This is simple, it is not the campaign managers that are paying from their pocket but the companies you see their logos on the campaign banners. If you click on the banner, there is a link there and you will be directed to the company's website. This means that we are generating traffic for the company, so it is a pure marketing tactic.

Your pay is also commensurate to your work and your rank in the fourm.

No one will ever ask you to refund any money previously paid to you for your campaign participation so far you qualified for it, didn't defraud and did your work diligently and didn't impersonate anyone.

Acceptance of Bitcoin or not, the government is still saddled with the responsibility to keep a sane environment, not that illicit financial flows will be moving up and down in the name of Bitcoin and cryptocurrency and they will not be able to do anything about it. Only that people do not want to accept the fact, and they want a world of no regulation and control. But are they thinking about the bad effects of that as well? A lot of victims of illicit flows are out there, who knows the next victim of terrorism and trafficking? We should not be selfish but even pray for more regulations as the decentralization of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies is making it easier to move illicit money, easier than fiat. Although I know before now, yet recently, all the movies I watched that involved illicit flows, it was all about Bitcoin transfer means, just because of the easiness. So it can't be comfortable for the government to fold their arms, and it will be very reasonable to make the company dealing with Bitcoin and other cryptos in their domains to at least be accountable for their transactions and I see nothing wrong about this.

Registration, licencing and regulation are important and I will always support it. We should even thank the countries' governments that are still allowing cryptocurrency in their domain, if they don't, there is nothing anyone can do. Also, for the reason why some countries ban cryptocurrency, well, it is obvious and it is to encourage illicit financial flows since the government cannot oversee it. Even the illicit flows will be meant for so many illegal activities that could be so devastating to the country. But some governments are only protecting their economy, crypto is also a devil in disguise as your country's money might not be recorded for the country but stay in crypto (cross-border payments), how can it add FX to your nation even if it is gotten from another country? The government will never know of such a transaction unless you call their attention to it. Nevertheless, the government that banned crypto went too far, they should have regulated it just like the US and the Western nations are doing. This would have served the same purpose or almost the same purpose as the banning but with the government gaining more from it. This is even as the supposed banning is not always effective as people use other means to move cryptos behind the back of the government.

In everything we do, it is best that we moderate things, be it in feelings and achievements or setbacks, we should not be so self-believing, it could be the downfall of the person if care is not taken. Gambling as we know it is always risky, it is not such that we can entirely predict rightly, for this reason alone, we should not be too perfect in our thoughts, but try as much as possible to understand our approach to it and also manage ourselves and our account towards it. We do not think that because we win today, it will be like that tomorrow also, or believe that because we lose today, we will not gain tomorrow, either one can come, but when we are preplanned for them with good management and control instead of overconfidence, the negative side will affect us minimally. Everything must be moderated based on the results we are regularly seeing whether it is positive or negative.

As we gamble, we should avoid emotion and other psychological imbalances, they creep in carelessly and we should approach gambling politely and decisively. We should have our plans and budgets, know the dos and don'ts of gambling and no matter how profitable it is for us. We should never forget our place in it as it is such that can either make us win or lose and in losses, we plan even better as we rely on the good budgets that will preserve our account at any point in time. Going against these will only put the gambler into trouble and can easily end the previous joy of a winning gambler.

I don't think you are advertising anything either but giving information, seeking answers and opinions, and by virtue of this as well, you are propagating information which is the beauty of the forum. What Bitcoin can and can't do are many, that's why we have altcoins trying to do better so that what it (Bitcoin) can't do, the alternatives can do it. So, it is not new and not about calling it Bitcoin or not, altcoins would have been able to do what the instant Bitcoin would want to do.

Well, the people and market sentiment and appreciation about a thing could be uncertain, it can't be predicted as such, it is not until it is developed and fully marketed that we can know the outcome. No one can ever say if the present Bitcoin can ever be for life, especially the decentralized nature which will always be the subject of controversy. If other similar projects with almost the same name are being developed, who knows what will eventually happen? But my concern is that some similar projects have been done before with Bitcoin still retaining what it is, my final advice in this regard is for us to be watchful of the situation, and if it is worth trying, why not invest in it? After all, many projects in which people make money started like that.

