Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 05:44:18 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 »
181  Economy / Service Discussion / Best Crypto trading exchanges? on: December 24, 2013, 07:53:06 PM
Cryptsy

Coins-E

BTER

Of sights like those above. Which are the best and why.

Fees. Dependability etc.
182  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Coinbase - Hands down the most unprofessional Bitcoin service I've dealt with on: December 19, 2013, 03:48:30 AM
Coinbase isn't for day traders. Those types looking to trade frequently should look elsewhere. Coinbase is  for buy and hold types that sell in a year or so. Or Coinbase is for nerdists that actually want to buy things with Bitcoin. 

It looks like Coinbase is swamped by the new level of trading. 

I actually bought some Bitcoins for a grand a piece and I'm not sniveling. It won't be long and they will be going for $2000. Cheesy 
183  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Coinbase - Hands down the most unprofessional Bitcoin service I've dealt with on: December 19, 2013, 01:28:33 AM
I've never had any trouble with Coinbase and they have reasonable fee's.  All of my trades have went through with no problems. The other 2 places I tried to do business with were a nightmare.

I would be pissed off if I were having problems but so far I can't complain. I'm also wondering if some of these complaints are just smear tactics by shills.   
184  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: How to send out of a watch-only wallet? on: December 08, 2013, 03:33:46 AM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=281949.0
185  Economy / Speculation / Re: It's over. Bitcoin is finished. on: December 07, 2013, 11:15:26 PM
The last bubble was bitcoin's last hope for establishing itself, now that it's crashed in the middle of the media spotlight, no one will have confidence in it anymore. Have fun holding the last tulip when it all comes crashing down. Serves the gullible idiots right for buying into a ponzi scheme posing as a fake currency.

Cheesy
186  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Government/ bank backed cryptocurrency vs bitcoin on: December 07, 2013, 11:12:27 PM
1 They will inflate it to use for free as you work for it. This is the same as stealing money out of your account or lowering your wages. 

2 They will confiscate it if you don't pay for a ticket or fine.

3 They will confiscate it  to pay the interest on the public dept. Cypress bank deposit confiscation.   
187  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: purchased 1.08 btc from coinbase instantly, still pending on: December 07, 2013, 10:23:22 PM
I recently used the instant feature and before I could blink the BTC was in my wallet.
188  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: btc on coinbase on: December 07, 2013, 10:01:46 PM
Coinbase is the only BTC company I have tried that hasn't screwed me so far.  Their are always a few that will have problems. Most of the time it is their own fault. Eventually all the issues are straightened out to my knowledge.

If the BTC price is soaring upwards Coinbase is known to cancel orders though.     
189  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Off-Topic on: December 07, 2013, 09:06:11 PM
you think there's a hope to get back our btc?

You might eventually get the dollar value of the equipment you ordered. The Price of BTC fluctuates too much. They claim they cashed out the BTC but we haven't seen any proof of that. I bet if they were in LA county for a few nights you would all have your money back.   
190  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Safest BitCoin Web Wallet on: December 07, 2013, 01:19:54 AM
Which is the most trustworthy BitCoin web wallet as of yet against which there's almost no user complain ? I think those owners revealing their real world identity are the safest. Please suggest which one you use...

p.s. I am looking for user's opinion rather than owner's certification.

Coinbase is the only Bitcoin company I've tried that has not ripped me off yet. Very low fee's.

I never leave Bitcoins on any online wallet for long. Learn how to secure your coins without an online wallet. I currently use  Bitcoin QT and Armory.

http://bitcoin.org/en/choose-your-wallet
191  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: can blockchain.info be wrong ? on: November 25, 2013, 06:43:17 AM
It's called change: 
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Change

thats exactly what I was thinking, just my reading about it was months ago and became a little blurry.
so both my wallet and blockchain.info are fine.

THANK YOU!!

anyway, that scarry experience went good for me anyway, I am just transfering all my wallets to special netbook that will be used only for operating wallets. that is the most secure way, isnt it? not a single other program copletely cleen , just updated original system with new updated antivirus and runnig firewall.


