Are you sure with this accusation? Do you have any proof for this? You know it's Lauda, you're throwing a big accusation for this. I don't think it's fair to tag the one who's running the bounty campaign for inaccurate distribution of tokens since it's being handled by the company alone. UNLESS after being proven that the project didn't give the allocation that was promised when the project launched and the manager still supporting it, then he can be considered as accomplish.

Now, my opinion is that the Kora team only partially fixed the problem and this is still considered as a scam. I understand that the hard cap was reduced, but only in half. That's why they should have reduced the bounty pool in half, not four times! Your thoughts?

Impressio: got my infos on scam accusations (too lazy to retrieve the post you could check it out yourself)

Slate: telegram channel. I joined the bounty and was asked to make an account on their site and the rewards would be rewarded on my dashboard. Upon knowing that it isn't an ERC20 token i didn't bother to make cause i don't know how those tokens work and how would it be beneficial to me.

Vivalid: telegram channel said that distributions was after ico, checked the thread and it's stated there that the ico is until oct 14.

Lpesa : telegram channel also. But for the rewards to be given you need to have a certain amount loaded to your lpesa wallet. If you don't want to cash in, they have a separate channel for loans. Didn't bother to loan since it would took to much time for a few bucks.

Kepler: also telegram channel. I'm counting on this since the previous 4 was a waste of time and effort.

Почему бы не лочить ветку баунти,если выяснилось что проект-скам?И не редактировать OP? никто не сможет слать отчеты-полезут проверять что случилось,а после удалять свои твиты/репосты.И никаких красных трастов бы не понадобилось.