If the casinos are baiting you, why not refuse to be baited? All I see here is that many are just weak in their psychology and allow themselves to be played. And for me, the casinos are exonerated here because they will not force you to accept any terms and conditions or play their way, it is the gambler who would see it and say, okay, I am in for this or not. For this, anything that comes from it is nobody's headache but the gambler. Gamblers should just go for the money they can afford to lose, the strategy that works best for them and the management that can preserve both their psychology and account portfolio. Otherwise, they will complain from now till tomorrow and nothing will change/happen because anything we do in casinos is our choice, everyone has the opportunity to quit too.

Let me answer these questions together. For me, I do not have any issues with my casinos and sportsbooks and I do not think I have ever had it because I always do what is right and be one step ahead of them in their excesses. But for so many people's issues that I've seen, what I would like to talk about are the KYC and the VPN issues which I believe casinos/sportsbooks should be fairer about than what they are doing now.

1. For the KYC, I think they should mandate the completion immediately after registration, or in the worst case allow the customer to gamble with them for a maximum duration of 3 months with regular weekly reminders to assure their seriousness. Otherwise, such a gambler should be asked to withdraw his money, not that they will seize the money to themselves until it is done. That is never fair to me.

2. For the VPN, I think a whole lot of cheating is attached to it. If they are not afraid of VPNs for hacking reasons, I do not think it is fair to use them as a means to seize customer's money. The worst, send their money back to them and end the cooperation with them, which is justifiable. Also, if multiple accounts are detected due to VPN, they have the system, so why not investigate? I am sure the true investigation will reveal whether or not they are the same person instead of acting harshly.

What you wish for is not going to be possible because we have different individuals thinking differently in the corridor of power in different countries, this is why the tax laws and other laws are not the same. You have a point too, but your points do not particularly have to be that way. In every good environment, I do not see the reason why we should not pay tax on all our incomes, we often do not know the benefits of this, but if you are in a good country where the system is working, please, appreciate it and find all means to support the government and the fellow citizens, especially in the area of taxed.

I said that because I am in a country where the system is not working, we envy you guys. On our part, any reason for us not to even pay the tax will be so welcomed as our government can't account for anything but corruption.

Now, in a country where the government is not asking for a gambling tax, indirectly, you might still be paying it. This is because they tax the casinos/sportsbooks very much, and your losses are included, and since most people are losing, the government is not losing. Either they tax you or they tax the casino/sportsbook, they still have the money. But it is fair to only tax an individual with their gross profits, and not on the immediate ones. This means that if you had lost $100+$100+$100 initially and now gained $400 later, you should be taxed from the excess $100.

You have a very good point and if I started stating the reasons why gamblers might need to use VPN, I might still be numbering 7 or so. Can we now say those gamblers with varied reasons why they use it are not for any good but to cheat the casinos? Definitely No. Each case has to be treated differently. What I see here is that most casinos are overbearing about this, the excesses are too much. Some are not even stating it in their terms and conditions but will enforce it nonetheless, these are not just fair.

What I realise is that they've seen it as a means to cheat their customers to make more money unquestioned, so they often use it whether it is done ignorantly by the customer or not, which is bad. This is also happening elsewhere and let me use Binance for an example, initially, if you use a VPN with them, you are free, but now, if you use it, your account could be banned immediately. Why is still so difficult for them if not for using the opportunity to confiscate people's money?

Till today with my traditional forex brokers, they do not care about the use of the VPN, do you know why? They have been in the business for so long and since it was well-planned and strictly regulated, they tread carefully. This is not the same with exchanges and casinos, this is why they are doing as they like. However, as it is now, their customers are just like voiceless people at their mercy, so it is better we avoid the use of VPN and stop claiming fairness with them which will never get us anywhere since they are the Boss, except for a few among them who just have integrity.

The wage may not be so high but the prestige and privileges attached to the position will be enormous, these are not worth losing. And certainly, he will be punished, though it might not be as we think, nonetheless, this will always stain his record book. And after retiring from this job, someone like him may not get any private security job anymore because his record will always haunt him.

Hahaha...force and paramilitary have their ways of dealing with this kind of situation. After all, it is not a treasonable offence, I believe he will remain in his job but in a different office. Also, he can either be demoted, suspended, or transferred to a very unfavourable place.

I do not assume that because he might not even have access to that kind of big money. What I realise is that he saw an opportunity and he wanted to use it. We are humans and a light risk like that which cannot affect the direct security of the PM can still be thought of, but the issue is that he handled the play unprofessionally. It is not today that leaks are happening that can't be ever traced to who leaked it.

Thank you for this, mine is that we should not because of the mindset that mistakes or failure can be a stepping stone to start relaxing, I just dislike advocating weakness and some people will misuse this point if care is not taken. These people could be wrongly getting their motivation when they make mistakes/fail, that can't be good, but we can't avoid it, many gullible people will misjudge the whole point. From the beginning to the end while gambling, whether we fail or not, we should always be at alert and be up and doing, we should be very careful and thorough in all our betting engagements and leave no stone unturned.

