Bitcoin Forum
May 30, 2024, 06:42:01 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 [94] 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 ... 306 »
1861  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory 0.96.5 on: June 08, 2022, 11:53:31 AM
Do you happen to use a newer version? Reason I ask is, in my version there is no “notepad” to be clicked.
I'm using 3.1.18.
The "Notepad" in mine is located next to "Lookup on Server..." if "Settings->Show Toolbar" is ticked; check if it's available in your menu "View->Notepad".
If not, you may have to upgrade Kleopatra.
1862  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: SHA256 once & twice on: June 08, 2022, 11:36:56 AM
Yes, this is page which I am talking about.
Hmm, if so, it has nothing to do with brainwallets.
It's about encoding the ECDSA Private key into Wallet Import Format, it's all about private keys.
Those two "SHA256 hash" steps aren't about hashing a passphrase, I believe it's clearly written there.

These are the only steps in your reply that's covered by the WIF documentation:
WIF generation:
-snip-
-snip-
-snip-
4. add 80 in front
-snip-
6. base58encode_check
7. print to WIF file
Its equivalent steps of the instruction in the Wiki "Private key to WIF" are:
4       =   2
6 & 7   =   3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Does "_check" first go with sha256 on the data?
"Base58" just encodes the data into Base58
"Base58Check" encodes it with a checksum where those two SHA256 is used.


Brainwallet isn't actually part of Bitcoin, it's just a simple "hack" to make ECDSA private key.
Since SHA256's result is 256-bit and ECDSA private key is also 256-bit, the makers of Brainwallet have thought of using that hashing algorithm to make ECDSA private keys from phrases.
Only steps 1 and 2 in your reply above are related to Brainwallet, the rest of the steps are just to convert the 256-bit result into WIF.
1863  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: SHA256 once & twice on: June 08, 2022, 09:25:36 AM
Seems like the way the WIF was encoded for most private keys is SHA256 used once which is different from what tells the documentation of WIF.
Docs say that SHA256 should be done twice (second time on result of first). Strange.
-snip-
Does not tell but I want to do as the docs (WIF Wiki). Normally there should be sha256 used twice.
You mean this wiki: en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Wallet_import_format?
The only step where it mentioned to use SHA256 twice is for computation of the checksum which is already the "_check" in your "6. base58encode_check" step.
1864  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Old Version For Cold Storage on: June 08, 2022, 02:56:29 AM
But, with the seed phrase, I can always recreate things at any time in the future - or can I?
Yes the seed phrase is all you need to restore the wallet, it's basically where all of your wallet's private keys are made from.
1865  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: electrum seed recovery on: June 08, 2022, 02:51:27 AM
https://learnmeabitcoin.com/technical/mnemonic

i want this script but in php/js/python
Why?
Electrum's seed phrase isn't even BIP39, it has its own seed phrase implementation.
Also, that can't be used to recover missing words from your seed phrase, it's for converting 'entropy' into 'seed phrase' and 'seed phrase' into 'seed'.

seed phrase = mnemonic
1866  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Export Electrum Transaction History Filter on: June 07, 2022, 10:38:05 AM
-snip-
Go to the menu "Wallet->History->Export" and select "json", or CSV if want it to be compact but it doesn't have "names", just values.
The direction is pretty good, but I don't understand why CSV is not good, really.
I've exported CSV and opened with Excel/LibreOffice Calc and it looks great, it has headers, one can use mathematical operations on it:
It's just my personal preference and to be honest, I haven't used the CSV format.
Plus the next part of my reply wont work with "electrum-history.csv" export.
1867  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: VanitySearch (Yet another address prefix finder) on: June 07, 2022, 04:32:58 AM
Somebody told me Vanity/BTCcollider could be used on Intel processors only. Is this true?
No, I've seen some replies who tested this with their Ryzen CPUs like this one (link)
He might have misunderstood the info that it doesn't work with AMD GPUs (Video Cards).
1868  Bitcoin / Electrum / Export Electrum Transaction History Filter on: June 07, 2022, 04:03:45 AM
-snip-
I'm using Electrum on Windows.
I know I can view the fee for any transaction as you have mentioned, but I would like to view the fees for my entire transaction history at a glance, or be able to export this information to some type of text-based extract (csv or other).
You can only export the entire transaction history in ".json" format, that includes a "fee" and "fee_sat" names and values.
Inbound transactions will show "null" values for the fee.