Safer than a virus infested computer you could still have some malware on one of your wallets. I use Armory for Bitcoin and use the signing computer as little as possible on the internet. Don't know of any armory type wallets for alternative crypto's.
192  Bitcoin / Press / Re: 2013-11-23 CNBC Bitcoin puzzle: Heads, it’s excitement. Tails, it’s anxiety. on: November 25, 2013, 01:13:05 AM
All they know about is who was on Star Search last night and which states allow same sex marriage.  Cheesy
193  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Off-Topic on: November 17, 2013, 05:34:44 PM
Update 11/9/2013: TerraHash is still in business, we have not filed for bankruptcy yet. The refund from Yifu was cashed immediately back then, we did not make any profits from the recent surge in BTC prices. Again, we are still committed to provide as much refund as possible. I will update again in a couple days on how we are going to proceed with that.

I still believe terrahash will stick to what he keeps saying. Or, no need even to put a word here.

But maybe it is a bit too long... Hope I can get my bitcoin refund soon as promised.
I admire the effort and risk and believe it is not worth terrahash to lose his reputation.

Yeah, same here!

It is a really long wait, but there's still no evidence on being bad guys as they update us. Yeah, they had updateing issues, but I believe they will do as much as they can! Wink




    
Re: OFFICIAL TerraHash Thread (Klondike/Avalon Assembly US)
September 25, 2013, 06:25:39 PM
   
Reply with quote  #4535
Some events happened last week, that have forced us to make a decision to go out of business. A lot of issues compounded to press us to do this. The failure of the Klondike project was one. Chase, our bank, shut down our accounts. Also the delay in the shipment of the chips has resulted in a lot of customers asking for refund. We already owe a lot of money to PayPal, and with all the refund requests, it is impossible for us to continue our operation profitably. So we have decided to dissolve the company.

We are going to ask for a refund from Yifu. As soon as we get a refund from him, we will start refunding all the orders. We will be able to refund about 50% of every order with this amount. We are trying to get our money out of Chase, which will help us refund another ~5% of each order. We are trying to return as many components as we can, and as soon as we get more money back, we will send additional pro-rated payments to each order.

Once we get a refund from Yifu, we will be sending an email to everyone asking for a current Bitcoin address where to send the payments.
194  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Mouse Freezes? on: November 14, 2013, 10:56:53 PM
You probably don't have enough RAM.
195  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Off-Topic on: November 12, 2013, 01:01:28 AM

......

" PayPal has no obligation to contest or appeal from any such order or process."

Sorry. This isn't Holland Dutch justice.

Nowhere does it say anything about confiscating a charge back of a customer for a trustee in a court bankruptcy case. This is more likely related to when TH had their Paypal account frozen. And if they are sued it could be held up again for garnishment. Their were no refunds.

I may be misreading you but I got my refund via paypal, I am not sure what you are suggesting here.


Their is a legal difference between TH voluntarily giving you a refund. Compared to a forced refund (charge back) (reversal) via Paypal or Credit Card.

If you have a Paypal account and are doing something illegal, have a judgment against you, didn't deliver a product etc etc etc. They can freeze your account. This doesn't apply to a customer that has received a charge back.    

If you were a relative or friend etc etc of TH and received a refund while nobody else did. Then a court could take the money back from you. But this isn't the case.  
196  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Off-Topic on: November 11, 2013, 11:39:29 PM
Although I wrote that I was out of this thread, I will weigh in one last time to explain just how court ordered chargebacks work.

I'm not going to tell you a pack of lies; I'm only going to tell you how things work in the real world.

First, Paypal does not, repeat DOES NOT dispute court orders.  Not now, not everl NEVER! It's just not worth the cost to them.  Right in the Terms of Service, it is as well.

Now, let us assume for the sake of discussion that Terrahash has filed a bankruptacy proceeding and that all transactions within 90 days of that filing are being examined by the Court Trustee.

Now the Court Trustee, he's tokin' on a number and diggin' on the radio while he looks at these transactions, finds a few he doesn't like, looks out over the bow of the ship that is Paypal and says, "I'm gonna move you Baby!" and he does, right into the Terrahash Paypal account, instigating a chargeback which Paypal will immediately pay to the Court but wait.....................................

The Terrahash bank accounts are either empty or have been seized already by the Trustee and there is no money to be had from that quarter.