But if there were mistakes along the line, fine, we can correct them heroically, but not the ones we will take for granted, I hope you get the point. Such mistakes will remain uncorrected in this case which will not do the person any good. The moment you make mistakes, write them down or in your mind, then correct them ASAP. If it is an error in the budget and management today, do not make the same mistake tomorrow, change it and also enforce the change immediately. That is the only way this context can help gamblers, and not how many are just taking it here.

Judging by your response, I think you are referring to sports betting and not casinos. And you think the snacks and drinks will not distract you? Well, I like to respect individuals' ways of doing things and also encourage them not to replicate what others believe is right all the time especially when it is not convenient for them, our personalities can never be the same, and so are our actions and preferences.

That said, in my observation, I do not have a difference in the two, do you know why? I am always serious about anything that has to do with money. Even if it is just $1, money is money, so I don't take it lightly. This is why my focus is extremely sharp when I am betting on casinos regardless of whether it is offline or online. Still, I think I am better alert in physical casinos if I think it deeper.

My thought is that the bodyguard is truly unprofessional and if found guilty, he has to face disciplinary actions. I don't think such a bodyguard can be trusted in such a sensitive role anymore and this will forever be a dent to his career. You can imagine the person guarding the prime minister of the UK, that's very good luck and an enviable career which no one should jeopardise.

If at all he wanted to gamble such, he should have planned it to the point that none of his family members would be employed for the job, but a very distant friend who can keep it a secret and bet it as if nothing happened. He is a security officer, so he should know better than this.

There are a lot of bad and ugly things happening these days, people are just crazy and companies could be very desperate to the point that they will indirectly attack their competitors. This is not just happening but yes, it is increasing these days. I am so sure of this because of a reviewing site I follow revealing some, where the site doesn't take any review lightly, they will make sure they do their due diligent research to be sure that it is from who it says it's from to a reasonable extent. By that, they've caught enough of rival companies using their representative to attack others by leaving bad reviews about that.

They would open a new username like any other forums but the website would detect that the review came from a certain office against a rival company. At times too, it will be a good review by the same company about itself, so trusting reviews entirely is not a very good idea. But on average, if one is wise and can read reviews insightfully, such a person will not be a victim of that. And of course, a lot of reviewers would be paid for the tasks which are not even their staff, and at times, it could be friends or associates.

You have good points and it has to do with the general movements of the crypto market most times, otherwise, gambling coins often perform poorly. Although some would have a significant rise when there is an opportunity, especially those times that Bitcoin new/events would set the market agog, otherwise, you will be seeing a few of them having significant performance. I believe that is the way they would do until this bullish season is over. Many will not hit their ATH anymore even created this season again till it is over, so we need to be extremely careful about them regardless of the types around them. This is unless the success of the casinos/projects linked to it significantly warranted that.

BFG token indeed. Do you think this platform can quickly replicate that of Betfury? I doubt it. Well, it depends on their marketing strength though but with the way I see things now, they can't be comparable, it will take time.

Besides, it will look a lot messy if the OP would consider it as you stated. In my opinion, I understand him to have carefully limited it to how it looks now on this thread. The thread is to attract marketers who can get their casino propagated as they like and get them converted one way or another. I believe the extra features can also easily be seen on their platform when the intending customers visit it just as all the companies we advertise for in campaigns here do. They do not reveal all that they can offer unless you visit their website/platform.

Are casinos true to their high RTP? You should consider that even as I do not believe they are true to it. Offering such a high RTP and being true to it could be very risky in my opinion.

This sounds like a good plan, after all, you are just starting and you can continue to add games as the project advances. What I like you to know is that there is no amount of games that will be satisfactory to gamblers as we have our different preferences, but note that the number of games you have can define your size as an establishment too.

In other words, 10 games is still a welcome development in my opinion but expanding it will be better.

No! BNB is cool by me, but ETH is a discouragement due to the high fee associated with it and it will discourage enough people. You may also consider an extra coin with a very low transaction fee and fast transaction speed to make it 3 for a start.

Well said. Despite being against so many casinos in many ways, the KYC is not always part of it, and so long as the casinos did not tell you they are no-KYC casinos, it is in their every right to ask you for the KYC completion at any time regardless of the situation. The issue with our people is that they are too trusting and relaxed about this. Too trusting in the sense that since the casinos did not ask them for the KYC for years because they are losing or not making a reasonable amount of money from their pocket, they believe they will not ask them if they now started making regular or big withdrawals. They are also relaxed in the sense that what are they waiting for when they are dealing with centralised casinos that they can't complete their KYC as and when due?

