The rationale for gambling is different from the problematic of RNG in computer science, for gambling you still want something that will have poisson like distribution to have a "fair" game where the chances of winning are still known.

Chaotic mechanical processes in the end tend toward poisson distribution if the parameters stay constant, like dice or roulette or coin tossing, even at quantum level on long enough time you can find average with good statistcal match.

Turing machine are not good at creating randomness they are not made for this, on the contrary. They are perfect exemple of closed system with very low entropy.

Words are important

Edelman and the likes show that its not that easy to know where sentience and consciousness really starts or ends.

At which point you consider a cell or a group of cell is sentient or not ?

Ontologically speaking even a stone is a being 

Ever heard of poisson distribution ?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_distribution

Its the law that govern certain category of random events.

If you flip a coin, the average distribution will tend toward 50/50, and the occurrence of ten time the same result will be lower than occurrence of 50/50 with a distribution law.

I agree with that, the kind of investor seen in the 2017-2018 round dont look like very serious investors, like long term partner who really believe in the project. It more seem in large part they were more gambler profiles, or people wanting To benefits from pump and dump, inside trading, and fraudulent scheme.

Not the kind of investor you are looking for To build long term parternship based on trust and long term perspective and use case, and how the technical solution will benefit in a sector or another, more like pseudo traders looking at charts and statistic pattern, regardless of a grounding in "real economy".

It doesnt look like an environment conductive to solid company with a real long term objective in the market outside of reading coffee ground on trading chart trying To figure where the next pump is going To be.

Even without going into the bible what i find worrying is how medical science is straying away from hypocrathes oath. I can understand practice can evolve and we dont have To stick To 2000 years old practice and ethics, but on the general principle of what the role of a physician is supposed to be about, which is protecting life, not doing any action that will harm life, and the only practice he is allowed to do is to cure a disease or ailment, which also exclude abortion from medical practice.

Now it seems its going all corporate, even with organ traffic, and all kind of things that make it look more like bio industry than the original principles in which pharmaceutics and physicians are supposed To be grounded.

https://youtu.be/dYtqtwfJviI :p

Yes ! I can never understand how scientist can be atheist. Those who are nihilists Who think everything is just chaos and dont care ok, but scientists Who believe that mathematics is the language of the universe, Who are seeking logical reasonning and rationalism to explain the universe, then saying it has no purpose or reason , i dont understand. Believing in science to describe the universe with logical reasonning is pretty much the same than saying there is a god.

I dont think we have a lot of information on this, its the problem Imo, we are far to really know that much about what make life Alive and when it should be ok to use it as a tool in some process.

When scientist can create a cell from scratch and create complex life form that can thrive survive reproduce and be happy then we talk, but we are still far from this.

For the moment we are far to understand all the possible consequence and stake of this.

I guess it often how science progress, first they make plenty of mistake with zero ethics and after a while some Real science can émerge from it.

But in the case they should better think twice and study everything enough to have better bases to fund a strong ethic uppon, for the moment they are still playing with fire, but i guess its how you get progress faster, and there is going to be a whole juicy business around this before we start to get a Real clue about that.

I have read mein kempf, what i remind of it is mostly the style of writing, very sentimental, its there you see Hitler was very sentimental and an artist he was also a painter before, and mein kempf show him being sad with the state of the country and essentially playing violin, which is what is called a charismatic leader. From the tantric way its obvious he practice black tantra, instilling despair and focusing on the pain and bad feelings, with the result that we know. But its mostly emotional manipulation, in order To inspire a certain behavior and suggest certains solutions. But when manipulators write a pièce To manipulate people, you can say there is nothing genuine in it. Its manipulation, propaganda.

But mein kempf didnt influence high rank nazi all that much, compared To Henry Ford who was more the model for the new world, with the international jew, or evola, even theosophy in some part.

The superiority feeling i also rooted in wasp culture, that some people mostly White are genetically superior and the other are inferior races and it has very little To do with nationalism at core. Taking a swatika from the other side of the world as a flag show it has more in common with evola, aryanism, and certain theory about lost tradition with the hyper borean, than with meinkempf or nationalism.

Its not from brave new world, even if this story is also about that. Mein kempf is propaganda, the persons who write propaganda know its a lie , a forgery and a fraud. If you read the propaganda and think its what the people who write it think, you dont understand how propaganda works. Even the nationalist leagues were funded by the big industrials, To reel the working class in, but its not the essence of the ideology.

