it would be cool to have something like, as a myself i would run the client 0-24 if there was some incentive for that, it would eliminate the need to go for a pos system in the future(like many have suggested)
but payout should not be too small like faucets or few satoshi as usual, but in the range of 10k-100k, this could also encourage more people to adopt bitcoin and store bitcoin locally instead of using unsafe online wallet
|
|
|
altcoin are too much of a gamble, the worst gamble you can ever get here, and the alt wave ended long time ago, now they worthless even at launch(just some exception here and there nothing else)
even instamining those alt is risky already, because many of those alt born dead
i don't recommend them for earning bitcoin, the best way right now to earn bitcoin, are simply signature campaign nothing else
|
|
|
pretty awesome idea. seeing I do not know how to use the keys to get the btc LOL I know it wont be me,
run your client and in the console under debug type importprivate key 5JF6A9117cAWShh8ydfPfmyiehFmwYdUog5tpPaBqGWfREf4GvP the idea is cool, but the amount is low, yeah i'm greedy , but not so much because i'll not add those key
|
|
|
Saving money in bank is an investment and I think it is much safer than any other online investment schemes.
ahah no, save money in banks, it's pretty useless nowadays, bank will use to do their shitty investment, also interest is very low, in most case(practically all)it is not worth it, to lock your money for one year to this add the fractional reserve, and we are done, personally i'll never deposit any money on any bank, they are the worst thieves, in this world the only bank that i know is my QT-Core client
|
|
|
In the future, if governments allow payments for services through bitcoins (there is already some talk regarding this), their holdings will increase.
Only if they decide to keep a balance in bitcoins... they don't need it, they are already rich, they can print useless money all days, this is why they are not interested in bitcoin the only bitcoin they will ever have are those confiscated, and then used for various auctions
|
|
|
could be the pool, or a faulty miner, did you bought it used? or the software which you are using for mining, maybe not a good/stable version, checks all of these
|
|
|
I cannot see that Bitcoin volatility can still be a issue or a risk factor, seeing that the price has stabilized for many months now.
The exchange rates are still very much volatile. We are seeing dips and bumps of as much as 20% in a time period of 48 hours. And off course there is a strong chance of a crash or a boom, in the range of 40-50% occurring in the near future. the last swing of 20% was more than 1 month ago, right now the fluctuations are much tiny, more like 5%, i would say that there isn't much volatility
|
|
|
returning to the previous pump(300)? or just the usual little mini pump of the weekend?
who know, but as long as the 200 barrier hold, i'm fine with the current situation, steady grow is always welcome
regarding the title i am referring to the larger bearish picture for 1+ years. Seeing signs that this last final wetbeardream push down to double digits may not actually take place. The fundamentals are way too strong for a big push down, so eventually we are going much higher. You could say (for example) that for the first time in history Bitcoins are actually worth over $200. if i remember correctly on april 2013, bitcoin surpassed $200, it went to 230, so this is not the first time I ment value based on fundamentals, not the speculative price. Are Bitcoins finally "actually worth" over $200? well yes, you should know that bitcoin is really undervaluted right now, and it was undervaluted even at 1200 peak, let alone at 200..
|
|
|
returning to the previous pump(300)? or just the usual little mini pump of the weekend?
who know, but as long as the 200 barrier hold, i'm fine with the current situation, steady grow is always welcome
regarding the title i am referring to the larger bearish picture for 1+ years. Seeing signs that this last final wetbeardream push down to double digits may not actually take place. The fundamentals are way too strong for a big push down, so eventually we are going much higher. You could say (for example) that for the first time in history Bitcoins are actually worth over $200. if i remember correctly on april 2013, bitcoin surpassed $200, it went to 230, so this is not the first time
|
|
|
I actually don't want a "boost". What Bitcoin needs is long-term acceptance to everyone in the world and not just the greedy investors who want the fast money.
while this is good and all, bitcoin need absolutely to rise in price right now, as it is really undervalued, a rise in price would bring more investors to come also, not talking about a pump, but a steady rise the adoption is somehow releated to price
|
|
|
How do you plan to handle disputes? what if the seller claims to have sent the goods and the buyer claims not to receive it? you will need someone to act as a mediator. It would be best to use a 2 of 3 with buyer, seller and escrow each holding one key. If the transaction is all good, both buyer and seller can move the funds on their own without the escrow needing to do anything or even know the transaction is taking place, they only need the escrows public key to set up the 2 of 3. When there is a dispute then the escrow can get involved and ultimately choose who gets the coins by signing their transaction. So long as the escrow does not collude with the buyer or seller this is safe.
