Здравствуйте уважаемое сообщество, у меня такой вопрос : после отправки мной адреса для получения карты прошло уже более трех рабочих дней, а ответ я так и не получил от команды минекспэй о подтверждении! Как узнать получили ли они мой адрес доставки? и вышлют ли мне карту?
Все кто получит карту будут оповещены одновременно. Карты какого банка все таки будут? Если приват банк был тестовый, то какой основной будет? Где то могу я получить эту инфу прежде чем заказывать карту? Значит тогда ждите следующей недели. Тогда узнаете всё, включая " terms&conditions" ..  |
|
|
|
You are welcome.
I just frankly admit that for me it is very strange when you blamed the project for scam, insulted the team, the participants and me with lies, etc. , and now speak as politely as if nothing had happened. But I am a normal person, so I can close my eyes to past events if you really conduct a "friendly conversation." I have a different version of events to you. I would unequivocally put the blame for the drop in etiquette on you and those that were blindly pumping Minexsystem/Minexcoin/Minexpay and Republia or doing it because they were receiving a payment. That then provoked a reaction from those that saw the misinformation/lies promoting non-existent business deals with CSOB and without even making relevant checks about Novarise as outright lies and scam. Having said that, regardless of all differing opinions I have no interest in engaging with anybody unless it remains on cordial terms. Minexsystem/Minexpay/Minexcoin seems to be working towards something far better than they were a few weeks ago. I would welcome any real progress on that project. About Republia, I still have seen nothing so far that alleviates my concerns about it being a scam but that might change in the coming days/weeks You either do not understand the essence of fraudulent projects, or are too absorbed in searching for fraudulent projects, which, in your opinion, is a complete deception. Look around - in fact, there are hundreds of coins that have not done anything even from the very first step, but simply deceived and hid. They do not need to wait more than 2 years to do a dirty business. And now from all these projects you have chosen Minex - the largest fraud in your opinion, which, in turn, has no direct relation to the Republic, but, nevertheless, you have already accused her of fraud. I just do not understand why you are doing this? Much work has been done, no one hides their faces, their names, their location, their telephone numbers, etc. Fully open to dialogue. But do you think scammers do it? Yes, look around again! Just projects collect money, even without everything from work, even without an action plan, hiding people, etc., and people donate money. Why are you not there? Why not protect poor people? Or do you think that I have invested 10,000 dollars in the Republic (let's say), I do not understand what this project will be, and I would not see fraudsters? Of course, I would see it, since another investor is not a novice. Not everyone is stupid, especially now. This is not 2017. Everyone studies the project in length and across and assesses prospects, risks and legality ... Therefore, if you engage in dialogue and doubt something, it does not mean that you are right in your opinion. Every person is right in his own way. But to assert without direct confirmed (I emphasize) the facts that there is no need for lies and fraud. It looks like slander. Unfortunately,there is direct connection between Minex and Republia and it is impossible to negate.You can negate only if you dont want to see it.Minex and Republia do not share only same people, but almost same financial program with minor, irrelevant differencies.Only different part is whitelist technical plan. I do not make judgements easily,but there is a few things which can make every investor very,very cautious: - Both Republia founders, Daniel Shulayev and Vladimir Gyrych and advisor Boris Shulayev worked/work in Minex. 16.Dec.2016,while in pre-ICO, Minex gave statement to different crypto news portals,signed by PR manager,Daniel Shulayev(certainly approved by Boris) how Minex made a contract with one of the leading european banks to buy share in Minex by buying 1,092 millions of MNX for 1705.44 BTCs. Now,we know it was a lie.Big one.Banks do not pay in BTCs and in that time Minex didnt exist as a company.It was founded 9 months later in 22.Aug.2017,so it was impossible to buy share in non-existing company.Reason for that lie was Minex obligation to refund investors if pre-ICO was unsuccessfull.This way they avoided it. Question is how to believe to these people now,when they proved themselves as willing to do anything just not to return money to investors? It is valid question and in bussiness trust is extremely important.They didnt do minor but major violation of investors rights. - why Republia took Boris Shulayev as an advisor? After disastruosly leading of Minex ,taking him as an advisor is sending very bad impression to potential investors and make any attempt to negate relations to Minex futile - Republia whitelist is much more serious and difficult to achieve than Minex list.Costly too.Minex didnt succeed to realize much simplier list.By their own admission,Republia will need several years to achieve goals if everything goes well.For that time Republia will use ICO collected money and selling premined coins. For investors it means that Republia would not be able to keep promise about maintain exchange rate in tight range due to lack of funds for it.Not without massive external financing.On the contrary, using premined coins for financing will make situation even worse.As time passes, initial funds will be depleted and Republia will need to sell more and more coins to finance developping.It will make greater and greater pressure on market and price and one by one,investors would dump theirs coins with a loss.Then,Republia will need to sell even more coins to finance it and here we come in vicious cycle of hyperinflation generated by parking 70% rate and premined coins selling,like Minex did. Now,a month before ICO sale ,despite promises to change financial plan,Republia did nothing.Every investor before initial sale would like to see these changes of financial plan and not to rely on ICO leadership promises.Promises that something will be done after sale, no investor will buy as a truth. All above problems made me very,very sceptical about project.When someone make ICO based on a disastruos financial construction (proved in earlier ICO),with a lot of same people involved in it, I cant qualify that any more as incompetence but as an intetion. This is why this project has so high probabilty to turn scam.Not because people fudding it,but because serious problems and flaws described in text above. I will answer you, although I asked questions to another user and not at all about what you write to me, what I asked. Unfortunately, you want to wishful thinking. There is no direct connection between projects. If you consider the kinship of the consultant Boris and his son, one of the co-founder Daniel, direct linking of the projects is stupid. Did Daniel create his project and this is a connection? What nonsense. Direct communication is a complete copying of an idea, copying products, a blockchain, etc ... This is not the case here. Absolutely new innovative blockchain, which is written from scratch, not fork. Absolutely innovative opportunities to create contracts and projects on a new platform. Absolutely innovative approach to security and the ability to integrate other projects ... And a lot of things .... Did you read white paper? What is the connection with minexcoin? Bank? So even it is modified and will act according to its algorithm, in different directions ... Therefore, do