However, we should be able to use gambling as entertainment and not to make money. How hard we try to make money from gambling will not be easy because we must think about luck, which cannot always come when playing gambling. That is why we must control our emotions so we are not provoked to continue gambling and know when to stop.-snip-
I always trying to learn from my experience, I failed to play slots just for fun. Due to one reason, when I've just played a slots few times, I get maxwin. And than, Maxwin managed to change my way of thinking about playing only for fun, to the desire to win. Of course, this will definitely be experienced by those who are new to gambling, because maxwin is always a beautiful story to tell fellow gamblers, even though we have taken the wrong way in gambling.  This is the problem. I understand that Maxwin may change your mind. But it would be best not to continue gambling once you hit a Max win. It will end up losing your money. I never got a Max win in any slots. Now I am curious how often you have hit Max win and which provider games give Max win too frequently. I have been gambling but failed to hit a single max win. I do not play that much because I know I may lose all my bankroll. Maybe because I believe that you won't every time. We lose more than we win. So, we shouldn't take gambling as a source of making money. Instead, I see it as entertainment. |
|
|
|
I thought DdmrDdmr repeated the same action again. Approx three hours ago, I got a notification from my telegram bot, and it seems I got another four more merits. I just logged in and figured out that no merits were credited. Now I am curious if it was a glitch from TryNinja's telegram bot. Is this happened only to me, or has someone else noticed the same thing? I thought it was another real spree, as he has done something similar. I am kinda upset now  I was really scared when this morning I got a bunch of notifications from @tryninja bot about other merits from @ddmrddmr. Luckily, it was sone kind of delay in the bot and not another spree! Okay. Thanks for confirming. But the bot increased the merit count as well. That's why I thought it was not a delay, and it might be a double spree. Now I am confused why you were scared. He did this before, and as far as I know, everyone likes it, including you. I was happy when I saw a double spree instead of being scared! |
|
|
|
I thought DdmrDdmr repeated the same action again. Approx three hours ago, I got a notification from my telegram bot, and it seems I got another four more merits. I just logged in and figured out that no merits were credited. Now I am curious if it was a glitch from TryNinja's telegram bot. Is this happened only to me, or has someone else noticed the same thing? I thought it was another real spree, as he has done something similar. I am kinda upset now |
|
|
|
Hi Mrs. Johnson
I thought you have a D. How many Johnson are here BTW? |
|
|
|
Don't be surprised if you see England get all out before they score 400 or less. As I said several times, it's a matter of a single session. But it's unlikely to happen if the pitch has the same condition as yesterday. The Ashes are the series where both teams fight for dignity. So, no team will let others go away that easily. All team players give their best effort to get the desired result.
Aussie fast bowlers seemed expensive last day, except for Pat Cummins. If English batters can keep a steady momentum and not start to play unnecessary bit shots, it won't be hard for them to score and take some lead.