We really need better support for M of N in wallets. Something like this would significantly reduce scams on Bitcointalk. All an escrow needs to do is post their public key in a thread and the buyer and seller can craft a 2 of 3 address with it and continue on their own without the escrow and only require the escrow to do anything when there is a problem.
Perhaps you could make a standalone application to do m of n escrow transactions. I think the best way to do it would be to make it in Javascript, you're most likely to see the most usage there.
this is actually easy, because you must sign to take the package from a courrier(ups for example) if you do not sign, then i know you refused the package(i can check on the tracking), so this isn't a problem really same thing if the buyer don't release the fund, but he say that he released them, just check blockchain transaction, if this is true or not and btw i'm all for automatization, "machine" here are far better than human
|
|
|
Do I need to purchase a set of fans to keep the miners cool? What do I need to purchase to keep them cool? Also, running the AC low wouldn't be sufficient enough to cool them right? I usually run my AC below 70 degrees all summer because my bill doesn't change or anything.
Also, how do I check to see if the electricity power in my apartment is strong enough to support multiple mining equipment? I see that the maximum is 125 amp or not to exceed 110 amp per branch circuit stab... I don't know want to purchase mining equipments if my apartment electricity can't support them.
new fans can help with the noise, those miners are all very loud, they can also help with cooling them, as long as they move a good amount of air, you should see about CFM when purchasing a fan, the higher the more air it moves, and bigger the fan the less noisy is for electricity usually those apartment can support 3kw, now i don't know if you are with 120/220, but amperage should be around 15 or 27
|
|
|
Who could've predicted that Windows is a really insecure VM host? I don't mean to claim that there's zero advantage to using VMs (more so when their encryption requires an interactive password), but advocating them as a lot safer (or as any kind of alternative to cold storage) sounds really troubling to me.
Both. Using both is safer than either on their own (think BadUSB attacks). which windows? windows 10 will have a new kernel, probably a better security because of this i still think the best antivirus is the owner of the machine, the OS itself does not matter much
|
|
|
Let me ask you one thing:
Who is that gives value to a "thing"? I think we are giving value to each thing in our life. The problem with the fiat value is that people are giving value to a piece of sheet so Why can't we give value to a byte (data)?
not to a piece of shit, but to something that is losing value, that's the funny thing, it is as if you eat your vomit you see the no sense, that the government has build in all those years? completely stupid
|
|
|
Just a theory, but I have a gut feeling
I stopped right there. Theory and gut feeling shouldn't be used in the same sentence... Especially when it relates to something that could make you lose some money. Isn't that how all theories are developed before researched or proven/unproven? "I have a gut feeling we don't actually have all the planets and stars revolve around us, but we revolve around the sun..."Sure. But that's astronomy. This is money. And any decision about money that involves a "gut feeling" would mostly lead to losses. if you count every "gut feeling" here in this section, some truth might come ahead, i mean one of them must be right about the movement of bitcoin it's more fun to read about opinions, than having the right prediction immedaitely, and personally i'm sharing the same feel of the OP, something big is coming...
|
|
|
if this is true, it must be recent, because i know for sure, that they delivered many miners back then(they also responded to my email very quickly)
maybe they started the scamming fest now, because no one is buying from them any more miners
|
|
|
only For you Changed port to 8332 but see again error OKY? and about CPUminer only For TEST i'm checking for this, i found similar errors on other thread, and you should re-check user, password and pool just to be sure try to add "http://" before localhost
|
|
|
have you installed the correct drivers? it appear that the miner is not even running?
try cgminer 4.3.2 + stm drivers
commandline --scan-serial //./COM10(the rest is just pool user and password)
|
|
|
|