Even if someone is going to take your transaction and replay it to the other chain (e.g. from BCH to BSV), the coins will be sent to your address. From what I understood (and I'm far from an expert on Forkcoins), the transaction can happen on both chains without someone replaying it "manually". But you're confusing me now  If (after moving your BTC and waiting for confirmations) your BSV moves too when you move your BCH, I can help you by sending you $0.01 worth of BCH. This was split already, and doesn't exist on the BSV chain. Then, you send all your BCH including my BCH-dust to a new address. This new transaction can't exist on the BSV chain, so your coins are split. |
|
|
|
When I read fuckpay's thread a few days ago, I was thinking a Newbie warning flag might be good. It's not the first scam accusation I've seen on Freewallet. However, until now they resolved the issues after jumping through their hoops, and I believe it's in their Terms. But we all know most people don't read Terms, and that would justify a Newbie warning flag. I've said it before: Freewallet is not a "wallet" by my definition. A wallet gives you access to your private key, and puts you (and only you!) in charge of your coins. They're an exchange pretending to be a wallet. This is misleading. Flag supported. That being said, sending that much money to any service without doing some very serious background research isn't the smartest thing to do.Quoting myself from earlier scam accusations: So Freewallet is asking KYC information before you can access your "wallet" again?
In my definition, a wallet is something that gives you and only you full access to your private keys, which means you and only you have full power to do whatever you want with your funds.
If Freewallet has the power to freeze your funds, why does it call itself "wallet" and not (for instance) "bank"?
We are based on our terms and conditions. To prevent third parties from gaining an unauthorized access to the users account, we may ask for additional verification. I read that. My point is: that means what you call a "wallet" is not a wallet! Freewallet didn't respond to this post. The reason behind blocking the user's account is more complex than just the amount of funds. Our security is powered by a sophisticated algorithm developed by top specialists in the industry, so we wouldn't take it on lightly. I've said it before: you should stop calling your service a wallet. This is misleading, as a wallet is something that gives the user full and unrestricted access to his private keys. What you're running is more like a bank, users are at your mercy. Your website literally says: "make access to coins easier". How exactly are you making it easier by blocking transactions? Freewallet responded: We make this access easier thanks to an easy and comfortable interface, swift processing of transactions and many other helpful features.
At the same time, any process dealing with people's money requires a very high level of safety. If we launch the verification procedure it solely means all operations on this particular account will be scrutinized to make it as secure as possible. I'm glad none of my wallets is at the mercy of someone with a financial incentive to keep my money away from me. |
|
|
|
For a long time now, I've had the plan to buy a new car for 1 Bitcoin. Since Bitcoin is totally moving moving in the wrong direction, I washed my car today
Can I get a summary of the reason for this drop in price? I read some theories about Trump posting something on Twitter, but do people still listen to billionaires who have a huge interest in conventional dollars to protect? |
|
|
|
Want say there is very hard to get merit.I think admin need do something about it. Have you seen your post history? Merit was designed to stop users like yourself from ranking up, and it's working just fine! And judging by your Merit history, it's a good thing you ran out of sMerit too: |
|
|
|
I thought that i can reduce my heating bill in the winter You should calculate the expected payback time on the rig before buying one. If it doesn't pay for itself during winter, and you'll still need to run it during summer, your electricity bill (and room temperature) goes up. |
|
|
|
First: this is your first post away from the Altcoin boards, and you're already posting it on the wrong board. Please move (bottom-left) it to the right board. the email was something like heeeey i have your nude pics how you jerk off or something like this Then stop jerking off in front of a camera! Or make a living out of it, take your pick Learn from this guy:  what are the chances to mass spam somebody who has BTC and is stupid enough to fall for this jeses As with all spam: it's very cheap to send, and it only needs a very low response rate to turn a profit. |
|
|
|
"DarkStar" popped up again: I'll send wwzsocki a PM. I guess he was looking for DarkStar_: |
|
|
|
I had a quick look at your post history, and noticed you've created many ANN-token threads filled with spam like "registration" and "good project". To make this a Meta issue again: I wouldn't mind if you'd get banned for incentivising low-effort posting (but that case isn't very strong). And you've done your fair share of low-effort posting yourself too. Luckily, your spam stopped after the Enhanced newbie restrictions & requirements took away your ability to post images. |
|
|
|
Mine as well, thanks in advance 
User ETFbitcoin ( full history) - Received a total of 854 Merit up to last Friday.
