I'm the first to concede it must be hard for sports betting sites to have to update daily for some fixtures (especially during finals).

Tennis is another one as you don't know who the winner is going to  face off against in the next round until a separate game is played.

Rugby Union

Japan and Australia face off this weekend. I haven't had a chance to see what the odds are for that game yet.

Thanks for the link, aoluain - I might have to shop around for another site that has some of the "additional" markets.  It's always good to be able to see players playing at the competition level against their countrymen ass opposed to at the International Level.  To my way of thinking, you can pick up on their more relaxed style of play and perhaps see an entirely different game played.

Welcome @Stong RCP  !

Would you please ensure that you use the Submission Form that can be found in the first page for all future posts?  (I've linked to it for easy reference)  -  I would also appreciate it if you could go back and ammend your first post (ever!) so that it conforms with the standard.

Thanks,

I did a long post and I'm not sure what I did, but I lost the entire text...

In essence, Canterbury, Waikato, Wellington and Otago are the powerhouse teams in the New Zealand Rugby (Union) - a few of the teams also play against their Australian counterparts in a trans Tasman Cup, so that harks pack to my comments concerning the NRL and divisions and relegation.  (and I'll keep those teams in mind when I'm placing bets )


Welcome!

If you've got any links for the competitions, or even which gambling sites cover these fixtures, then I'd be glad to add them to the OP / first posts.

Nice to have you with us.

Thanks for your good wishes, hopefully you did well.

---

---

I meant to post these bets earlier Simona Halep won against Anastasia Potapova:

• Simona Halep @ 1.35 - Taken Amount: 0.05 mBTC - Possible Payout: 0.07 mBTC
• A. Kalinskaya/A. Potapova @ 2.01 - Taken Amount: 0.05 mBTC - Possible Payout: 0.10 mBTC - CANCELLED

I'm nnot certain - was the Bernarda Pera - Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova match delayed?

Not necessarily - if Zodiac1233 wanted to, they could have come on anytime in the last ten weeks to say their dear friend lightlord was ill, but didn't.  

(Yes, my bad. Zodiac1233 hadn't posted for over twelve months - but in saying so according to BPIP.org, Zodiac1233 hasn't "woken up" so in those more than twelve months Zodiac1233 has been quietly logging in once in a while and doing "stuff" that isn't posting).


I could say you are a great guy on your trust page, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it is true...

(You're a great guy BTW)        

One of my pics has been cancelled ( Ekaterina Alexandrova Vs Ons Jabeur ) while another matchup is underway at the moment.  ( Anastasia Potapova Vs Simona Halep (and it's not looking good for Anastasia Potapova )).  I don't know why, but I thought all five of those matches would have been played already, however, three won't be played for many hours yet.

In the meantime...

• A. Kalinskaya/A. Potapova @ 1.65 - Taken Amount: 0.05 mBTC - Possible Payout: 0.08 mBTC

Which is due to start any minute now.   

Rugby Union:

In the Mitre 10 Cup in New Zealand, I have the following wagers on the games available this week-end:

• Bay of Plenty @ 1.14 - Taken Amount: 0.05 mBTC - Possible Payout: 0.06 mBTC
• Hawke's Bay @ 1.36 - Taken Amount: 0.05 mBTC - Possible Payout: 0.07 mBTC
• Taranaki @ 1.16 - Taken Amount: 0.05 mBTC - Possible Payout: 0.06 mBTC
• Otago @ 2.57 - Taken Amount: 0.05 mBTC - Possible Payout: 0.13 mBTC

On the other side this week-end in Premiership Rugby England, I'm going for:

• Leicester Tigers @ 1.43 - Taken Amount: 0.05 mBTC - Possible Payout: 0.07 mBTC
• Saracens @ 1.10 - Taken Amount: 0.05 mBTC - Possible Payout: 0.06 mBTC
• Gloucester Rugby @ 1.43 - Taken Amount: 0.05 mBTC - Possible Payout: 0.07 mBTC

---

---

It makes a whole lot of sense compared to poaching teams from other competitions by depleting those comps of valuable teams.

I hadn't considered parking the FUN tokens for a half year, but I guess it makes sense to be able to consolidate the tokens into one lump sum, or space them out over a twelve month period a bit more than if you might be waiting for months on end for them to mature.

