The answer to your post is, there's lots of people who make believe they're rich when they really aren't because they have no way to control or defend their assets against the other 99.9%.  Hell, much of their assets rely on the 99.9% being able to purchase their goods but they can't.  It's just a system of phantom wealth everywhere.  

In the end, the only wealth you have will be what you can hold in your hand and defend with a Natzee Luger, or what the consensus of your neighbors agree is yours.  There will obviously be massive redistribution and pillaging whether people want to believe so or not, or pretend they can avoid it.  No, non-fungible shitcoins are not in any way a benefit over metals in this, especially when your balance and account history is sitting right out in the open for the entire world to view it.  

The so called "elite" put their money in private trusts to try and avoid things like this, confiscations, and turn their account balance and transactions opaque.  A non-fungible shitcoin is a step downwards in that regard.  If the world went Venezuela or simply Joseph Tantor style reduction in complexity and is mostly based around barter or whatever, digital shitcoins are not going to be of any value.  It will be physical metals ruling with an iron fist, so there is no lame shitcoin pumper talking points like "but muh shitcoins are easier to hide!".  

It's pretty abnormal to want to have kids in an overcrowded/overpopulated environment, combined with the fact knowing the world is on the eve of financial apocalypse where you yourself might even have a low chance of survival. The only type of people who are having kids right now are bottom of the barrel R-selection group brown people or just dumbasses and fools in general.  

Women generally fall under the category of fool and will want to have kids no matter what, though.  They will attempt to trick you into this act even if it's a dumb idea.  I guess stupid women are required for the species to exist, otherwise everyone would all stop having kids at the same time and go extinct.

You consider metals being represented by paper a normality, I consider it just a transitory scam.  Through history, paper money has ALWAYS been a derivative of metals, not vice versa.  It's just a simple, temporary scam that will implode like it always does.

People will always use banks no matter what because they want to outsource security and responsibility to someone else, but there's absolutely nothing stopping the form of money used solely being gold, silver, and copper instead of paper.  You can easily have enough granularity with those three metals.  It just means the market caps of silver and copper would be much higher than they are now in comparison to gold.  Even if silver is $500 an ounce, a 1/10th ounce silver coin is only $50, then you can have 1 oz copper coins, 1/10th an oz, or even 1/20th of an ounce copper coins below that if you really want to.

The banks are also always going to attempt to run fractional reserve no matter what widget you use whether it's metals or digital shitcoins until you form a physical lynch mob and hang them, so fractional reserve is not even a valid topic to discuss concerning type of monetary unit.

^This brief time span in history will be known as the period where women erroneously thought they were more intelligent and more important than men simply because they spent orders of magnitude more time and money on physical appearance, clothes, and putting on makeup.  Everything is presentation and no substance.

Unlike bitcoin, it doesn't matter who currently owns or runs whatever minining camp in physical gold, silver, or copper.  Metals remove middlemen and counterparty risk, so it doesn't matter at all.  All that matters is what you have in your hand.  As opposed to bitcoin where people think or make believe they actually own a coin when they don't, otherwise they wouldn't constantly be looking over their shoulder to do things like look up mining pool centralization. You never own a bitcoin.  It's not possible to take delivery of a bitcoin.  It's cloud banking just like cloud computing aka horrible.

As for the government, I do not give a flying shit what the Jewish occupied govt says.  The evil cult of Judaism is my enemy.  There are 300 million goyim sleeper cells in the US alone ready to expel the Jew just like they've been expelled from nations 300+ times before.  It's inevitable they are given the boot.

Bullshit post.  The only top line hierarchical form of consensus in the real world is force.  Your shitcoins can be made unspendable or blacklisted by the designed to centralize transaction validators, or rendered unusable by numerous other factors.  They have built-in middlemen and don't remove counterparty risk.  In other words, you don't even have to apply direct force to stop their use or confiscate them such as PoW cultist retards would like you to believe. They can be directly attacked or side channel attacked.