- Received 5 Merit (0.58%) for 3 (0.51%) of 584 posts created before the introduction of Merit (0.0085 Merit per old post).
- Received 813 Merit (95.19%) for 304 (13.54%) of 2244 posts created after the introduction of Merit (0.3622 Merit per new post).
- Received 36 Merit (4.21%) for posts that are now deleted.
I noticed you have a peculiar Merit spending pattern: Do you quickly empty your source once you get it, instead of gradually using it over the course of 30 days? |
|
|
|
I'd like to see which all users who earned more than N Merit, but never received any from me. Can you make N high enough to show the 100 top-Merit-earning-users that I missed? It can be earned on all boards. I'm hoping/guessing N is around 200 for this.
N = 223 Thanks! That means I've merited 191 out of the 291 top-merited-users I'm surprised by the number of names I recognize. You gonna need to learn a few languages to get 81 out of that list though. I quickly checked the first 10, but didn't find anything I would Merit yet. |
|
|
|
So 391- 420 = - 29. Since I have 279 to give I must have received 308 as source. You probably had 200 airdropped, right? I got 200, even though it should have been 400 according to theymos' formula. |
|
|
|
I'm looking for users that earned a lot of merits but I never merited them. I would expect this list to be topped by users who post in languages I can't read. Or maybe users who post on the mining board. I'd like to see which all users who earned more than N Merit, but never received any from me. Can you make N high enough to show the 100 top-Merit-earning-users that I missed? It can be earned on all boards. I'm hoping/guessing N is around 200 for this.
I can use this data to beat suchmoon's top position on meriting-most-different-users  Only 81 to go: 1. 16960 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 1175 unique users in 3928 transactions
6. 5054 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 1094 unique users in 3776 transactions |
|
|
|
I am a source.
on the lifetime send list I sent 420
101. 420 Merit sent by philipma1957 (#64507) to 159 unique users in 240 transactions
on the lifetime receive list I received 782
55. 782 Merit received by philipma1957 (#64507) from 124 unique users in 395 transactions
so 782- 420 = 362 I also received some source credits
yet My merits to give away = 279
so am I miscounting the value of received merits
are they get 2 you can spend 1?
and if 4 people give 1 total 4 I can spend 2 or is it 0 and getting 1 point does not allow giving points away even if you get 1000 1 point merits?
Let's start with a graph to show your sent/received distribution: For every 2 Merit you receive, you earn 1 sMerit. It doesn't matter if you receive then one by one or in larger chunks. You spend your source Merit before you spend "your own" Merit. Once your source is empty, you start using up your own stockpile. If you've receieved 782 Merit in total, that earned you 391 sMerit. To quote myself: Have you considered sending more per post? Theymos recommends you empty your source: If they complain about amounts, tell them to complain to me. It's best if sources try to exhaust their source allocations, even if it means giving posts higher amounts than is typical. If you have 150 source merit and you only see 3 merit-worthy posts in a month, then I'd rather you over-give each of them 50 merit than let the merit expire. That way there are more people capable of sending merit, and the "merit economy" is less top-down. I don't really agree with this though: it wouldn't look good to to just dump 50 Merit on a Newbie with one post, but doubling or tripping the amount per post would make sense if that's what you need to empty your source. The red graph shows you've recently started giving out more Merit. |
|
|
|
Scrape again, Holliday!
User actmyname ( full history) - Received a total of 640 Merit up to last Friday.
- Received 13 Merit (2.03%) for 5 (0.17%) of 2801 posts created before the introduction of Merit (0.0046 Merit per old post).
- Received 608 Merit (95.00%) for 193 (10.61%) of 1819 posts created after the introduction of Merit (0.3342 Merit per new post).
- Received 19 Merit (2.96%) for posts that are now deleted.
I'm curious to see my own changes too:
User LoyceV ( full history) - Received a total of 3258 Merit up to last Friday.
- Received 123 Merit (3.77%) for 11 (0.32%) of 3399 posts created before the introduction of Merit (0.0361 Merit per old post).
- Received 3124 Merit (95.88%) for 778 (13.21%) of 5886 posts created after the introduction of Merit (0.5307 Merit per new post).
- Received 11 Merit (0.33%) for posts that are now deleted.
I'm glad to see my "Merit received per post" went up, even though I've posted many long lists of data in Archival. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