not be silly. Yes. All your judgments that supposedly "not enough money", "not enough coins" - this is only your opinion and desire. The financial model was created not by fools, but by people who have an economic education. Well, you can not know what will be implemented after the fact, you can not know what will be modified, because the project completely eliminates hard forks and is subject to change, depending on the participants жeл desires ’by voting. And I appreciate your concern for your concern with the Republia project, but you read the questions I wrote earlier and answer them better. How did Republia deserve such attention? Why not hundreds of other projects that are really scam? I understand that nothing just happens. And once you are here, it means that you are pursuing some goals. Therefore, I am very “skeptical” about your sincerity ... Iam sincere believe or not. I have not desire to ruin anything just to clarify some things that are worring any investor. As you could read in mine post , when I linked Minex and Republia I specified that connection between 2 projects are in people and in financial part ,not whitelist.Core of the Republia team and Minex is the same,financial part is copy of Minex one,so this connection is very real. Major problem is trust. How to trust people which made false announcement(signed by Daniel Shulayev and approved by his father Boris, in the time when both Republia co-founders and advisor worked in Minex) about leading european bank buying a share in Minex(which was registred 9 months later and was not possible at that time) for 1705.44 BTCs, just to avoid to return money to investors,because they didnt succeed to realize pre-ICO selling. Such negative audacity to do anything to avoid to return money to investors would scare the hell out any investor.It puts major SCAM sign on the project. No investor would like to see such negative reputation. You are right that both economic models(which are same) Republia and Minex was not created by fools.These people have economic education and that fact scares me even more,because it means that Minex fall and Republia copy of Minex economic model was made on purpose to be unsustainable.Bad consequences for investors were not coincidence,but intention. People with economic education would know from the beginning that 70% interest rate will cause hyperinflation and make any price regulation attempt futile. They knew that promises to investors of massive interest and tight regulating of price was lie from the beginning ,made as a trap for naive and greedy people.Making in Minex OTC option only for selling coins is not coincidence,but intention,because everybody,not just people with economics education know that OTC selling without rebuying option will cause constant price decline which we all witnessed in Minex. That is SCAM sign No.2. Nobody from Republia team ever gives any explanation how Minex proved unsustainable economic model will make better in Republia and why. In this case I would call on Einstein quote " Stupidity is doing same thing over and over and expecting different results"I'll tell you a clever thing. If the goal was to conceal a team with something, and in this case "links with minexcoin", could it hide it? I will give the answer for you - in the end, yes. Did someone do this? Of course not. Therefore, it is not necessary to look for some otherworldly connection. Republia is an open project and even it will take into account the experience and shortcomings of other projects .. This is also not a secret. Further. Please do not lead the conversation in such a way that the event has already happened, namely the collapse of the "financial system". This is especially true of the Republia project, which has not even passed the ICO stage yet, and you have already decided its fate in the future. Do not make yourself a professor of economics. Needless to say, you're smarter than everyone. It is your opinion. The opinion of the team is painted in white paper, but not in the fullest extent. I will not speak for minexcoin plans - that is their business. I can not imagine them, but just an ordinary investor. The Republia project is discussed here. ps Moreover, do not fantasize about the bank in which the cards are issued. Well, you do not know! Why are you doing libel now that cards will be issued in Ukraine? I repeat - you want to discuss the Minexcoin project - they have their own topic. You are right about one thing - Republia cant conceals connection with Minex despite all theirs denial.It is futile job. Republia and Minex has different whitelist,no doubt in it.But Iam not questioning Republia whitelist ,Iam questioning integrity of people who lead it .What they did in Minex pre-ICO phase was deliberate lying of investors how pre- ICO selling was successfull.Doing it, they avoided to return money to investors. That was not some minor offence,but major breaking of investors rights and trust.In business world they will go to jail for that. Another question - if Republia leadsership wanted to make a break from Minex why they put Boris Shulayev as advisor? About what he can advise them,after trashing disaster with Minex? How to ruin everything and get away with it? He can be just liability,not asset. Putting Boris as advisor they were put only big warning sign to all investors - Danger ! Scam in progress ! About financial model of Republia - mine question is why Republia leaders didnt make any meaningful explanation to investors how and why they think that Minex financial model which Republia using would not make another crash ,now with Republia. To explain it to you little more colorful - after some time, people realized that one type of cars has a construction defective brakes which can be deadly to drivers and passengers.Now,you go to buy car and cars salesman wants to sell you similar,new type of car ,but with same defective brakes.You ask salesman isnt such defective brakes gonna kill me and he replies to you: Dont worry ,just drive ,everything will be OK. Will you believe to him?? ps. Didnt want to talk about Minex card here,just responded to Jollygood question So, I found out that your only “distrust” argument for Republia is that Boris is an adviser? I remind you that, apart from Boris, there are 3 other advisers who are no less competent than him. No wonder that he acts as a guarantor of investments in mnx. All of your “facts” are not as such, since you have no evidence — for example, copies of papers, contracts, or direct witnesses. This is just your attitude to the project. Therefore, to continue the discussion further probably does not make sense. I heard you. Financial model Republia working. I am grateful for your opinion, but the team itself expects what it should be and what its goals are. The goal of higher interest rates for the first time is to saturate the market with additional liquidity, and moreover gradual. Unlike EOS, which released almost 90% of its tokens as a result of ICO within a few months, Republia reduced this number (full pre-mine) almost 7 times, which will positively affect the price of the coin. Further, the bank’s interest will be reduced to the minimum to ensure a long-term model for 25 years of coin mining. Taking Boris as advisor is just one of reasons why I dont believe to Republia team.But certainly not major ones. As i said and I will repeat it once again: Major reason No1:- Both Republia founders, Daniel Shulayev and Vladimir Gyrych and advisor Boris Shulayev worked/work in Minex. 16.Dec.2016,while in pre-ICO, Minex gave statement to different crypto news portals,signed by PR manager,Daniel Shulayev(certainly approved by Boris) how Minex made a contract with one of the leading european banks to buy share in Minex by buying 1,092 millions of MNX for 1705.44 BTCs.
