^^^ Clown.
The Sagnac Experiment was designed by Sagnac in 1913 for the specific purpose of detecting the aether and was successful in doing so. The result being the Sagnac Effect and empirical proof of the aether.
I know you won't read it notnatman, but for the sake of others who might be slipping into a like mindset, here's some interesting reading: https://briankoberlein.com/2015/08/11/does-the-aether-exist-hint-no/This article states that the Sagnac experiment proves the aether "A shift in the interference pattern is exactly what the aether model predicts." A direct quote that contradicts the title of the article proves it's misleading and intellectually dishonest. It then tries to whitewash the result by claiming it didn't disprove relativity because it (relativity) doesn't apply to rotating systems. Dufour and Prunier totally blow this argument out of the water by proving the results are in fact not consistent with relativity: "Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories" -- https://books.google.ca/books?id=XVLmihZnsvUCYou've just been BTFO asshole. It's no wonder you believe in a flat Earth, your reading comprehension is abysmal at best or blinded by your one-eyed subjectiveness at worst. Here's a key point taken straight from the article that you conveniently ignore constantly when the Sagnac experiment is discussed: "...the Sagnac experiment is inconclusive, since it agrees with both the aether and relativity models." You've been BTFO, deal with it. edit: Lets see if I can clarify the intellectual dishonesty in your linked article a bit. 1. They reference the Sagnac Experiment. 2. They reference two theories: (a) Static Aether. (b) Special Relativity. 3. They note the experiment is consistent with both theory 'a' and theory 'b'. 4. They claim because the experiment is consistent with theory 'b' theory 'a' has been disproven. Can you see what an absolute fuck head the guy who wrote that MSM style article is? Not to mention that Dufour and Prunier proved empirically that special relativity is in fact not consistent with the results, a fact the author omits entirely so can make his intellectually dishonest claims. edit_2: The comments in the linked article are gold. |
|
|
|
^^^ Clown.
The Sagnac Experiment was designed by Sagnac in 1913 for the specific purpose of detecting the aether and was successful in doing so. The result being the Sagnac Effect and empirical proof of the aether.
I know you won't read it notnatman, but for the sake of others who might be slipping into a like mindset, here's some interesting reading: https://briankoberlein.com/2015/08/11/does-the-aether-exist-hint-no/This article states that the Sagnac experiment proves the aether "A shift in the interference pattern is exactly what the aether model predicts." A direct quote that contradicts the title of the article proves it's misleading and intellectually dishonest. It then tries to whitewash the result by claiming it didn't disprove relativity because it (relativity) doesn't apply to rotating systems. Dufour and Prunier totally blow this argument out of the water by proving the results are in fact not consistent with relativity: "Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories" -- https://books.google.ca/books?id=XVLmihZnsvUCYou've just been BTFO asshole. |
|
|
|
|
^^^ Clown.
The Sagnac Experiment was designed by Sagnac in 1913 for the specific purpose of detecting the aether and was successful in doing so. The result being the Sagnac Effect and empirical proof of the aether.
|
|
|
|
|
^^^ The Sagnac Effect exploits the aether to produce its effect and is empirical proof thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
All these folks here that argue so hard that Earth is a spinning globe know for a fact that it's flat and are liars. It doesn't matter how much proof is presented they'll argue the Earth is a spinning globe no matter what. They have almost unlimited financial resources to manufacture any needed evidence and the manpower to devise all sorts of pseudoscience to baffle and confuse everybody.
This is a conspiracy and these people are the Devil and his minions described in the Bible; the synagogue of Satan.
|
|
|
|
|
^^^ That's aether drift, it correlates with sidereal time and most likely drives the projection of all the celestial objects. This drift was measured by the M&M experiment but the effect was many magnitudes smaller in size than the predicted effect the experimenters were expecting if the Earth was in motion. The aether drift also explains the many experiments that detect the so-called Coriolis effect.
