আমি তাহলে ভুল দেখলাম নাকি? নাকি ঘুমের ঘোরে লিখছি কে জানে। এই ফোরাম আমার কাছে সোশ্যাল মিডিয়ার মতো হয়ে গেছে। অন্যরা ঘুম থেকে উঠে বা ঘুমানোর আগে ফেসবুক, ইন্সটাগ্রাম ইউজ করে। আর আমি ফ্রি টাইম পুরাটাই ফোরাম ইউজ করি। তবে মাঝে মাঝে সোশ্যাল মিডিয়া ও ইউজ করে থাকি। জানি না ঘুমায়ে ঘুমাতে লিখেছি নাকি।


ভাই মনে করার কিছু নাই। তিতা হইলেও আপনি সত্যি কথা বলছেন। তবে আমাদের এখানে হইচই করার কারণ আছে। আমরা চাচ্ছিলাম এখানে একটা কম্পিটিশন বানাতে এবং সবাইকে আরো একটিভ রাখতে। আমরা চাচ্ছিলাম একটা লোকাল বোর্ড এর আবেদন করার জন্য। এর জন্য সবাইকে একটিভ রাখা জরুরি ছিলো। আর পাকিস্তান থ্রেড এ আমাদের মতোই পোস্ট নিয়ে হইচই হয়ে থাকে। একটিভ লোকাল থ্রেড বলতে এই দুইটা থ্রেড ই একটিভ আছে লোকালে। তাছাড়া অন্যান্য একটিভ কমিউনিটি অলরেডি বোর্ড পেয়ে গেছে। তো হইচই ব্যাপার টা পজেটিভ ভাবেই নিচ্ছি। এক এক জনের পয়েন্ট অফ ভিউ এক এক রকম হতে পারে। তবে আপনার পয়েন্ট খারাপ ছিলো না।

Don't write just for your signature campaign requirement. You should read before posting, you should think before you write. Look at the bold part of my post. As I said, I don't want to mention any names and am not discussing this particular case. Since BitcoinGirl.Club wrote something, and I felt I had something to add; I wrote my experience. I should mention that the person I am talking about is not JollyGood. I did not mention any names here.

If everyone starts creating a thread because of an accusation that never continues, then the whole reputation board will be crazy. It does not worth creating a thread because the accuser got silent after my first reply, there is nothing left to do. Stop encouraging people to create new drama threads.

If you were trying to catch merit, you are successful.

The model looks like the dude.  
He recognized his old picture maybe!


Who wastes that much time on Twitter?
Biodom?  

Wait, what? When I saw the scorecard last time, England needed 76 runs, and they had four wickets in hand. Ben was hitting some massive six, and I thought this was the day for England. Ben Stokes alone fought against the Aussies. Ben Duckett played well as well. But, the rest of the batting lineup of England showed some poor performance.

Congratulations Aussies! Hazlewood got the most crucial wicket. Hazlewood took both Ben Duckett's and Ben Stokes's wickets. Ben Duckett played well in both innings. Yet he failed to win because of his other team mates! Better luck next time.

It seems good to me.
One of my friends from Marseille confirmed it's good for him as well.
Maybe it's your ISP?

If web3 casinos also get a license and integrate 3rd party games, they may also ask for KYC. Some providers need information about players when they see suspicious activity on their game, they may ask for a KYC and web3 casinos will be forced to ask for KYC from players. I did not play in web3 casinos yet because I don't think there is any reliable web3 casino developed yet.

Moreover, I am afraid of connecting my wallet to any website. This is another reason I also don't use new unnamed Decentralized exchanges. If any web3 casino can build their reputation and their name in the future, I won't mind playing there.

I don't want to say anything about any particular case or this thread. I don't want to mention any name too. But, one of these forum police blindly said I participated in a Pizza baking contest and other contests to farm merits. While I did not participate in any contest organized in this forum so far. Now I am afraid if I participate in any contest, they will say I am a shit poster and trying to farm merits from the contest. They also said I post shit in the WO thread to farm merits while I got around 7-9 Merits from the WO thread from the general discussion in my forum lifetime.

It's too easy to accuse someone in this forum. While accused members get tagged if the accuser is right, why they don't even apologize if it's proved that they were wrongly accusing someone?
I mean I am saying you are a scammer without any proof and I failed to prove it, shouldn't I apologize for accusing you?