Physical metals, on the other hand, DO require direct force to confiscate them.  There is no fucking 'side channel' attack on physical metals.  If you want to attempt to steal them, prepare to die trying to take them. There's no actual way to attempt to defend yourself against the theft, destruction, or immobilization of your digital shitcoins.  The direct application of force can be entirely bypassed and you can be rendered broke with no defense precisely because shitcoins have built-in middlemen and don't remove counterparty risk.  

There IS NO NASH EQUILIBRIUM to protect you from anything because it's designed to centralize.  It's a cuck system where you're just standing out there like a sitting duck waiting to be cucked.

*Translation:  Us raging faggot criminals at Bitfinex have once again pulled the plug on the exchange because we're trying to artificially rig the market upwards but people took out longs so we would lose money and hope we can implode the longs by turning off the power.  If this tactic fails to work, we will then claim to be hacked and just steal your money anyway.

It's never your bitcoin even if you do have the key.  It's not possible to take possession of a bitcoin.  Just like cloud computing, your shitcoin resides in the virtual cloud and you have to pay a ransom fee and ask permission to a transaction validator if he will allow you to do anything with it.  The fact coins are non-fungible, transaction validators are designed to centralize, and transaction validators have the ability to blacklist funds, means the system is nothing but a permissioned ledger, Orwellian piece of garbage similar to the Chinese social credit score system.

This is why the kikes in congress said they will attempt to ban any 'anonymous' craptocurrency.  They know non-fungible coins always lead to their dystopian slave coin goal while fungible ones are just like deleting AML/KYC.  Fungible coins will still be a dystopia anyway, just not as big of one.  It will still centralize into a tiny amount of mining pools the bankers/govt will take control of and take a cut out of every transaction to make themselves permanently richer than everyone else.  It's no different than collecting a steady stream of interest.

The 3d industry (I think a few places like Pixar) tried to outsource to India and it failed in the past.  Their work was not as good as western nations, plus they put their cultural slant on the work as well.  This was just the beginning, though.  The industry is already mature in the west and succeeds in funneling lots of people who are naturally gifted at arts into the field.  In places like India, for numerous reasons, that does not happen.

Maybe it's even impossible for those people to be funneled into that industry at all without the entire nation itself industrializing into a 1st world country, then India's massive population would hold no advantage.  But it's also possible even if their nation stays somewhat 3rd world, they manage to carve out niche industry (think call centers) except instead of call centers, they specialize in programming, 3d, or whatever and undercut the west.  As time goes by, as long as the wage gap between each country is huge, the more incentive there is for them to attempt to form those niche industries and undercut the west, so a lot of it seems sort of inevitable.

Like I said, due to India's structural problems and relative 3rd world status, it's entirely possible India fails to undercut the west, but it's EASILY possible places like China undercut just about EVERYTHING in programming, plus all the low wage, Eastern Euro countries and Russia as well.  There's not much stopping those nations from demolishing the standard of living in programming in the future.  Most of them even know English now.

This is what you see people spam in the Poloniex trollbox right before something implodes to zero.

Yes, it's shocking to see someone mention video games on a forum solely composed of scammers, pump and dump scammers, programmer scammers, and people who play video games that discovered it might be possible to make money with their idle GPU.

You're speaking from a pre-bubble implosion position.  This is the eve before 2008 before everything goes off a cliff again, except probably far worse this time.  I talked to some Australian the other day that was making decent money making ENDLESS RUNNER phone video games.  This is the worst type of video game that exists, yet he's somehow making decent cash making them (entirely subsidized by advertising which is currently imploding).  

Plan for the future, not the present.  There will soon be zero demand for people like that and talent will flood the market like a torrent.  Things are like the exact opposite of how people such as Anonymint describe them.  He says the future is a knowledge age where intellectual capital is king.  He seems to have overlooked when the economy blows up, nobody actually needs people who make endless runner video games, but people still need the same amount of plumbing work and everything else done.  So intellectual capital people are going to be the ones kinda getting obliterated in the short and medium term at least.

You're not really safe in the short or medium term unless you're doing something related to the base of Maslow's Pyramid.