What I know is that Bitcoin can initiate a move in the crypto space, and altcoin can do the same as well, it is not all about Bitcoin, but just that Bitcoin is more symbolic and has more news to cause the movement than that of altcoins. I've seen many times that Bitcoin was sluggish on movement but some altcoins move so well and the lucky ones to have purchased them made their money, such will always continue to happen in the market as it is not about Bitcoin alone. As for Dogecoin, I do not have so much trust in this coin anymore, it seems that it has served its time, we should give room for others now. Then, the much of focus on Dogecoin helped it so well, and the same thing goes for Shiba Inu, but now, there are many alternatives in their cadre and many more crypto that need money to be spread in them, so do not expect that much inflow of money on Dogecoin like before, and for this I believe it will disappoint the expectation of many in the next bull run just as it did in the recent one witnessed where most major coins moved at least two times their price, but Dogecoin and Shiba Inu reduces to do. That've served their meme's time in my opinion.

It is good to read the terms and conditions of the company you are signing to, nevertheless, often time, if you want to gamble all the same, whether most of the terms and conditions are against you or not or you have given the casino so much power, you will still accept it, or else, you will not be able to gamble your favourite games. This is your choice still, but since most people want to gamble all the same, they then continue to accept the terms and conditions they read or did not read. But some are too careless about this, they would agree to the terms and conditions even without reading some key parts, despite in many, the evil is embedded in those parts which causes issues for them eventually.

I don't joke with the part about withdrawals, especially the reasons that can cause account locking and refusal to honour my withdrawal, so I pay attention to them and also talk with some support staff. However, what I have noticed is that these terms and conditions of casinos are almost the same thing except for a few alterations, which is more discouraging for me as we give them so much power indeed. No wonder that even the court often sides in favour of the customer at times despite being guilty a little bit in such a case that could be bent by the judge since it is a plain evil with most terms and conditions in key areas. I wonder what the government is doing about it as it amounts to cheating due to the desperation of people. It is not all terms and conditions that should be allowed by the law.

You have some point there but not entirely right. As much as I believe and will support you about the share of losses, disappointment and emotions in gambling, and even the responsibility by gamblers is a choice to make by oneself, I will never agree that a friend can't influence it. Be it your money or not, many friends have influenced responsible gambling amount their friends, especially if they are gamblers themselves. That is why it is part of our advice here and in other places that you should talk to friends and family about your irresponsible gambling and addiction. Or do you think it is a joke?

To some friends, even without telling them, they could speedily know or suspect the issue and the danger ahead for their friend and by either direct advice or by the influence of their styles of gambling, the friend could change or emulate them. You might have your own mind, but some people can be well influenced by friend and their environment, and if the friend is such that is irresponsible in his gambling, it could corrupt the person in question. And if that is possible, so is the responsible part of it too, which is why we should also be careful of the kind of friends we keep, they could either set us right or influence us badly depending on how strong or weak our minds are.

This might look somehow to you but that is the truth. At times, it's not about the person alone, especially those who have loose mouths, they can get faster help before it gets worse. If the right control is advised or exercised by the persons from the beginning, the effect is always negligible, while some might even leave gambling from the very beginning or learn how to control/comport themselves towards it.

Why are you amazed here, is it about the who part of what the OP says or just a fraction reservation from your end? You should have been elaborated on your discussion since you started with a remark that looked objective to what the OP is trying to say, but unfortunately, your short response seems to be neutral in tone and still does not change anything from what we already know. But before you might be moved to add some words if so desired after my reply, I would like you to know that anyone could be healed of any gambling issues. This can only be easy if they are willing, but if they are not willing, they can still get healed but will take more time and a better approach from those who are saddled with the task to help them.