Go to the menu "Wallet->History->Export" and select "json", or CSV if want it to be compact but it doesn't have "names", just values.

Here's a 'Notepad++' trick to filter the export file:
  • Open 'electrum-history.json' file using Notepad++
  • Use 'Find' (CTRL+F), go to 'Mark' tab and tick "bookmark line".
  • Type "fee_sat" then click "Mark all", all lines with "fee_sat" will have blue-circle next to the line's number.
  • Exit 'Find' dialogue box and click the menu "Search->Bookmark->Remove Unbookmarked Lines", and only "fee_sat" lines will be left.

If you want to remove the 'null' values, re-do all the steps but use "Clear all marks" in 'Find' first (to remove the current bookmarks),
bookmark lines with "null", then use "Search->Bookmark->Remove Bookmarked Lines" instead.
1869  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Help and Advice on Running Own Pruned Node on: June 06, 2022, 09:21:54 AM
I've never used bitcoind on the command line before, so I'm not sure if this will even upload blocks. But if it does, I'll keep it running Smiley
This thread from bitcoin.stackexchange might help: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/101691

You can also use bitcoin-cli getnettotals to see how much data your node has already sent to its peers in the current cycle.
AFAIK, it's all of Bitcoin Core's network traffic so mempool might be included in the result.
1870  Other / Meta / Re: How to change a text font within the forum on: June 05, 2022, 11:39:00 AM
For those who can't distinguish the difference and want to reproduce the "looks" in Chrome or Edge:

  • Open his/your profile, then launch "inspect" (CTRL+SHIFT+I).
  • Go to "Sources" tab (in Chrome), "Debugger" tab in Edge.
  • Expand "bitcointalk.org->Themes->custom1->style.css".
  • Go to line '65' and edit the font "verdana" into something else wrong or delete it like: font-family: wow, sans-serif; or font-family: sans-serif;
  • That will leave the next font "sans-serif" active.

To toggle the previous setting to see the difference between them, simply use Undo (CTRL+Z) and Redo (CTRL+Y).
Reloading the page refreshes it to the server's version, the edit works in that session and in your browser only.


So it seems to be Brave Browser's issue with the font Verdana like what's being discussed in the linked issue in dkbit98's reply.
1871  Bitcoin / Electrum / Cold Storage and Watching-only Electrum Versions PSBT Compatibility on: June 05, 2022, 02:55:11 AM
I think it should work if you generated an unsigned transaction from a watch-only wallet's latest version it will generate a PSBT file you can then import it to your electrum 3.8.8 and be able to sign it. And transfer it back to a new Electrum wallet to broadcast. -snip-
Unfortunately, the PSBT export from the latest version down to 4.0.1 aren't compatible with the lower versions 3.3.8 and below.
He either have to downgrade the watching-only wallet into v3.3.8 or upgrade the cold-storage to v4.0.1.

Electrum Release Notes:
Quote from: Release Notes
# Release 4.0.1 - (July 3, 2020)
-snip-

* Partially Signed Bitcoin Transactions (PSBT, BIP-174) are supported
   (#5721). The previous Electrum partial transaction format is no
   longer supported, i.e. this is an incompatible change. Users should
   make sure that all instances of Electrum they use to co-sign or
   offline sign, are updated together.
1872  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Problems syncing this morning : invalid block, please help on: June 05, 2022, 02:35:56 AM
So i am quite happy i managed to find a solution that works. I still run the undervolt for other things and some other wallets but not for BTC core.

Still a mystery the reason why though ;-)
Glad that you found the source of the issue.

