypto cannot solve many things just like that, this is really faced by Venezuela, I mean, cannot stabilize the national economy because of many obstacles. Recapitalization by reforming the system must be done in the long term through new sectors to improve their fiat value.

from the business side, it is not easy if the company wants to develop business marketing with such currency conditions. If so, they will start with stable coins, and most will definitely be more comfortable with it in the end. So the point here is that crypto with high volatility will remain a stock asset that is not offered even if there are companies that provide risky things like that, they also always measure potential panic ratios that will emerge