https://cointelegraph.com/press-releases/minecoin-completes-first-stage-of-ico-ahead-of-schedulehttps://www.nxter.org/minecoin-cryptocurrency-platform-completes-first-stage-of-ico-ahead-of-schedule/ It was a lie.Big one. Banks do not pay in BTCs and in that time Minex didnt exist as a company.It was founded 9 months later in 22.Aug.2017,so it was impossible to buy share in non-existing company.Reason for that lie was Minex obligation to refund investors if pre-ICO was unsuccessfull.This way they avoided it. Question is how to believe to these people now,when they proved themselves as willing to do anything just not to return money to investors? It is valid question and in bussiness trust is extremely important.They didnt do minor but major violation of investors rights. them(just look at theirs expenses sheet list),so they will not be able to do it. To begin with, I want to say that you did not appear (and were not previously) part of the minexcoin command (previously minecoin), so your all judgments are just your opinion - no more. No need to refer to any foreign publications as there are official sources of the company. And the company tells as much as it sees fit. To assert that a bank can do and cannot do - you need to work in a bank or own it (do you happen to work there? No? Have not even doubted), or at least know from "external" information sources that banks can also to act as market makers and even trade on the markets and exchanges, of course, legally. It may have various funds in its subdivision ... To confirm, I provide a link to the article of 2015 (for example): https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/french-bitcoin-revolution-bnp-paribas-plans-add-crypto-its-currency-funds-1512360 Please do not mislead people with false information. I repeat: banks can invest in any project, if not directly, then using other opportunities. And the most important, with regard to a million coins, the company officially announced this information: https://medium.com/@minecoinorg/minecoin-q-a-8ded1b0db1f1Therefore, you do not need to invent anything and fantasize. But let us return back to the question that minexcoin cospania did not exist at that time - yes, that is true. Then there was the minecoin company. Officially, it was announced about the rebranding of the company and became minexcoin: https://twitter.com/minexcoin/status/847502788275732482Honestly, I no longer have a desire to respond to your "facts", especially as they concern minexcoin. If you have any doubts or concerns about the minexcoin project - you can express them to the official branch, you can contact its management with a request about your "lack of sleep" regarding their accuracy and honesty. But here it is concrete - Minexcoin is not directly related to the Republia project, except for the indirect - family ties and some employees (in the past). Republia is an independent project, with its goal, which is more advanced (perhaps) than others - we will see this after the fact. Therefore, I will not give in to your "provocations" anymore. Only talk on this important topic topic. Everything. Thank you for understanding. p.s. The answer to the second question I will give you in the near future. |
|
|
|
Did you think that maybe people have an ugly feeling that they are scammed from the MNX team?
He promises many things in this project, but very few of them was realized.
what do you think about investors? He invested his money and now they have only dust from there? Devs just saying soon, soon for a year. Your views are shared by many people. There are many red flags about this Minex project but I am giving them the benefit of the doubt for a few weeks at least just to see what they accomplish. They claim they are very close to releasing Minexpay branded crypto Mastercards so let us wait and see what happens. Can you give me some link where Minex claims issuing branded payment cards? I know that before issuing branded payment cards they would need a contract about it with some card issuer.They have none till now. They are probably trying to push ukranian Privat Bank cards as their owns which is illegal,plus it is impossible for non-ukrainian resident to get it without having residence and contact number in Ukraine and also personal presence in bank for signing a contract about account opening. Hell. That's why you repeat the same thing all the time? Probably you either have poor information or you probably do it on purpose - promote false information. The community has repeatedly asked Boris a question about Privatbank cards. He clearly and unequivocally replied that the cards that are being sent are not Privatbank cards. Moreover, why did you decide that they are from the Ukrainian bank? I advise you to stop falsely fantasizing and wait until the end of this year. I will personally prove to you with the example of my card that you do not correctly guess about the origin of the card. |
|
|
|
nice sale, managed to pick up some more MNX @ 0.00018 btc. Haven't read this thread in 1-2 months.. But i see little has changed. I dont understand these people, who go on and on and about same thing. Jollygood, u have 1 point: in your opinion mnx is a scam, i get it. You should have said it once and then off you go to your next adventure.... how and why are you going on for 500 messages and more about that i dont understand. People like you are killing this forum... U're not the only one like this tho (one other ico i invested in, there was a guy screaming scam for more than 1.5 years and 1100 posts...) What is this madness are you even human beings? Anyway, its hard to read news concerning MNX with all this white noice on this thread. Good luck on the card! TO MNX TEAM: Hey, if you are still looking for ways to get your card out, maybe u shld contact Prasos Oy ( www.prasos.fi). Its a Finnish company, that owns and operates worlds first BTC-ATM:s, that are located in several cities over finland. They work simply, like, you pay with bitcoin, and get cash out of the machine. or you pay with cash and receive bitcoin. Maybe you should look into this possibility. Did you think that maybe people have an ugly feeling that they are scammed from the MNX team? He promises many things in this project, but very few of them was realized. what do you think about investors? He invested his money and now they have only dust from there? Devs just saying soon, soon for a year. Indeed till now all crypto card based projects are under big trouble to provide a working product. It is long time ago when they promised all people will get their cards and after this we see only delay after delay and just promises sooner this dream will become true. The distribution of cards is already starting this week, and you are still talking about promises ..  |
|
|
|
You are welcome.
I just frankly admit that for me it is very strange when you blamed the project for scam, insulted the team, the participants and me with lies, etc. , and now speak as politely as if nothing had happened. But I am a normal person, so I can close my eyes to past events if you really conduct a "friendly conversation." I have a different version of events to you. I would unequivocally put the blame for the drop in etiquette on you and those that were blindly pumping Minexsystem/Minexcoin/Minexpay and Republia or doing it because they were receiving a payment. That then provoked a reaction from those that saw the misinformation/lies promoting non-existent business deals with CSOB and without even making relevant checks about Novarise as outright lies and scam. Having said that, regardless of all differing opinions I have no interest in engaging with anybody unless it remains on cordial terms. Minexsystem/Minexpay/Minexcoin seems to be working towards something far better than they were a few weeks ago. I would welcome any real progress on that project. About Republia, I still have seen nothing so far that alleviates my concerns about it being a scam but that might change in the coming days/weeks You either do not understand the essence of fraudulent projects, or are too absorbed in searching for fraudulent projects, which, in your opinion, is a complete deception. Look around - in fact, there are hundreds of coins that have not done anything even from the very first step, but simply deceived and hid. They do not need to wait more than 2 years to do a dirty business. And now from all these projects you have chosen Minex - the largest fraud in your opinion, which, in turn, has no direct relation to the Republic, but, nevertheless, you have already accused her of fraud. I just do not understand why you are doing this? Much work has been done, no one hides their faces, their names, their location, their telephone numbers, etc. Fully open to dialogue. But do you think scammers do it? Yes, look around again! Just projects collect money, even without everything from work, even without an action plan, hiding people, etc., and people donate money. Why are you not there? Why not protect poor people? Or do you think that I have invested 10,000 dollars in the Republic (let's say), I do not understand what this project will be, and I would not see fraudsters? Of course, I would see it, since another investor is not a novice. Not everyone is stupid, especially now. This is not 2017. Everyone studies the project in length and across and assesses prospects, risks and legality ... Therefore, if you engage in dialogue and doubt something, it does not mean that you are right in your opinion. Every person is right in his own way. But to assert without direct confirmed (I emphasize) the facts that there is no need for lies and fraud. It looks like slander. Unfortunately,there is direct connection between Minex and Republia and it is impossible to negate.You can negate only if you dont want to see it.Minex and Republia do not share only same people, but almost same financial program with minor, irrelevant differencies.Only different part is whitelist technical plan. I do not make judgements easily,but there is a few things which can make every investor very,very cautious: - Both Republia founders, Daniel Shulayev and Vladimir Gyrych and advisor Boris Shulayev worked/work in Minex. 