|
@bulanula why are you so quick to call scam. It was hard but not a scam. I'm looking forward to seeing the final clues too.
|
|
|
|
Still don't understand how that will lead us to the 10 BTC !? How will the winner get this 10 BTC ? GoWest send it directly / manually to his address or what ? Redeem a private key they found on Internet ? Where the moneys at ... LOL ? It's completely out of my hands. It will be automated for the person that finds them. Yes, I think I found them! Watch for a 10 BTC transaction to the address in my sig. Thanks for the fun Saturday morning, GoWest! well done |
|
|
|
Bittleships.com <--Next Stop!
Can't be. It says "If you're paying bitcoins to sink the battleship, you've been led astray." click on the link one below bittleship on the http://betwithbtc.com/ site |
|
|
|
My wife thinks that shit is everywhere - especially on Reddit  |
|
|
|
This is one of the major reasons why bitcoin is better for consumers. Pay with bitcoin and you don't have to trust anyone with your credit card details.
really, if you really think about this, the hack never really matters. if your information gets stolen and used to buy things to sell for cash, you pretty much get your money back inside 2 weeks. It's still a hassle to deal with the credit card company to get your money back and not everyone pays close attention to their bill so things can slip past. |
|
|
|
|
This is one of the major reasons why bitcoin is better for consumers. Pay with bitcoin and you don't have to trust anyone with your credit card details.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with mjcmurfy and evoorhees and others. This is a bad policy.
And the fact that people with existing images in their sigs can keep theirs while others cant have one just makes it much worse. If you are going to implement this policy no one should be allowed to have them. It reinforces the idea that bitcoin favours early adopters and is unjust.
You need to rethink this.
|
|
|
|
Did you use my one-liner? In that case, can you paste here the output of this? apt-cache search libdb|cut -d' ' -f1|grep '++-dev' Ran the above and got this libdb++-dev
libdb5.1++-dev
libdbus-c++-dev
I see. I've fixed the first post to work also on your system. Thank you, that worked a charm. |
|
|
|
|
@ssaCEO
I think you are on the right track trying to to target the people who are currently gambling on other sites rather than just the bitcoin crowd. How is the feedback on the gambling forums, blogs etc? I'm surprised I haven't seem more press hits on how bitcoin and gambling are a perfect fit. There's been so many about Silk Road for example. Is the problem just that it's too inconvenient for the average gambler to buy bitcoins?
The bitcoins for Christmas is a nice idea, but doesn't help someone buy bitcoins. Maybe something like a Strike Sapphire branded Casascius coin that people could buy from with their credit card might persuade some people. Would it be possible to do something like make the bitcoins from the Strike Sapphire-Casascius coin available in their Strike sapphire account immediately upon payment but withdrawals would not be possible until they receive the physical coin - maybe a stupid idea with some flaw I'm not thinking about.
Anyway good luck and keep up the good work.
|
|
|
|
Did you use my one-liner? In that case, can you paste here the output of this? apt-cache search libdb|cut -d' ' -f1|grep '++-dev' Ran the above and got this libdb++-dev
libdb5.1++-dev
libdbus-c++-dev
|
|
|
|
In Ubuntu 11.10, I'm getting the following when I try to compile. In file included from src/qt/bitcoin.cpp:9:0:
src/headers.h:36:20: fatal error: db_cxx.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make: *** [build/bitcoin.o] Error 1 Anyone have any ideas? |
|
|
|
|
Interesting, but if I got an email like this that I wasn't expecting I might assume it is spam or some sort of scam. You'll have to be careful to word it properly to avoid that.
|
|
|
|
Wasn't the idea of destroying bitcoins by spending to a provably non-redeemable address floated somewhere around here before? It was part of one proposed mechanism of migrating value to a new blockchain I think.
It seems to me that scripts such as this (sharp and pointy as they may be) should be allowed.
@julz this might have been related to what you are thinking about above: http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/924/can-a-bitcoin-be-destroyed |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