There is 56 runs partnership between Harry Brook and Ben Stokes at stumps of day 2. Ben Duckett was another victim of nervous 90's and missed his 3rd test hundred by just 2 runs. First session of day 3 is important for both teams as team dominating that session will defiantly have an upper hand in the match. England are in good position but the job is not over yet, they need to play with caution and try to get lead of 100 runs from here on. On the other hand Aussies must be thinking of strategy to bowl them out before they reach 416. Look what I was saying before starting the game today. Precisely this is what happened with England. The new ball is always dangerous in the first session of the day. Harry Brook and Ben Stokes had to play carefully, at least for the first session. But it happens in cricket. Now this does not look good for England. Aussies already got 158 runs lead with nine wickets in hand. They might set a good target from there. At least four hundred target will be somewhat good for Aussies. Since another two full days ahead, i don't think aussies will declare the innings and they will bat until get all out. |
|
|
|
AP maire baat ko samjy nahi, Mai apko blame nahi karr raha hu balky apko samja Raha hu ky hamara thread alredy badnaam hochuka haa aur Mai nahi Chahata ky koi bari rank Wala bhi mistakes kary aur jab investigation ho toh apko bhi pakistani thread sy connected pai, that my point.... Baki apko yaha achi helpful and constructive post karny ky liya welcome..... Explanation karne ke liye thanks. Jaise main previous post main bola ki main aisa kuch nahi kia ki main ban ho jao aur dosri koi chis kar raha hu jiski waja se mera reputation kharab ho sake. Mistake to har koi kar leta hain kiuki hum insan hain aur hum duniya par aye mistake ki waja se. Phir bhi main ye bol sakta hu ki main aisa kuch nahi karta. AP ghalat janty haa, shayad AP ny iss cheez ko Sahi sy samja nahi, koi bhi image jab ap Kahi sy uttaty haa toh woh Kisi AUR ki property haa aur AP binnah Kisi REFRENCE link ky woh add kardy toh AP show karna Chahty haa ky yeh maire haa, q ky koi Banda Tabb REFRENCE add nahi karta jab woh khud iska REFRENCE yaha owner ho, toh yeh cheez apko plagrism ky zamray Mai lata haa as AP usky work ko apni property dikhaa rahy ho (Presenting work or ideas from another source as your own, with or without consent of the original author, by incorporating it into your work without full acknowledgement)source plagrism ka Matlab Sirf yeh nahi ky koi text copy ki. Balky iss ma aur saary cheezy bhi aaty ha aur iss sy 100% chance haa ban hoony ki aur agr na howy toh woh moderator ka barakpan hogaa so kindly ap newbies ko ghalat taraf na la Jai, Mai Pagal nahi hu Jo Baar Baar inko samjata hu ky yeh na karo woh na karo. mujy apny community aur community ky member ka khayal haa isliyaa Mai yeh Sab karta hu.. mujy umeed haa iss rules aur evidence ky Baad apna mind change karlyngy. 33. Posting plagiarized content is not allowed.[e]
Hum ye rules to janta hain. Plagiarism rules image pe apply nahi hain. Ap koi bhi image forum par share kar sakta ho without claiming ki ye apne khud banaye. Agar aisa hota to WO thread ka maximum people ban ho jata. Main incopress go mention karunga Thank you all for your answers, I think the discussion of this issue has been exhausted. / Below is the answer by mprep (Global Moderator). 33. Posting plagiarized content is not allowed.[e] - Does this rule apply to images? AFAIK no, it doesn't apply to images.
Thank you, can I quote you? Feel free.
|
|
|
|
Remember that England is playing in their own backyard, and they are much more familiar with the conditions than Aussies. Yes, they are doing okay, and it seems they might take the lead from this point. Ben Stokes seems steady with the bat so far. His current strike rate is below thirty, which shows great patience. It's true that a single good/bad session can change the momentum.
But we are on the end of the 2nd day only. Still, a long way to go for the match result. I would wait for the end of 3rd innings before I predict the match result. I did not place any bets. I am not taking any pressure, BTW.
After the end of first day's play I thought that Australia is going to dominate this test match. But there was an amazing fightback from England during the first session of second day, which saw Australia collapse from 316/3 to 416 all out. And the England batsmen handled the Australian batsmen with a mix of patience and aggression. Nathan Lyon and Pat Cummins bowled really well, but from the other end Mitchell Starc was leaking runs. The decision to replace Scott Boland with Mitchell Starc is not working well for the Australians. Don't be surprised if you see England get all out before they score 400 or less. As I said several times, it's a matter of a single session. But it's unlikely to happen if the pitch has the same condition as yesterday. The Ashes are the series where both teams fight for dignity. So, no team will let others go away that easily. All team players give their best effort to get the desired result. Aussie fast bowlers seemed expensive last day, except for Pat Cummins. If English batters can keep a steady momentum and not start to play unnecessary bit shots, it won't be hard for them to score and take some lead. |
|
|
|
The problem with gamblers such as the OP is that they always believe that they will end up in profit all the time. Online casinos exist because gamblers lose more than they win. Assumptions such as winning a fixed amount everyday is purely illogical. If you are lucky, you will win and if you are not then you are going to end up in red. Online casinos are good if you want to relax and play a few games. But if you want a fixed source of income, then try your luck with freelancing (obviously after improving your skill set).
