I've tried it and they can't describe it correctly, they only understand about fiat definitively. Most elderly people don't use the internet. But different things for young people, smartphone internet has become a daily consumption, I take a comprehensive approach by having to understand what their hobbies are, if they like to gamble, then I can easily direct the use of bitcoin through crypto platform betting.
|
|
|
Now the price of doge is $0.002, all times high was $0.0187, I think doge can go back there. In that time I remember correctly it was a little more then 100 satoshis! I think that doge can go higher then this, doge price fluctuates but in long time range. But will we see a drop before some higher price, its question, I'm following doge when I can these days and looks like price hold strong position, it doesn't go under 28 satoshis.
if the long consolidation remains stable at $ 0.0025 and even above, it will accumulate potential prices to rise, the doge does not always move flat and I see they can go up at any time, but there is no point yet to see a big reaction and they will not touches $ 0.01 in the short term, it will remain within the monthly fluctuations in the 27-35 satoshi area
|
|
|
agree, low volume we can't judge as dead coin if the progress of development still continue. also i believe you all know and meet with the "real dead coin" but have huge volume transactions. (its can be from some whales for manipulation market and Pump and dump).
So what actually we call dead coin?
ironX is an example of a dead coin where they only have a large volume of sell orders without having a buy position at all. they have active developers who are always debating monotonous development, there is still no valid definition of a dead coin because coins dying close to zero can still be activated at any time. There is still a point where the holder is still trying to hold on the lowest peak price.
|
|
|
Some bounty hunters still hold on to their tokens even when every thing looks not so good for crypto, through successful bounty spreadsheets some bounty hunters still keep their tokens for example gowithmi, why? Do you think they are doing the wrong thing? Will they regret later?
there are several reasons such as the price of coins that are still not worth trading according to their target, if the coin is only worth $5 then their coins will only stop up to the deposit stage only with a market cost greater than that, and vice versa if the coin turns out to have a volume enough, they will increase their profit targets patiently. Another reason is that they are waiting for a better market with easier Kyc requirements.
|
|
|
And the potential problem that may arise from stable coins is the actual truth about being pegged to a certain fiat currency or asset. If that stable coin has no real backing which I think most of these stable coins are only bluffing, then, it would cause problem to its users later on. When the project starts to having problems, then its customers may not get the value what they want. Bottomline, still hard to trust those stable coins, they still have the chance to go down to what it is pegged for.
if you talk about Usdt, that is certainly true because they are not open about the issue of audit transparency, and they still often print Tether without strong responsibility. But you can try other stable coins like Tusd (trusttoken) because they guarantee their usd reserves with escrow / transparent third parties, there are better stable coin choices in terms of long-term use.
|
|
|
sometimes we don't have to always believe in market conditions with so many levels of price manipulation, now it's still in a cycle of saturation that keeps repeating. but we must be more connected to the analysis of fundamental developments and their relationship with adoption, this is a definite determinant of stability. If you really want to be active in current prices, then you have to adapt to reasonable targets, don't think about stability in instant movements.
|
|
|
Yeah, fiat money really a bubble and one of the disadvantage it's inflation. You can collect a lot of money but is it have a sense if by twenty years your money will lose a half of value on this money. So, you must know it and not only collect money but also invest and generate more and more money that inflation can't "eat" your money.
policy controls related to government investment can optimize the rate of inflation development, this will save many developed countries and some developing countries, but unfortunately not to other countries. The concept of fiat bubbles is not entirely true because there is socioeconomic control so it is not broken and is always monitored institutionally, and the concept is actually still very potential for bitcoin.
|
|
|
I have always had this strong feeling that the global adoption of blockchain technology would take place soon whiles its twin partner cryptocurrencies would take quite a long time. It's a great feeling to hear such a big company like Coca Cola stepping up on the front to adopt the blockchain technology. This would serve as a good exposure about the technology to other equally famous industries across the globe.
the thing that's useful for developing positive influence is quality, and this will silence many seasonal investors to think about sustainable things in reverse. outline focuses on the revolution of the logistics system and some things related to data, other companies also definitely want an alternative step using the same thing from the blockchain, I see here various altcoin data-based projects can be invited to work together to perfect the system, so they don't see from business calculations first.
|
|
|
A lot can be done if there is a will. But as of now no one cares and the scammers are having a free run. I am afraid that now it is too late to rescue the ICO sector. The number of new ICOs listing every month has fallen to a small fraction of what we had in 2018, and most of the investors have decided not to participate in this sector anymore due to bitter experiences in the past.
A few simple regulations could have rescued the ICO sector, such as making third party escrow mandatory for the projects. But the investors continued to pour in their money in to shady projects, and this actually encouraged the scammers. Rather than those who are behind these scam projects, I would say that most of the blame should fall on the investors. If they had been a bit more cautious, then the situation could have been much different now.