My empirical proofs that the Earth is not in motion stand firm.
|
|
|
|
You're such a clown astargath. On the video you posted we can see very clearly that the stars are circulating above stationary plane earth.  Don't be such clown as astargath, research flat earth  The Earth is motionless, it's not spinning, twisting, turning, rolling, rotating, circling, wobbling, moving forward, sideways, up, down, left, right, backwards or in reverse nor is it accelerating or have any velocity at all. This is proven beyond a reasonable doubt with, 1. Direct measurement of the stars: (a) "Airy's Failure" (failure to prove the motion of the Earth) Experiment where a water filled telescope views star light vs. an air filled telescope. This is direct measurement of starlight i.e. an empirical measure. 2. Direct measurement of the Earth: (a) "The Michelson & Morley Experiment" where direct measurement of the theorized motion of the Earth was attempted with an interferometer. This is direct measurement of static aether i.e. an empirical measure. (b) "The Sagnac Experiment" and effect is interferomic method that exploits the static aether to create a ring interferometer. This effect directly exploits the static aether and constitutes empirical proof thereof. There you have it folks, proof my detractors are clowns. |
|
|
|
^^^ I highly recommend folks not store their coins on random websites. Talking to strangers is also not advised; just shout no and run if you're approached!  |
|
|
|
This is "The Eagle" lunar lander, some identifiable pieces it's made from include aluminum foil, tar paper, sticky tape, curtain rods and BMX bicycle parts:  NASA claims astronauts traveled to the Moon in that pile of garbage and took the following image of a globe Earth:  Meme related:  |
|
|
|
Flat earth and god.
Two of the biggest lies.
All the photographs of a globe Earth are fake i.e. a lie, that being the case you should go climb in an oven and be mindful not to let the door hit your ass on the way in.  |
|
|
|
|
^^^ I'm clearly saying the Earth is not in motion, you can't feel the motion because it's not moving! Why do you put words in my mouth you piece of shit?
Also Airy's Failure experiment provides empirical proof the stars are in motion and the Earth is motionless.
|
|
|
|
^^^ Claims I can't feel four and a half ounces, just fuck off with your bullshit. edit: All new phones have an accelerometer, tape it to a merry-go-round and spin it until it reads .02 m/s^2. Do you feel it, do you feel the motion?  edit_2: The sixth sense is equilibrioception or the Sense of balance. This sixth sense can be used to determine if the Earth is in motion. Ask your average person about man's sixth sense and you'll likely get some kind of retarded response about psychic powers and how they don't believe in that kind of thing. We can thank Jewish mysticism and Hollywood propaganda for this confusion, they love muddying the waters, moving goalposts and redefining the meaning of words. For example Google returns the following image when "equilibrioception" is input.  |
|
|
|
if the earth is flat then where is the tip? we just need logic  Logic? * Moon is strong enough to make tides but clouds and rain no worries * Mathematics for every mile in length the curve is 8 inch squared (100km 870 meter, 1km 8.7cm, 100 m 87mm) can you show some practical evidence * 1000 miles per hour rotation and you feel nothing* Have you heard of 2nd law of thermodynamic, look it up * Transmitting over such long distances would require billion of billions of watts, what with solar panels * Two coastal cities 2 hour flight apart manage to have massive temperature differences with the sun 93 million miles away * .....can fill the page Did you sell your logic? Not sure if you are a troll but here we go: 1. Newton's theory of gravity provided the first correct explanation of ocean tides and their long known correlation with the phases of the moon. Roughly a century later it was also used to predict the existence of atmospheric tides. the density of the clouds can be considered to be (but not in fact) the same as that of the air in which they ride. In this case one could consider a cloud to be simply an opaque section of air. The Moon does affect the air and along with the air the clouds are likewise affected. 2. I can show you plenty of photos of earth 3. Think about riding in a car or flying in a plane. As long as the ride is going smoothly, you can almost convince yourself you’re not moving. A jumbo jet flies at about 500 miles per hour (about 800 km per hour), or about half as fast as the Earth spins at its equator. But, while you’re riding on that jet, if you close your eyes, you don’t feel like you’re moving at all. And when the flight attendant comes by and pours coffee into your cup, the coffee doesn’t fly to the back of the plane. That’s because the coffee, the cup and you are all moving at the same rate as the plane.4. You should be the one looking it up 5. What distances? 6. And a close sun would explain that better because? Did you sell your brain?  