Now Paypal, being the Evil Empire of payment processing is not going to stand for this or any other kind of loss so the Paypal guy, who is also tokin' on a number and diggin' on the radio takes a look around and sends a chargeback to the person who received the refund payment.

BANG!

The entire amount of the funds paid to the Court is now charged back to the person(s) who received the refund in the first place, zapped by Paypal from either the associated bank account or credit card.

This is how it works and the ship that is the Paypal account of the person who received the refund acts as though it has hit an iceberg and goes right on down!

If the person wants to fight the chargeback, it will be up to that person to secure legal counsel, which counsel will require a hefty retainer which number might even exceed the amount of the chargeback and there will be little hope of recovery of the funds.

Now there is a way to protect yourself against such chargebacks but the method will result in the loss of your Paypal account, which is probably going to happen anyway, so no real damage done.

Here are the steps you would take:

(1) Make NO changes to the Paypal account itself so as to not draw unwanted attention to what you are doing.


(2) Clean out your Paypal account, leaving only USD $1 in it.  If you sent the money from the Paypal account to your bank account, wait until the money hits the bank account before proceeding to Steps 3 and 4.

(3) Close the bank account associated with the Paypal account but don't tell Paypal.  They will not know unless and until they try to charge back to that bank account.

(4) Cancel any and all credit or ATM cards associated with the Paypal account but again, don't tell Paypal.  They'll figure it out if they try to charge back.

Now if Paypal does attempt a chargeback and you have followed the above steps, you are at least temporarily immune to chargebacks.  Your Paypal account will be locked and Paypal will email you to death to try to get you to update your account with new info.

Ignore them.

Following this plan will get you smooth sailing for at least a while and protect your hard earned funds from what amounts to legalised theft due to the actions of Terrahash & Co.

If you are lucky and depending on the amount involved, Paypal will only send you nasty letters and eventually go away, turning the bad account over to a collection agency.

If you are not so lucky and the amount is large enough, Paypal will instigate legal action against you but that scenario is not really very likely as such actions are often just not worth the time and expence involved.

My $.02.

Wink

P.S.: Apologies to Jamie Brockett.




Unless and until you can provide precedence I'm considering this advice tripe.

Okey, dokey!

https://www.paypal.com/webapps/mpp/ua/useragreement-full#10

Here ya go!:

"10.4 Actions by PayPal - Court Orders or Other Legal Process.

PayPal, in its sole discretion, may take various actions including placing a hold, Reserve, or other limitation on your Account or the funds in it and/or releasing any or all of your funds in the event it receives notice of a court order or other legal process that restricts the use of or access to your funds or requires their release. PayPal will give notice of a hold, Reserve, or limitation it makes to comply with a court order or other legal process, unless the court order or other process directs that PayPal not provide you notice, in which case the court order or other process supersedes any notice obligation PayPal has undertaken or agreed to under the terms of this Agreement. PayPal has no obligation to contest or appeal from any such order or process. Holds, Reserves, or limitations on your account that are placed in response to a court order or other legal process may be maintained longer than 180 Days. PayPal will decide in its sole discretion the appropriate scope of a hold, Reserve, and/or limitation to assure compliance with a court order or other legal process.

Additionally, in the event PayPal receives notice of a garnishment or equivalent legal process directing the restraint of funds in your Account or directing payment of funds from your Account to the court or another third party, PayPal may limit your Account and hold the funds in it for up to 180 days, and may disburse funds from your Account, as needed, for the purpose of resolving any Dispute, Claim, Chargeback, or Reversal."

Take special note of this:

" PayPal has no obligation to contest or appeal from any such order or process."

Sorry. This isn't Holland Dutch justice.

Nowhere does it say anything about confiscating a charge back of a customer for a trustee in a court bankruptcy case. This is more likely related to when TH had their Paypal account frozen. And if they are sued it could be held up again for garnishment. Their were no refunds.
197  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Off-Topic on: November 11, 2013, 11:29:41 PM
Quote
I have seen just such actions in a case recently filed by a friend who had sold off a collection of vintage cars prior to filing.

The Court Trustee went out and retrieved each and every of those cars, leaving the purchasers high and dry with no recourse.

The cars were subsequently sold at a bankruptcy auction, with the proceeds going into thepool of  funds to repay creditiors.