Casino could be a good source of income for affiliate marketers. If someone has a big friend base or fan base of casino games, they can a smart amount of commission from the affiliate program. Some successful websites like BTCgosu make a good amount from affiliates. But, if someone thinks they will make money each time they gamble, they are dreaming. I agree that the casino business exists because gamblers lose more than they win. The casino has an advantage that players do not have. Casinos have house edges which may seem too small a percentage, but it has a great effect in the long run. |
|
|
|
Also , just to be honest i personally asked to DT member to tag my active loan just because lender is not a DT
The lender could have done that himself, as he has been DT-2 for a long time. Anyway, there is no problem if everything goes smoothly. |
|
|
|
My question is, what big purchase could we see Elon Musk likely make this year?
Maybe some kind of shitcoins? Every shit coin Twitter account is trying to get attention from Elon Mask, even knowing they won't get his reply. But Elon Mask is an expert in business and making money. If you can get his attention and convince him to retweet your project or products, your share will rocket high for a day or a week. Kidding aside, I won't be surprised if Elon Mask bet with Zuckerberg saying you have to sell me one of your platforms to me if I win. Elon might get interested in buying either Instagram, WhatsApp, or other things that Mark Zuckerberg owns. I am sure Zuckerberg won't accept such an offer. |
|
|
|
A lot of you guyz on this WO were saying we'd be at $50k or even $100k by now. So much so, you were nearly peeing yur lil' selfies. So. Deal. With. It.  I thought you were proudhon |
|
|
|
England are doing OK, they trail by 138 runs but never underestimate their ability to totally mess things up. Australia set a tough target but England are doing OK with only 4 wickets lost. I’ve seen England in similar positions get bowled out in 90 minutes though.
Hopefully they can push to get close to the total of 416 set by the Aussies but do not rule out an England collapse on day 3, we’ve seen it all before.
Remember that England is playing in their own backyard, and they are much more familiar with the conditions than Aussies. Yes, they are doing okay, and it seems they might take the lead from this point. Ben Stokes seems steady with the bat so far. His current strike rate is below thirty, which shows great patience. It's true that a single good/bad session can change the momentum. But we are on the end of the 2nd day only. Still, a long way to go for the match result. I would wait for the end of 3rd innings before I predict the match result. I did not place any bets. I am not taking any pressure, BTW. |
|
|
|
Looks like Australia is going to win this test and it is clear even before the end of play for first day. Apart from occasional bursts by Josh Tongue, none of the England pacers seems to be capable of troubling the Australian batsmen. Partnership between Marnus Labuschagne and Steven Smith is now worth 82 runs, and it came after David Warner scored a half-century. The match is rapidly slipping out of England's control. Australia may end up somewhere around 350-400 on the first day. And they got Mitchell Starc in place of Scott Boland, so there's going to be a lot of searing pace once the Poms come out to bat.
