Hello?     You forgot to mention the sound wisdom of: HODLCRAEFULLY!!!!!    

Whoaza!!!!!

You seemed to have made a kind of non sequitur response.  My earlier statement that you posted above was an attempt at a normative assertion, and to group label WO peeps who are obsessed with talking about me (or having a "special" day for such talk), as retarded.... hahahahahaha


Regarding, having bids down to $300, that seems like a BIG ASS waste of time and energy to maintain such buy orders, but I understand that we are in bitcoinlandia, and sometimes wild, wild west lackings in liquidity on some exchanges, so I suppose there could be some fluke flash on one or more exchanges and trading pairs that could cause you to profit a lot from having such outstanding buy orders (that aspect is like the lottery, but ties up your money). 

Still, we do have several DECENTLY SIZED areas of buying support that are going to need to be broken through before we go down - which currently I anticipate to be at around $7,500, $5k, $3k and $2k... and surely there are some smaller support areas in between those DECENTLY SIZED levels.  I don't really have a problem with having a certain quantity of money already on exchanges and dedicated to buying BTC in the event of price drops, but there seems to be a certain level of disutility in locking up too much money in that regard. 

On a personal level, I do have actual orders set up in an area around $3.5k and I have a decent amount of money that is in reserves that would be available for prices going below $3.5k.... Yet, I am still anticipating that this time around, we are more likely in an early 2013-like scenario rather than an early 2014-like scenario, so in that regard, it does not seem considerably likely that I will need to use my money that is prepared for the below $3.5k--- however, if we break below the first DECENTLY SIZED support area of $7.5k, then it becomes more likely to consider those lower areas... and sure with the ongoing current downward price movement, breaking below $7.5k is becoming more and more probable.    I understand that a lot of folks have not really been prepared for so much downward, so they contribute to additional downward price movements by selling at these price levels (rather than buying, like they should be doing  - only so much we can do about others, but just attempt to prepare ourselves to take advantage of such situation as much as we can).

By the way, there does seem to be decent evidence for the argument that this whole ongoing BTC downtrend remains an opportunity to continue to purge alts, rather than any reflection on any actual problem with BTC fundamentals.

Peeps here do not have that kind of scheduling discipline, and if they end up having such stupid-ass and irrelevancy discipline, then we will likely witness a form of group autism spectrum disorder.



 

You are coming off as a fucking retard that is making shit up and has nothing to contribute, except perhaps fantasy.

Oh... let me make up a claim, generalize and elaborate about the claim and then tell all that I am correct based on the shit that I just pulled out of my ass.

At least you can be fairly creative with your trolling nonsense.. gotta give you that much.   

Actually, almost all of the fucktard bearshills come into this thread and act like they have some kind of meaningful and unique insightful perspective into bitcoin price dynamics..

but they are proven to be retards, over and over and over..  For some reasons (I wonder why?) they want to trick you out of your bitcoins.

After they fuck up then they kind of disappear when they do not have anything to latch onto in their pie in the sky bitcoin death fantasies.


Surely this Jacques_Bittard troll shit shill job would have been with Tera beara calling the end of bitcoin (and further and more painful price corrections) during the March 2017 down to $890 - and that surely would not have been a good time to sell any decent amount of your bitcoins.

Before I typed my above response to your nonsensical earlier post, I quickly glanced at your post history, and I kind of anticipated that you would have the capabilities of a reptile in your non-sequitur...

Oh gosh, my prediction skills are getting better and better.

Oh lookie the cute lillie tera beara.. she wants to be seen.  


Is it possible for you to figure out a more interesting passive aggressive focus?  besides yo mismo?

Perhaps you are a lillie bitty delirious at the moment?


GET  A FUCKING GRIP...

SNAP OUT OF IT, TERA dee beara.

Gosh... maybe I am getting worried about coinbase on a personal level too...

I continue to be locked out of my CB account  - and seems to be based on a simple issue with my bank (bank of america) reversing one of my attempts to transfer money from boa to cb... shit... I am thinking that maybe I should hound my bank about this situation, too?

Thanks to infofront for taking it over - including responsibilities and having a moderation vision that seems to have allowed for it's continued quasi-wild, wild west style, and thanks to theymos in allowing a kind of democratic transfer of ownership that seems to have been a very fucking BIG success to the forum and for the bitcoin community.

Hahahaha...

decent point... no 21million limit and no 1mb blocksize limit mentioned in the white paper [second point implied]... therefore... bitcoin is surely deviating from the vision of bitcoin.  


O.k.... we have a decent target date in the very near future for bcash to potentially pump .. gasping, gasping, gasping for air.. .. .. whether the pump will be successful?  I don't have much clue for odds, but it does seem that bcash is pretty well bleeding in the credibility and incredulity department.

