No. if Lauda is excluded from DT1, he cannot be on DT2. Lauda is blacklisted from DT1 (not excluded), and is still on DT2 ( proof). |
|
|
|
Lauda should be blacklisted for what happened when the flag system was implemented I think it's commendable that theymos is trying to not be a dictator here. Update: Lauda has been removed from DT1. |
|
|
|
Maybe next time the community will learn to respect people decisions, when they asked to be removed from any system. We should at least grant them their wish instead of turning them into something else out of desperation to leave. Part of the DT-system is giving each user their individual vote. I don't exclude users when I don't think they deserve it. As for the positive trust on Quickseller: I don't think a few more red or green matter much on the grand scheme of tags he has already collected. Hhampuz has 36 DT2-inclusions. He won't be excluded any time soon. As for the topic title: I'm not really afraid  I'm perfectly capable of using my own judgement, and so are (most) DT members. Cryptohunter (or his alt) for instance has made accusations about me, but that doesn't make me afraid of him and I don't think anyone takes it seriously. I just don't really care, and ignoring his posts solves the problem of trolling. |
|
|
|
Hello I would like to know if it was possible to generate a bitcoin address with some letters only, I explain myself If you can't run it yourself, DO NOT fall victim to scammers who offer vanity addresses for which they know the private key. See my Pretty Addy Giveaway for a secure method. ex: 15nE3ebnYkJYRok2H9H9Xdw1widwPtYt7TD4
1E3en5widwbn..........
1onbwE53................ You're going to have to limit the prefix length, or it will take forever to create. |
|
|
|
it's a pity, but we have not received any feedback from you yet, though the campaign started 4 days ago. I've completed my review 4 days ago, and sent you a PM with Letter of Guarantee and my addy the same day. Please check again  |
|
|
|
they promised to complete a maximum of 3 months That's not what your screenshot shows, they clearly said " at least 3 months":  Comparing it to other sites doesn't make sense, it might be those other sites have a much less secure setup than Stake has. Any legit exchange will tell you the same: it's impossible for their employees to access private keys, and that is by design, not by accident. Stake didn't scam you OP. Think of it as dropping a ring through a crack in the floor of a bank, and expecting the bank to break open the floor just to fix your mistake. You made the same mistake 3 times in a row? That's what I read too. OP needs to learn to check his transactions before sending them! |
|
|
|
2. teach me, i've just used google documents It's probably just a graph setting. |
|
|
|
I would rather be in a situation where the majority of sockpuppets weren't eligible at all, rather than relying on random chance to prevent them from being included. That could happen indeed, but when I posted evidence of sockpuppets voting, it took theymos less than 2 hours to blacklist them. It's likely we can't catch all of them, but I'm not really worried about large numbers of sockpuppets on DT1. |
|
|
|
I have 2 questions: 1. Why only the last 11 days? A graph is more interesting when it shows all data. 2. Why the smooth lines? I would have expected a vertical jump 4 days ago (because korner went on a flagging spree). Judging by the number of days, you've used my Flag viewer as data source. Note that I don't count "days", flags were introduced on June 12, less than a month ago. I try to update my Flag viewer once a day, but there have been days with more than one update (for testing or to get updated BBCode). |
|
|
|
If we list all the threads in which the OP never posted again or posted only once, that will be a very useful list to start manually go trough and reporting mega threads. That would require scraping half a million topics, and 50 million posts. I don't think it's worth doing this. |
|
|
|
What a waste of bitcoins. Lost Bitcoins are a win for all Bitcoin holders: it becomes more scarce which means the value of the remaining coins goes up. |
|
|
|
My main-net Eclair has one inbound good for BTC 0.01 so I should be able to receive your (LoyceV's) L-Loan, but alas, nothing as yet. The payment that was "in transit" disappeared from BlueWallet without a trace (my balance wasn't reduced). I can only guess it couldn't find a channel. Do you want to try sending me a request and I'll see if I can fill it from my end? I could, but that would be the worst loan ever |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
