You guys would be better off mining x11 on nicehash and buying Niro and you'll get a lot more than mining it straight up. Just a little advice.
Bad advice X11 too hot :< Well then get the older lesser optimized versions, and it'll run cooler, but give you slightly lesser hash/btc in the end. Or you could downclock the card if it's OC'ed and run the latest version. Either way, you'll get way more like that than mining Niro directly. You think x11 is too hot? Trying running Quark and you'll change your mind. |
|
|
|
|
Watched blade runner recently, funny reading this quote from the movie:
"The Nexus series of replicants – genetically engineered by the Tyrell Corporation – are virtually identical to an adult human being, but have superior strength, agility, a wider temperature range tolerance, and variable intelligence depending on the model."
|
|
|
|
|
You guys would be better off mining x11 on nicehash and buying Niro and you'll get a lot more than mining it straight up. Just a little advice.
I have ~ 267 mh/s, found 2 blocks yesterday within 10 mins, (mined just for the fun of it, and nothing for the next 45 mins), and today I found one block upon starting the miner.
It's just more worth it mining on the CPU, but probably a Xeon as the reserves don't get depleted much on the cpu channel.
|
|
|
|
Is the newer version of gpu miner required after update on 31/7 if so is there any resolution to issues with libeay32.dll?
Forget GPU mining bro, block reward is too long. |
|
|
|
Release 56 has finally made be break 100 mh/s on quark. Virtual beers for everyone!  Aliman, Your 980ti is beating the Titan-X   The titans in this picture are to close to eachother. They will heat up and trottle. Bether to use 70cm usb risers and spread the cards. The titans are not good for mining. 12GB of ram doesn't help, and the prise is skyhigh. Wrong about the heat; servers tend to be cooled differently. Right about everything else. Cooled differently by magic I presume? Forced cool air in the front and out the back. And those are the characteristics of the blower type heatsink, it's got nothing to do with being a server. Right now, it's actually like a test bench. And SP is right about the risers and all. I meant, rack mounted systems tend to have cold air forced in the front - you could actually have them not overheat. But unfortunately, they still do over heat. One card absorbs the heat of the other, and it moves all the way to the last card. |
|
|
|
Release 56 has finally made be break 100 mh/s on quark. Virtual beers for everyone! Aliman, Your 980ti is beating the Titan-X The titans in this picture are to close to eachother. They will heat up and trottle. Bether to use 70cm usb risers and spread the cards. The titans are not good for mining. 12GB of ram doesn't help, and the prise is skyhigh. Wrong about the heat; servers tend to be cooled differently. Right about everything else. Cooled differently by magic I presume? Forced cool air in the front and out the back. And those are the characteristics of the blower type heatsink, it's got nothing to do with being a server. Right now, it's actually like a test bench. And SP is right about the risers and all. |
|
|
|
Release 56 has finally made be break 100 mh/s on quark. Virtual beers for everyone! Aliman, Your 980ti is beating the Titan-X The titans in this picture are to close to eachother. They will heat up and trottle. Bether to use 70cm usb risers and spread the cards. The titans are not good for mining. 12GB of ram doesn't help, and the prise is skyhigh. Wrong about the heat; servers tend to be cooled differently. Right about everything else. Cooled differently by magic I presume? |
|
|
|
How's the power consumption on 980ti , compared to 970 ?
Lets see, this does 268 - 280W at the max, running at 1500Mhz. My MSI GTX 970 4G consumed something like 220W, given the custom PCB and heftier power connectors. |
|
|
|
Release 56 has finally made be break 100 mh/s on quark. Virtual beers for everyone! |
|
|
|
|
80 GH/s on Quark on nicehash even at 0.23 BTC/GH, how's that even profitable?
|
|
|
|
|
I gotta say,the concept behind the trust key is quite tricky.
Hopefully we don't lose all of our staked coins if we go past 30 days to update them (like if I'm out of the country to visit my family).......
|
|
|
|
just few results for new compiled git from sp_ on my poor gtx750 1gb
lyra 1500/1600 1130khs
quark 1500/1575 6030khs
Other algos without improvements comparing to my old records.
win7 64bit, ccminer 32bit, cuda 6.5, driver 353.30
quark on nicehash gives 7-8% rejects with ccminer and 1-2% on sgminer.
nice hashes ... i dont get that with the 2GB cards ... but then - i dont overclock either ...  ... #crysx Bro, if you don't OC, you ain't taking much advantage of your system! |
|
|
|
This is a brilliant coin by someone who knows the crypto industry. One small suggestion. As pos is developed and released, all will agree the tech is superior and will allow long term growth. However, 1 thing has bothered me about this great coin. Its name. Niro is not marketable in the real world. To illustrate: suppose you see a piece of art on the wall in an art gallery 50 years ago. Someone tells u its a Picasso painting. u say: this painting sucks. Fast forward to present day, same scenario. Someone says you are looking at a Picasso. U say, Man thats ugly, but i want it! Why? The name adds so much value. We live in a world where branding and names are absolutely as important as what you are buying into. As you move into marketing efforts, the tech will stand out, but people will always feel in the back of their minds this: Niro is a stupid name that will be hard to adopt in the real world. This is my humble opinion, but feel it will become important as this coin grows over the next year. Cheers
RT
I believe that there was quite a bit of discussion when it was being renamed couple of months back, looks like you missed the train on that on. |
|
|
|
If you want a working miner for cuda7.0 this is the correct branch: https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminerI tried to compile my fork for the cuda 7.0 and started modding a bit. But the compiler wasn't good enough. Not worth the effort.. Around 10% drop in hashrate in all algos.. If you have time please run tvprovot's cuda 7.0 version of quark and compare the hashrate with my 6.5 release 54-git and post your findings. Getting 71 MH/s using that miner compared to yours with 93 MH/s. |
|
|
|
|
Sounds good man, could you clarify on the stakers vs holders part. As long as we have it in our wallet and with the new core, we'd be staking?
|
|
|
|
|
This is why we need recyclers kids.
|
|
|
|
|
Speaking of quark, thought I'd mention that the fastest is still just release 51 for 970/980's. With 3 970's and 2 980's, I'm getting 92.6-93 mh/s compared to a max of 92.5 mh/s on the newer releases.
|
|
|
|
|
It would be great if we could use the Viz pool for GPU miners and cestballot pool the way it is for the cpu guys.
|
|
|
|
|
If anyone wants to dump 1-2 BTC worth of niro slightly below the market, lets do this!
|
|
|
|
|
Been a while since I've seen it cross 1K sats.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