An object traveling on a linear path with a constant velocity experiences no acceleration. In contrast a rotating object with a constant angular velocity experiences constant acceleration. How do you rectify this you fucking shill? You give as an example a jet traveling on a linear path at a constant velocity with no acceleration as your example of why you can't feel any acceleration on an object you claim is rotating thus experiencing acceleration. I know your answer is going something about the magic force of gravity (an unproven theory) but I just like to show what absolute nonsense your arguments for the globe are. Traveling in any path besides a straight line at a constant velocity does indeed require some type of acceleration. The Earth is always accelerating as it bends its way around the sun. This is because the Sun is always exerting a gravitational force on the Earth. Due to the eccentricity of the orbit, we're going slightly faster when we are closer to the Sun (in January) than we are when we are further away (in July). So there is a slight change in speed. The problem is that it's too small. The acceleration of the spinning earth away from your feet is, at the equator, about .02 m/s^2. It's swamped by the gravity, about 9.8 m/s^2. You don't feel a difference like that, though it shows up on a bathroom scale.You can certainly see it moving at least compared to stars and planets like in this beautiful video: https://youtu.be/x2D7jHfitzk?t=29sSo the scale next to my shitter can feel it but I can't?  Nice troll response when you have no argument. My argument is that anybody could feel it if the Earth was undergoing constant acceleration not just the washroom scale; the Earth is not in motion. The blasphemy or meme if you will reflects the weight of your argument. Then prove it, I already gave you the calculations and why we can't really feel it, the acceleration is way too small to feel it. If your claim is that we should feel it, feel free to prove it, bring on your calculations dumbass. A 62 kilogram person would experience a 1.24 Newtons of force due to an acceleration of .02 m/s^2 that's 130 grams or 4.5 ounces. So you claim I can't feel four and a half ounces? Have an ounce of bud.  |
|
|
|
if the earth is flat then where is the tip? we just need logic Logic? * Moon is strong enough to make tides but clouds and rain no worries * Mathematics for every mile in length the curve is 8 inch squared (100km 870 meter, 1km 8.7cm, 100 m 87mm) can you show some practical evidence * 1000 miles per hour rotation and you feel nothing* Have you heard of 2nd law of thermodynamic, look it up * Transmitting over such long distances would require billion of billions of watts, what with solar panels * Two coastal cities 2 hour flight apart manage to have massive temperature differences with the sun 93 million miles away * .....can fill the page Did you sell your logic? Not sure if you are a troll but here we go: 1. Newton's theory of gravity provided the first correct explanation of ocean tides and their long known correlation with the phases of the moon. Roughly a century later it was also used to predict the existence of atmospheric tides. the density of the clouds can be considered to be (but not in fact) the same as that of the air in which they ride. In this case one could consider a cloud to be simply an opaque section of air. The Moon does affect the air and along with the air the clouds are likewise affected. 2. I can show you plenty of photos of earth 3. Think about riding in a car or flying in a plane. As long as the ride is going smoothly, you can almost convince yourself you’re not moving. A jumbo jet flies at about 500 miles per hour (about 800 km per hour), or about half as fast as the Earth spins at its equator. But, while you’re riding on that jet, if you close your eyes, you don’t feel like you’re moving at all. And when the flight attendant comes by and pours coffee into your cup, the coffee doesn’t fly to the back of the plane. That’s because the coffee, the cup and you are all moving at the same rate as the plane.4. You should be the one looking it up 5. What distances? 6. And a close sun would explain that better because? Did you sell your brain? An object traveling on a linear path with a constant velocity experiences no acceleration. In contrast a rotating object with a constant angular velocity experiences constant acceleration. How do you rectify this you fucking shill? You give as an example a jet traveling on a linear path at a constant velocity with no acceleration as your example of why you can't feel any acceleration on an object you claim is rotating thus experiencing acceleration. I know your answer is going something about the magic force of gravity (an unproven theory) but I just like to show what absolute nonsense your arguments for the globe are. Traveling in any path besides a straight line at a constant velocity does indeed require some type of acceleration. The Earth is always accelerating as it bends its way around the sun. This is because the Sun is always exerting a gravitational force on the Earth. Due to the eccentricity of the orbit, we're going slightly faster when we are closer to the Sun (in January) than we are when we are further away (in July). So there is a slight change in speed. The problem is that it's too small. The acceleration of the spinning earth away from your feet is, at the equator, about .02 m/s^2. It's swamped by the gravity, about 9.8 m/s^2. You don't feel a difference like that, though it shows up on a bathroom scale.You can certainly see it moving at least compared to stars and planets like in this beautiful video: https://youtu.be/x2D7jHfitzk?t=29sSo the scale next to my shitter can feel it but I can't? Nice troll response when you have no argument. My argument is that anybody could feel it if the Earth was undergoing constant acceleration not just the washroom scale; the Earth is not in motion. The blasphemy or meme if you will reflects the weight of your argument. |