16.Dec.2016,while in pre-ICO, Minex gave statement to different crypto news portals,signed by PR manager,Daniel Shulayev(certainly approved by Boris) how Minex made a contract with one of the leading european banks to buy share in Minex by buying 1,092 millions of MNX for 1705.44 BTCs. Now,we know it was a lie.Big one.Banks do not pay in BTCs and in that time Minex didnt exist as a company.It was founded 9 months later in 22.Aug.2017,so it was impossible to buy share in non-existing company.Reason for that lie was Minex obligation to refund investors if pre-ICO was unsuccessfull.This way they avoided it. Question is how to believe to these people now,when they proved themselves as willing to do anything just not to return money to investors? It is valid question and in bussiness trust is extremely important.They didnt do minor but major violation of investors rights. - why Republia took Boris Shulayev as an advisor? After disastruosly leading of Minex ,taking him as an advisor is sending very bad impression to potential investors and make any attempt to negate relations to Minex futile - Republia whitelist is much more serious and difficult to achieve than Minex list.Costly too.Minex didnt succeed to realize much simplier list.By their own admission,Republia will need several years to achieve goals if everything goes well.For that time Republia will use ICO collected money and selling premined coins. For investors it means that Republia would not be able to keep promise about maintain exchange rate in tight range due to lack of funds for it.Not without massive external financing.On the contrary, using premined coins for financing will make situation even worse.As time passes, initial funds will be depleted and Republia will need to sell more and more coins to finance developping.It will make greater and greater pressure on market and price and one by one,investors would dump theirs coins with a loss.Then,Republia will need to sell even more coins to finance it and here we come in vicious cycle of hyperinflation generated by parking 70% rate and premined coins selling,like Minex did. Now,a month before ICO sale ,despite promises to change financial plan,Republia did nothing.Every investor before initial sale would like to see these changes of financial plan and not to rely on ICO leadership promises.Promises that something will be done after sale, no investor will buy as a truth. All above problems made me very,very sceptical about project.When someone make ICO based on a disastruos financial construction (proved in earlier ICO),with a lot of same people involved in it, I cant qualify that any more as incompetence but as an intetion. This is why this project has so high probabilty to turn scam.Not because people fudding it,but because serious problems and flaws described in text above. I will answer you, although I asked questions to another user and not at all about what you write to me, what I asked. Unfortunately, you want to wishful thinking. There is no direct connection between projects. If you consider the kinship of the consultant Boris and his son, one of the co-founder Daniel, direct linking of the projects is stupid. Did Daniel create his project and this is a connection? What nonsense. Direct communication is a complete copying of an idea, copying products, a blockchain, etc ... This is not the case here. Absolutely new innovative blockchain, which is written from scratch, not fork. Absolutely innovative opportunities to create contracts and projects on a new platform. Absolutely innovative approach to security and the ability to integrate other projects ... And a lot of things .... Did you read white paper? What is the connection with minexcoin? Bank? So even it is modified and will act according to its algorithm, in different directions ... Therefore, do not be silly. Yes. All your judgments that supposedly "not enough money", "not enough coins" - this is only your opinion and desire. The financial model was created not by fools, but by people who have an economic education. Well, you can not know what will be implemented after the fact, you can not know what will be modified, because the project completely eliminates hard forks and is subject to change, depending on the participants жeл desires ’by voting. And I appreciate your concern for your concern with the Republia project, but you read the questions I wrote earlier and answer them better. How did Republia deserve such attention? Why not hundreds of other projects that are really scam? I understand that nothing just happens. And once you are here, it means that you are pursuing some goals. Therefore, I am very “skeptical” about your sincerity ... Iam sincere believe or not. I have not desire to ruin anything just to clarify some things that are worring any investor. As you could read in mine post , when I linked Minex and Republia I specified that connection between 2 projects are in people and in financial part ,not whitelist.Core of the Republia team and Minex is the same,financial part is copy of Minex one,so this connection is very real. Major problem is trust. How to trust people which made false announcement(signed by Daniel Shulayev and approved by his father Boris, in the time when both Republia co-founders and advisor worked in Minex) about leading european bank buying a share in Minex(which was registred 9 months later and was not possible at that time) for 1705.44 BTCs, just to avoid to return money to investors,because they didnt succeed to realize pre-ICO selling. Such negative audacity to do anything to avoid to return money to investors would scare the hell out any investor.It puts major SCAM sign on the project. No investor would like to see such negative reputation. You are right that both economic models(which are same) Republia and Minex was not created by fools.These people have economic education and that fact scares me even more,because it means that Minex fall and Republia copy of Minex economic model was made on purpose to be unsustainable.Bad consequences for investors were not coincidence,but intention. People with economic education would know from the beginning that 70% interest rate will cause hyperinflation and make any price regulation attempt futile. They knew that promises to investors of massive interest and tight regulating of price was lie from the beginning ,made as a trap for naive and greedy people.Making in Minex OTC option only for selling coins is not coincidence,but intention,because everybody,not just people with economics education know that OTC selling without rebuying option will cause constant price decline which we all witnessed in Minex. That is SCAM sign No.2. Nobody from Republia team ever gives any explanation how Minex proved unsustainable economic model will make better in Republia and why. In this case I would call on Einstein quote " Stupidity is doing same thing over and over and expecting different results"I'll tell you a clever thing. If the goal was to conceal a team with something, and in this case "links with minexcoin", could it hide it? I will give the answer for you - in the end, yes. Did someone do this? Of course not. Therefore, it is not necessary to look for some otherworldly connection. Republia is an open project and even it will take into account the experience and shortcomings of other projects .. This is also not a secret. Further. Please do not lead the conversation in such a way that the event has already happened, namely the collapse of the "financial system". This is especially true of the Republia project, which has not even passed the ICO stage yet, and you have already decided its fate in the future. Do not make yourself a professor of economics. Needless to say, you're smarter than everyone. It is your opinion. The opinion of the team is painted in white paper, but not in the fullest extent. I will not speak for minexcoin plans - that is their business. I can not imagine them, but just an ordinary investor. The Republia project is discussed here. ps Moreover, do not fantasize about the bank in which the cards are issued. Well, you do not know! Why are you doing libel now that cards will be issued in Ukraine? I repeat - you want to discuss the Minexcoin project - they have their own topic. You are right about one thing - Republia cant conceals connection with Minex despite all theirs denial.It is futile job. Republia and Minex has different whitelist,no doubt in it.But Iam not questioning Republia whitelist ,Iam questioning integrity of people who lead it .What they did in Minex pre-ICO phase was deliberate lying of investors how pre- ICO selling was successfull.Doing it, they avoided to return money to investors. That was not some minor offence,but major breaking of investors rights and trust.In business world they will go to jail for that. Another question - if Republia leadsership wanted to make a break from Minex why they put Boris Shulayev as advisor? About what he can advise them,after trashing disaster with Minex? How to ruin everything and get away with it? He can be just liability,not asset. Putting Boris as advisor they were put only big warning sign to all investors - Danger ! Scam in progress ! About financial model of Republia - mine question is why Republia leaders didnt make any meaningful explanation to investors how and why they think that Minex financial model which Republia using would not make another crash ,now with Republia. To explain it to you little more colorful - after some time, people realized that one type of cars has a construction defective brakes which can be deadly to drivers and passengers.Now,you go to buy car and cars salesman wants to sell you similar,new type of car ,but with same defective brakes.You ask salesman isnt such defective brakes gonna kill me and he replies to you: Dont worry ,just drive ,everything will be OK. Will you believe to him?? ps. Didnt want to talk about Minex card here,just responded to Jollygood question So, I found out that your only “distrust” argument for Republia is that Boris is an adviser? I remind you that, apart from Boris, there are 3 other advisers who are no less competent than him. No wonder that he acts as a guarantor of investments in mnx. All of your “facts” are not as such, since you have no evidence — for example, copies of papers, contracts, or direct witnesses. This is just your attitude to the project. Therefore, to continue the discussion further probably does not make sense. I heard you. Financial model Republia working. I am grateful for your opinion, but the team itself expects what it should be and what its goals are. The goal of higher interest rates for the first time is to saturate the market with additional liquidity, and moreover gradual. Unlike EOS, which released almost 90% of its tokens as a result of ICO within a few months, Republia reduced this number (full pre-mine) almost 7 times, which will positively affect the price of the coin. Further, the bank’s interest will be reduced to the minimum to ensure a long-term model for 25 years of coin mining. |
|
|
|
You are welcome.