 আপনাকে অসংখ্য ধন্যবাদ ভাই। একটিভিটির চাইতে মেরিট বেশি থাকা যেমন একটা বোরিং ব্যাপার, তার থেকে মেরিট বেশি থাকাটা একটু সম্মানের ও ধরা যায়। আমরা প্রথম দিকে কিন্তু তেমন মেরিট পাই না। অনেক সময় খেয়াল করবেন যে নতুন ইউজার রা ভালো পোস্ট করলেও মেরিট পায় না। আবার অনেক হাই রেংক মেম্বার এমনিতেই মেরিট পায়। আমি নিজেকে নতুন ই মনে করি। শিখার তো আসলে শেষ নাই।

আপনি চাইলে https://imgflip.com/memegenerator ওয়েবসাইটটি ব্যাবহার করতে পারেন। এখানে অলরেডি ট্যাম্পলেট বানানো আছে। আপনি শুধু টেক্সট গুলো চেঞ্জ করে দিয়ে ছবি সেভ করে নিবেন।

আপনাকেও ধন্যবাদ ভাই। আরো ৩০ একটিভিটি দরকার যেটার জন্য দেড় মাস অপেক্ষা করতে হবে।

আপনাকেও ধন্যবাদ ভাই। জানি না ফোরামে ইন্টারেস্ট কতোদিন থাকবে। তবে আমি যেসব বোর্ড গুলাতে পোস্ট করতে ভালো লাগে, সেখানেই পোস্ট করে থাকি। আমি মেরিট পাবো কি না তা ভাবি না। তবে মেরিট পেতে সবারই ভালো লাগে। আমারো লাগে।

ভাই আপনাকেও ধন্যবাদ!  কিন্তু আমার মনে হচ্ছে আমাকে আপনারা একটু বেশিই সম্মান দেখাচ্ছেন 😁। আমি কিন্তু এতোটাও জিনিয়াস না। আর আমাদের থ্রেড এর টপ কন্ট্রিবিউটর এর মধ্যে কিন্তু আপনিও একজন। অনেক সময় ইনফরমেটিভ পোস্ট করার আইডিয়া না পেলেও চেস্টা করি পোস্ট গুলো পরে সেগুলোর উত্তর দিতে। এতে করে প্রতিদিন একটি পোস্ট করা যায়।

 আপনাকেও অনেক ধন্যবাদ ভাই। আমি ভাই এতোটাও রেস্পেক্ট পাওয়ার যোগ্য না যতোটা আপনারা করছেন। আপনাদের সকলের সাহায্য ছাড়া কোনো ভাবেই এখানে আসা সম্ভব হতো না। আপনারা ছিলেন বলেই আমিও আছি।

আপনি ভুল করে LDL ভাইকে কোট করেছেন আগের পোস্ট এ  

আশা করি সব কিছু আরো ভালো ভাবে ঠিক হয়ে যাবে। এজন্য অবশ্যই সবাইকে একটিভ থাকতে হবে। একটিভিটি যদি কন্টিনিউ বাড়তে থাকে, তাহলে মেরিট ও বাড়বে আশা করা যায়। তবে একটিভিটি কমে গেলে মেরিট ও কমে যাবে। আপনাকে ধন্যবাদ আরো একটা মাসের ডাটা তুলে ধরার জন্য!


প্রতিদিন একটা পোষ্ট লেখার আইডিয়াটা আবারো আমার জন্য কাজ করেছে। এজন্য নিজেই মাস শেষে বুঝতে পারি না যে আমি এতাগুলো পোষ্ট করে ফেলেছি। এভাবে যদি কন্টিনিউ করতে পারি, একদিন এই থ্রেড এর অলটাইম টপ পোষ্টারদের মধ্যে আমার নাম ও থাকবে। আমি অলরেডি ৭ নাম্বারে চলে আসছি। আমি আশা করবো সবাই এভাবে একটিভ থাকবেন। আজকে সকালে দেখলাম আমারো ২৫০ মেরিট হয়ে গেছে। এখন শুধু একটিভিটি বাড়ার অপেক্ষা।

Unfortunately, they are using web3 technology to scam people. They want us to connect our wallet to sign up or log in. I am upset that I won't be able to troll them. Most of the time, when I see phishing websites that pretend to be original website, I go to the login page and write a bunch of random email and passwords and make them be happy for a few minutes until they figure out those emails and password doesn't really exist.

Back in the old days, there was a lot of spam phishing. They were trying to hack Facebook, Gmail, and Yahoo accounts, making phishing websites and asking users to log in to get a bonus. Some of my friends tried to trick me a long ago, saying you can use free Facebook using this URL. Fuck it!

I also think that web2 or web3 does not matter. As long as they provide fair games and fair technology with instant deposits and withdrawals, I choose the platform to gamble (even though I am not a regular gambler). My point was this it is not the right marketing strategy to blame another type of casino for getting attention and turning their players into your players.