Project developers are not convinced of the sustainability of their coin prices in the market, some of the things that I see are wrong in their post-ico mindset, moreover they have more coins than investors, they must have the confidence to control and not just think about the sustainability of their projects, escrow also only facilitates transactions and Refunds, the team does not look at the price precision to strengthen their project, and from this point most scam sentences emerge.
|
|
|
Darbfinance, at first this exchange seemed potential and was supported by many supporting partners, the staking program also worked well in a few months, after I was smooth with Kyc requirements and had made a deposit. they suddenly give an announcement to suddenly close the operation and ask users to move their assets. I did not understand what they were thinking because they seemed to intend to just finish after enjoying their coin sales funds.
|
|
|
many users write steemit, that makes sense because it's very popular, but there are similar alternatives you can try: Sapien (SPN)for status / meme purposes, there is a social media based platform that can be tried: Sphere (SAT) & Futurepia (PIA)they have a coin reward system, and already in coinmarketcap, their platform still has active users until now.
|
|
|
There are currently too many projects so they look exactly the same in terms of ideas and systems, this condition clearly cannot be compared to the trends in 2017. Depending on ico alone is not enough for now, there must be supporting partners to structure the initial fund foundation before entering the publication stage, then also partners in system development. This has been done by ADA in the initial launch stage, unfortunately there are no more coins with similar progress, so the potential becomes raw instantly.
|
|
|
must be based on projections of at least 3 years to continue to expand assets. Many people panic too quickly because they cannot stand the price of Btc floating for months. if you have time to trade, then you must be prepared with quick movements to convert it to usdt when the trend tends to go down, and again pick it up from the bottom. But if you are passive, then you can stay focused on buying in regular portions. Prosperity will come when you are patient and always aware of updates.
|
|
|
This is nice on the part of bitcoin that it is cleaning market and making it possible for investors to get rid of useless projects. I am relaxed that now there would be only useful and decent projects available for investments which can reduce stress for investors. I am in the favor of bitcoin dominance because it is ruling altcoins very well.
Domination will still not go down, and alt will still face a dramatic ratio of low-scale movements with a downward trend very often. if the investor you are referring to is a trader, that makes sense. But for investors who still care about the new shitcoin will continue to exist. I highlight the pressure on altcoin and this still applies to everything because of bitcoin, but it hasn't had a big influence to make many altcoins knocked out, they just go down because of market sentiment.
|
|
|
Many ICOs appeared using the real identities of the project team and dominance emerged from Africa, Russia and China, I even confirmed this several times via skype (I didn't carelessly follow many ICOs). if their project ends up detrimental, they are not even touched by law because there is no online crypto business regulator that limits the number of investors from outside their country. If this is related to terrorists, the government should have pocketed their data as evidence, but in reality this problem is still not too important to be taken seriously. For KYC, this is a very abstract problem because their business does not get legality, even after circulating in the market, dev is free to spread coins to traders without KYC. Important data investors and hunters who are considered important eventually become a boomerang for themselves.
|
|
|
High demand because the factors revealed will increase the value of the currency, it is true for fiat. But there is nothing related to permanent policy in bitcoin so it's very different. bitcoin always evaluates prices so that they will never be zero. Currency devaluation does not affect anything, but it is useful to rearrange the influence of the central economy and focus on GDP, the rest depends on economic policy and governance. this explanation is suitable for macroeconomics. and you also have to look at the micro side related to investment because not everything will go parallel and only focus on debt.
|
|
|
Common man don't really care about sharpening assets, so they only attract profits that they think are enough. Investors are the opposite so they can continue to be stable, they manage everything with long-term calculations. Consumptive nature is also different, investors tend to target something higher / expensive and this gives the effect of higher patience patterns on maximum satisfaction. Choose only to achieve targets and even in urgent conditions.
|
|
|
there is no need to clearly support it, but prepare their own crypto with their focus on digital transitions through the blockchain. this is the economic foundation that I see in China.
bitcoin transactions cannot be traced flexibly, but macro transaction control can be carried out from their official cryptocurrency (not from fiat) so that it will explicitly maintain the fiat value and further distance from the possibility of inflation.
|
|
|
Is it necessary for a university to be registered from a government to issue a degree/diploma certificate? Or are there any governments who offer free registration of universities online?
I want to open a blockchain university which may offer master and graduation level courses for free
accreditation is very important for this, if not then your efforts will only become ordinary non-regulated training institutions. Online open universities are already widely circulated, you can also start the same thing with the informal phase first and take care of regulations gradually, it can be started by holding regular blockchain seminars to refer to the formation of educational organizations that focus on legal pre-registration according to the conditions and provisions.
|
|
|
Yes, indeed technical analysis is useful, but that does not guarantee that you will win 100% as the market is manipulative by someone who can have power to manipulate it such as whales, group of people, so this is something we cannot control that is why experts always recommend 'stop loss' in every coin we are trading at.
TA is part of supporting indicators, fundamentals are often not always 100%, so there is no single congruent factor for volume accumulation. prices will not really move without the manipulation factor. Here TA plays an important role because the candle will always be connected to the line behind it. Discussing about SL, sometimes it is not necessary if it is still close to the resistance and potential for a breakout.
|
|
|
|