I just frankly admit that for me it is very strange when you blamed the project for scam, insulted the team, the participants and me with lies, etc. , and now speak as politely as if nothing had happened. But I am a normal person, so I can close my eyes to past events if you really conduct a "friendly conversation." I have a different version of events to you. I would unequivocally put the blame for the drop in etiquette on you and those that were blindly pumping Minexsystem/Minexcoin/Minexpay and Republia or doing it because they were receiving a payment. That then provoked a reaction from those that saw the misinformation/lies promoting non-existent business deals with CSOB and without even making relevant checks about Novarise as outright lies and scam. Having said that, regardless of all differing opinions I have no interest in engaging with anybody unless it remains on cordial terms. Minexsystem/Minexpay/Minexcoin seems to be working towards something far better than they were a few weeks ago. I would welcome any real progress on that project. About Republia, I still have seen nothing so far that alleviates my concerns about it being a scam but that might change in the coming days/weeks You either do not understand the essence of fraudulent projects, or are too absorbed in searching for fraudulent projects, which, in your opinion, is a complete deception. Look around - in fact, there are hundreds of coins that have not done anything even from the very first step, but simply deceived and hid. They do not need to wait more than 2 years to do a dirty business. And now from all these projects you have chosen Minex - the largest fraud in your opinion, which, in turn, has no direct relation to the Republic, but, nevertheless, you have already accused her of fraud. I just do not understand why you are doing this? Much work has been done, no one hides their faces, their names, their location, their telephone numbers, etc. Fully open to dialogue. But do you think scammers do it? Yes, look around again! Just projects collect money, even without everything from work, even without an action plan, hiding people, etc., and people donate money. Why are you not there? Why not protect poor people? Or do you think that I have invested 10,000 dollars in the Republic (let's say), I do not understand what this project will be, and I would not see fraudsters? Of course, I would see it, since another investor is not a novice. Not everyone is stupid, especially now. This is not 2017. Everyone studies the project in length and across and assesses prospects, risks and legality ... Therefore, if you engage in dialogue and doubt something, it does not mean that you are right in your opinion. Every person is right in his own way. But to assert without direct confirmed (I emphasize) the facts that there is no need for lies and fraud. It looks like slander. Unfortunately,there is direct connection between Minex and Republia and it is impossible to negate.You can negate only if you dont want to see it.Minex and Republia do not share only same people, but almost same financial program with minor, irrelevant differencies.Only different part is whitelist technical plan. I do not make judgements easily,but there is a few things which can make every investor very,very cautious: - Both Republia founders, Daniel Shulayev and Vladimir Gyrych and advisor Boris Shulayev worked/work in Minex. 16.Dec.2016,while in pre-ICO, Minex gave statement to different crypto news portals,signed by PR manager,Daniel Shulayev(certainly approved by Boris) how Minex made a contract with one of the leading european banks to buy share in Minex by buying 1,092 millions of MNX for 1705.44 BTCs. Now,we know it was a lie.Big one.Banks do not pay in BTCs and in that time Minex didnt exist as a company.It was founded 9 months later in 22.Aug.2017,so it was impossible to buy share in non-existing company.Reason for that lie was Minex obligation to refund investors if pre-ICO was unsuccessfull.This way they avoided it. Question is how to believe to these people now,when they proved themselves as willing to do anything just not to return money to investors? It is valid question and in bussiness trust is extremely important.They didnt do minor but major violation of investors rights. - why Republia took Boris Shulayev as an advisor? After disastruosly leading of Minex ,taking him as an advisor is sending very bad impression to potential investors and make any attempt to negate relations to Minex futile - Republia whitelist is much more serious and difficult to achieve than Minex list.Costly too.Minex didnt succeed to realize much simplier list.By their own admission,Republia will need several years to achieve goals if everything goes well.For that time Republia will use ICO collected money and selling premined coins. For investors it means that Republia would not be able to keep promise about maintain exchange rate in tight range due to lack of funds for it.Not without massive external financing.On the contrary, using premined coins for financing will make situation even worse.As time passes, initial funds will be depleted and Republia will need to sell more and more coins to finance developping.It will make greater and greater pressure on market and price and one by one,investors would dump theirs coins with a loss.Then,Republia will need to sell even more coins to finance it and here we come in vicious cycle of hyperinflation generated by parking 70% rate and premined coins selling,like Minex did. Now,a month before ICO sale ,despite promises to change financial plan,Republia did nothing.Every investor before initial sale would like to see these changes of financial plan and not to rely on ICO leadership promises.Promises that something will be done after sale, no investor will buy as a truth. All above problems made me very,very sceptical about project.When someone make ICO based on a disastruos financial construction (proved in earlier ICO),with a lot of same people involved in it, I cant qualify that any more as incompetence but as an intetion. This is why this project has so high probabilty to turn scam.Not because people fudding it,but because serious problems and flaws described in text above. I will answer you, although I asked questions to another user and not at all about what you write to me, what I asked. Unfortunately, you want to wishful thinking. There is no direct connection between projects. If you consider the kinship of the consultant Boris and his son, one of the co-founder Daniel, direct linking of the projects is stupid. Did Daniel create his project and this is a connection? What nonsense. Direct communication is a complete copying of an idea, copying products, a blockchain, etc ... This is not the case here. Absolutely new innovative blockchain, which is written from scratch, not