That shouldn't be necessary. If there's a problem with 2 addresses, then there might well be a problem with even more (most likely the case). Don't you think a general troubleshooting look on your end would be more appropriate?

It should be easy to confirm that there are addresses that received stage one and two but not stage three, don't you think? After all, there aren't that many and Excel does the job in seconds.

My wife and I still haven't received our stage 3 coins.

That was a really good idea. Good going, and congratulations!

Absolutely. Without a long term vision, the short termers will drag you down to the point where instead of slowly accumulating a long term investment, you sell what little you mine at a loss!

Glad you liked it!



I'll be there to pay you a visit from time to time!

In the meantime, we've got a first birthday party to plan for January 10!

And you're right about organizing something to increase visibility. This should be our number one objective right now. DGB is back on the map and being mined like crazy! This is the time! We're back on track and still in the "early adopter" phase (that should last long enough to really take DGB mainstream).

You know, when I look around, I don't see any crypto that's even close to DigiByte’s professional and proven Dev team, long term business plan and global vision, and algo change and mining production that’s literally rocking along – nobody’s even close to being positioned to develop a wide scale user base like DigiByte is. It’s not even close if you ask me.



I took a closer look at the long term, and at current rates of production (a realistic projection), some 22 years from now, around 2036, block rewards will finally make it to 1 DGB. Who knows how much a loaf of bread will cost by then, but if we were to say for argument's sake that it costs the same, and if BTC were still only worth $500, and DGB only made it to the 1000:1 mark at 50¢, that would still translate into a whopping $1,440.00 a day, and with current diffs, would still be very profitable (hey, if a loaf of bread costs the same, then so would electricity, right?   ). Being more realistic, we should throw in some sort of inflation into the mix, but it would be the same for all components, more or less, correct? The point is that as the block reward falls, the price will rise . . . unless we're talking about a dying (or already dead) coin, which DGB certainly is not. I put in a green area on that chart where I think it's highly likely to be one of the "kings of the hill", but that green area could extend forever - theoretically, block reward never gets to zero (and if and when it might be necessary, years and years from now, we could always to a switch to POW/PoS . . .). There are transaction fees to keep in mind as well.

To be sure, I think this thing's as solid as it gets, and to worry about the short term only diverts our attention away from what we should really be concentrating on, which is aggressively bringing new early adopters on board. We've got a couple of years to create a user base equaled by none, and I dare say that at this time we have ZERO competition and it's ours for the doing.



None what-so-ever YC. It's only about block reward and money supply, and some personal, well informed (if I don't say so myself) observations.

Price is completely independent. It could go up, network hashrate and diff could go up too, let's say to a million miners just to be gregarious, and the blocks discovered and DGB mined would be the same. What could cause a million miners to get on DGB? An incredibly rising price, of course, but that's something I don't predict in the short term by any means, and a subject for another day, which I do expect to address as soon as I have the time to properly do so.





Oh, and while it's cheaper to just buy DGB with fiat, why bother renting hash (or investing in hardware)? But that's for another day too.

Start point data was based on money supply and block reward as of yesterday, and the projections are based on the 0.5% block reward reduction every 10,080 blocks and the assumption that the smoothed, long term block discovery rate equals the current rate.

Good question. Thanks for asking. I thought it was evident, but by the looks of the lack of response, I think you were not alone in wondering. I've also edited the original to include that information.

New money trail for newly skimmed DGB:

Newly Generated Coins
to
DFkpdefR47BRfa4AU2zdEXup6aCtt9VSy7
to
DT3qxDjbtzrG5skLX2fi5c9xCWCtvS3XCj
to
DRykTe2nXZpSX1KytPXjvPhGfCAXb4ZBM6

These are not 20% amounts. These are entire block find amounts.

DRykTe2nXZpSX1KytPXjvPhGfCAXb4ZBM6 now has a nice final balance of 6,846,600 DGB.


Do you think he's going to send you a thank you note at Christmas for being so nice and letting him rob you blind?


srcxxx's future of mining: bend over, grab your ankles . . .         

srcxxx,

Since that was your last on the subject, this is my last as well (I've done enough of my good citizen's good deeds in this regard and frankly I'm also a bit bored with your childish evasiveness . . . but I can only speak for myself as perhaps others might want to voice their concerns, anger, whatever, as they discover having been deceived).

The data speaks for itself. A full 20% of all your DGB pool's block rewards is automatically taken off the top and sent to one of two separate addresses where those DGB are "parked".