Its much deeper than that, the nationalism is just a media to reel people in, mein kempf is propaganda , the Real ideology is Henry Ford, productivism and profits over human values. No sacrifice is too high to get an industrial one up over other nation etc

After ww2, the nazi went CIA, swarmed to south america, middle east, Afganistan etc to concoct civil wars and coup to promote "industrial développement" by exploiting ressources and people to build their Ford topia global.

Now its to the point most people think being scientist is building the next cellphone Who will make the next top company, originally science is studying things and building axiomatic reasoning.

The nazi model infiltrated our society more than we can think, lot of nazi have been recruted in scientific position after ww2.

I read descartes im french i know this story its part of our national history and culture

But what descartes also say is that our senses are misleading and we can only trust our thought, and doubt everything we see or hear, that material world is an illusion etc in itself its also what you find in most religions too. Its about power of the mind and of rational thinking, with his theory of the soul with the pineal gland etc i dont think he wrote that because of pressure from catholic church. And it still boil down to say there is more to the world than what the eyes can see and there is a divine inspiration beyond the mind as a pure mechanical system etc

The catholic church was suffocating a bit, but there was other branch of religions as well, like rosicrucian even if its a bit after, or cathares, templar ans other groups, rejecting the catholic dogma doesnt mean he was not into religion or believing in god.

Like liebniz Who is also one of the best mathematician and logistician, he was also critics of catholic church and some religious dogma, but he was still christian.

I dont really see where is this huge barrier between scientific research and religion in itself if you dont limit religious practice to catholic inquisition.

Einstein riemann or newton had the choice. And even the others like liebniz, descartes etc Even if you look where algebra comes from, its also grounded in theology.

Religion is not about astronomy or supposed to give a description of the material world.

The geocentric model come from aristotle more than the bible as far as i know, and ironically he was more the science Guy of the team.

The relationship between catholic church and aristotle and natural science is complex.

 But its hard to say that catholic church was anti science by supporting the aristotle model because its the closest to science you could get at this time.

Science still cant explain life and consciousness either.

Most great scientist and philosopher were religious too.

Sure you can send the PDF i think there is lot of thinking To do on how To fund blockchain project properly , ICO are not really very good, IEO ultimately depend on the trust with the exchange to be neutral and objective, but even selling token as both fund rising speculative assets and utility token for users is not very good idea imo. Neither for the investor or the project development long term.

This is "VAPORWARE"

Science originally is not even about achieving things, or doing company or building technology. Science is about knowledge and understanding the rules of the universe, and not only thermodynamic and how many watt you can get from 1l of gas, and how much profits you can make out of it. And from the moment you are in this demarch of understanding law of universe, it require the proto thesis that the universe has law, that are constant and eternal, and that it obey To reason, which is in alignement with theology.

Technology can only bring real progress if it contain an humanist dimension to it, like in the platonic sense of percieving knowledge through the good like we percieve object through the Sun. Like the noble truth in budhism.

Otherwise it just become a tool to satisfy greed and ego, putting material needs above everything else, leading To a form of self destruction.

Religion is not opposed To knowledge or science in itself, on the contrary, the logos as the basis of rational thinking is a concept from theology, only in the measure that its taken in the Matrix of greed and ego, destroying eco system and exploiting children To build some technology as cheap as possible To make a maximum of profits in wall street. But its not really what science is about originally.

The relation between mathematics and physics is purely coincidental, and only hold if you believe the universe is ordered and follow reason, otherwise physics is a delusion like any other, with its lot of dogma used to justify the privilege of a ruling elite like the bad side of institutional religion, and no axiomatic grounding as a rational discipline.

They even put a shiva statue in front of the CERN, it show that scientific progress and religion are not fundementally opposed.

Im developper, i like science and technology, why so offensive lol

The ecosystem is being destroyed because we loose respect for life and the sacred in our race for developpement.

I dont even understand why you oppose systematically the two, after all originally science is a branch of greek philosophy, sophy coming from Sophia, which is a greek goddess of wisedom, also close to concept of trinity.

Negative growth rate, i expected more optimism from a great progressist scientist like you lol whats the use of all those force in the universe if in the end we cant use it To grow our population  

But yeah why not im living again when i go to Bali lol but there is still technology there. Afganistan maybe not, too much CIA Who want to promote capitalist développement with al Qaïda.

Its even quite ironical to see people like you promoting science as absence of bias and objectivity having so much preconcievied and stereotypical view about certain topics while calling everyone ignorant.

.

And we have destroyed 90% of our ecosystem and lost social cohesion, with two world war and a cold war, plus Hiroshima and all,but at least we have xannax and know how many rings there is on saturn and how many forces there is in the universe.