I found it on my node, cant post the raw TX though because the board says:


Its a 177kbyte TX.

I put it here -> http://pastebin.com/VDTvHkXq

If you paid a good fee, it will get confirmed.

Here is the decoded version if anyone wants to check on the fees -> http://pastebin.com/APi8Nz9Y

OMG he sat next to blockchain, so jelly.

Remember the password. Electrum does not automatically generate a password protected wallet for you, it asks you for these information. What you describe happens when you had a previous installment of electrum and did not remove the wallet files (they dont get deleted automatically on uninstall).

I know, but Im looking for a clean copy. Since I cant verify the download from there Id rather not use. I still have some leads to follow though.

---

AFAIK there are no problems with VMWare and Mac per se. If you have a copy you could just test it. Im not sure how much the free version is capable off though. In my personal experience the workstation versions by VMWare have issues with GPU computing as they cant directly access the hardware. That might result in issues with rending, but its not really my area and there are plenty of other hypervisors.

Die benötigen sich gegenseitig, die ohne Fee erzeugt Wechselgeld das von einer der anderen verwendet wird. Die erzeugt ebenfalls Wechselgeld was von der dritten verwendet wird. Ist mir auch erst beim pushen aufgefallen, das ging nur in ner bestimmten Reihenfolge, sonst kam immer "no-inputs".

The biggest problem AFAIK is getting a clean ISO file to install the OS. Apple has no official source and newer MacBooks no longer come with a CD.

Die letzte TX ohne Gebühren die ich alle 30 minuten neu ins Netzwerk gegeben hat, brauchte ca. eine Tage für die Bestätigung[1]. Ich mach das mit deinen TX auch mal, ma gucken was passiert.

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1434572.0

#1 use PayPal for a deal
#2 wait 1-3 months
#3 fake account trade
#4 wait a little longer
#5 charge back
#6 "account was sold m'kay"
#7 profit

There is no perfect solution to this. I think you are just in on this because it gives you ammunition for your case against doog.

Meet in public places, dont get lured away, e.g. because "Oh, I have it right here in my car". Make sure you understand possible issues with confirmations and confirmation times. Counterfeit fiat can be a problem as well.


Depends on your area, some charge up to 20% in each direction. Whether or not that works I cant tell.


There is no correct price, there are different markets that have people willing to sell for different prices. A nice overview can be found here -> https://bitcoinwisdom.com/

Sure if your OS is broken electrum cant protect you.

-> https://bitcoinspakistan.com/blog/electrum-seed-explained/

You can use dice or something else if you want.

-> https://bitcoinspakistan.com/blog/make-your-own-electrum-seed/

Probably best to start here -> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/API_reference_(JSON-RPC)#PHP

Ich hab die noch, soll ich die nochmal los schicken oder ist es dir lieber wenn sie vergessen werden? (Hab sie dir erstmal per PM geschickt damit sie gespeichert sind).

Beide liegen ca. gleich auf[1]. 27.5% bzw. 27.4%. Es kommt drauf an wenn man fragt.

Classic supporter werden sagen: "Nein, zu Hause kann ich Classic nicht laufen lassen da werden ich per DDoS von den Core supportern aus dem Netz genommen. Ich zahl jetzt jmd. X BTC pro Monat, der lässt nen Node bei Amazon/Choopa für mich laufen".

Core supporter werden sagen: "Die Anzahl der Classic nodes ist manipuliert und zentralistisch organisiert, das ist unsicher und nicht gut für Bitcoin. Wenn alle nodes in nur zwei Rechenzentren stehen ist es egal ob es 1000 oder 2 sind."


Wenn es dir egal ist, wirf nen Würfel. Bei gerade nimmste core, bei ungerade nimmste classic.

[1] https://bitnodes.21.co/dashboard/?days=90#user-agents

If all the scams are there, everything else is safe, right?

A warning I cant verify means nothing to me. You might as well be a troll for all you provided.

Who are "they"? The stats for "most online" have been disabled a while back, but I doubt there are half a million users posting daily.

From the adstats[1] there are roughly 15k unique users logged in per given period. Not sure how many of them post at least once a day, probably not all of them.

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/adrotate.php?adstats

With your reputation (none) here its just hot air. If you are too lazy to provide something that can be confirmed, dont bother posting as its just wasting time.

*poof* -> http://pastebin.com/XDKdU159

One is for the recipient of the coins you send, the other is your change address.


This is nothing to worry about, multibit HD discourages address reuse, which is perfectly fine for a wallet.

Bitcoin does not work with balances, but with whats called "inputs". If you have received a total of 1 BTC on an address, you can spend 1 BTC, but it matters how you received them. If you received 1 BTC in a single transaction you have 1 input worth 1 BTC (case A). IF you received the 1 BTC in 10 chunks of 0.1 BTC each, you have 10 inputs worth 0.1 BTC each (case B).

Lets assume you now want to spend 0.5 BTC (no fee for simplicity).

In case A you have a 1 BTC input, so you need to create two outputs (to be used later as inputs in another transaction). One worth 0.5 btc to the recipient and one 0.5 worth BTC back to yourself.

In case B you have 10 inputs worth 0.1 each, so you can just use 5 of them to create a single 0.5 BTC output. In this rare case there is no change. Usually however the inputs dont cleanly match the amount you want to send and thus there will be a change output. Multibit HD uses a new address whenever there is change. As its covered by the seed, the coins are still yours and you can spend them same as all other coins you received.

Its always 51% of what makes the network secure, for proof of stake its 51% of the coins. This can be old coins, as well as premined coins unless there are defenses against that (e.g. hardcoded checkpoints). For proof of work its 51% of the computing power, for proof of X this is 51% of X.