I actually agree. I use them because they are allowed. I think the signature for everyone should just only be a unique donation/wallet address. No referrals. That is it. I have no doubts that a lot of other Bitcoin forums and communities would get started and going if the official one was a little tighter and more focused. Seems like it would just be better for Bitcoin overall to kind of spread itself out to more places. I know reddit has their own Bitcoin shit going on, and I think no images in their signatures might be the reason lol My answer though, no images in signatures ONLY because there should really just be no signatures. I rather see images than a line of links and donations and referrals. If everything was uniform where it was just people having their donation as the sig, the forum would actually be easier to read too. Proof of concept Before with Signatures, After with only Donation Signatures. |
|
|
|
In my opinion this thread does not expose any information, that was not exposed previously. I do realize you posted information that is just out there, you have found a way to easily gather and present it and allow people to just view it in a different way. I will stop commentary on how you are handling your PR and get to.. I started thinking on that. I'd need to figure out how to do persistent storage for my script in three browsers FF/Chrome/IE, and I'd need to write a html dialog to customize skins. It is at least one day of work. I think it has to wait. Maybe when there will be 2000 installs and more people will tell me that they need it. If there are good suggestions about the looks (colors? margin & padding of buttons? spacing? fonts?), maybe I could change now the default skin. Well, here, since you have that in your signature. I guarantee if it looked like this button  .. you will get more clicks. I made these since I had Photoshop open:   You will notice on the forums here they would of course not stand out like your current buttons, but people will notice them in your signature I believe. Maybe not notice them as much as the current button look, however I believe it is more inviting and trusting to click these. So maybe less views but more conversion. An alternate look could be, when you hit Reply or New Topic, the "Post" and "Preview" buttons have a nice thick look similar to your current ones, but also slightly more inviting than the ones you have. |
|
|
|
|
Where did your user name stem from?
|
|
|
|
Dude, you guys survived some of the worst pr spam with those TH referral links. I think everyone understood those referral codes were put out before the real bad stuff was going down at Gox. Keep up the good work guys, always attempt to at the least make the company as transparent as possible (I guess it's hard not to when you are on forums with us bastards), congrats  Now let's get some graphics work done on the inside and have that market data on the top of every page  |
|
|
|
|
Now is that invited tied to you where we would have to be 'friends' or 'connected' ?
|
|
|
|
Insider info omg [04:13] <Lynzoy> why [04:13] <FooDSt4mP> because i know something most people here dont? [04:13] <Lynzoy> well that would indicate that this is not a good time to sell [04:14] <FooDSt4mP> which is why i am actually considering your offer [04:16] <Lynzoy> i'll give you .2 for free if you tell me everything you know [04:17] <FooDSt4mP> ill buy 10 at 28 and tell you it all [04:17] <Lynzoy> does it have to do with market depth or something [04:18] <Lynzoy> okay i can do 10 at 28 [04:19] <Lynzoy> tell me all of your secrets in email form [04:19] <Lynzoy> i really need to sleep and don't want to stay on the chat for too long [04:19] <Lynzoy> lindsaygravina@DOMAINNAMEHERE [04:19] <Lynzoy> okay? [04:19] <FooDSt4mP> ok [04:19] <Lynzoy> awesome [04:19] <FooDSt4mP> 12gvAH12XMgEdsPDjNikZEdfaJx15yJAPq send them to there [04:20] <FooDSt4mP> and ill send the PP and an email [04:20] <Lynzoy> DONT send pp to that address [04:20] <Lynzoy> send it to igravina@DOMAINNAMEHERE [04:20] <FooDSt4mP> the paypal? [04:20] <Lynzoy> yes [04:20] <FooDSt4mP> ok [04:20] <FooDSt4mP> i will send it as soon as i receive the btc [04:21] <Lynzoy> k [04:23] <Lynzoy> sent [04:23] <Lynzoy> you're sending $280 to igravina@DOMAINNAMEHERE [04:23] <Lynzoy> gift please Interesting, Lynzoy only has over 70 because she is just a speculator http://pastebin.com/WxkUM0feJesus, I'm surprised people put up with Pastebin |
|
|
|
A broken link, where you have to read "REMOVE THIS TO GIVE ME 0.5BTC", before removing it, in a thread that says "CSRF" in it... and you're complaining he wasn't transparent enough?
So much for other people claiming that the Bitcoin forums were mostly composed of smart folks - you'd have to be dumb as a box of rocks to fall for this post.