AFAIK, processors don't have consistent quality. Some are better some are worse, it's what they call "silicon lottery".
You may have picked the one which performs bad with the same underclock/undervolt setting as the others.
1873  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum 4.2.2 2-of-3 multisig: sign transaction with remote wallet? on: June 04, 2022, 04:40:05 AM
Or would that plugin also be necessary for initialization as well?
That's only for signing transactions.
I missed the "situation" above question number 1 so I guess I have to add that it's only an answer to 'Question 2'.
1874  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum 4.2.2 2-of-3 multisig: sign transaction with remote wallet? on: June 04, 2022, 03:49:11 AM
Question 2: Is there a way to sign a transaction in a 2-of-3 multisig wallet in Electrum when all hardware devices are in separate locations?
There is a "Cosigner Pool" plugin that will do exactly what you're asking.
You can enable it in "Tools->Plugins->Cosigner Pool" of all three cosigners (restarting Electrum might be necessary).

After that, a "Send to cosigner" button will show up in the advance transaction menu after you sign it.
Click it to do its thing.
1875  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: electrum seed recovery on: June 04, 2022, 03:29:54 AM
using tool will be slow
Finder-outer can find it within an hour even with only CPU (unless your machine is 10-years old or more).
3 out of 12-words will only have 8.5 billion permutations.

The condition is you must know any associated address and its full derivation path.
e.g.: the seed phrase's first address = m/0'/0/0, second address = m/0'/0/1, third address = m/0'/0/3 and so forth.

since he have last words ca be easy to simple try many last word is checksum so ...
Electrum's last word isn't a checksum, the whole seed phrase is computed to check if the result's prefix is a valid Electrum "version number".
Anyways, that's not the info you want to focus on.
1876  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Excessive Elektrum Fees on: June 04, 2022, 02:56:39 AM
You might be sending amount in "BTC" but your Electrum's unit is in "mBTC"...
2200% of the amount is ridiculously high specially with todays average fee rate.

Check the setting: "Tools->Preferences->Base Unit", then set it from "mBTC" to "BTC".

You can also set the fee rate estimation from "ETA" to "mempool" for lower average (1 up to 0.5mb from tip for the priority).
You can set it in the drop-down menu beside the fee-rate slider during the send dialogue box or advanced send menu.
1877  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Can't sign a message with bitcoin core on: June 04, 2022, 02:47:22 AM
Take note that they wont be able to verify your message with other software.
They'll have to specifically use Electrum, so include it to your email/chat or the signed message itself.
What you mean? They, who? The message is given to me to sign. I'm not sure I can change it!
Then just include a note saying "verify using Electrum" together with the signed message.

"They" are the ones who'll receive your signed message, if they try to verify your message using Bitcoin Core or other tool, it will fail to verify.
At the moment, only Electrum can verify messages signed with Native SegWit address via Electrum (with exceptions to a few tools).
1878  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Forum UI colour, why blue? Instead of bitcoin Orange? on: June 03, 2022, 12:46:57 PM
Normal Mode:
It's not even that awfully bad as I thought.
I am already using an alternate theme from the BPIP extension and even custom theme is possible there.
If there's demand for such a theme (and OP likes is), I guess that maybe you should share it.
-snip-
Unfortunately, as my note implies, it's not a theme or a plugin.
I just edited the page's CSS forms through the browser via "inspect", it's gone the moment I refreshed the page.
1879  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Private Key format on: June 03, 2022, 04:22:55 AM
private key 5vUtxFj43b4BM6t5dyXnLFEKLbXv8nB75fDFNRZLj7t7Vurvh address 3Nx***********************
anyone knows what it is  ? the address contains 2.9 coins
Don't know, but it couldn't be a WIF private key of that address.
Because the address appears to be a "P2SH-SegWit" and the the private key looks like in WIF uncompressed format.
If anything like it, the coins can't be spent in a standard way.

If it's something like other P2SH like MultiSig, then it may be a prvKey with missing characters of a single cosigner or just a clue to the private keys,
I can't tell, try this thread: [overview] Recover Bitcoin from any old storage format
1880  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Can't sign a message with bitcoin core on: June 03, 2022, 03:31:03 AM
-snip-
If I don't have another way, I'll do that, and then, I will create a fresh new address in my offline node and transfer the Bitcoin there!
Take note that they wont be able to verify your message with other software.
They'll have to specifically use Electrum, so include it to your email/chat or the signed message itself.
Pages: « 1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 [94] 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 ... 306 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!