Rikafip bi mogao malo više potegnuti slažem se. Istina, trebao bih biti malo aktivniji u onom BSFL threadu, ali cesto skroz zaboravim tamo pisati jer ne posjecujem redovito gambling board. Premier League Fantasy
E ovo zvuci super te cu se definitivno prikljuciti, samo javi ovdje kad budes otvarao. Dok sam svojedobno bio aktivan u NBA threadu cak sam planirao otvoriti NBA fantasy thread ali sam u medjuvremenu izgubio volju tamo pisati zbog velike kolicine smeca pa sam naravno i prekrizio ideju o fantasy league. Može ne znam da li ću ja otvarati, prošle je godine vodio icopress. Ne guramo se jedni drugima ali biti će sigurno pool. Javim ti u svakom slučaju. |
|
|
|
Ja na moru pišem više nego dok radim obično. Lagano postić tu i tamo iz hladovine s gemištom u ruci. Istina to nikada nisu tehnički postovi ali takve ionako ne pišem u zadnje vrijeme. Sada je samo gambling ostao a tu ću se morati ionako ekstra aktivirati za pokrenuti nove sezone u svim poolovima. Slackovic očekujem te barem u nekima  Naravno. Ali molim te napomeni ovdje kad otvaraš pool jer ne pratim Gambling uopće osim par threadova među kojima najviše pratim BSFL natjecanje, naravno  Ako ovdje napišeš, sigurno ću primijetiti, a možda se uključe i casperBGD i Rikafip jer vidim da im ide u BSFL-u. CasperBGD igra već sve godinama on je unutra. Rikafip bi mogao malo više potegnuti slažem se. Očekujem sljedeće poolove ove sezone pa razmisli šta te zanima: Premier League Premier League Fantasy La Liga (moj) Serie A (moj) Bundesliga Formula 1 I neko cricket sranje Upad u svih košta, mislim da sam prošle godine platio preko 300$ ali u konačnici bi trebao zaraditi barem u nekom. Premier League je težak za poludit i u njemu bude 50+ ljudi. Ovi moji su ti 20ljudi i dosta lakše za do nagrada. Naravno PL ima i veće nagrade ali ne može i ovce i novce. Napišem negdje na našem dijelu još kako budu startali. |
|
|
|
hmm da, nekada smo kimali par tisuća postova mjesečno a sada smo sretni ako vidimo rast sa 301 na 328 postova. Preko ljeta gotovo sigurno ne treba očekivati bilo kakav rast već daljnji pad aktivnosti, dok je pola ekipe na moru  Ja na moru pišem više nego dok radim obično. Lagano postić tu i tamo iz hladovine s gemištom u ruci. Istina to nikada nisu tehnički postovi ali takve ionako ne pišem u zadnje vrijeme. Sada je samo gambling ostao a tu ću se morati ionako ekstra aktivirati za pokrenuti nove sezone u svim poolovima. Slackovic očekujem te barem u nekima |
|
|
|
|
Current number of post (Including this one): 11309
Rank: Legendary
bech32 address: bc1qe5xzranx3u3jfykx83gknc2yz57jq4m5pkc5hf
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 259
|
|
|
|
Big thanks to SirJohnVonSlotty and whole Coinslotty team for being very fair and easy to work clients. Hopefully we will reunite on some future project I think it was all thanks to SirJohnVonSlotty. We need more people like him in world we live today, and he clearly proved that he can be trusted with any of his future projects. I wish him all the best with his new projects and to get married soon, no more time wasting on beach SirJohnVonSlotty shows us how it should be done, so many casinos are turning scams whenever they decide to close, if ever there is a new project coming from the team the whole community will welcome it, SirJohnVonSlotty mentioned later this year I'm sure that will be the one that will last long with the community's support. This is still the best time to run a casino and we all looking forward to your new one. Just to clear something up, coinslotty is not closing. It is changing management. Be it for better (hardly possible) or worse we don't know at this moment |
|
|
|
The payment that you will receive for future weeks will be calculated based on your average post count, so if your weekly average is 15 posts, that number will be used for calculations for the remaining weeks as well.
Don't know if any signature campaign, ever on forum, gave a severance pay to campaign members. Especially not in such high amount when duration of campaign is considered. Enjoy it guys and hope we will set some new standards in forum signature campaigns with this move. Big thanks to SirJohnVonSlotty and whole Coinslotty team for being very fair and easy to work clients. Hopefully we will reunite on some future project
I will change [Full] to [Finished] on Sunday after last payments have been sent. And then I will lock the topic maybe two days later so that you guys still have to time to discuss if necessary. |
|
|
|
Nope, Alcaraz was already out of the competition when the spreadsheet was opened, and there was no reason for him to be included in that question; he is a top seeded player, and non-tennis fans were bound to pick him as favourite without doing any research. Many of us fell for it, and when I noticed it, I raised a flag, and my opponent was also unhappy with how the question was framed.
