I've had only good experiences with NewsCrypto so far, but I have to say it's taking you guys forever to release some of the features you said are under development for your premium plans.

What's the ETA on the automatic arbitrage opportunity finder?

Right now the premium functionality just unlocks a bunch of tools NewsCrypto has aggregated from other places... When are we going to get something proprietary?

I know you're slightly cheaper than TradingView, but right now the NWC token price is going up and you're losing that edge...

I'm fairly sure it won't happen again. Once you're dead, there's no doing it twice.

I don't have any sympathy for cases like this. I mean, why kill yourself over a $730,000 debt? Most US college students are in over $100k debt, and plenty of people pay it off.

He could simply emigrate to a country with no extradition laws and start a new life, and yet he kills himself over this? Insanity.

He must have had a lot of other shit going on in his life at the same time or suffered from clinical issues, as this isn't normal behavior. Throw your life away over money? WTF.

Good luck with that. They'd have to break some of the most effective privacy and obfuscation systems ever designed to do so. Can't imagine that the IRS has the capabilities to crack Ring CT signature or ZCash's zk-SNARKs. They can't even track offshore funds, how the fuck are they going to track anonymized transactions?

I think they're just scare mongering, hoping that they can scare some people out of using these privacy coins just in case theyhave some sort of magic deanonymization tool.

Well, most DeFi platforms are actually experiencing meteoric growth at the moment—whether deservedly so or not.

So long as you don't believe that they'll be around in several months or years, and you just trade the trend you should be fine. I personally trade a bunch of DeFi coins like Orion Protocol (ORN), Stake, Aave etc, and don't have emotional affiliation to them.

Just trade with pure logic and no sentiment, and you can turn a profit. Stay away from anything with an anonymous team or no working product though.

More chunky wins on the high roller board today! Including a 0.05 to 0.7 ETH bet and a win of almost 1 million DOGE!



You've gotta be in it to win it!

You need to understand that there are extremely challenges to creating a universal money.

Though it is true that the vast majority of countries have a stable economy, there are also a large number of developing economies that suffer from rampant hyper inflation. Some of this is due to corruption, but also due to extremely poor fiscal policy in these countries.

How would these countries that don't even have their own economy under control be able to buy Bitcoin to even make it their country's national currency? It would take an extremely long time, and that's if all the Bitcoin isn't hoarded by the more economically developed countries.

I don't think Bitcoin will ever be a truly universal currency, but it can definitely get close.

I understand that Roy Jones Jr is one of the greatest of all time, but Mike Tyson is just an absolute beast. But since it's an exhibition bout, I'm pretty sure they are not going to be going for knockouts. If this is true, then Roy Jones Jr is going to win on points—he's definitely the more technically gifted boxer of the two. I think Mike Tyson's best bet is to come out all gun's blazing and try to knock him out cold. I also don't think it should be an exhibition bout... I mean, why?

They're both around the same age and will be fighting at the same weight. They're roughly the same size though Roy Jones Jr usually fights lighter. He's also much more active too. I think it's going to be a tough night for Mike Tyson if he refuses to go in for a knockout.

I don't think they would ever be able to hold it for long that it would just be simply forgotten. Usually these hacks affect a large number of people, and many of these will check regularly to see if the funds have been moved. Even if the number of people checking does dwindle over time, there will still be the odd guy that checks every year or so, just in case (someone just like me).

I was scammed for 14 BTC back in 2016 and the guy still hasn't moved the coins. I still check the address on etherscan every few months, just in case.

Also, it's not that hard to cash out illegally obtained Bitcoin's, there's a few wallets like Wasabi and Samourai that feature built-in fungibility and mixing tools. Though these might be breakable if somebody has enough data about the participants involved in a mixing session.

I'd rather place a bet on who'd be first to commercialize space flight.

There seems to be a few players in this race, like Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin and Elon Musk's SpaceX. Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic is another well-established player.

I want to see which of these will be the first to open a space hotel or being mining asteroids too.

My money is on SpaceX for now, but Blue Origin is probably a sleeping beast.