|
|
|
if the earth is flat then where is the tip? we just need logic Logic? * Moon is strong enough to make tides but clouds and rain no worries * Mathematics for every mile in length the curve is 8 inch squared (100km 870 meter, 1km 8.7cm, 100 m 87mm) can you show some practical evidence * 1000 miles per hour rotation and you feel nothing* Have you heard of 2nd law of thermodynamic, look it up * Transmitting over such long distances would require billion of billions of watts, what with solar panels * Two coastal cities 2 hour flight apart manage to have massive temperature differences with the sun 93 million miles away * .....can fill the page Did you sell your logic? Not sure if you are a troll but here we go: 1. Newton's theory of gravity provided the first correct explanation of ocean tides and their long known correlation with the phases of the moon. Roughly a century later it was also used to predict the existence of atmospheric tides. the density of the clouds can be considered to be (but not in fact) the same as that of the air in which they ride. In this case one could consider a cloud to be simply an opaque section of air. The Moon does affect the air and along with the air the clouds are likewise affected. 2. I can show you plenty of photos of earth 3. Think about riding in a car or flying in a plane. As long as the ride is going smoothly, you can almost convince yourself you’re not moving. A jumbo jet flies at about 500 miles per hour (about 800 km per hour), or about half as fast as the Earth spins at its equator. But, while you’re riding on that jet, if you close your eyes, you don’t feel like you’re moving at all. And when the flight attendant comes by and pours coffee into your cup, the coffee doesn’t fly to the back of the plane. That’s because the coffee, the cup and you are all moving at the same rate as the plane.4. You should be the one looking it up 5. What distances? 6. And a close sun would explain that better because? Did you sell your brain? An object traveling on a linear path with a constant velocity experiences no acceleration. In contrast a rotating object with a constant angular velocity experiences constant acceleration. How do you rectify this you fucking shill? You give as an example a jet traveling on a linear path at a constant velocity with no acceleration as your example of why you can't feel any acceleration on an object you claim is rotating thus experiencing acceleration. I know your answer is going something about the magic force of gravity (an unproven theory) but I just like to show what absolute nonsense your arguments for the globe are. Traveling in any path besides a straight line at a constant velocity does indeed require some type of acceleration. The Earth is always accelerating as it bends its way around the sun. This is because the Sun is always exerting a gravitational force on the Earth. Due to the eccentricity of the orbit, we're going slightly faster when we are closer to the Sun (in January) than we are when we are further away (in July). So there is a slight change in speed. The problem is that it's too small. The acceleration of the spinning earth away from your feet is, at the equator, about .02 m/s^2. It's swamped by the gravity, about 9.8 m/s^2. You don't feel a difference like that, though it shows up on a bathroom scale.You can certainly see it moving at least compared to stars and planets like in this beautiful video: https://youtu.be/x2D7jHfitzk?t=29sSo the scale next to my shitter can feel it but I can't? |
|
|
|
Mining BTC with GPUs died out years ago.
yup and good years they were. i will never get rid of my 6870 and 5830, they are largely responsible for my stack as while i did sell coins through the years i kept enough to make my wife and i extremely happy.. i keep meaning to mount them in a frame and hang them on a wall as they were so good to me. I realized BTC was worth something in October of 2013, by that time GPU mining of BTC had already died out. I got some Asicminer Block Erupters and was so impressed with BTC and mining I went all in on a Black Arrow (named after a UK rocket and "space" program) ASIC pre-order as the market on Bitfury ASICs had dried up and I missed the deadline for the KnC Jupiter (more "space"). I saw all the coins the Jupiter customers were getting and Black Arrow seemed to have a good history of delivering miners based on Bitfury chips. Black Arrow ended up stealing my money and never shipped the miner I ordered.  When I made the pre-order I had a small amount of money left and also purchased an old used HD 6990 5790 for $250, I made ROI in about a week solo mining Nova Coin.  It finally died in a shower of sparks about 8 or so months back of fan failure two years ago but damn that card mined a lot of coins. , it would do 50 MH/s ETH putting my new RX 580s doing 30 MH/s to shame.