fork. Absolutely innovative opportunities to create contracts and projects on a new platform. Absolutely innovative approach to security and the ability to integrate other projects ... And a lot of things .... Did you read white paper? What is the connection with minexcoin? Bank? So even it is modified and will act according to its algorithm, in different directions ... Therefore, do not be silly. Yes. All your judgments that supposedly "not enough money", "not enough coins" - this is only your opinion and desire. The financial model was created not by fools, but by people who have an economic education. Well, you can not know what will be implemented after the fact, you can not know what will be modified, because the project completely eliminates hard forks and is subject to change, depending on the participants жeл desires ’by voting. And I appreciate your concern for your concern with the Republia project, but you read the questions I wrote earlier and answer them better. How did Republia deserve such attention? Why not hundreds of other projects that are really scam? I understand that nothing just happens. And once you are here, it means that you are pursuing some goals. Therefore, I am very “skeptical” about your sincerity ... Iam sincere believe or not. I have not desire to ruin anything just to clarify some things that are worring any investor. As you could read in mine post , when I linked Minex and Republia I specified that connection between 2 projects are in people and in financial part ,not whitelist.Core of the Republia team and Minex is the same,financial part is copy of Minex one,so this connection is very real. Major problem is trust. How to trust people which made false announcement(signed by Daniel Shulayev and approved by his father Boris, in the time when both Republia co-founders and advisor worked in Minex) about leading european bank buying a share in Minex(which was registred 9 months later and was not possible at that time) for 1705.44 BTCs, just to avoid to return money to investors,because they didnt succeed to realize pre-ICO selling. Such negative audacity to do anything to avoid to return money to investors would scare the hell out any investor.It puts major SCAM sign on the project. No investor would like to see such negative reputation. You are right that both economic models(which are same) Republia and Minex was not created by fools.These people have economic education and that fact scares me even more,because it means that Minex fall and Republia copy of Minex economic model was made on purpose to be unsustainable.Bad consequences for investors were not coincidence,but intention. People with economic education would know from the beginning that 70% interest rate will cause hyperinflation and make any price regulation attempt futile. They knew that promises to investors of massive interest and tight regulating of price was lie from the beginning ,made as a trap for naive and greedy people.Making in Minex OTC option only for selling coins is not coincidence,but intention,because everybody,not just people with economics education know that OTC selling without rebuying option will cause constant price decline which we all witnessed in Minex. That is SCAM sign No.2. Nobody from Republia team ever gives any explanation how Minex proved unsustainable economic model will make better in Republia and why. In this case I would call on Einstein quote " Stupidity is doing same thing over and over and expecting different results"I'll tell you a clever thing. If the goal was to conceal a team with something, and in this case "links with minexcoin", could it hide it? I will give the answer for you - in the end, yes. Did someone do this? Of course not. Therefore, it is not necessary to look for some otherworldly connection. Republia is an open project and even it will take into account the experience and shortcomings of other projects .. This is also not a secret. Further. Please do not lead the conversation in such a way that the event has already happened, namely the collapse of the "financial system". This is especially true of the Republia project, which has not even passed the ICO stage yet, and you have already decided its fate in the future. Do not make yourself a professor of economics. Needless to say, you're smarter than everyone. It is your opinion. The opinion of the team is painted in white paper, but not in the fullest extent. I will not speak for minexcoin plans - that is their business. I can not imagine them, but just an ordinary investor. The Republia project is discussed here. ps Moreover, do not fantasize about the bank in which the cards are issued. Well, you do not know! Why are you doing libel now that cards will be issued in Ukraine? I repeat - you want to discuss the Minexcoin project - they have their own topic. |
|
|
|
Последний шаг - подтверждение адреса доставки.
Пожалуйста, отправьте нам свой полный адрес доставки карты, в ответ на это письмо. Отправил,пока в ответ ничего не пришло_а должно?Ок,кароч ждем! в чате отписали что Темник в Лондон за картами сегодня полетел.завтра будут в Киеве.Кажется до нового года карты будут у первой тысячи счастливчиков.
Шикардос,так реально получиться быстрее,надеюсь я в эту тысячу все таки попадаю  Про Лондон шутка наверное_или реально Темника заслали туда? никаких шуток. это действительно правда. карты должны быть завтра в Киеве. если конечно не произойдёт никаких чп.. А как узнать попал ли я в эту счастливую,первую тысячу получателей карт?) Может есть где ни будь возможность отслеживать свою порядковую очередь на получения карт? порядковый номер был при оплате (<1000) + должен был запрос прийти на адрес доставки = вероятно вы в этой тысяче... )) |
|
|
|
Последний шаг - подтверждение адреса доставки.
Пожалуйста, отправьте нам свой полный адрес доставки карты, в ответ на это письмо. Отправил,пока в ответ ничего не пришло_а должно?Ок,кароч ждем! в чате отписали что Темник в Лондон за картами сегодня полетел.завтра будут в Киеве.Кажется до нового года карты будут у первой тысячи счастливчиков.
Шикардос,так реально получиться быстрее,надеюсь я в эту тысячу все таки попадаю Про Лондон шутка наверное_или реально Темника заслали туда? никаких шуток. это действительно правда. карты должны быть завтра в Киеве. если конечно не произойдёт никаких чп.. |
|
|
|
Кстати,а ответ на письмо кто нибудь уже получил?? Да и вообще должно ли прийти ответное письмо от команды минекспэй? Если кто то получил ответное письмо,то ответьте пожалуйста через какое время оно вам пришло?
Поддерживаю этот запрос, так как я тоже не получал подтверждения, хотя отправил адрес. Может этого подтверждения и не будет, но если кому придёт, то , пожалуйста, напишите об этом. Уж очень хочется, быть на борту в первой тысяче.  будет ответ. ждите. мне пришло через 2 дня. |
|
|
|
You are welcome.