I still insist that questions should be double checked before letting out, most is of us are new to many sports here and those little tricks mess with our research.
We can't do anything about it. Questions are checked at Sunday when we post them. There is a lot of time until Tuesday deadline and stuff happens. We don't want to give shorter deadline to accommodate all time zones and we want to have tennis questions. Every single tennis tournament starts on Monday and that is the risk we must take when making tennis question. I checked the tournament in question and Alcaraz was 1.01 favorite to win that match against Marozsan so I really can't take the blame for including him in example as top seed. We could write vanilla questions but that seems much more boring to me. That story we give in front of question is just that, a story that helps you see our mindset and some of the reasons why we included it in the form. All those tennis questions can be made just in a way "We have tournament in the Rome, name finalists and winner". And now you are giving us problems because we want to do more? Feel free to disregard the story part of every question, only the question itself is important when answering and I already told that at least twice here in the thread. We double and triple check the questions itself but story part I am writing from my head and could have misleading stuff in it. It doesn't usually, but it could, especially by the time of deadline. Don't know how my colleague does it
Georgia game was scheduled to be played at 19h, we both checked it on Sunday and then both livescore and bookies got new info later on and game was played at 14h. That is something we did not expect to happen even in the wildest dreams. But we were lucky in the end and that early start gave no real advantage. Both games were draws at halftime and Netherlands was a better team in first half just like the odds suggested. I believe anybody who answered at the halftime had the same dilemma as those that answered early. For instance I answered early and was happy that I did not have to do it at this point. |
|
|
|
The VAR is not a bad thing; I just hope that if we find ourselves in similar situations like this in the future, the game will not be voided; there was a similar situation like that with question No. 10 in the first season, round 11, where a player who was already out of the tournament prior to when the question was made was added to the question, and that alone caused many non- tennis fans a point, and nothing was done about it.
What are you talking about? question you mentioned is: 10. We have a big tennis tournament played in Rome this week. Alcaraz had an easy time on clay this season but this is the first time that Đoković is playing in the same tournament with him. Everybody expects Đoković – Alcaraz final but most are undecided who will take it. Who will reach the final and who will take the title? Use following format: Đoković – Alcaraz; Alcaraz. This is a H2H question and you don't have to pick Đoković and Alcaraz, this tournament is full of surprises and it is probable that one of them will not even make it to the final encounter. We did not give any players here, you just needed to choose finalists and winners. And both Djoko and Alcaraz that were used in example played in the tournament. We can also make a trick question and intentionally give you a player that is likely to drop out due to injury. This is sports fanatics league and we expect you to know everything about every sport Void questions will only happen in situations when we screw up and don't cover all outcomes. We also added some rules in OP about the way we grade forfeits in particular sports. Stupid situations happen but with each season we will have more checks/rules to cover them. |
|
|
|
What a game between GG and Quest, over 120 minutes, back and forth. Rapiers lying around the map and nobody even having slots to fit them in... Never watched something like this before. And it was my first game in Bali Major Hopefully rest of them will deliver as well. |
|
|
|
Due to popular demand and some recent developments which penalized early submitters we have decided to introduce VAR. Basically a way for you to edit your answers 3 times per season. Since this season is already well under way, we are giving you 2 challenges for season 2. VAR rules:- Can be used to change answers in any round before that round's deadline - Can be used 3 times per season (2 times for season 2) - Send us your desired changes over PM or write in the thread and tag both Trofo & Cryptofrka, this is up to your discretion. If you trust us, better use PM to not clog the thread and give possible info to others. If you are playing against us maybe it is better to post in thread to avoid possible frictions - After you spend your challenges don't come and ask for more, whatever happens there are no more changes left for you Slissy
jeremypwr
cls63
Harkorede
casperBGD
LTU_btc
arallmuus
jayce
buwaytress
Igebotz
slackovic
vd309
mitchr4
darxiaomi
LFC_Bitcoin
slaman29
dbshck
strongkored
ralle14
notblox1
famososMuertos
ulven
Woodie
Cryptofrka
Trofo
Renato297
mv1986
leea-1334
DireWolfM14
Jinetics1111
Pulsar77
entebah
Dittoup
MAAManda
Rikafip
Coin_trader
wwzsocki
Saint-loup
Danydee
hakan2217
BitcoinHunt3r
Kokee44
ILuckyGuyI
goodpunt
Ozymandias_DZ
bullrun2020bro
navidart
vivekdkhyani
itshalaa
chi20
Omikifuse
imarios
Bonta
kanapka
|
|
|
|
(...)