oh man black arrow.. i almost preordered one as well as one from another company around that time (hashfast? dont recall the exact name). i figured between the two companies one would come through. riiiight. whew, dodged that bullet. i did have a bfl FPGA that did ok, mainly because they were so slow getting their asic out it was profitable for a while. as well as a couple block erupters. but we all know where bfl went, and good riddance. think bitmain is bad? imagine if bfl became the dominant asic provider. my only regret is that i didnt order more cards back in 2011. but btc was high risk and fairly unknown back then and no one knew where it would go. i was always into distributed computing (seti@home, F@H) so it was kinda right up my ally. and of course i got to buy shiny new cards for games  i looked at it more as a new hobby than a get rich thing, as well as wanting to be part of the "grand experiment" of decentralized money. my 1st btc was earned on a 4850 (testing the waters) but as soon as i figured out the process of turning btc into fiat in a bank account (mtgox and dwolla) i ordered the 6870, and later the 5830. my wife was like you paid hundred of dollars for THAT?? (the 6870). of course now she doesnt even blink when i order gear for mining. she just smiles when she looks at our bank and crypto accounts. geeze memories The CEO of Black Arrow (Alex Sovu) just got convicted and sentenced to 11 years for hacking and robbing the banks ATMs. I can't imagine this clown gave up turning his company into a multi-billion dollar business just to rob me and make sure I didn't make any money, WTF? Bitmain (located across the street from BA) delivered my Antminer S5 at least a week early and now they're bigger than Nvidia. After defrauding me and most of his customers the Sovu turned to defrauding ATMS, WTF? The guy paid a huge bail bond (with my stolen money) and is now on the run from his 11 year conviction. The lengths this asshole, his company and various co-conspirators went to make me a butt-hurt loser is fucking mind blowing. |
|
|
|
|
^^^ ROI coin belongs in the loo not on the street!
|
|
|
|
if the earth is flat then where is the tip? we just need logic Logic? * Moon is strong enough to make tides but clouds and rain no worries * Mathematics for every mile in length the curve is 8 inch squared (100km 870 meter, 1km 8.7cm, 100 m 87mm) can you show some practical evidence * 1000 miles per hour rotation and you feel nothing* Have you heard of 2nd law of thermodynamic, look it up * Transmitting over such long distances would require billion of billions of watts, what with solar panels * Two coastal cities 2 hour flight apart manage to have massive temperature differences with the sun 93 million miles away * .....can fill the page Did you sell your logic? Not sure if you are a troll but here we go: 1. Newton's theory of gravity provided the first correct explanation of ocean tides and their long known correlation with the phases of the moon. Roughly a century later it was also used to predict the existence of atmospheric tides. the density of the clouds can be considered to be (but not in fact) the same as that of the air in which they ride. In this case one could consider a cloud to be simply an opaque section of air. The Moon does affect the air and along with the air the clouds are likewise affected. 2. I can show you plenty of photos of earth 3. Think about riding in a car or flying in a plane. As long as the ride is going smoothly, you can almost convince yourself you’re not moving. A jumbo jet flies at about 500 miles per hour (about 800 km per hour), or about half as fast as the Earth spins at its equator. But, while you’re riding on that jet, if you close your eyes, you don’t feel like you’re moving at all. And when the flight attendant comes by and pours coffee into your cup, the coffee doesn’t fly to the back of the plane. That’s because the coffee, the cup and you are all moving at the same rate as the plane.4. You should be the one looking it up 5. What distances? 6. And a close sun would explain that better because? Did you sell your brain? An object traveling on a linear path with a constant velocity experiences no acceleration. In contrast a rotating object with a constant angular velocity experiences constant acceleration. How do you rectify this you fucking shill? You give as an example a jet traveling on a linear path at a constant velocity with no acceleration as your example of why you can't feel any acceleration on an object you claim is rotating thus experiencing acceleration. I know your answer is going something about the magic force of gravity (an unproven theory) but I just like to show what absolute nonsense your arguments for the globe are. |
|
|
|
Mining BTC with GPUs died out years ago.
yup and good years they were. i will never get rid of my 6870 and 5830, they are largely responsible for my stack as while i did sell coins through the years i kept enough to make my wife and i extremely happy.. i keep meaning to mount them in a frame and hang them on a wall as they were so good to me. I realized BTC was worth something in October of 2013, by that time GPU mining of BTC had already died out. I got some Asicminer Block Erupters and was so impressed with BTC and mining I went all in on a Black Arrow (named after a UK rocket and "space" program) ASIC pre-order as the market on Bitfury ASICs had dried up and I missed the deadline for the KnC Jupiter (more "space"). I saw all the coins the Jupiter customers were getting and Black Arrow seemed to have a good history of delivering miners based on Bitfury chips. Black Arrow ended up stealing my money and never shipped the miner I ordered. When I made the pre-order I had a small amount of money left and also purchased an old used HD 6990 5790 for $250, I made ROI in about a week solo mining Nova Coin. It finally died in a shower of sparks about 8 or so months back of fan failure two years ago but damn that card mined a lot of coins. , it would do 50 MH/s ETH putting my new RX 580s doing 30 MH/s to shame.
edit: It's been so many years it looks like I made a mistake, it was an HD 5970 that I originally got, another older dual GPU HD card. I got confused with this other dual GPU model, the HD 6990 was a more recent acquisition. |
|
|
|
So, is it dead already?
Mining BTC with GPUs died out years ago. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