Also, irresponsible gambling is a choice, and I always advise people before choosing to gamble, this will not even cause them issues that will need external help as they would have guarded against such from the beginning. But people are so naive and also adamant, they are greedy towards the money, and hence the reason they are trapped often mentally when it comes to gambling. The same goes for healing as well, once they desire they want to be healed, they will be healed, this is a choice for everyone, especially if you know that what you are doing is not good and obviously negative to your life.

When it comes to the Bitcoin of before, it is in fact an opportunity that lands cannot contest with, it could earn you thousands of multiple of the invested money in a very short time. Land can't achieve that even in 100 years, but yet, land is a very good investment, especially if lowly appreciated land becomes a choice place. We have seen countless of such before where some people could earn more than 50 times of money they used to purchase the land.

One thing about land is that it doesn't depreciate in most cases unless something bad just happens or it is confiscated from the person. But the truth is that things are changing with Bitcoin, and now, I think some lands are even better than Bitcoin, this is because Bitcoin has grown enough and though might continue to grow but it can't be in its huge multiples as before anymore. As for the risk involved, Bitcoin has higher risks, it has the entire risk of owning it on the internet and the fast depreciating risk during the bearish season. But for land, it is offline, once it is properly documented, no one will just come and steal your land from you.

In all, if one has the money, such can invest in the two, after all, it is still a good way to diversify one's portfolio.

I love all the tasks you posted here and I do not think that there is extra that any crypto investor can add, other than staking their crypto or investing elsewhere other than crypto before halving time. As you iterated them above, I believe that wise investors can make use of all. They can buy more altcoins after the selling is over and I must say that this is my plan as well. I have a little amount to commit to buying at their low levels. But I must ensure that a bullish pattern is seen on the weekly chart again before doing that. Also, I've sold some altcoins too, I was able to outsmart the current bearish view, but the coins I sold are not much. Of course, DCAing is a very good approach, but I advise everyone to stop that plan for now, they should start to use the DCA approach when they are at least sure that the altcoins they are interested in have bottomed already even if the bullish pattern is not yet strongly visible. But for the rest of my altcoins, many had lost back some of the profit initially gained since the last bull run, so your number 4 is applicable in this regard. I will continue to watch them, but I know that they will definitely make me happy over time. So, no needed for panic.

Thank you for this advice, I hope people can learn it and still change before they become the next victim of cryptocurrency. This scam started with Bitcoin, later, it graduated to Ethereum, but now, you see it all around the cryptocurrency as a whole. It is so bad to the point that people are so gullible, they just believe even when they haven't learned a single thing about where and what they are committing their money. How bad could that be? Once they hear the name Crypto, they believe is an automatic way to make money, but it is not, one can make the money or lose it, and one of the fastest ways to lose money in cryptocurrency is to believe in hypes and HYIP. The most common ones are mining scams and other fake staking scams. Everyone needs to learn and know the way the cryptocurrency they are dealing with works before they commit their money especially if you want to stake or mine. Many of them are now on social media employing the services of influencers to swindle people due to their cheap trust in mere handles. The earlier we know, the better for us.

Nothing can be compared to skills and creativity, if one doesn't possess them, I urge such to at least learn them because they are enrichers and problem solvers. Once you can solve a problem, nothing is your limit unless you do not know how to put 1 and 2 together to form the desired result. If you are not creative/talented yourself to have one or develop it into skills, find it one way or another instead of staying idle and being a follower for the rest of your life. It is financial freedom we are talking about, you need it, and you do not procrastinate if you are wise. I've been smart enough to know this since I was young and I have strived to be independent, even though the road wasn't rosy at all, just not for the faint in the heart, I was able to do it in my own bit and achieve considerably well.

Though I am not still satisfied due to the few resources to pursue the future, I am happy that I did not just give myself to be used by one boss or employers, and I know it will get better since there is time. I decided to stop working under anybody many years back and developed my trading/investment, leadership and writing skills (book writing). You might be thinking that these are not so wonderful for making money, but if you are good at them and channel them rightly, they will help you, my friend. Leadership skills help with more connection, and if you can write a book, you can write a movie, which means money. However, those are just a few examples.