I bought one of those cars from the Court for much less than the original seller had wanted.
Cheesy

This example is unrelated to our situation. This is an example of someone hiding assets before filing Chapter 7. Has nothing to do with us the customer. The creditors ended up with the money in this case anyway. And guess who the creditors are in our case? Paypal and the Credit Card companies. They will be the first to get back their money and we are already paid by them.

Nope.

Read my post again.

No one hid any assets at all.  The transactions were open and no effort was made to conceal them.  The proceeds were even put towards the debts by the debtor but that made no difference to the Trustee who reclaimed the cars and dumped them into an auction as the Trustee found that the transactions had been completed in anticipation of bankruptcy.

Dealing with the bankruptcy court Trustee is a whole new world and is a game played by the Trustee's rules, some of which are made up as the Trustee goes along.

Good luck!

My $.02.

Wink

We can't tell exactly what happened in the case from what you posted. But I would bet the cars were sold to friends and relatives for a lot less than they were worth just before bankruptcy.

Unrelated to our situation. And you have still failed to come up with any case where a charge back by Paypal or a Credit Card, from a customer was confiscated by a court action. 
198  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Off-Topic on: November 11, 2013, 12:39:14 AM
Quote
I have seen just such actions in a case recently filed by a friend who had sold off a collection of vintage cars prior to filing.

The Court Trustee went out and retrieved each and every of those cars, leaving the purchasers high and dry with no recourse.

The cars were subsequently sold at a bankruptcy auction, with the proceeds going into thepool of  funds to repay creditiors.

I bought one of those cars from the Court for much less than the original seller had wanted.
Cheesy

This example is unrelated to our situation. This is an example of someone hiding assets before filing Chapter 7. Has nothing to do with us the customer. The creditors ended up with the money in this case anyway. And guess who the creditors are in our case? Paypal and the Credit Card companies. They will be the first to get back their money and we are already paid by them.

Nope.

Read my post again.

No one hid any assets at all.  The transactions were open and no effort was made to conceal them.  The proceeds were even put towards the debts by the debtor but that made no difference to the Trustee who reclaimed the cars and dumped them into an auction as the Trustee found that the transactions had been completed in anticipation of bankruptcy.

Dealing with the bankruptcy court Trustee is a whole new world and is a game played by the Trustee's rules, some of which are made up as the Trustee goes along.

Good luck!

My $.02.

Wink

It's not about hiding assets but BTC being used.  Find us a court case where BTC was recovered from a closed business.  Assuming TH really does close being a LLC.


They could get those Bitcoins back if they want. Or track and see where they went.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/oct/26/bitcoins-seized-silk-road-raid
199  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Off-Topic on: November 10, 2013, 11:30:19 PM
Since Terrahash was essentially dealing in unregistered securities there is no telling exactly how the Court will handle the matter but anyone who received a refund in the 90 days preceeding the filing will have that refund in jeopardy.  Remember, the Court can go back as far as two years in reversing transactions and does so on a regular basis.

So your saying that those of us that received valid refunds via paypal are in jeopardy of having it clawed back?
I find this hard to believe, please supply precedent.

That is exactly what I am saying.

The powers of the Court Trustee are, to use a trite phrase, "broad and sweeping".:

http://www.muchshelist.com/knowledge-center/article/powers-and-duties-of-a-chapter-7-bankruptcy-trustee

From the citation:

"Duties of the Trustee




The overarching duty of the trustee is to collect and liquidate the property of the estate and to distribute the proceeds to creditors. The trustee's specific statutory duties, as set forth in Section 704 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, include the following:

    To collect and reduce to money the property of the estate and close the estate as expeditiously as compatible with the best interests of the parties in interest;
    To be accountable for all property received;
    To ensure that the debtor performs his or her intention as to retaining or surrendering property of the estate that secures consumer debt;
    To investigate the financial affairs of the debtor;
    If a purpose would be served, to examine proofs of claims and object to any that are improper;
    If advisable, to oppose the discharge of the debtor;
    Unless the court orders otherwise, to furnish information concerning the estate and the estate's administration as requested by a party in interest;
    If the debtor's business is authorized to continue operating, to file with the court appropriate reports and summaries, including a statement of receipts and disbursements; and
    To file a final account of the administration of the estate with the United States Trustee and the court.