QFT(lack thereof)


I will try to remember that you are coming off as a deceptive exaggeration of an idiot who wants to proclaim doom and gloom while hoping to be correction and failing to recognize value.

You are not doing shit.  You are coming off as a merit beggar with you several posts focusing on how hard it is to earn merit supposedly, and suggesting that you are somehow contributing some kind of meaningful substance when you are not...


Against my better judgement, I am responding but only to let you know how annoying you are seeming in your merit-focusedness...

Maybe if you would focus on some other more interesting topic, you might find some one who is incentivized to send you a merit because you inspire them to think or to laugh or to feel, rather than to become annoyed with you?

Funny that you have almost the same exact stupid-ass butt hurt style as a few posts earlier...  add a few ALL CAPS for attention to your whining..  so I think that a very similar response would be appropriate, to the extent that ignoring similar whiny-ass nonsensical posts like yours and the above might be another appropriate plan, too.

Anyhow, I will repeat:

Aw  poor lillie tingilie.    

It is such a sad situation.. making me really, really, really and very sad to think about it.    

Much saaaaad and very wow...     

For now, I'm not going to delve into your ongoing nonsensical and persistent parroting decision to fictionally rename bitcoin for your own false dichotomies.


My reference to the Alex Jones show is not about Alex Jones, but instead about Roger Ver who wanted to go on Jones's show to promote bcash, and Ver made a fairly dismal attempt at getting Jones's attention to the Ver rendition of the bcash plight.

The interview should be a bit embarassing for bcashers, but I am sure you are sufficiently willing and capable of propagating some attempts to salvage the interview with spin-o-matics.

Here's a 39 minute version of the Alex Jones interview that involves a bit of an introduction before getting to interviewing Roger Ver and including a couple of phone calls from listeners, too.

Aw  poor lillie tingilie.    

It is such a sad situation.. making me really sad to think about it.    

Oh my!!!!!      Another whining "me too" wimp.  


There may be a  need for a new interwebs rule, especially for the WO thread:




or perhaps an endurance test?

   


Toughen up WO participants.  


The interwebs should not be a place for thin-skinnedness, whether we are referring to investing in bitcoin or participating this thread.

Surely your post is a "must read"  because it has been bolded.    

I will concede that it could take longer for a newbie or a jr member to garner attention from other members in order to receive merit, but you should also consider some critical self-reflection, as well. 

Look at your post history.   You have a lot of one liners and participation in bounty threads, and this seems to be true of your post history both before and after the implementation of the merit system.  Quantity of one liner posts does not necessarily equal substantive contribution that motivates other members to want to send merit to you because they are inspired or humored by you in some kind of feeling way... They need to get merit sending inspiration from the content of your posts.

Anyhow, if you are currently having trouble getting 10 merits, and you cannot seem to figure out what you are doing wrong, then you are likely going to have even more difficulties learning how to reach the next couple of merit thresholds of 100 and 250 merits.  Of course, if there is some kind of luck that this merit system changes to make earning merits easier for you, then you may benefit from that in order to rank up, but I would not bank on that kind of change happening any time soon.

hahahahaha

I agree with a lot about what you said, Flying Hellfish... but you did seem to take this subject matter to almost the opposite extreme in order to make your point... .. ..

Certainly, rank is important in terms of the forum, incentivizing member contributions, and there are certain potential financial and status benefits with rank.  You know the expression, "rank has its privileges"?

But, yeah, the overall point that you are making and several other posters in this thread are questioning whether rules should be made around exceptional posters, such as nullius.  There is no problem to strive for greatness, but there is also variety in contributions, and some definitely worthy folks are going to get left behind through this new merit system without tweaking. 

Additionally, theymos's decision to start the initial merit distribution of all members with merits at the minimum merit level of their current rank will disparately impact members who had been nearly to rank up under the old system, but based on the new system are now faced with earning merits to catch up to where they would have been.

We cannot become oblivious to some of these disparate impacts and the variation of activities and contributions of members who are worthy to rank up but might get locked out of (or left behind from) ranking up because of these new merit terms. 

By the way, I have also witnessed some members who seem to engage in a kind of subconscious merit beginning earning a lot of merits, and many of those members are going to rank up much easier than some members who might be more worthy, but less capable (or willing) to engage in self-marketing.

Anyhow, I have also read quite a bit of merit posts suggestions in the recent months, and sure there is also a common constructive theme within suggestions that recognizes that this merit system is in its early days and could take a decent 6 to 12 months to verify how matters are playing out and perhaps an equal amount of time, if not longer to reasonably attempt to fix bugs (if there are possible fixes).