Sounds like a neat idea, but also one which could end up with you getting a heavy knock on the door, when the police trace laundered drug money to people buying you gifts on Amazon and come to ask you what you know about it!

No it isn't.
Wikipedia says:

Who do you think was flying the planes? Not the passengers, but the crew, who are included in the 227 figure.
There were 239 civilians on flight 370.

I've already told you that isn't true, why are you repeating it?

Oh, the irony.

You need to try to work out whether you think you are talking about what is or what should be.
Because in the real world, the one that is, you don't get to avoid the consequences of your actions by just saying you don't agree to subject to the law. No matter how much you redefine the phrase common law, it simply doesn't have the effect that you seem to think it does.
Try it and see.

In which case you are including flight crew for the 9/11 planes, but not for flight 370, so they don't match anyway, do they?
The equivalent number for flight 370 would be 239.


It took off at 8/3/2014 00:41 in Malaysia.


From Wikipedia:
and

So you just picked the one that gave the answer you wanted, and ignored the other.


So you knew you wanted to get 2277, and manipulated the numbers until you did.


No it isn't, that is the mystically bullshity part.
You have deliberately sampled only the numbers that suited your argument, then manipulated them in a specific way, which has no justification other that to give the result you wanted, then claim it shows some deep meaning. It doesn't.

Sigh. This is just too silly. The system you describe is Britain's got Talent or Big Brother, not the legal system.
As someone above said, why not just use it as money, why the desperate attempt to see Bitcoin as the solution to every problem in the universe?
You could make all communication by embedded messages in the blockchain, but why not just use email?

Yet it is exactly what you then try to argue:


a) If it were true, it would indeed be a coincidence.
b) It doesn't appear to be true. Where are you getting the 227 figure for 9/11 flights from?
c) Flight 370 only took off on 3/7 if you are American. In most of the rest of the world it took off on 7/3. And in Malaysian time, it took off on 8/3.


You use MYT here, but used UCT or EST above.
Why? Because it makes the numbers fit the pattern you are looking for.
Why not:
2 25 27
2 7 9
279 = H.R.279 - To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to take land into trust for Indian tribes, and for other purposes.

Or
2 25 2 7
2727 = H.R.2727 - To amend the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 to provide that not less than 40 percent of amounts available from the fund under that Act shall be available for the Land and Water Conservation Fund State Assistance Program.

Or
22 5 27
459 = S.459 - Minuteman Missile National Historic Site Boundary Modification Act
Or H.Res.459 - Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 3372) to provide a process for ensuring the United States does not default on its obligations.
Or S.Res.459 - A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to childhood stroke and recognizing May 2014 as "National Pediatric Stroke Awareness Month"

Or many other possible combinations? Because you are trying to find connections.
How many other messages did the system send?
How many possible permutations of numbers do they include?
Exactly the sort of garbage you said you weren't interested in.

And now you arrange dates as d/m, whereas above you used m/d. Because you are trying to create a connection.
We only have 10 digits, so with a little manipulation you can create all sorts of coincidences. So what?

I bet they won't.
If you actually try to apply any of his ideas, you'll see exactly how far you get.
He either believes what he says, in which case he is a fool, or doesn't, in which case he is a charlatan.
If you break the law of the land and get caught, you will be fined/locked up as appropriate, regardless of whether you recognize their jurisdiction or not.

When people talk about 'common law countries', or 'common law jurisdictions', they mean places whose legal systems are based on the English one. That is what the term means. If you want to say something else, you should use a different term. There is nothing about the English common law system which says that you are only obliged to follow those laws you 'contractually' agree to.

Numerology includes believing that those converted numbers somehow have magically gained special meaning, or that the fact that two different sets of input map to the same output implies some sort of connection between them. Nothing to so with science of any sort.

You wrote: The United States, Canada and Britain, along with Australia, are common law nations
'Common Law' used here means the English common law system, used by many ex-colonies and others, as opposed to civil law jurisdictions, such as France.
It predates the link you have given by many hundreds of years.

The link you have given is not a definition of common law.


This is just as wrong as if I were to say that gravity doesn't affect me unless I agree it does.
Commit a crime and get caught, and you will be punished, however loudly you claim that the law doesn't apply to you.

This...
...is rubbish. It is simply wrong.

How is that 'simple', compared to just asking the jury?

That is exactly the wrong definition of common law.
Common law is that which does not derive from any known government statute, but from historical usage and previous court decisions.

There are very few common law offences left in most common law countries, they having been replaced with statutory equivalents.


This is, it should hardly need to be said, wrong.


As is this.
What is it that you think the phrase 'common law' means?

It does.


To encourage the gullible to believe that they would ship earlier than the last possible date.

The block payout is clearly 500, not 505:


Edit:
It appears that the code allows you to create blocks with less than the maximum reward, it only checks that you don't create more:

So this bug only allows a miner to give themselves fewer coins that they should have earned, not more.
Similarly, it allows for more to be sent to the dev address, but not fewer.
Hard to see that as a real problem for the coin.

Conclusion is that there is a badly configured pool which is earning 1% less for its miners that it should be.

That absolutely does not apply to Bitcoin.
If all miners switched off tomorrow, no more transactions were processed, and the BTC/USD price fell to zero, would it have any noticeable affect on the economy, let alone a disastrous one? No, it wouldn't.

BTC is the virtual currency, it has the history, the press, and what little adoption there is.
There are dozens, if not hundreds, of altcoins now, and no rational reason to think that any of them (or at least any of the simple clones) will ever amount to anything.
At the current price of 20 satoshis, the entire 50M coin premine is worth 10 BTC, or about $6500.
Why would a tribe, having decided to use a virtual currency in the first place, decide (acting rationally) to use MazaCoin, rather than just spending $6500 to create their own 'National Reserve' and 'Tribal Trust'?
The only point was the premine. The premine is now almost worthless. So what is the point?

BTC is being used, and therefore has perceived value.
MazaCoin isn't, and so doesn't.

So you can be poor but morally superior?