That's 20% of rewards that is not paid to miners.

PERIOD!

If you ever want to take the issue up again by addressing those facts, I'm sure we'd all be interested in hearing you out.

Everything else is diversionary BS.

@Litejavichu

You think that's good or something?

You can't be serious.

Can you say sockpuppet?

Pretty good for a self-confessed "noob". If I didn't know better, I'd say I was impressed.

That strange error was probably the keystroke logger install. 

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/f395b88edb6d65bae2f8850b2b15cf9f0972b14d96ca0b376716fc9dcc2712f8/analysis/1409906301/

Yeah, with his kind of "transparency" and data reporting:

"You need to understand that daily profits will be different each day.
There is a fee that pool operator takes and it is undisclosed currently. Our pool likes to keep things simple.

Q: Why is my hashrate so low? I used to have 16.7MH/s on R9 290 and now I have like 930KH/s
A: That is normal. Because boostpool can switch netween different algorithms, you would be getting different hashrate otherwise (depending on current algo). So it was decided to scale the hashrate to be consistent. So grs-sgminer shows hashrate similar to Scrypt hashrate on the same equipment."
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=770959

It's sooooo much easier to scam.  

Wow, I was going to ask if anyone knew how to buy BTC in Europe with fiat, and https://www.litebit.eu/en/ looks really interesting. Now, I've got to take a closer look. Don't have much time this weekend, but I'll have to make some time because I really want to get aggressively on the buy side of all that dumping!

I finally got around to doing a 24 hour analysis comparing the block find numbers between algos (much easier that I thought due to some block explorer features I was overlooking).

Groest........541
Qubit..........556
Scrypt.........177
SHA-256.....515
Skein..........572

Total blocks found 2361.

If we add the averaged 369 blocks that scrypt should also be finding to that total, we’d we looking at a total of 2730, which would be very close to theoretical.

I’m not at all sure about what could be causing this, but with the issue having to do with scrypt, and with scrypt being the “old” algo, my first inclination is to ask if active “old” wallets, or previously configured and still not updated pool servers, or exchanges, or the like, might not be causing this.

Was thinking about ideas, and/or prototypes, for those working on block explorers, and this one came to mind as an example to follow (or perhaps to at least glean some tidbits from). I think it's a great example of a lightweight, but lean and mean foundation to build on.

http://columbus.aidbit.net/

I use the srcxxx’s optimized sgminer with the --myriadcoin-groestl kernel switch (which is not the –optimized switch to be used only on his pool). --myriadcoin-groestl works on all pools and gives me almost double the hashrate that the sgminer prettyhatemachine version gives me with only an ~25% increase in electrical usage and slightly higher temps. The added additional gain to that 25% that the –optimized switch gets you - only on his pool - is minor in comparison, and will not make up for your “hidden fees” even in your wildest dreams. (Try 48 hour minimum benchmarking on various pools to confirm.)

HOWEVER, keep in mind that you use this miner at your own risk and that you should have adequate security measures in place (along with perhaps a nice little autodestruct honey pot) since this is the only version/flavour of sgminer that I know of that gets heavily flagged as being a Trojan on the part of a good many AV companies. https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/f395b88edb6d65bae2f8850b2b15cf9f0972b14d96ca0b376716fc9dcc2712f8/analysis/1409906301/


BTW, I love that phase “hidden fees”. Can’t get enough of this doublespeak, euphemism ridden world we live in.

That’s a fantastic way of making skimming sound a whole lot better.  

Since the final destination address still only has 51 transactions (only 34 when I originally posted on this ... if my memory serves me correctly), probably the easiest way to confirm the sends to the final destination receiving address is by going to that address ( http://insight.dgb.cryptopoolmining.com/address/DRykTe2nXZpSX1KytPXjvPhGfCAXb4ZBM6 ) and totalling the amounts received from the send address (DBy3212dWAPPzPcyt5fSSchjyozyr5ejLw) and then comparing that with the total amount sent by the send address.

This is still relatively easy to see since the blockchain data is still relatively new, and that is why it is extremely important that everyone take a look at this to “see it with their own eyes” while it’s still easy to do so. In not too much time the blockchain will get much more unwieldy and the data will roll into history so to speak. It will become a he said, she said event. All DGB miners and investors, please take the 10 to 15 minutes that it takes to see this with you own eyes while it’s still easy to do so.

And many thanks to the folks working on block explorers. Without you, we’d all be operating in the blind!