I think adoption can also be improved by reducing resistance from governments, corporations, and banks.

It seems that every couple of months or so, we get news that a government of some country is looking to crack down on the industry in some way. There's also regularly releases from banks stating specifically that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are HIGHLY risky investment options but not money etc.

You even get paid campaigns from hedge funds shitting on cryptocurrencies—probably so they can manipulate the market while it's still young and net a ridiculous profit.

We need to work on breaking down these barriers, since we always seem to hit against one right when the market is on a big rally.

So glad that we have a platform like this to automatically track these scammers.

Saves people having to check every day whether or not their stolen funds have been moved by the perp.

However, some of these larger movements tend to be taken out of context by noobs, who seemingly thing that a large Bitcoin movements almost certainly equals a dump, whereas a large stablecoin movements equals a pump.

It's true.

Technical analysis can be useful for measuring the direction of the market over longer scales, but it wont help when something has just burst onto the scene and is going bonkers.

I think far too many spend their on working on their TA, when they should actually be spending that time scouting for hidden gems that haven't hit exchanges yet, and are about to pop when they do.

Fundamental analysis is the way forward, combine this with industry contacts, and you've got a recipe for grabbing all the best tokens before anyone else even knows they exist.

Ah, looks like you're right.

I simply did CTRL + F "crypto.games" and it didn't come up.

Looks like the thread is more comprehensive than it first appeared 

ICOs are the old way of doing things, IEOs were the next generation, the current generation is the DYCO's offered through DAOMaker.

These are basically ICOs that have a guaranteed refund rate if you ever want to cash out.

Projects don't get access to all of the money at once, hence they can't just sit around and twiddle their thumbs. If they fail to deliver on their promises, then customers can pull the money back and screw them once and for all.

Take a look at Orion Network, this was the result of the first DYCO. You'll see for yourself how it went.

Safe is a strong word.

Let's start with reasonably safe instead.

In investment, there is always risk and reward. For most financial instruments, the risk is usually limited since the companies that offer them are frequently bound by certain rules and regulations that govern how they need to act and the precauations they need to put in place to protect user funds.

Most crypto companies are not bound by these rules, so they're really just operating based on reputation rather than culpability.

I don't believe crypto.com is a scam or anything, but it's certainly not bulletproof. Don't go investing your life savings on it.

Well, most countries don't actually tax cryptocurrencies until they have been disposed of. This essentially means once they have been spent, sent, used or otherwise exercised.

Only a handful of countries will tax cryptocurrencies that havent been disposed of, this is because it actually opens them up to some severe downsides.

For example, if somebody buys a lot of cryptocurrencies and then loses most of their money, they could then claim a tax rebate in many countries. And since there are more losers than winners in trading, it would probably be net negative for them to tax undisposed digital assets.

Pretty sure America is the only country that does this, that's because it's a third world country masquerading as a first world one, and needs all the money it can to keep up this image.

Any reason why you haven't listed the salary/pay grade these CMs can expect?

You've got a long list of your requirements and what you want, but don't even have the decency to at least state what the CMs can expect in return?

I personally find it infuriating when potential employers/recruiters do this, and I can only imagine that the highest quality candidates wouldn't apply for such a position. I certainly wouldn't.

Has anybody from Bitcointalk hired you yet? And do you have any vouches from Bitcointalk users?

Basic, very basic.

These are all massive cap cryptocurrencies, realistically even in 3-5 years they might only experience a 2-10x improvement at the very best.

If you really want to rack up the money, you should invest in a micro-cap coin that has the potential to climb into the top 100 or even top 50.

You can see a few DeFi coins have managed to achieve this lately, odds are a few more will also make it.

These can make 10x improvement in a much shorter time, which could then use to build your long-term stack in BTC, ETH etc.

I said this to JollyGood weeks ago, this thread should be closed IMO, it's useless.

You already have a resounding result which shows Fury is favored by the majority, you don't need to get to 100 votes to tally the percentages—just scale up the numbers.

This thread should be closed until the fight is announced, or at least the title should b changed because its misleading.