If you never wanted to complete a KYC, why not go for the decentralised casinos? That's the way I view it. Now, it becomes an inconvenience when they are hoping to get their withdrawal as fast as possible but the casino requested for the KYC to be completed. This could be so annoying but I will always absolve KYC casinos or the ones that are silent about it of any wrongdoing. If at all it is not stated in their terms and conditions, so far they also have not advertised a no-KYC, it is the right of the person to ask the support for clarification, and that is what I do.

Above all, I complete my KYC even before I send my first deposit and I think it is smart enough to avoid later issues.

Are you now trying to find an excuse for the casino? You better don't. Because all of their actions and your defence for them are still pointing to guilt. Firstly, their terms and conditions never state what is being meted to the OP. Secondly, you are very wrong if you do not regard what is happening as a scam. A scam is not all about stealing your money, if someone is dishonest with their words and services, they are scamming you, period. You might want to confirm that though.

Lastly, there is no hacking prevention or fraudulent act that should have caused them to limit someone's withdrawal to that extent and the support has nothing to say about that. This is purely a deliberate and a dishonest act that shows how irresponsible they are. How can you call it fair under any guise for someone who could send about $10,000 without any stress into the casino but will take him at least 20 days to withdrawal his money. That is sheer wickedness if you do not know and it is doesn't sound good for you to talk it down.

I just visited your website and I must say it is nice work you have there. It's highly responsive with nice colours and user-friendliness, although it is about affiliate stuff, but with benefits. Just ensure it is unbiased and continues to be done in a unique way which can only make it always acceptable.

But still, there is a need for you to continue to update the casinos there, this is unless you want to go by the plan of the most popular ones only which I won't advise you to do. Many casinos are still missing, and perhaps you might just browse through the ones that are being talked about on this forum for updates, at least to start with before adding extras.

I know it is a long work that can't be done so fast. All the best.

Oh oh, you later said what I expected of you. You see, it is not about the size of the casino at times but the reputation and integrity to maintain the reputation. This is because the gambler looking for a casino may not be depositing more than $1,000 in most cases which I believe any serious casinos will be able to handle well if they are well-prepared to avoid liquidity issues. But if the casinos are now having integrity issues that are decreasing their reputation, it is a very big issue.

However, in the summary of my online search about this casino in my last post, I handed them 3/10 which is not acceptable if the gambler is safety conscious. Imagine having so many withdrawal issues all over the internet, what do you think their fate can become over time? Even if they are bigger than you claimed, it still serves no integrity purpose that will make people be persuaded to deal with them.

I understand and good luck with that. But in this case, are you sure that ZKX is a decentralised exchange? You have to ascertain this to avoid issues for yourself. Many establishments often claim they are decentralised but are indeed centralised. If they can't be sincere with a simple thing like that, how can you trust them? I don't know ZKX so there is little I can say now, but drawing from the point that you switched exchanges due to the high fee of Binance is doubtful of ZKX because I have not seen decentralised exchange having an overall lower fee (including blockchain) than the centralised exchange.

Their mode of operation should differentiate this for you though.

Anything online is hackable or disruptable, only that decentralised system can be better secure since there are no central rights or claims on assets.

It's bitget.com, please be careful this way so that you don't fall victim.

The reason why most of the reputable and popular exchanges will not be accessible from Nigeria's IP is the issue with the Nigerian government where they claim the P2P initiative is the reason for the exchange rate woe of NGN, so they blocked their websites through ISP. But they forgot to block the app's access.

You can access Bitget from the downloading store of your OS, but I've never used it. I switched to Bybit after Binance stopped offering P2P. Also, get ready for your KYC verification.

I can see that many are sharing their bots from https://github.com, many more could be later shared as well but to what end? Knowing everything about how a bot was made or even creating your own doesn't make it successful. I've seen enough of them with transparent disclosure about what they are made up of and the varied settings to work best with them, but still, they didn't give outstanding results.

Unless you have another reason for this, I say the bots aren't worth it regardless of whether you know how it is being made or not, they are always in three categories, but in the end, they will not be worth your time, efforts and money.

Good question, above it all, ensure you are investments inclined rather than being sentimental about holding. Most people in the cryptocurrency world would always be talking about holding but this has never been replicated in the results most times, while the earlier adopters seem very lucky. If care is not taken, while investors are holding for too long they might lose back their initial profits. I've known this for long and I made sure that I smartly invested in some crypto assets rather than holding, but I still hold some.

However, the result is that I regret some of the holding decisions, but the ones I invested in in such a way that I invest and divest intermittently based on my chart reading, I am happy about them. This is why I would like you to be smart here, holding has its disadvantages as well, but one thing that is sure is to know the right time to buy and divest, this is what I will be turning entirely to now to avoid some earlier mistakes.

Some of the cryptos that had earned me more than 6 times profits have reduced it to about 3x now, and the painful thing is that I was just trying to hold and not that I didn't see the trouble coming when the market was trying to reverse or have a major retracement. This is why we should be the friend of our higher timeframe charts above anything else and invest/divest as they advise.