You have to select Playmoney currency to see the bonus. I was credited 2,000 PM but for some reason every time I try to place a bet it gives me an error msg saying odds have changed. Kept refreshing and trying new selections but same errors.

I might be trying out the bonus with real deposits, if this resolves. I usually use parlays to complete my rollovers when it comes to bonus money. Will let you guys know how it turns out.

Reserve writing contest.

Hmm, not entirely sure if I understand this post correctly, but from what I gather, I'd like to give a try to the writing/editing section. After all, I do enjoy gambling!

To clarify, this thread is what we're supposed to clean up, right? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1966246.0

Apart from the obvious security and anonymity reasons people have already mentioned, I personally like creating different wallets (or at least different addresses) for the various different types of payments I make/receive.

This is purely administrative from a personal point of view. My main wallet (Electrum) is for large, significant transactions. Even within that, each address is assigned a purpose so I can easily do minor bookkeeping.

I also have a wallet within an exchange to store Bitcoins I intend to cash out. This allows me to immediately sell it when I need it, while saving on fees sending from my personal wallet (so I save some time and a bit of satoshi).

That makes two of you now (the other is game-protect) whose chief aim is to alert people about casino scams. It's a great idea to form some sort of community to protect consumers but you already face a difficult task, especially with the way crypto gambling is virtually unregulated. I might suggest a more formal approach, and less antagonistic ones - with a clear focus on achieving your goals.

Game-Protect for example, does quite well in structuring their consumer protection aims but suffers from a conflict of interest (they also advertise casinos). You can see the user's trust feedback to understand how important objectivity is.

@OP: You can start by improving your thread title. A casino being offline isn't nearly enough to warrant a scam.

Great soccer tip, and yes it was a friendly but England is really poor these days. Can't even show up in a friendly!



Good profit on this one, I only wanted to make up for the earlier tennis loss. And of course am going to bet on your next tip too!

I think one of the major reasons people would still use Polo is the amounts of Bitcoin available for borrowing (for margin trading). In the past 24 hours, I've just seen more than 8,000 BTC available to borrow, which is still a great deal more than their competitors.

Time to see if one of the traditional heavyweights are any better at predicting Bitcoin ebbs than the slew of crypto traders here. Interesting that they're projecting bullish patterns only after a 20% drop.

I found several errors (grammar) but nothing critical, such as:
1. A long long time ago (punctuation)
2. Anyone have these values (Anyone who has)
===

1) Why do you think it will fail? Very good if you can find several reasons we'll fail, but we're thankful for any number.
I believe there have been similar ideas in the past. I cannot speak of their success, but the founders will always give in to the very tempting idea that they are correct and new individuals would find it very difficult to integrate. As you begin, this project will likely fail. If not from financial reasons, for legal ones. If not for that, then because of the impossible nature of individualism.

2) How much do you like the idea? (1-5 stars)
1.5 stars.

3) What's the most attractive part to you?
The co-working space. Like-minded people to work with.

4) What are the barriers that would stop you from joining this project next month, if you wanted to join?
Financial.

5) How much do you want to join if it works? (1-5 stars)
1. Unfortunately, I have family whom I must prioritise.

6) What parts of the content did you not like? What did you like? Is there too much text, or too little?
It's your text, nothing to dislike.

7) Are there other improvements we should make?
A suggested "roadmap" for individuals without means

Just signed up and spent a bit of time. First impressions: smart and slick, doesn't load slowly at all (well done!). Quick comments:

1. After verifying email, there is an error msg displayed.
2. For rollover of bonus, ToC doesn't describe min odds. It only says you can't bet both sides of the game. Can I do parlay bets to complete rollover?
3. FAQ says there are withdrawal fees, but there isn't any amount mentioned. Could you clarify?

Well, I sure wish I'd been around when all you old hands were playing but glad to be able to be part of this now (thanks philipma1957 for the contest!) so here's my semi-pseudo-educated pick.

+8.0 = buwaytress

Another new site to try! Looks like I have a new past time now. Been happy with normal UK bookies as they give generous offers every now and then but am beginning to think Bitcoin sportsbooks are worth it just for hassle-free payments. Will update later how it works out.

If everyone accumulated then it's defeating one of the earliest main purposes of Bitcoin, if not the founding idea of what it was... a p2p digital currency. The more people use it, the better in the long run, no? Otherwise remove all the volume from trading and you have an otherwise useless commodity.

Even if it does fall all the way down to 2k, that would be a support level for me and a perfect opportunity to get in - I have yet to buy any but will be in a position to do so soon so this will be timely. If it does't and hold as you think it will, still a good time for a correction. I have to say no one can be unhappy with the way it's going now.

Just checking back on this thread 2 months before kickoff! It's definitely certain to get 20 people at this rate. Understand OP is escrow for pot so I'm happy to already send my fee before I gamble it all away (yes, it will happen).

The fixtures are due to be released on 14 June (2 days away)... I'll volunteer to put up a suggested spreadsheet with known participants if everyone's okay with that.

Ouch, Denis had me going there for a while after he won the first set... not sure what he did thereafter as he whimpered to lost the second and third. Wish I knew more about tennis to help with these tips.

Still a good record so far, 5W 2L.

Always a good thing to have competitors, just to keep the major ones in check. I, for one, feel that exchanges need to focus on exchanging and trading platforms need to focus on trading. The best exchangers I use have the highest rates and quickest exchanges. I imagine the best traders should have tight spreads and good volume to fulfill orders correctly.

The one thing that will make you stand out is support. Responsive, expert support staff that resolves issues quickly.

It's of course possible and you'll find many, many people doing that with success. The only problem is once they hit that "big amount", it becomes a bankroll that's not nearly enough to last any variation of martingale strategy. End result is loss just with an extended timeframe.

The only true purpose of this strategy is to record wagers, if the site has some form of loyalty programme.

Entertainment value is pretty good though!

Seems like Bitcoin is refusing to "correct". Gargantuan momentum keeps driving it up - I've noticed volumes on some local exchangers are doubling and some buyers are offering even 5% above polo's ask. I can see a bare 1% profit if I were to buy from these exchanges and sell locally. But without a bankroll the effort's not quite worth it yet.

Wow, another 3 goals to win over 2.5, and good thing Macedonia hit back for 1 just as I predicted. One shot on target = one goal. What a match. Having a good run so far, eh guys?



Looking forward to your next tip today.

Well you're already more than 10 percent in profit if you really got it at that price! Does make me wonder why on earth were people in South Korea buying it at above 4000 when Bitcoin first broke the 2k barrier. Fever pitch sure is something to watch isn't it?