Do you remember what I was saying yesterday? It seems England is not in a bad position at all. Right now, England trails by 138 runs only. Robinson and Josh Tongue both got three wickets each. So, it was your early prediction about the match result, which might be wrong. I am not saying I am right. But I would wait for the 2nd innings of Aussies. A single good session of a test match changes the match. Two hundred seventy-eight runs by losing four wickets is not too bad. I feel like England can take a good lead from this innings. Harry Brook and Harry Brook are on the crease. Let's see what happens. I don't think it'll be a tough task for England to take some lead 138 with 6 wickets in hand, with two batsmen who have settled a bit as well i don't think it's too much to do. But yes I do feel that this match will head either toward a draw or towards another nail biting 5 day and things will be quite clear by tomorrow. Because if English almost break even, Aussies are going to bat again and give a hefty target which will make it a bit inverse of the previous match. Considering England playing in their own backyard, they can have an advantage of using the pitch, and they are much more experienced than the Aussies in this pitch. I was telling Sithara007 about it and s/he said the Aussies would win the match because they were doing good in the first innings. I want to say again that the cricket match is unpredictable. Even though England batters have done well so far, we don't know if they can score another 138 runs before they get all out. As I said before, a single good session can change the match. We have to wait another two or three days to see the final result. |
|
|
|
It took you nearly 5 years? Wow. I thought my recall was slow when it took a day or two to recall an old acquaintance's name. You must have uncovered one helluva trigger! He was probably in a coma, you know, one of those comas where you forget your past habits and wake up speaking a different language. Happens all the time. Different language? How did you come up with that bullshit? I write English since my first post here.  Thanks for reminding me how hostile this place is though. No wonder why all the old users left. Don't take everything so seriously. He was just saying the possibility. Your first post is in English, and you have also posted in WO. But waking up after a long period of time and writing your first post in a WO thread might be suspicious in someone's eyes. The forum is full of freedom unless you violate any rules. Since xhomerx10 and nutildah got a critical point, would you mind signing a message from your Staked Bitcoin address? Some old forum members staked their addresses to prove their ownership. It seems you are one of them. 1MBpb67Eq6YwJgTA9j9Rd1rvWfxFGF1hHq
Please sign a message to prove your ownership if you don't mind  I will be happy if you can prove them wrong. |
|
|
|
As we know that most gambling sites will require you to gamble and wager your whole balance once, before you can cash out or withdraw from the gambling site and they take this measure so people do not do money laundering whereby deposit and withdraw without gambling.
Now the point here is that on the gambling site, there are many easy winning bets with odds like 1.01x etc. If the money lauder is sensible he can easily be wagering the whole amount by placing a few bets where the odds are very low and the winning chances are 99%.
So does this mean that there is a loophole here and the money launderers can easily by pass this wagering requirement?
No matter how much is the wagering requirements. No matter how much winning chance are you playing with? You still can lose the bet even if you place bets with a 99% win chance. Real gamblers do not do money laundering. Casinos require a wagering requirement saying it prevents money laundering, but they want a player to lose money. Legit casinos won't force their players to wager more than 3x of their deposits if they do not take any kind of deposit bonus or other bonus. If they do, you should avoid such platforms. There is an opposite side as well, Why a real player would withdraw his money without even playing if he is a real gambler? |
|
|
|
Looks like Australia is going to win this test and it is clear even before the end of play for first day. Apart from occasional bursts by Josh Tongue, none of the England pacers seems to be capable of troubling the Australian batsmen. Partnership between Marnus Labuschagne and Steven Smith is now worth 82 runs, and it came after David Warner scored a half-century. The match is rapidly slipping out of England's control. Australia may end up somewhere around 350-400 on the first day. And they got Mitchell Starc in place of Scott Boland, so there's going to be a lot of searing pace once the Poms come out to bat.
Do you remember what I was saying yesterday? It seems England is not in a bad position at all. Right now, England trails by 138 runs only. Robinson and Josh Tongue both got three wickets each. So, it was your early prediction about the match result, which might be wrong. I am not saying I am right. But I would wait for the 2nd innings of Aussies. A single good session of a test match changes the match. Two hundred seventy-eight runs by losing four wickets is not too bad. I feel like England can take a good lead from this innings. Harry Brook and Harry Brook are on the crease. Let's see what happens. |
|
|
|
It's not about web 2.0 or web3, for me the most important thing is that the provider is trusted, the deposit and withdrawal process doesn't take long, customer support available every need, game, uptime its more importan for me. Web3 might be considered better in terms of transaction speed, however, i think all providers have rules such as minimal confirmation for deposits, and the withdrawal process may not be done instantly, even though in fact it already supports web3.