Web3 platform has a long way to go. Most of the web3 casinos do not have enough variety of games that can attract players to them. Yet they blame other platforms for not being fair while they choose to ignore providing any kind of evidence.

I am curious how do they hit the jackpot in their game. It's impossible to manipulate the game. If a casino can select players who will win a jackpot and who won't win a jackpot, then this is not fair. I don't think casinos can do this. Better to say that I don't know if it's possible. If so, I don't know which providers allow casinos to do such things. If they are doing something like this, that's a serious problem.



Indeed, you are right. But how many gamblers follow that? Most of us continue to play with the hope that we will win another jackpot or big wins. That's because most of the new gamblers come from watching big wins from streamers and content creators. Now casinos are also active on social media with some video ads. New gamblers choose those platforms by watching those videos.

Hodlers,
What is the correct way to HoDL Bitcoin?

There was no delay. It was a double notification and we got the same notification twice. I got four merit a from DdmrDdmr at 10 PM my local time and then I got the same notification again after eight hours and merit counts also increased on the Bot. I've checked my BitcoinTalk account and it seems there we no new merit history. That means whoever received some merits between 4:00 PM UTC to 12:00 AM UTC (Or maybe one or two hours more) on July 30 encountered this issue. Now if you can figure out what was the problem, it will be great. Or does everyone have to adjust their merit count?

I already adjusted my merit count but many of us maybe did not notice the difference. Now if you sub struck the merits that were credited twice from every user, what will happen to users who already adjusted their merits?

Another solution could be to run a script and cross check telegram bot merit count and BitcoinTalk merit count and adjust if there is any mismatch.


TryNinja's PC is bricked at the moment. He can't check what is going on. So, he is unlikely to tweak anything.

What are those? Balls?
So you are saying Hodlers have big balls? 

This is not true. Each merit spree might have different criteria. You won't receive any merits if your post doesn't meet his criteria. So, It's not possible that he may send merits to all users. After each merit spree, he constantly updates his thread and adds what were the criteria for the current version of the merit spree. Here is the last three versions and the criteria ;


The latest version of merit spree criteria was similar to version thirty-six. The only difference was he ignored service and WO posts this time. If you received merits from at least five different people since January 2023 and the posts are not in service/WO and DdmrDdmr did not merited, you are the qualified one.

It's like I killed someone because I suspect he killed one of my relatives or tried to kill me. Even if it's proved that someone killed your relatives or attempted to kill you, you still cannot kill someone. There are laws in each county. You cannot make a decision based on just suspicion. You should have some proof to claim that he is a killer and should be punished.

Now, we don't know if some casinos were cheating on us. It's not easy for players to cheat a casino if they do not have some kind of bonus. If you find a loophole where you cheat the platform, it's not ethical to use it to take advantage. In this case, you are a cheater.

This part is very crucial. I agree with you. We always see scam accusations created by newbie accounts or somewhat low-ranked accounts. But, sometimes, we can understand that the user is not a newbie in this forum by seeing their writing style. It's not impossible, but it's strange when a user creates a scam accusation right after creating his account. It should take some time to understand what is scam accusation board and how it works.

Even though they have another good ranked account, they decide to create a new account to create the scam accusation. This part is fishy. Why not create the accusation from the main account? Maybe they are guilty of doing something against the rules and if it's proved, they may be tagged as proven cheater / scammer.

I have seen some gamblers continue playing the same game, hoping for another big win because they think this slot is better and lucky for me. Sometimes they have another big win in less than a hundred spins, and they continue because they believe this is my lucky slot. There are different kinds of streamers as well. People tend to follow their advice and follow what games they are playing.

We don't understand one thing when you see a streamer playing on the same platform's means that platform sponsors are not real money and cannot be withdrawn. Most of the time that money is provided by casinos for streaming purposes. Those streamers don't really care about losing.

So, as a gambler, we should not follow streamers to learn how to gamble and which game we should play.

You might lose some users if you are a casino owner and decide to impose complex restrictions on wagering requirements for non-bonus deposits. Look, I am a player and like playing my favorite games. If I play a couple of bets with a low winning chance and I hit a big win, wagering a meager amount, I won't take the risk to wager more, and I would like to withdraw my winnings.

The restrictions you put on the non-bonus deposit won't allow me to withdraw my winnings. In this case, the player will be frustrated about it. It makes sense when casinos require a wager on deposit with bonuses and in certain games. But when it comes to non-bonus deposits, it should not be more than 1-2x and not on some selective games.