He's already all-in on imaginary, valueless shitcoins.  Not the greatest idea to both train for a job in that while being all-in invested at the same time.  Then when the shitcoin industry implodes, you suddenly have zero money in your wallet and your skills are now also worth zero.  Have to diversify somewhere.

Regardless, the whole "learn to code" thing could probably be considered a decent investment in the 80's, 90's, and early 2000's, but now with full blown global labor arbitrage everywhere, it doesn't seem like that great of a position when you have to compete with people who will work for 1/4th to 1/10th of what you will.  The effectiveness of tariffs to stop the work from being outsourced is much lower than other fields too.  

Have you looked at the video game industry and whole 'app store' bullshit lately?  It's an obvious huge bubble as well.  90% of these game devs are going to be getting the axe or going bankrupt and it will be far more brutal than the old Atari era industry crashes.  We are currently at the trough of the commodity super cycle (no, bitcoin is not a real commodity), so people invested in real world goods and industry should be making a killing soon while 'intellectual capital' will probably be taking a major hit.

Of course when I say "industry", I don't mean index stocks where the PE ratio is completely laughable like Amazon and everything else.  I mean the rise of commodity prices in general and people who benefit from that like miners and others.

The learn to code meme is dumb.  Since almost everything to do with programming can be done remotely, I'm amazed globalization hasn't gutted salaries completely.  I would guess it will keep progressing in that manner until the act of coding is doing lots of work for mediocre pay and looking like a pretty shit industry compared to many others.  This is why you see metric tons of trannies in programming nowadays.  They got tired of trying to pass themselves off as women and failing so all just started programming remotely from their house.

I'm sure more lower salary nations like China, India, Eastern Europe, etc, will continue to massively drive down wages as they hop on the programming bus with the army of trannies already there.  If you don't want to be completely displaced by global labor arbitrage, you kind of have to have some kind of skill that can't be outsourced.

Cryptocurrency has no valid Schelling point.  Anyone who claims it does is a moron.  "First mover advantage".  Tell me, how did "first mover advantage" work out for things like the Sega Saturn vs the Sony Playstation in the 32 bit video game console race?  It didn't.  The shit you spam all day is just mindless pump and dump propaganda.

The craptocurrency market is even more fake than the absurdly fake stock market.  It's bad enough people are buying imaginary, valueless tokens, but add on the fact the bitcoin market is controlled by a single entity on the fake, criminal exchange Bitfinex all the way from $200 to $20,000, so you have no real price discovery at all.  The 'real' price of a bitcoin is anyone's guess, but anyone who has been in this market knows the entire trip from $200 to $20,000 was nothing but Bitfinex manipulation.

Just tried new Resident Evil 2 game.  Graphics are cool and everything.  Gameplay is non-existent.  I'm not sure how it got an overwhelmingly positive rating.  It controls like a 747 too.  An example of a good FPS-RPG is Metro 2033 Redux.  Resident Evil 2 plays like an endless find the hidden lever adventure game combined with worst combat system ever.

JayJuanGee, what in the fuck is this jibberish you're posting?  Your argument is basically that since bitcoin has some minor level of liquidity *right now* it's guaranteed to always be there.  No, it's not, just like hundreds of other fiat notes and altcoins whose liquidity used to be something and is now zero.  The only thing that can maintain liquidity on a long enough timeline is an actual use case. 

Gold has a lot of use cases, although much lower than silver and copper, so that typically prevents it's liquidity from imploding and the commodity going to zero.  Bitcoin's only real use case is regulatory arbitrage, which is an untenable, TEMPORARY feature.  Transaction validators are designed to centralized, traffic is not obfuscated, transactions are non-fungible, etc, so it's extremely easy for the govt to stop regulatory arbitrage in bitcoin and even control it entirely.

Then all you have left is some fake claim of scarcity which isn't even true since cryptocurrencies have no valid Schelling point.  In this thread you have people who only care about Ethereum, or only care about Monero, or only care about Bitcoin.  People just flee to whatever the blockchain pump and dump of the day is, whatever has the lowest transaction fees at the time, or whatever coin where the distribution favors themselves instead of the next guy.  Metals do not have any of these problems because you can't create a new noble metal in your basement.