I think you are just overbearing in this reply, nothing else, as what you said as seen in the quote above is the same thing as far as I am concerned. Another source of income could be "relative," maybe you would like to define them better to ascertain what you are talking about. Are you telling me that securing another job is not an added advantage to earning more if you have the time and energy? Many moonlighters earn more with their additional jobs than the main jobs, so people could combine jobs if they want to earn more. I mean having 3 jobs a day and are fine with them depending on the nature of the job, the pay and the time they have for free activities before the day runs out.

It is not all jobs that will be so burdensome, and some are informal but may pay really better than the formal jobs, it depends on how you have developed yourself to have enough qualifications to fit in for whatever service is required of you. In this light, I only view your post as an overbearing one which can't see the light of the day as far as I am concerned because it is not all jobs that are formal or that will be so shocky to take all your time and energy for the day. Yet, they give you good and reasonable extra income. I even know some people enjoying this even as they are government workers.

The Bitcoin ETF saga of approval/rejection has finally been put to rest as the "approval" finally has it. But the market has never greeted it with much excitement as it sold on that very day of approval but rose sharply to hit a little above $49,000 the next day before plummeting ever since then. This is no doubt a short-term setback for Bitcoin even as we expect the positive effect of halving on the coin. Also, I hope that this short-term bearish trend, (perhaps I should call it a correction of the main bullish trend) will not grow into a more determined bearishness that will put the coin under further pressure.

As it is now, since last week, I knew that Bitcoin would fall but I expected it to be held by the support level of the 1D Fibo level of 38.2% at $40243 as you can see on my chart below. The market hit the level yesterday and sharply rebounded to record a daily high of $42,143. This indicates that it respected the level and buyers pended their position at the level or closer levels. A sustainable bullish price action above the level, in my opinion, might be the end of the recent bearish view and will bring about the resumption of the whole bullish trend to retarget above $49,000.

But first, the resistance level of the 1D Fibo level of 23.6% at $43,606 must be successfully breached higher, while a daily close above the level will ascertain it. However, a successful breach of the 1D Fibo level of 38.2% at $40243 will cause more bearish pressure that will eventually unveil $37,519, which is the 1D's 50% Fibo level before any bullish consideration will ever be possible.

This is my view guys. What are your views about the current Bitcoin status?

You have done it all and I must that you have all the experience when it comes to sports betting. On my part, I must say that I stick to my betting before the actual match, I rarely bet on live matches and I entirely avoid the virtue matches to avoid fooling myself. I resolved to do this based on my experience and smartness after carefully studying how sports betting works, and I believe that it is the reason why I have a happier betting experience than an average person.

Virtual matches have their flaws and they are discouraging to me, while live betting could alter one's psychology since you are being moved by the moment and live happenings. I don't think the smartest decisions can always be made in that condition. Enough mistakes could be made through this, so I avoid it as I do not like to bet under tension, especially when the initial bets have already been lost. But betting before the actual match gives me the benefits of calmness and not of sentiment based on what I currently see. I speculate with a lot of criteria, so it is actually what I wanted to do that I do. Thankfully, it often works for me even as I manage by bettings and accounts rightly.

It all goes hand-in-hand, the risk and the reward attached to it, the house is not foolish, they know how to permutate and combinate it together so that the tough choices would be presented to you in the form of the odds and the risk involved so that you are confused. But this should not still cause issues as, I for one, will never go for the risk that is too high and not feasible to win, especially in football. I know how I play my thing and avoid most games if necessary when the choice is attached to too many risks. At the same time, it is not that bad, the risk could be well-sized and many of them are fairly concluded in a way that will be good for the gambler and the house.

