|
Is it possible to run SDK 2.1 with the newest 13.1 drivers? I can't get the SDK 2.1 to install. it complains that everything is already up to date, but I uninstalled the latest SDK before trying it, so that's kinda weird. I want to use this weird combination since I use my rig both for gaming and mining, and I'm running 5 series cards, which like 2.1 best for mining.
Tips would be appreciated. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
7970s that only run up to intensity 13 tend to like -g 2. Try it and see if it improves your hashrate
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to see the Mtgox Euro orderbook somewhere? Because there's a 2,5% premium when Euro trades hit the USD orderbook, so I'd like to keep that to a minimum. So I'd love to see how liquid the current Euro market is on Mtgox. Thanks for the info  |
|
|
|
Doesn't look quite so bad on a 3 month log chart  The red arrow indicates the peak of course, but also the moment we hit the top of the steep channel we were in. We're now at the bottom of the least steep trendchannel, correct? Let's hope for a strong rebound |
|
|
|
bitcoincharts' api is working as expected as of this writing, so I'd expect the feed to be able to get the history again (but I haven't tested that).
Nope, not working: Historical download failed: HTTP Error 502: Bad Gateway  That's another story. You simply wait, retry and get the data. End of the problem. Yesterday you didn't get the requested data and it sucked hard. not working and i did that for the past 16h Same here. Tried a lot of times, but it's not working |
|
|
|
bitcoincharts' api is working as expected as of this writing, so I'd expect the feed to be able to get the history again (but I haven't tested that).
Nope, not working: Historical download failed: HTTP Error 502: Bad Gateway |
|
|
|
|
Yeah that can happen while mining, doesn't mean there's anything wrong. You can decrease the intensity setting for your miner, it should get rid of the artifacts, however you will most likely end with a lower hashrate as well.
|
|
|
|
I started getting involved with Bitcoin when it was at 9$ and on it's run up to 31$. Didn't make a bitcointalk account until a bit later, but I must say I'm enjoying my time around here: Total time logged in: 30 days, 6 hours and 57 minutes. Never been banned either  |
|
|
|
|
What the hell are you talking about?
|
|
|
|
|
Is anyone going to make a scammer accusation so he can get tagged? Or should I do it?
|
|
|
|
I subscribed to quite a few sources in order to catch a flash crash, sell high and buy low. None of them called a top or forecast this crash other than to say "if it goes below the x line then sell". I don't know how automatically sell below a moving line and I was busy today so I missed selling. Not a major bummer since I only speculate with a small amount but it does make me think I've wasted my money on tech analysis - once again another failed experiment!  Do you agree? Do you have a method for automating buy and sell? I think Bitfinex has stop-buy and stop-sell orders. Might wanna take a look there. |
|
|
|
That leaves 4,418 shares claimed to be bought out by 12/24/2013. If this number remains unchanged until December 17th, 2012, that will leave 231.7875 BTC to be paid out. This makes the weekly buyout payment 4.4575 BTC per week. Each share will receive 0.00100894 BTC per week until December 24th, 2013 starting on December 24th, 2012. Fuck you. You miss every single fucking "weekly" payment and now you think because the price has risen so much that ~9 BTC is enough? _You_ missed your payments, so it's _your_ fault. I understand you cannot pay the full 231.7875 BTC, that would be insanely unfair after such a rise. But if you had kept your word, and made your weekly payments, we would have already gotten WAY more than the measly 9 BTC you paid out. I cannot understand why we should we "pleased" with this. You didn't say a word anymore. Didn't reply to our request for updates/payments, and now we should be pleased with what we got? Had you just kept your word and sticked to your plan with 4.4575 BTC weekly payments, after only 3 weeks we would have gotten more than we got now. |
|
|
|
|
Anybody? Can this be send without a fee by creating a raw transaction? Can I include my own transaction in a block while mining?
|
|
|
|
Well, the downside of p2pool mining is that your payouts come frequent and small, so you're trying to send a transaction with a lot of dusty inputs to make up that amount.
That makes your transaction take up more space, and pushes your fee up.
-- Smoov
Hmmm that makes sense. But as far as I know, LTC transactions aren't even close to the blocksize limit, so sending it without fee should get it confirmed as well, even if it takes slightly longer. Hell, I'm a miner myself, so naturally I should be able to just include my transaction in a block, even tough there's no fee attached to it. Is there any way to do just that? Maybe via a raw tx? I never used that function before though, not even sure if that's possible with LTC, but I've heard of people using it with BTC. Look into transaction fees. Yes, you can send a TX without fees. Has to be high priority enough. Sending a TX without fees is not a good idea on bitcoin now, even if the client accepts it, btw. Yes I understand, but bitcoin's situation is a lot different with a lot of competition between TXs to get inside a block. With LTC it should be a lot less hard to get a low priority transaction in a block, and I don't really mind if it would take a while. But since I'm a miner myself, it shouldn't be impossible to include my own feeless transaction. I just have no idea how to do that. |
|
|
|
|
Posts like these makes me feel we are close to topping. What a irresponsible, greed fueled decision...
Edit: I mean the post about maxing his father's creditcard.
|
|
|
|
Well, the downside of p2pool mining is that your payouts come frequent and small, so you're trying to send a transaction with a lot of dusty inputs to make up that amount.
That makes your transaction take up more space, and pushes your fee up.
-- Smoov
Hmmm that makes sense. But as far as I know, LTC transactions aren't even close to the blocksize limit, so sending it without fee should get it confirmed as well, even if it takes slightly longer. Hell, I'm a miner myself, so naturally I should be able to just include my transaction in a block, even tough there's no fee attached to it. Is there any way to do just that? Maybe via a raw tx? I never used that function before though, not even sure if that's possible with LTC, but I've heard of people using it with BTC. |
|
|
|
LTC transaction fees really are too high right now, the client assumes everyone's got 10,000 LTC+. I think they should be reduced from 0.1 LTC default to 0.01 LTC (or lower). Most clients actually ignore transactions < 0.0001 LTC (see mininput parameter).
Yeah but mine is even at 0.60, not just 0.1. It's insane =/ |
|
|
|
I don't have much experience with moving ltc around, but I thought that the fees were optional? Can't you set your own fee right in the litecoin wallet, or even elect to pay no fee at all? My understanding was that it would just take longer to process your transaction that way...
The optional fee is set to zero in the client. However, that 0,60 fee is a mandatory fee it seems. Can't send it without the fee. How does anyone expect Litecoin to succeed if those fees are so high? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