@cryptofrka I like the Hawkeye-inspired 3 chances per season. But since we have short rounds, and these are meant for emergencies, perhaps only needs 1 chance per season? Again, I hate overthinking and overcomplicating but it might be something useful down the line (I don't mind the current system, I think the risk of missing a deadline is big enough to not push too close even if I did take the risk this round). I really wish VAR in EPL was given this too. Manager can have 3 VAR reviews per game.
I like the idea as well and I think in order for Trofo and cryptofrka to have as less additional work to do as possible because of that solution, everyone should be bound to posting that change here publicly before the deadline. As long as the post arrives in this thread before the deadline and then gets quoted once by either Trofo or cryptofrka, it would count as accepted. The quote doesn't have to be before 19:00 forum time, but some time around that and I also think that there are enough active eyes here to ensure that no edits have been made anyway. As for the number of jokers, I think I would vote for 2 despite the rounds being short. I wouldn't mind 3, but I think at least two because one can be spent whenever somebody wants and still has 1 in reserve for critical moments. It would be really bad if it happens twice and something is on the edge in the last two rounds and a loss is inbound due to such an issue. No need for quotes, you can see when the post has been edited and if it is it will not be accepted. If we implement it we will just change answers manually in the table and it will be up to the person that submitted change request to double check that we did not miss it. Post will always be available to reference since it must not be edited. 3 seems like good number for season when it starts but we will probably limit it on less if decide to implement it this season. But one thing comes to my mind: to save jokers, someone could just wait and check the thread here if information was missed or not searched for that will then be revealed by someone else who uses a joker. Is it an issue? Maybe via PM is better? I still think that someone doing the research should have an edge over someone leaning back and wait maybe? There isn't a good solution. We can't stop you from writing things in the thread like De Minaur situation in this round. If I was participant I wouldn't mention it before the deadline for example. If you guys send PMs there is no accountability. How can anybody check that we received a pm on time? Or how can we prove that somebody did not send pm when he claims he has? In the end it all comes to commitment and fair play. We made penalties and rules in such ways that top players with utmost commitment will rise to the top and those that take it casually will drop to lower leagues. That will give us a couple of great leagues and lowest division just for fun. This season we did not have a single round where everybody posted answers on time, while we did not have anybody from firsts division miss the deadline. Numbers don't lie and I expect the divide to grow as seasons progress. Every addition makes things much more complicated and has some negative effects as well. We will double check everything before committing to changes. There will always be players that want to game the system. |
|
|
|
(...)
@cryptofrka I like the Hawkeye-inspired 3 chances per season. But since we have short rounds, and these are meant for emergencies, perhaps only needs 1 chance per season? Again, I hate overthinking and overcomplicating but it might be something useful down the line (I don't mind the current system, I think the risk of missing a deadline is big enough to not push too close even if I did take the risk this round). I really wish VAR in EPL was given this too. Manager can have 3 VAR reviews per game.
I like the idea as well and I think in order for Trofo and cryptofrka to have as less additional work to do as possible because of that solution, everyone should be bound to posting that change here publicly before the deadline. As long as the post arrives in this thread before the deadline and then gets quoted once by either Trofo or cryptofrka, it would count as accepted. The quote doesn't have to be before 19:00 forum time, but some time around that and I also think that there are enough active eyes here to ensure that no edits have been made anyway. As for the number of jokers, I think I would vote for 2 despite the rounds being short. I wouldn't mind 3, but I think at least two because one can be spent whenever somebody wants and still has 1 in reserve for critical moments. It would be really bad if it happens twice and something is on the edge in the last two rounds and a loss is inbound due to such an issue. No need for quotes, you can see when the post has been edited and if it is it will not be accepted. If we implement it we will just change answers manually in the table and it will be up to the person that submitted change request to double check that we did not miss it. Post will always be available to reference since it must not be edited. 3 seems like good number for season when it starts but we will probably limit it on less if decide to implement it this season. |
|
|
|
I have two suggestions for next season. I'm wondering what your opinions are about these:
1) In case of there is a tie for free bet, the one who sent their prediction before is announced as the winner. (This can be applied for this season.)
2) In case of there are 7 or more similar answers in 10 questions, penalty questions are asked just as it is done in the cup. (Even if there is no tie these questions can be considered.)