I just frankly admit that for me it is very strange when you blamed the project for scam, insulted the team, the participants and me with lies, etc. , and now speak as politely as if nothing had happened. But I am a normal person, so I can close my eyes to past events if you really conduct a "friendly conversation." I have a different version of events to you. I would unequivocally put the blame for the drop in etiquette on you and those that were blindly pumping Minexsystem/Minexcoin/Minexpay and Republia or doing it because they were receiving a payment. That then provoked a reaction from those that saw the misinformation/lies promoting non-existent business deals with CSOB and without even making relevant checks about Novarise as outright lies and scam. Having said that, regardless of all differing opinions I have no interest in engaging with anybody unless it remains on cordial terms. Minexsystem/Minexpay/Minexcoin seems to be working towards something far better than they were a few weeks ago. I would welcome any real progress on that project. About Republia, I still have seen nothing so far that alleviates my concerns about it being a scam but that might change in the coming days/weeks You either do not understand the essence of fraudulent projects, or are too absorbed in searching for fraudulent projects, which, in your opinion, is a complete deception. Look around - in fact, there are hundreds of coins that have not done anything even from the very first step, but simply deceived and hid. They do not need to wait more than 2 years to do a dirty business. And now from all these projects you have chosen Minex - the largest fraud in your opinion, which, in turn, has no direct relation to the Republic, but, nevertheless, you have already accused her of fraud. I just do not understand why you are doing this? Much work has been done, no one hides their faces, their names, their location, their telephone numbers, etc. Fully open to dialogue. But do you think scammers do it? Yes, look around again! Just projects collect money, even without everything from work, even without an action plan, hiding people, etc., and people donate money. Why are you not there? Why not protect poor people? Or do you think that I have invested 10,000 dollars in the Republic (let's say), I do not understand what this project will be, and I would not see fraudsters? Of course, I would see it, since another investor is not a novice. Not everyone is stupid, especially now. This is not 2017. Everyone studies the project in length and across and assesses prospects, risks and legality ... Therefore, if you engage in dialogue and doubt something, it does not mean that you are right in your opinion. Every person is right in his own way. But to assert without direct confirmed (I emphasize) the facts that there is no need for lies and fraud. It looks like slander. Unfortunately,there is direct connection between Minex and Republia and it is impossible to negate.You can negate only if you dont want to see it.Minex and Republia do not share only same people, but almost same financial program with minor, irrelevant differencies.Only different part is whitelist technical plan. I do not make judgements easily,but there is a few things which can make every investor very,very cautious: - Both Republia founders, Daniel Shulayev and Vladimir Gyrych and advisor Boris Shulayev worked/work in Minex. 16.Dec.2016,while in pre-ICO, Minex gave statement to different crypto news portals,signed by PR manager,Daniel Shulayev(certainly approved by Boris) how Minex made a contract with one of the leading european banks to buy share in Minex by buying 1,092 millions of MNX for 1705.44 BTCs. Now,we know it was a lie.Big one.Banks do not pay in BTCs and in that time Minex didnt exist as a company.It was founded 9 months later in 22.Aug.2017,so it was impossible to buy share in non-existing company.Reason for that lie was Minex obligation to refund investors if pre-ICO was unsuccessfull.This way they avoided it. Question is how to believe to these people now,when they proved themselves as willing to do anything just not to return money to investors? It is valid question and in bussiness trust is extremely important.They didnt do minor but major violation of investors rights. - why Republia took Boris Shulayev as an advisor? After disastruosly leading of Minex ,taking him as an advisor is sending very bad impression to potential investors and make any attempt to negate relations to Minex futile - Republia whitelist is much more serious and difficult to achieve than Minex list.Costly too.Minex didnt succeed to realize much simplier list.By their own admission,Republia will need several years to achieve goals if everything goes well.For that time Republia will use ICO collected money and selling premined coins. For investors it means that Republia would not be able to keep promise about maintain exchange rate in tight range due to lack of funds for it.Not without massive external financing.On the contrary, using premined coins for financing will make situation even worse.As time passes, initial funds will be depleted and Republia will need to sell more and more coins to finance developping.It will make greater and greater pressure on market and price and one by one,investors would dump theirs coins with a loss.Then,Republia will need to sell even more coins to finance it and here we come in vicious cycle of hyperinflation generated by parking 70% rate and premined coins selling,like Minex did. Now,a month before ICO sale ,despite promises to change financial plan,Republia did nothing.Every investor before initial sale would like to see these changes of financial plan and not to rely on ICO leadership promises.Promises that something will be done after sale, no investor will buy as a truth. All above problems made me very,very sceptical about project.When someone make ICO based on a disastruos financial construction (proved in earlier ICO),with a lot of same people involved in it, I cant qualify that any more as incompetence but as an intetion. This is why this project has so high probabilty to turn scam.Not because people fudding it,but because serious problems and flaws described in text above. I will answer you, although I asked questions to another user and not at all about what you write to me, what I asked. Unfortunately, you want to wishful thinking. There is no direct connection between projects. If you consider the kinship of the consultant Boris and his son, one of the co-founder Daniel, direct linking of the projects is stupid. Did Daniel create his project and this is a connection? What nonsense. Direct communication is a complete copying of an idea, copying products, a blockchain, etc ... This is not the case here. Absolutely new innovative blockchain, which is written from scratch, not fork. Absolutely innovative opportunities to create contracts and projects on a new platform. Absolutely innovative approach to security and the ability to integrate other projects ... And a lot of things .... Did you read white paper? What is the connection with minexcoin? Bank? So even it is modified and will act according to its algorithm, in different directions ... Therefore, do not be silly. Yes. All your judgments that supposedly "not enough money", "not enough coins" - this is only your opinion and desire. The financial model was created not by fools, but by people who have an economic education. Well, you can not know what will be implemented after the fact, you can not know what will be modified, because the project completely eliminates hard forks and is subject to change, depending on the participants жeл desires ’by voting. And I appreciate your concern for your concern with the Republia project, but you read the questions I wrote earlier and answer them better. How did Republia deserve such attention? Why not hundreds of other projects that are really scam? I understand that nothing just happens. And once you are here, it means that you are pursuing some goals. Therefore, I am very “skeptical” about your sincerity ... |
|
|
|
You are welcome.
I just frankly admit that for me it is very strange when you blamed the project for scam, insulted the team, the participants and me with lies, etc. , and now speak as politely as if nothing had happened. But I am a normal person, so I can close my eyes to past events if you really conduct a "friendly conversation." I have a different version of events to you. I would unequivocally put the blame for the drop in etiquette on you and those that were blindly pumping Minexsystem/Minexcoin/Minexpay and Republia or doing it because they were receiving a payment. That then provoked a reaction from those that saw the misinformation/lies promoting non-existent business deals with CSOB and without even making relevant checks about Novarise as outright lies and scam. Having said that, regardless of all differing opinions I have no interest in engaging with anybody unless it remains on cordial terms. Minexsystem/Minexpay/Minexcoin seems to be working towards something far better than they were a few weeks ago. I would welcome any real progress on that project. About Republia, I still have seen nothing so far that alleviates my concerns about it being a scam but that might change in the coming days/weeks You either do not understand the essence of fraudulent projects, or are too absorbed in searching for fraudulent projects, which, in your opinion, is a complete deception. Look around - in fact, there are hundreds of coins that have not done anything even from the very first step, but simply deceived and hid. They do not need to wait more than 2 years to do a dirty business. And now from all these projects you have chosen Minex - the largest fraud in your opinion, which, in turn, has no direct relation to the Republic, but, nevertheless, you have already accused her of fraud. I just do not understand why you are doing this? Much work has been done, no one hides their faces, their names, their location, their telephone numbers, etc. Fully open to dialogue. But do you think scammers do it? Yes, look around again! Just projects collect money, even without everything from work, even without an action plan, hiding people, etc., and people donate money. Why are you not there? Why not protect poor people? Or do you think that I have invested 10,000 dollars in the Republic (let's say), I do not understand what this project will be, and I would not see fraudsters? Of course, I would see it, since another investor is not a novice. Not everyone is stupid, especially now. This is not 2017. Everyone studies the project in length and across and assesses prospects, risks and legality ... Therefore, if you engage in dialogue and doubt something, it does not mean that you are right in your opinion. Every person is right in his own way. But to assert without direct confirmed (I emphasize) the facts that there is no need for lies and fraud. It looks like slander. |
|
|
|
As Republia brand ambassador how much do they pay you and what exactly is your "role" as brand ambassador?