Some web3 casinos can be untrustworthy as well. OP claims that Web 2 casinos are unfair and Web 3 casinos are fair. I've repeatedly asked to back his claims by submitting any proof they might have. They decided to ignore my questions, and this thread is still up for a new discussion. we often see scam accusations that some fake website drained Metamask wallet or another wallet once they connected with some website. There is no guarantee that web3 casinos won't do that if they have something bad in their mind. Once we deposit some amount on a web2 casino, we cannot lose more than what we deposited. But a web3 casino can drain your wallet that you connected to their website. |
|
|
|
I reckon if a casino, exchange are any service in the cryptospace is not banned under your jurisdiction and you use a VPN for privacy, this is okay. However, if you are not allowed to use a service because, according to the law, the jurisdiction you are under has banned the service, then you should be more careful.
What would happen when the service asks for KYC and they find out that you are not supposed to be logging in their site? It would appear to them that you are using a VPN to avoid the restrictions imposed under your jurisdiction.
No matter if you are from a banned region. Some casinos do not allow VPN usage. If you deposit/withdraw a lot of money at a casino and use VPN, you might trigger KYC. But, if you use a VPN and a different IP address each time, They will wait for you to submit the documents. You are in trouble if your IP country does not match the document you submit. So, before anyone uses a VPN should make sure it's allowed on that platform. Some casinos allow VPN usage saying they respect your privacy. I am unsure how they verify KYC if the use triggers KYC. |
|
|
|
Advance EID Mubarak Bhai log.
Khair Mubarak, brother mujy kushi Howe AP yaha posting karty haa but apko batawo ky yaha pa ik aur Bangladeshi (naim) ky name sy posting karta taa but Kuch ghalat kaam ki wajah sy woh ban hogaya aur jab investigation howe toh na Sirf uski posting Mai balky merit receiving Mai bhi Pakistan ka name taa so directly/indirectly pakistan ka name badnaam howaa, Kuch waqt sy hum khud apny Kuch users ki wajah sy badnaam haa jabky hum koshih karr rahay haa ky apny liyaa board bana dy but aisy waqaat ussy hum sy doorr ly ja rahy ha , so kahny ka Matlab yeh ky AP yaha posting karr rahay haa but aisa koi kaam na kary jis sy again hamara board again badnaam hojai..😍👍 Shukria bhai. Main aisa kuch nahi kar raha hu mera khudki local thread ka badnaam ho jayee. Kon kya kia tha isliye ap mujhe blame nahi kar sakta. Main yaha active nahi hu. Agar main wrong nahi hu to ye mera 5th ya 6th post in pakistan thread main. Lekin main Pakistan thread follow karta ho kyu ki mujhe language thodi thodi aata hain aur main samajh leta hu. Baki hafiztalha and SaimExch AP apny images ky REFRENCE link add kardy warna nataij ky AP khud zimidar hongy...😈
Jab tak main janta hu ki Image source add karna jaruri nahi hain. Forum par Image sharing ka koi rules nahi hain. But, agar kisi ne koi contest par dosri ki image share kare wo allowed nahi hain. Ye bhi bannable offense nahi hain. But cheating ki waja se Tag mil sakta hain. |
|
|
|
Eid Ul Adha Mubarak to all Bangladesh Community from Pakistan Eid Ul Adha Mubarak brother. Thank you for visiting our local thread and wishing us. I hope everything is fine in Pakistan as well. Enjoy your Eid with your friends and family. May Allah accept your sacrifice. I understand that I am not a member of this community and I apologize if posting this message violates any forum rules. I am here to share this moment of joy with all my Bangladeshi brothers from Pakistan
It's completely fine to post in any local section. We welcome everyone to post here but we encourage using the Bengali language. I also post in Pakistan's Local thread and you guys always welcome me as well. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