Your first suggestion is interesting one, we will think about that. I like it since it offsets less info problem a little. Your second suggestion will not get implemented. We like to have draws in league. Just like real leagues have draws. Nothing wrong with that. |
|
|
|
I thought Cerundolo would have been counted as the winner directly as De Minaur didn't even make it to the tournament. But it looks like it will be counted as "the same" if Cerundolo doesn't beat Huesler today. I guess the question won't be removed from this round but I'm lucky that my opponent picked the same answer as me. De Minaur was in the draw and seeded on Sunday. I don't know if he left on Monday or later. If you google De Minaur Eastbourne you will still get hits on google even though actual pages where links lead have him replaced with Jarry. That is moot point anyway, we don't have a habit of doing trick questions on purpose but there could be one thrown in here and there. I spoke with cryptofrka and we agreed on following: 1. Question will not be voided, if we intended to do that we would have done it immediately when it became a "problem" Quote from rules: Forfeits in sports like Tennis or loses due to technical problems in eSports are counted as regular ML wins.
2. If Cerundalo wins today, he is correct answer. If Cerundalo looses today, Same is correct answer. This match today has almost even odds on Cerundalo and his opponent so this is by no means a done deal. |
|
|
|
Tennis question, I have an edge now because it seems my opponent leea answered very early  and I can't blame him, I still saw Alex de Minaur news as if he was joining the tournament when I looked. It's an advantage for me but I kind of agree with Harkorede, on these kinds of questions... are we trying to encourage everyone to submit answers late? Because I'm sure if the early guys who submitted early could see the news easily, they wouldn't answer Alex. I only knew because I read this thread In sportsbetting, the bet is lost if the guy actually played and retired, but if he didn't even play, bet is void, right? We hate when stuff like this happens but we do have a rule in the OP that says tennis result count as regular even when forfeit happens. On bookies it would be voided if you had De Minaur outright but we have duel and if Cerundalo wins today it is clear he came further in the tournament. Question is purposly worded in a way that forfeit doesn't affect it. We do have another problem if Cerundalo looses today. This is second round of tournamnet and De Minaur should have started it this round as well but withdrew from the tournament. Is that a same answer then or Cerundalo wins just by showing on pitch? We will think about it and give a definite ruling here in thread before the match starts. Edit: his name was in the draw. I choose him and cerundalo as duel because they were 3rd and 4th seeds. He was free in first round as seed and then withdrew before first round finished. |
|
|
|
|
1. Verstappen
2. Verstappen
3. Verstappen
4. 7 seconds
|
|
|
|
Anyone know if Bublik is playing this week? I couldnt see any tournaments with a quick search.
Also I only realised just now while searching the above, Alcaraz is back in #1 position on the
ATP rankings again after his win at Queens, just 80 points separate himself and Djokovic!
Over at Eastbourne in the UK its R32 today and there arent too many big names playing, Fritz and Paul
seeded 1 and 2, there must be another tournament on somewhere?
There is another one in Mallorca but only Tsitsi there worth mentioning. Top players aren't playing in week before Wimbledon unless they need matches like Tsitsi. |
|
|
|
Ahh yes that solves it. I exchanged the "de" in the link with "en" between the slashes and then it works out. Thanks!
Now it isn't working for me and I don't have any "en" in the link, please post the one that works for you Something strange is happening For anyone who is not able to read the article: https://sportsbet.io/en/sports/soccer/news/bitcointalk-sports-fanatics-league-round-3 Sportsbet.io redirects to your country and it might not be available then. I had to change "de" to "en" as marked above. Thanks. My original link doesn't have that en part. I guess it would be more safe to manually add it in the future to override local version of Sportsbet page some of you may be using. |
|
|
|
Ahh yes that solves it. I exchanged the "de" in the link with "en" between the slashes and then it works out. Thanks!
Now it isn't working for me and I don't have any "en" in the link, please post the one that works for you Something strange is happening Edit: and now it is back online. I guess sever had a hiccup |
|
|
|
@Trofo I am not sure what the issue is but I had the same problem with the last link you posted here. I can't open them. "Entschuldigung! Diese Seite konnten wir leider nicht finden. Bei Fragen stehen wir dir unter hello@sportsbet.io zur Verfügung." It says the site doesn't exist. I believe it works only in English site. Somebody else had similar problem. Article is under News section of Sportsbet and you can try to look for it there but I think it is best that you open private window and just click on the link. Let me know if it worked. Article is there and link is 100% good Edit: Actually it is missing now, don't know what happened will check. Was working half an hour ago |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