Powers of the Trustee

The trustee in a Chapter 7 liquidation case is authorized to employ accountants, attorneys, appraisers, auctioneers and other professionals to assist in carrying out his or her duties. Additionally, the trustee may use, sell or lease property of the bankruptcy estate, subject to a notice requirement. However, there is no notice required for a trustee to enter into transactions in the ordinary course of business if he or she is authorized to operate the debtor's business. The trustee is also authorized to obtain unsecured or secured credit in connection with the operation of a business and assume or reject executory contracts or unexpired leases of the debtor.

A trustee is vested with significant powers to aid in carrying out his or her fiduciary obligations to the bankruptcy estate. Among them is the ability to move to dismiss a bankruptcy case for cause, including unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors; non-payment of any fees or charges required under certain provisions of the Bankruptcy Code; and failure of the debtor to file certain information required under the Bankruptcy Code. The trustee may prosecute an objection to a discharge granted to an individual debtor. He or she may also object to proofs of claim filed by creditors in a bankruptcy case. The disallowance of a proof of claim or a reduction in its allowed amount has a significant impact on what creditors ultimately receive when the trustee distributes the funds on hand in a bankruptcy estate.

The most significant of the trustee's powers are generally referred to as avoidance powers, and they are often the subject of litigation in the Bankruptcy Court. Known as the "strong arm clause," Section 544(a) of the Bankruptcy Code gives the trustee the rights and powers of a judicial lien creditor or a purchaser of real estate, whether or not there is an actual judicial lien creditor or purchaser who may be able to exercise the same rights. Section 544(b) allows the trustee to bring actions that an unsecured creditor could bring (including state law fraudulent conveyance actions), while Section 545 permits the trustee to avoid the fixing of certain statutory liens. Section 547-Preferences authorizes a trustee to avoid certain transfers of property, including payments made by the debtor to creditors, within 90 days prior to the commencement of a bankruptcy case (subject to certain conditions). Section 548 authorizes a trustee to avoid fraudulent transfers or obligations made with actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud a past or future creditor. Transfers of property made by a debtor for less than a reasonably equivalent consideration are also vulnerable if the debtor was or thereby became insolvent, was engaged in business with an unreasonably small amount of capital or intentionally incurred debts that would be beyond the debtor's ability to repay. Finally, Section 549 authorizes the trustee to avoid transfers of property of the bankruptcy estate that occur after a bankruptcy case has commenced.

The Upshot for Creditors

The trustee's ability to recover property or funds by exercising these avoidance powers can be extremely lucrative and provides a significant benefit to the creditors of a bankruptcy estate. Therefore, you should pay careful attention to any communication from a bankruptcy trustee that references avoidance powers and consult with legal counsel about how to respond. Failure to do so could result in a creditor being subjected to litigation."

The transactions originated in the Terrahash accounts, essentially brokered by Paypal.

The Court Trustee can pretty much do anything he/she wants to do, including getting monies back even though those monies were paid out through a third party.

Fighting a reversal by the trustee, at least in these parts, is going to require a retainer in the area of USD $5K to any attorney worth his/her salt, which takes most of the fun out of disputing the claim as in the event that you are trying to get USD $5K back, even if you win, you lose.

Duck and cover boys and girls because the defecation is going to hit the air handler!

My $.02.

Sad


You show us a case where they reversed a charge back on a credit card or paypal.  Cheesy
200  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Off-Topic on: November 10, 2013, 10:42:12 PM
Quote
I have seen just such actions in a case recently filed by a friend who had sold off a collection of vintage cars prior to filing.

The Court Trustee went out and retrieved each and every of those cars, leaving the purchasers high and dry with no recourse.

The cars were subsequently sold at a bankruptcy auction, with the proceeds going into thepool of  funds to repay creditiors.

I bought one of those cars from the Court for much less than the original seller had wanted.
Cheesy

This example is unrelated to our situation. This is an example of someone hiding assets before filing Chapter 7. Has nothing to do with us the customer. The creditors ended up with the money in this case anyway. And guess who the creditors are in our case? Paypal and the Credit Card companies. They will be the first to get back their money and we are already paid by them.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!