After all, it risks we are taking as we gamble, we should learn how to take them, but reasonably, and when it is too high and unreasonable for us, it is not a must that we go for that betting, we can skip to the next one or wait till a fair and more reasonable one is presented to us. It is the house that is calling the shot, but we are also not forced, so let us make a carefully weighed and correct decisions.

Welcome to the party, we have said these times without numbers that it will not work at all, gambling is to engage more than that before the gambler is healed, and if one had locked the money, another money that is available later will be used to continue the gambling. This can't exclude anything but help the gambler to keep his money somewhere for a specific period of time. There are many investments we make that will lock our money for even more than 21 days, some 90 days, some 6 months, and some a year and even more. Will that stop a bettor or an addict in gambling to stop gambling?

Who knows, due to the fact that the money was locked and deprived the gambler of the chance to bet, maybe he will not repeat it again, but instead commit the money, after the 21 days have lapsed, to betting and wasted it including the profit initially gained. I think what the OP is suggesting is never the solution here and will never hold water. The solution is psychology and that is how the bettor should approach it. Building self-control and discipline and having the determination in what you want to do will go a long way over that recommendation. It will be nice for the gambler to work on his willpower, in addition, and always being cautious of gambling controlling power to be able to gamble when he feels like it and avoid it when he doesn't want to gamble.

Next time post this kind of a topic in the Scam Accusation section of the forum.

You should have pursued it with care, after all, it is not only Rollbit that offers gambling, you should have moved on to another casino when they were not acting professionally before opening another account with them, not to mention that you didn't know that you were committing an infraction by that. Ban or not, I do not think that Rollbit will condone double accounts to avoid cheating. This is a well-known rule in casinos, but still, casinos should treat cases like this differently to investigate the cause so that they can ascertain the threat to the company. And if there is no threat, I do not think it is a good idea to still have the account locked.

They may only advise you upon investigation to use only one account and select the one you prefer to be using so that they can delete the second account. But because of their selfishness, they will not do that. This is one bad thing in many casinos, they are doing anyhow and will always be proving a point that is not fair. Some people would fall victim due to ignorance, but it is morally right that the casino be reasonable about this. Nevertheless, I do not see a reason why casinos shouldn't give back the money of the customer if they are parting ways with them. I see the refusal to hand you back your money as stealing. Or did they give you back the money?

Don't get this wrong, I do not think the government can be so dumb as to say Bitcoin is not money when they know it is an asset, a tradeable one for that matter, you may only misquote them. Except that they fear Bitcoin is not supported by any physical asset, but they are wrong there as people's money is enough to support it.

You have a good point here, most of these casinos are just overbearing, and the Curacao license is not that strong to warrant what they are trying to pretend. Still, they should be prepared in case they are the subject of investigation one way or another. And this time, cryptocurrency will not save them as they must reveal all their financial flows crypto or not.

This is because regulation of crypto usage is still weak, with time, cryptocurrency users will be more accountable, and the time is near. No casinos will be able to operate over time as if they are not in the world bound by any law. For those casinos that are operating in sane environments, they have to be more accountable due to regulations and internal inventigations. You are not an insider, a lot is there for them to be answerable to as government officials and law enforcers will always be on their neck.

This situation has the mixed feelings from me and I do think that it will be so unfair to crucify Rollbit in this case. You will have to let go because they have the upper hand over you as you broke their terms and conditions clearly if you registered as a UK citizen and tried to verify with the UK's documents.

This is why you should be smarter next time and at least read the terms and conditions of your casino, and if you do not understand, ask the support staff. This is another warning to those who believe that it is later they have to do the KYC, most will argue with me but your case is another good reason they should think otherwise. After all, it would have revealed that to you even before you deposited a dime to the casino.

As it is, you are guilty my friend, unless you are not just thorough in your narration. If I read you and the image you posted correctly, you are also in the plus, which means you are a threat as some casinos often focus their beam on those who are winning and find ways to eject them. Just move on bro, you are a good gambler, look for the casinos that will allow your country of birth and residence, and you will be just fine.