In the WTA in Moscow, I'm putting some small wagers on the following:

• Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova @ 1.25 Taken Amount: 0.05 mBTC Possible Payout: 0.06 mBTC
• Aryna Sabalenka @ 1.23 - Taken Amount: 0.05 mBTC - Possible Payout: 0.06 mBTC
• Elena Rybakina @ 1.85 - Taken Amount: 0.05 mBTC - Possible Payout: 0.09 mBTC
• Anastasia Potapova @ 3.78 - Taken Amount: 0.05 mBTC - Possible Payout: 0.19 mBTC
• Ons Jabeur @ 1.31 - Taken Amount: 0.05 mBTC - Possible Payout: 0.07 mBTC

I haven't made any pics on the WTA in Tenerife for today.

The Redcliffe Dolphins Rugby League and Club and have been confirmed as the newest team to enter the convoluted Australian NRL competition in 2022 with Wayne Bennett tipped to be their "foundation" coach.



According to Wikipedia, The Dolphins is their new name and the club was originally founded in 1947, accepted as part of the then Brisbane Premiership in 1960 they were accepted as a team in the Queensland Cup in 1996 and now in late 2021 have jumped ship to the NRL commencing in 2022.

The Dolphins last Premiership was in 2018 (but only as minor premiers) and were runners up in 2016 and before that 2012.

There's plenty of websites reporting on The Dolphins move to the NRL, with this site confirming Bennett signing a $2M three year deal.

---

---

Comment.

Now would have been the perfect opportunity for the NRL to negotiate with the State based teams to have a "relegation" system such as the English Football has. dumping the bottom rung teams and, guaranteeing the winners of the various state based competitions entry into the National competition.

As such, the North Queensland Cowboys and the (wooden spoon) Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs should have been relegated from the NRL back to their state based competitions.

Originally, the NRL was short for New South Wales Rugby League...  entering new sides into a bloated competition while keeping the same number of Sydney and New South Wales teams proves the NRL is still just a Sydney-centric competition...

I've just had a look at Zodiac1233's post history and although they haven't posted for the last four months I can see they have a pattern of coming online every two, three or four months and posting information concerning the back-end operations of the two sites.  This makes me think lightlord is the owner/operator while Zodiac1233 is a third party tech support person given their posts are *just* concerning the two websites.

This is what Cnsba wrote in their OP:

https://ninjastic.space/post/58190848


I feel this thread should be kept open a little longer to allow others with issues against these two to have a platform to be able to air their grievances and to compare against what has been said before without having to go over old ground in a new thread.

If I was able to give merits for trust feedback, THIS:


would be by far and above the top of my wish list.  It has everything you need to know about the OP and their methodology here in the forum (Bitcoin Talk).

Well done @LFC_Bitcoin - I couldn't have put it better myself.

Truth be told, I don't have any strategy as such when it comes to the free rolls.  I get five per day and allow them to bank up for a few days (not more than a week at a time - usually) as I'm not online as much as people might think.  When I do roll, it's interesting to see how few of one or the other prizes there are, or, conversely, how many of one prize or another there are each time.

If I win enough bitcoin from these banked rolls to buy another 100 FUN tokens, I do so and add to my 365 day investment.  (It'll be interesting in about eleven months time to see what people do with their FUN tokens)

Campaign Managers don't have any kind of editorial control over a participants posts.  

There is no requirement to continue to receive merits once in the campaign - far from it.  If a participant can con or buy as little as five merits in the last 120 days, then they are in.  The Campaign Manager for the signature campaign I am in will, on occasion, make a comment on the Google Spread Sheet for a user to "spread out" their posts.  However, this is as close as a CM dares come to exert editorial control over a user's post's content.

I don't include the stipulation that for example five posts each week must be in (for example) the gambling/gaming sections.  But, even then as I said at the start, there is no editorial control over those post's content.

Firstly, you can stop quoting the entire post and then accept your alts have been exposed along with your admission that you have been banned (i.e. ban evasion).

I was in the 777coin campaign and only started looking for another signature campaign when the payments shifted (without explanation) to a fortnightly payment. The tier system was also a little jaring, but, being in such a campaign gave me prior history I could demonstrate when applying for any new campaigns I choose to apply to join.

---

---

Perhaps giving an undertaking to place participants of these two campaigns on ignore might hold the owner, lightlord to be more prompt with their obligations.

Actually yes, the campaign payments are ten weeks late - we've already established that the campaign manager took it upon themselves to declare it to be a bi-monthly payment due to the owner/operator of the two websites being unresponsive for more than a year (that this instance of payments falling behind) and just playing along with the CM when the payments fell behind.

Try reading a thread before you shit post.

From what I can tell, it's the second time he's rage-quit.  I posted a reply on the previous page of this thread.  I don't expect a responce any time soon, but at least we've tried to communicate.

What amazes me is that my trust feedback was neutral, yet theirs is trust feedback abuse with four or five negatives saying the same thing (how Butt Hurt ^TM they are).