If they did indeed sit on it as OP said, kudos for him to disclosing it. Full disclosure works with non-responsive vendors, so fuck them. I was beyond dumb, I knew it was something bad and still went in just to see what it was Still, those lesser than me are idiots too, and no one deserves to be fucked with in this subforum. Keep it in development and etc. Forcing it to break in public is not the way to fix things, it drops confidence overall, when cuddlefish obviously knew of this exploit for a while, I guess couldn't fix it but only manipulate it and use it to fuck around with general users (also, I have seen his link in another thread without the remove text, still does not matter). Look, I can't hate the guy for finding out an exploit, but if his choice was to not make this thread or make it, well he could have did a billion things more productive for this particular situation other than make this thread in the manner that he did. |
|
|
|
Maybe run the addresses through this list that was scraped earlier today? http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=24346.0I wonder if unemployed still has the unfiltered list... (any address added to a sig after this was released can't be trusted) Backed that up earlier and was even checking those first few addresses cd posted (obviously curious for myself and any other forum members, in a weird way, the list came at a convenient time lol) The list is at http://pastehtml.com/view/ayrpygp5m.htmlNot related directly with this particular scam, I guess. But if could also be the first steps in information warfare to discredit BTC. I don't wear a tin foil hat, but if this seems like he has an agenda so it seasy to believe something like this. |
|
|
|
So you'd prefer I just wait until they fix it, hoping nobody else discovers it before they do?
As opposed to how you handled this, of course. You could have put a detailed post, said what this link you are providing does and why and how it is wrong and I really could go on all day on how many different ways you could have made that same post, added just a little text, and it would have made the whole world of a difference. |
|
|
|
I've reported it to them, they've sat on it; I assumed they read these forums.
So is this what programming is now in days for everyone? Fuck patience and waiting on others... but also fuck making things for yourself, instead just break other peoples shit until they do something? What a world  |
|
|
|
i'm reporting this. not stealing anything.
1. It's only 0.05 BTC that comes to me IF you manually remove the link-breaking text
2. I deliberately broke the link with descriptive text
I would make a strong argument on how this is not a way to test that shit, especially knowing what it does and knowing the intelligence of all the users, including myself  Seriously, bullshit like that should be instant banning. The general Bitcoin Discussion forums should not be used to experiment with (don't shit where you eat) |
|
|
|
@ GoogleCodeJust launched in Google Labs: Swiffy, an SWF to HTML5 converter. Read about it here: http://t.co/flysVTO ^sk An excerpt from that link Today we’re making the first version of Swiffy available on Google Labs. You can upload a SWF file, and Swiffy will produce an HTML5 version which will run in modern browsers with a high level of SVG support such as Chrome and Safari. It’s still an early version, so it won’t convert all Flash content, but it already works well on ads and animations. We have some examples of converted SWF files if you want to see it in action.
Swiffy uses a compact JSON representation of the animation, which is rendered using SVG and a bit of HTML5 and CSS3. ActionScript 2.0 is also present in the JSON object, and is interpreted in JavaScript in the browser. This representation makes the Swiffy animations almost as compact as the original SWF files.
Swiffy is a great example of how far the web platform has come. Swiffy animations benefit from the recent advancements in JavaScript execution speed and hardware accelerated 2D graphics in the browser. Viva la Web! |
|
|
|
Awesome and awesome. So he is a Navy man? Are they cool with this sort of activity? Hopefully that is fake info Also, right click save |
|
|
|
Good edit, I was just about to really go to my kitchen and literally make some popcorn then come back to this thread lol |
|
|
|
: )
It's exactly where I am looking. Thanks.
Awesome, the fact that you said that makes me see this as "oh shit, this commercial really might happen" I have never created one, but had went through their whole process and regulations as far as video, just never used it for what I needed to, but still always felt the service was awesome, and if I had extra money, I would have a commercial for my penis every week. |
|
|
|
B-Porn, you are the most helpful, feedback giving guy in the whole community.
Must. Resist. Urge. To say "DUH DONATE NOW THAN LUL" This is going to be harder than it seems, I'll be back later :p Edit: Honestly, MetaCo.in provides that fun web site shopping experience (obviously Woot dominates this, but there are many others with all sorts of function). Either way, the fact that your site is run by Bitcoin is second to the fact that you have the feel of a site that says "Hey, we got some great deals, get it now, time is limited" .. if I didn't know what the currency was, I would just assume it is UK or something Non-America is all, so I really wish the site well in a general market, it'll take just that one or two great deals and great partnerships I think to be legitimate. This is of course post-Bitcoin legitimacy itself, but I try and ignore that when seeing everyone's sites. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