1. As a member of the Bounty Company my reward will be paid in coins RPB after its end and 2 months of "freezing" like other participants-April 15 2019. The remuneration will be calculated on the basis of the participation of all ambassadors. 2. My role is painted in the rules. Quote: "The Ambassador has the right to answer any questions from the community regarding Republia project, including questions about the distribution of coins, team and other frequently asked questions.
The ambassador can also promote, answer questions, communicate with people interested in Republia project in their native language, using Telegram- channels of the crypto-currencies and thematic crypto-exchange forums as a means for communication."Thank you for the explanation. I am trying to engage in a civil manner with Racquemis1 and TeMHuK, I would appreciate it if we could also engage a polite manner with both respecting any opposing views but always presenting arguments and debates in a friendly manner. Thank you. You are welcome. I just frankly admit that for me it is very strange when you blamed the project for scam, insulted the team, the participants and me with lies, etc. , and now speak as politely as if nothing had happened. But I am a normal person, so I can close my eyes to past events if you really conduct a "friendly conversation." |
|
|
|
As Republia brand ambassador how much do they pay you and what exactly is your "role" as brand ambassador?
1. As a member of the Bounty Company my reward will be paid in coins RPB after its end and 2 months of "freezing" like other participants-April 15 2019. The remuneration will be calculated on the basis of the participation of all ambassadors. 2. My role is painted in the rules. Quote: "The Ambassador has the right to answer any questions from the community regarding Republia project, including questions about the distribution of coins, team and other frequently asked questions.
The ambassador can also promote, answer questions, communicate with people interested in Republia project in their native language, using Telegram- channels of the crypto-currencies and thematic crypto-exchange forums as a means for communication." |
|
|
|
When they will release the card is still a big unknown. They are saying right now the card is in the testing phase but when it will end we don't know.
I would say very very soon considering it was announced yesterday that first batch of customer info was send to the bank for card issueing and that today, just now, people are being asked to supply them with their shipping address. Just supplied mine  sometimes is much better do not say anything. "very very soon", "soon" is anybody else tired of "very-soon-minexcoin-something-soon-very"? Apparently, apart from you, no one is tired anymore. I am sure that I will receive a card before the New Year. And I do not care who thinks what .. Are you sure? There are only 11 workdays until the new year. -- cut
I can't understand what are you talking about. People today was asked about delivery addresses for first batch of cards.
I did not get any call about the delivery address. Sure sure. )) I live in Ukraine and delivery to me will take a maximum of several days. I was already asked the delivery address and I gave the answer. 11 days is not a too long time, especially when we talk about minex cards. I will remind you to your words. No problem. Remind me. I think I have 14 days, not 11. |
|
|
|
When they will release the card is still a big unknown. They are saying right now the card is in the testing phase but when it will end we don't know.
I would say very very soon considering it was announced yesterday that first batch of customer info was send to the bank for card issueing and that today, just now, people are being asked to supply them with their shipping address. Just supplied mine sometimes is much better do not say anything. "very very soon", "soon" is anybody else tired of "very-soon-minexcoin-something-soon-very"? Apparently, apart from you, no one is tired anymore. I am sure that I will receive a card before the New Year. And I do not care who thinks what .. Are you sure? There are only 11 workdays until the new year. -- cut
I can't understand what are you talking about. People today was asked about delivery addresses for first batch of cards.
I did not get any call about the delivery address. Sure sure. )) I live in Ukraine and delivery to me will take a maximum of several days. I was already asked the delivery address and I gave the answer. |
|
|
|
I'm starting to worry, there is no news from the team and it is at least alarming how meetings with private investors take place, we need a positive result in order to collect the maximum amount in a matter of hours
Hello. You need not worry. The team will soon publish news and a report on the work done over the past few weeks .. You must understand that the news can not be thought out if they are not. Be patient. ps With private investors, everything is fine .. Wait for the official publication. |
|
|
|
|
Republia ICO Platform will allow to expand, add and supplement one or another product of the system.
To expand the ecosystem with your project you need:
- to be a member of Republia ecosystem;
- to have a unique RepubliaID;
- to fill in an application form;
- to pass automated verification Republia Spam-Content Bot;
- to pass an independent expert evaluation, which is carried out by professionals, chosen by the community members;
- to pass successfully a voting stage, in which at least 50% of ecosystem members should take part, while 51% of them will support the hosted project.
|
|
|
|
|
Republia ICO Platform позволит расширять, добавлять и дополнять тот или иной продукт экосистемы.
Для расширения экосистемы своим проектом необходимо:
- быть участником экосистемы Republia;
- иметь уникальный RepubliaID;
- заполнить аппликационную форму;
- пройти автоматизированную проверку Republia Spam-Content Bot;
- пройти независимую экспертную оценку, которая проводится профессионалами, выбранными ранее участниками комьюнити;
- пройти успешно этап голосования, в котором должны принять участие не менее 50% участников экосистемы, при этом 51% из которых поддержат размещаемый проект.
|
|
|
|
When they will release the card is still a big unknown. They are saying right now the card is in the testing phase but when it will end we don't know.
I would say very very soon considering it was announced yesterday that first batch of customer info was send to the bank for card issueing and that today, just now, people are being asked to supply them with their shipping address. Just supplied mine sometimes is much better do not say anything. "very very soon", "soon" is anybody else tired of "very-soon-minexcoin-something-soon-very"? Apparently, apart from you, no one is tired anymore. I am sure that I will receive a card before the New Year. And I do not care who thinks what .. |
|
|
|
Taking into account all the shortcomings of existing market solutions, Republia presents its ICO Platform.
All elements of the Republia ecosystem will be interconnected, as they will complement each other logically.
For example, the consensus will not miss ICO, if such a project already exists in the system, because there is no need to create projects on the platform several times, given the fairly narrow market.
In the personal offices of users will be shown applications of teams wishing to conduct their ICO on the platform and complement the Republia ecosystem with their project.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
